I mean, if you didn’t see this coming

Doesn't go nearly far enough but it's at least a start. America could learn a thing or two from NZ

>civil war in the US over gun rights
I don't think anyone will start a war to protect gun rights.
No one fought back when we lost the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th amendments. I doubt anyone would fight back if we lost the 2nd and 3rd.

so the shooter wants to stop assholes like him from doing shootings? oh wow, what a novel idea
That's what everyone else already wants, dumbass

The 3% of Americans who own more than half of the guns in the US will surely slaughter the other 97% who are libtard-cucks.

yeah,good thing i dont live in new zealand,like the majority of faggots posting about that mass shooting there

lol,who needs obama when you have donald trump(the guy who pretends to be a republican)and a democrat house majority.he'd did more then your scary nigger man did in 8 years to destroy america's gun rights

if the US were to revoke the 2nd amendment, it would be done at the federal level. If that's the case, it's not some flower-wielding liberal pansy that's coming to take guns, it would be the US army, and those 3% can't stop tanks with their pea-shooters.

those fat redneck morons wouldn't do shit and everyone knows it

>banning semi-auto weapons
so are they keeping pump action shotguns? level action rifles? or are they going back to muskets?

Link to manifesto? Already saw the video

should they just not do it, just because it was "his plan all along"?

The military and police support Trump and the 2A. They would turn on the leftists.

he literally could blow this place up, and even get away with it. Banning guns would not prevent it.

maybe related:
theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jul/20/muslim-terror-attacks-press-coverage-study

lol, guns been around for centuries, but one nutjob snaps and suddenly it's time to change everything.

arguing that you can defend yourself with guns is juvenile. the state (or any powerful organization) can fuck you over without using force at all.

well, people in the past seemed to use guns more wisely than nowadays

this is totally >unrelated< to the thread...

>The military and police support Trump and the 2A
>implying Trump would pass gun control
If gun control gets passed, it wouldn't be under trump

So is arguing you can defend yourself with due process and legal representation.

I live in Virginia, thanks for playing.

Attached: 47DD3F66-98AF-47D0-8F7C-ED097FADB1CF.gif (360x360, 955K)

It's almost like fear sells. The news isn't interested in informing the American public, they're just corporations interested in making money.

Attached: are all view points truly equal.png (500x500, 198K)

# pastebin com/i1sxLiPP

Who needs semi automatic rifles though?

>well, people in the past seemed to use guns more wisely than nowadays

Society seems to be producing more nutjobs that want to murder people than it used to. That's the problem. No one is asking why that's happening. They go for the low-hanging fruit and pretend it's the weapons.

Sounds like a perfectly good idea. You don't want people shooting each other, and you don't have some dumb several hundred year old misinterpretable law that people keep throwing around, making it harder to get guns might actually stop more people being killed in the same way next time.

Fake News Comrade.
The US is going to start seizing weapons and Trump will go along because Israel tells him to.

"This tragedy couldn't have been prevented" says only country where this regularly happens.

I guess NZ decided they didn't want to be like the US, and actually did something about it.

Says the soy-boy who doesn't understand how broad of a term "semi automatic rifle" is.

>>well, people in the past seemed to use guns more wisely than nowadays

Really? Like duels in the street, fully automatic weapons, no gun laws at all?

You know, you just might be right on that one. But then, would the military overthrow him? Because they also take marching orders from Israel. Now we're back to square one, with the US army taking guns from that 3%.

Attached: 1552423571297.jpg (750x684, 45K)

>all these r*ddit soyboys unironically thinking that nogunz is a good thing
sure glad i live in a country where the right to bear arms will never be revoked

Attached: blmjkYz.png (499x450, 243K)

He said he figured this would happen. He hoped it would spark a civil war. He saw that politics weren't stopping the mass migration of poor, third-world brown people into the anglosphere so the only option left was "direct action" (i.e. mass shootings, war). If White people allow their rights to be stripped from them and go quietly into that good night then that was already going to happen anyway with the current demographic and immigration trends. But if they put their collective feet down and fought back, then maybe we'd stand a chance. The brown hordes and the White leftists are already attacking us. We tolerate it because, fiercer than any war, luxury weighs us down.

