Let's goooo

5

The answer is obvious if you just cum on your hermit crab while farting.

another one of these threads
5

17

2 2/3

It’s just treated like another layer of parentheses.

1.8

learn java you put arrays in there

unclear whether
16/(2(2)) +1
or (16*2)/2 +1

I think it means the former so 5

3.2

>no one even reacts to troll answers

/end thread

81

it's 17. this shit is pemdas it's literally 6th grade math.

16/2(8-3(4-2))+1
4-2 = 2
3*2 = 6
8 - 6 = 2
16/2 = 8
8*2 = 16
16+1 = 17

Parenthesis, Exponents, Multiplication / Division (left to right), Addition / Subtraction (left to right).

Nigga you stupid as fuck

5

16÷2[8-3(4-2)]+1
16÷2[8-3(2)]+1
16÷2[8-6]+1
16÷4+1
4+1
5

mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html

You dont write a number next to a parenthesis without the multiplication symbol, so it's written wrong. Ignoring that, answer is clearly 17:

16 ÷ 2 * [8 - 3 * (4 - 2)] + 1
16 ÷ 2 * [8 - 3 * (2)] + 1
16 ÷ 2 * [8 - 6] + 1
16 ÷ 2 * 2 + 1
8 * 2 + 1
16 + 1
17

MATLAB says 17

slow down einsteinien whats a layer

CASIO says 5

don't (you) me unless you're using at least $100 worth of computational software to do this

Which of these three options did you want us to solve.

Next time write your equations so it is clear to everyone what you mean.

Attached: Untitled.png (1169x661, 21K)

are you actually so retarded as to spend the time to draw those in paint just for me to point out that option 2 is not the same as the others??

F/10 for effort

fuck (you) MATHCAD says 3.2

all three are different.

5, 3.2, 5

8,666666666666666666

whats it like be a second class pleb in the world of numerical analysis? I bet you also use a Cannon calculator

17

Attached: 1553323602092.png (820x814, 36K)

whats it like to never have advanced beyond adorable highschool software?

17
3.2
5

You are doing the order wrong on number one.
You first solve the parentheses and brackets giving 2
Then divide 16 by 2, and then multiply that by 2
Lastly adding 1.

16 ÷ 2(2) + 1 is the same as 16 ÷ 2 x 2 + 1
So we then go multiplication or division left to right.

you are the reason why mathematicians don't take applied maths seriously

Tell it to the calculator bub.

Actually, you can't go from 16÷2[2] to 16÷2×2 because 2[2] means that it is already 4 before the division. It might mean multiplication but it's not the same as basic multiplication.

-3

oh noes

Attached: 08b46.jpg (640x480, 55K)

No it is not special. The parentheses no longer count, the term has been simplified.
16 ÷ 2(2) + 1 is the same as 16 ÷ 2 x 2 + 1