ITT: Reasons for and against white supremacy

ITT: Reasons for and against white supremacy.

Attached: Fat Vegan.jpg (400x500, 33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=iv2QQAzrsWo&t=1s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

There is no objective *overall* supremacy, every race is better at certain things. Every ethnicity should be preserved for the sake of its unique attributes, or else the world with be impoverished.

Attached: b60.jpg (467x700, 46K)

Sounds like an argument for racial purity, not a far cousin

White supremacy could be a technique for maintaining white racial purity but its highly unlikely, I can't imagine more than 2 per cent of people want segregation, most people see it as teh worst thing ever

Attached: ap.b.jpg (768x1024, 220K)

Not sure where segregation came into the discussion, but amen to that. Shifting into your new gear, in spite of leftist beliefs, segregation is no longer an economically viable option. It would never survive today.

i'm with them until all the niggers are dead

What economic changes are you referring to? Not dat the issue is particularly relevant

Attached: b70.9.png (510x422, 349K)

It's 2019. If a business explicitly said "we only serve whites", it would never survive. It might get a boost in business from white supremacists in positive protest, but those people would quickly run out of the little money that they have and can no longer afford to visit. The other whites wouldn't give business to this place because they aren't racist and wouldn't support such a place. What is so confusing about the economy about that?

Whites have built the greatest civilizations, and advanced humans further than any other race in human history. That said, no race should claim superiority, or wish to rule over others. We’re all in this world together.

The real problem is religion.

To further my point, even closet racists wouldn't go to these places, in fear of outing themselves.

These types of businesses would never survive today.

This is an approachable position that won't scare away normies from the prospect of self-preservation among whites. I'm not a whignat or anything but I do have racial pride and hate to see what's happening to Europeans the world-over and I've found an approach similar to this is the most efficient for getting (reasonable) people to at least consider it.

So what you're saying is, wealthy whites aren't typically racists?

Sounds like you are conflating some of my points to try to make another. Can you be more specific? I like hypothetical scenarios to really play it out.

You said "white supremacists would spend what little money they have."

You are implying that white supremacists don't have a lot of money, therefore wealthy whites aren't white supremacists.

I was talking about government enforced segregation

Attached: 1455.5.png (595x565, 461K)

gjfdkaghajfkmghnafjkghnfkagnhfa

White supremecy is stupid, but I think there may be some merit to segregationism. Tribalism is innate in humanity. We will always be less trusting of those that are more different from us and race is an easy distinguisher. I think it's easier in small communities to get over this, when you can really get to know someone, but when society gets sufficiently large the "others" become nameless, faceless entities. It's harder for the average person to say, "My next door neighbor Ahmed may be a terrorist because he's Muslim" than it is to generalize to Muslims at large. Even most hardcore racists will say they know "one of the good ones". But when you're a democracy and trying to do things like allocate resources and fix problems the majority is always going to look out for itself, even if it's subconsciously. I mean, minority groups will look out for THEMSELVES also, but majority rules in democracy. It may actually be better for minority groups to be segregated and deal with their own problems themselves.

It wouldn't need to be isolationist and there are obvious benefits for cooperation between segregated groups. Assuming, say, blacks were able to get to a point where they had a stable, self sufficient society they would inevitably discover and invent new things that the white society wouldn't, just by nature of having a divergent path. Cultural diversity is a wonderful thing. Hell, I think even most open racists would say they like tacos or orange chicken. People talky about America as a melting pot, but when you melt everything together it just tastes bad. You need to distinguish between the different flavors to truly appreciate their contribution to the meal. But some things just don't mix, and if you try putting them all together it's just chaos.

i dont want anyone's supremacy based on a color. just based on aptitude

context is important
>I can't imagine more than 2 per cent of people want segregation

To address you directly in this thread, rich people don't give a fuck about segregation. It's not their concern. Black money and white money is money. This is a simple concept.

I was referring to small businesses who hypothetically think that segregation policies would for out for them. They would never live. Large public companies sure would never live. Each one would be ruled out of business, by public opinion. No small company worth mentioning would be carried by a group of wealthy whites. Ridiculous.

There is no context, other than "a business says whites only."

You said white supremacists have little money.

I'm guessing you wanted to insult white supremacy by (wrongly) assuming they are all worthless scumbags who can't get far in life. But when presented with the idea that your implication means that the big bad rich people of the world can't simultaneously be lumped in with white supremacists, you are changing your tune.

for: Blacks don't fart when they cum on their hermit crabs

against: White people fart when they cum on their hermit crabs

Fucking kek.

I am a white nationalist, but I do not believe in white supremacy.

Whites shouldn't have our own nation because we are better than everyone else, we should have it because we want harmony, not just in America and Europe, but throughout the world.

Blacks are not a problem in africa, muslims are not a problem in the middle east, asians are just fine in asia, BUT LET'S NEVER FORGET WHO WANTS TO TRICK US ALL INTO FIGHTING EACH OTHER INSTEAD OF OUR TRUE ENEMY.

Attached: download.png (225x225, 10K)

What is all of Scandinavia?

The point completely flew over your head, unsurprisingly. It sounds like you think I said that white supremacists make little money. What I said is that there are statistically so few white supremacists in aggregate that it doesn't really make a difference in the whole economic scheme. Sorry I didn't work into your mode of reading.

>doesnt believe in white supremacy
>"we are better than everyone else"

Explain yourself honky

Interpretation matters

>Blacks are not a problem in africa, muslims are not a problem in the middle east
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
Not sure about the bugmen, but I've seen some shit from them, man..

Let me edit this poorly written post and hope I'm correctly being specific about what he meant:

"Whites shouldn't have our own nation because we think we are better than everyone else, we should have it because we want harmony"

I've removed the implication that whites are better, which I'm sure was unintended.

Otherwise, I disagree with nationalism.

Specific examples are required for a response. Such a vague statement. Also, save some effort, we don't need pics

@ stupid white supremacists
@ "AFRICA SHITHOLE GENETIC IQ"
@ incapable of progress

youtube.com/watch?v=iv2QQAzrsWo&t=1s

White supremacy is dumb and unnecessary, leads to division and suboptimal usage of resources such as communication, labor, innovation, and intelligence

it also is such a triablistic mentality. tribalism is literally devolving

the issue of harmony isn't race, its just education and inclusion. if you believe in the marketplace of ideas, and that your culture and ideology is best, you shouldn't be afraid another race is gonna ruin that.

you are essentially admitting defeat and weakness, by "giving up" on diversity and trying to establish a tribalistic society