Who needs any guns at all? Take em all. People don't need to workout either. If your job doesn't require manual labor you should not be working out in a gym.

I'm tired of this toxic masculinity plaguing men around the world.

Can't tell if you're serious or satirical. Anyways, your dubs are impounded by the Govt. because you are guilty of reddit spacing.

Is there actually any reason they shouldn't be banned?

Can anyone list a case where a civilian having a semi auto rifle around has been a good thing?

That's what he said.
Bizarro President says a lot of things.

That's not reddit spacing, newfriend

You've never been in the military have you?
Theres less than 2 million people in the entire military, thats all 4 branches added together, not just the army. (Technically theres 5, IF you count coast guard, but for the purpose of a US civil war I wouldn't) Theres more than 330 million people in the states, we cant even keep Afghanistan locked down and they only have around 5 million people. Not to mention that bad things happen when you order men to attack their own families, at LEAST half of the military would defect in such a scenario. If you think the army could just roll through and confiscate all the firearms in this country like it wasn't shit, you've clearly never been the guy who has to actually GO TO WAR, instead of just talk about it.

It's a fucking nightmare scenario.

Church shooting a year or two ago was stopped by a civilian who had a AR-15.

You are also welcome to look up the videos of people defending themselves with semi-automatic weapons.

yeah they punish people who had nothing to do with it. sounds sensible to me.

The only legit case I can think of a civilian needing a semiautomatic rifle is bear hunting. Perhaps ex-military/police or militia members might want semiautomatic weapons to practice with to maintain their skills, but those can be rented and kept at a gun range.

Attached: 1526175399841.jpg (1100x619, 229K)

That right, as with all Constitutional rights, has been gradually infringed for some time now.

It only sounds sensible if you are a leftist who is scared to take care of themselves and is delusional and thinks the government does anything well.

You're proving the point. The entire purpose of semiautomatic rifles is to kill people.

>muh u kill this nerdy soibois
>what is an airborne nerve agent and why is my posse ded and im shitting blood

This is painfully accurate

>punish
Yeah, they take away a few peoples' toys and reward many others with less risk of being shot. Sounds like a pretty good exchange to me.

Not just bears. We gotta be able to shoot crazy MAGAttes, too.

Can't blame them. The data is overwhelmingly in support of the idea that stricter gun laws correlate with less gun violence in general and fewer mass shootings in particular. All the right wing conservative retards who still believe that "good guys with guns stop crime" and "If guns are illegal then only criminals will have guns" are complete fucking idiots.

I get where they're coming from though. If I was a weasely politician and everyone was looking at me to cure the country of violence I'd probably jump on the quickest and easiest knee jerk solution to keep my poll numbers high and get everyone off my back.

It would have been surprising if they hadn't taken this route.

Not everyone lives in a 700 square foot apartment in a big city. A whole lot of people live in places where you can shoot a gun and the bullet will not hit anyone before it lands on the ground. There is no reason to force people to keep their weapons anywhere other than their homes.

It would be accurate except the BBC is also complicit in covering for the atrocities in the Middle East.

Please provide the data

why would take awy guns from people that never shot any one. that's like taking away everyone's food because one dumbass got fat or giving every one medicine because one person is sick.

No, their purpose is to fire a projectile every time you depress the trigger.

Either way, you are moving the goal posts. You asked for an example of a semi-automatic rifle being used by a civilian for good and I provided it.

Don't use logic - it spooks the retards and the lefties.

School boards actually do this though, they'll outright ban certain foods from the cafeteria in an effort to "curb obesity" as if mayonnaise on sandwiches is the problem that's causing timmy to be 140 pounds overweight.

inside job

Yeah, keep the guns. That's totally solved the US's problem with people murdering each other all the time with guns.

Logic!

what's the point? they'll just eat till they're fat as fuck at home.

my rights haven't been affected, but I also don't use bump stocks, I just have automatics.

read the manifesto faggot

Attached: Screenshot_20190315-105745_Free Adblocker Browser.jpg (1440x2560, 945K)

Attached: IMG_20190316_122551.jpg (713x636, 117K)

Just ban white guys from having them. You're the fucking autists who can't act like responsible adults, fucking snowflakes.

It's an ineffective empty gesture to cover their asses. And it's even funnier because kids will just go out to eat at lunch and stop spending money at the cafeteria.

this would never work in america, the 2 amendment in the USA constitution is the 2nd most powerful/loved amendment (next to the 1st amendment) and steams from the very reason america was founded in the first place

i dont agree with that at all friend

It is the burden of a free society. There will always be people who wish to cause harm to others - be it with a gun, knife, explosives, car, truck, baseball bat, pointed stick or their fists.

Enforce the laws on the books already before you restrict the rights of those who obey the laws.

No one said anything about forcing people to keep their weapons outside of their home
Second, you do make a good point that if you live in the middle of nowhere, it would be hella annoying to drive several hours to visit a shooting range.

>, and those 3% can't stop tanks with their pea-shooters

someone worked the numbers

something like 3 million rebels fighting gorilla warfare imagine Vietnam all over again, weapons of war would be useless

add to that the fact the military and police are overwhelmingly republican

>It is the burden of a free society
What, dying all the time from preventable causes?

And it's hilarious to think the US is "free", your society is so heavily controlled by the oligarchy that talking is practically the only thing you have left.

Actually, the 2nd Amendment is the most powerful Amendment as it protects all of our rights.

All rights are protected by guns. If you break the law and the police yell at you to stop and surrender, do you comply if they don't have a gun or other weapon? Of course not.

So you are one of the people who said that they would take up arms to defend our rights, but didn't when we lost 8/10 of them? But you say that you would take up arms now, after we have lost so much? I doubt that. You would probably lick the boots of the soldiers who take your guns and force you to house them.

Attached: 1546631152715.jpg (500x500, 134K)

I use a semi-automatic .22 for small game hunting. I could use a bolt action, but the extra noise and time makes it slightly more difficult to get my game if I miss or something else appears.

If Americans couldn't carry crime would quadruple

Attached: 1lcl15s.jpg (640x624, 98K)

look at what's happening around europe

there answer? -make it illegal to report shitskin crime

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Manchester_Arena_bombing
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Berlin_attack
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Ansbach_bombing
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Würzburg_train_attack
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Nice_attack
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keighley_child_sex_abuse_ring
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/November_2015_Paris_attacks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2015_Île-de-France_attacks
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Westminster_attack
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Lee_Rigby
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_child_sex_abuse_ring
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_child_sex_abuse_ring
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_child_sex_abuse_ring
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_child_sex_abuse_ring

Attached: D1tzkBrW0AEbOeR.jpg (1158x1200, 324K)

>No one said anything about forcing people to keep their weapons outside of their home

>but those can be rented and kept at a gun range.

Yes, he did. >What, dying all the time from preventable
causes?

Like drowning, vehicle accidents, heart attacks from being overweight, cancer from smoking?

>And it's hilarious to think the US is "free"

Funny how people from shit-hole countries keep coming here and the leftists want to change the US to be like shit-hole countries.

gnicaps tidder ecin
kcab og ot evah uoy

>If you break the law and the police yell at you to stop and surrender, do you comply if they don't have a gun or other weapon? Of course not.
You know, plenty of people do stop for police without guns. It's not always "might makes right".

>dying all the time from preventable causes?
Pretty much yeah, unless you're for banning smoking, sugar, glucose, fast food chains, alcohol, etc etc etc

i agree with u friend. we're saying the same thing

That was the whole reason he was hired to do it.

Okay, do they outnumber the times used to kill innocent people?
Because if not, surely a ban is a good thing?

nah blood that aint me. as a black man i already dont fuck with system for obv reasons. therefore if something like that were to happen again, i would totes leave the country. im not gonna fight for a "right" in a country that i never fully had in the first place.

>Funny how people from shit-hole countries keep coming here and the leftists want to change the US to be like shit-hole countries.
Hey, lots of money can make a pretty comfortable life. The British Empire did rather well (albeit at the expense of practically everywhere else).

And leftists usually just like to emulate the places that are actually better, not shit-hole countries (although it's amazing how surprised most Americans are when the travel to other countries and discover that the socialised healthcare they've been warned about is actually really good, and that a lot of what Fox News told them was just horse shit).

>You know, plenty of people do stop for police without guns.

Really? Why? Are they stupid or something. If they've committed a crime, why give up if there is no fear of being caught?

full auto rifles from now on then so it seems

>If they've committed a crime, why give up if there is no fear of being caught?
No one said anything about not getting caught. It just turns out that a lot of people don't need the threat of death to behave themselves.

I mean, seriously America, what the actual fuck?

Right, that’s why black neighborhoods are totally safe.

Attached: E7D1FD80-C1CE-45CB-87FA-EA759E959655.gif (500x297, 741K)

>Okay, do they outnumber the times used to kill innocent people?

Yes. There are millions and millions of guns in the US and only a few thousand people shot in anger each year.

Plus, we don't hear of all of the times when someone breaks into a house and is stopped because the owner has a gun. That doesn't make national news.

And, even with a gun, most any teen-aged and older male can easily over-power my wife or daughter. Why make it easier for the attacker. With a gun, my wife and daughter don't have to get close to him (like with a knife) to stop the threat.

Bans only hurt law abiding citizens.

understandable. have a nice day.

user they're melanin gifted neighborhoods. Please refrain from using the term "bl*ck" it's inappropriate.

>Because if not, surely a ban is a good thing?
Of course it's a good thing. People just love to cry about having their toys taken away.

Prior Officer here......I sure as hell wouldn’t issue that order. It’s not likely the military would side with the left. The shit on us every chance they get.

Kiwis: Don't do it, Kiwis! For the love of ham & cheese, don't do it!

Attached: 1506826075516.jpg (1200x710, 504K)

Soo...he was behind all that...?

Attached: n05a4yx0zv7mzot42228591113300.jpg (1762x1163, 141K)

It's because we don't hold them sideways. Sights go on top for a reason. Also, das ray.

sauce on pic?

Thats grade A trolling here!

Attached: 1479172682062.jpg (345x336, 214K)

We also don't hear about all the random shootings in shitty neighborhoods.
Theft, attacks and all those other boogeymen you are using all actually go down after gun bans in countries that have done it.

If you cared about your wife and daughter you'd be more concerned about the real threat of them randomly being shot to death (or raped because criminals are more likely to act when armed) because guns are easy to get than the unrealistic fantasy of them 1. having their gun, 2. managing to use it in a bad situation.

WHY NOT JUST BAN MUSLIMS?

>And leftists usually just like to emulate the places that are actually better, not shit-hole countries

Which communist countries are better? Cuba? Venezuela? Because those are the places leftists want the US to become.

>discover that the socialised healthcare they've been warned about is actually really good,

So that is why people from countries with socialized medicine come to the US for treatments. Makes sense.

Wow, an extremist nutjob goes on a shooting spree & the far left extremist government takes away more freedoms from law abiding peaceful citizens? I'm shocked, I tell you...completely shocked.

Attached: wow.png (1731x1506, 458K)

Papa Johns girl.

>. If you break the law and the police yell at you to stop and surrender, do you comply if they don't have a gun or other weapon? Of course not.

> If you break the law and the police yell at you to stop and surrender, do you comply if they don't have a gun or other weapon? Of course not.

Are you stupid or something?

Right!? Totally out of character for them...

Attached: 1482719479466.jpg (400x386, 36K)

>We also don't hear about all the random shootings in shitty neighborhoods.

Actually, we do. We hear about it because those are usually in cities which have very restrictive gun laws.

Keep failing.

He wins again

dont worry dude it's really not an issue here we aren't being oppressed, very different to american gun culture. government is hardly far left extremist lol they haven't even legalised cannabis

no New Zealanders give a fuck about the gun issue, its not used as a political club here at all

I know, I'd just never seen any of the lingerie pics in the set. Just topless/normal underwear shots in the mirror.

[citation of every dead methhead in a basement needed]

>I mean, if you didn’t see this coming...

It's precisely what he wanted, after all. They're giving the lunatic murderer his desires.

>Which communist countries are better? Cuba? Venezuela? Because those are the places leftists want the US to become.
Are you being deliberately obtuse? Not communist countries, social democracies like the UK, Scandinavia, most of Western Europe. You know, the places the leftists actually mention when they say "this system is good, we should try it".

And yes, the US might have the best healthcare in the world, but only for the few who can afford it. The majority don't even go to the doctor until they're practically at death's door, and medical care is responsible for huge numbers of bankruptcies.

Do you know how many people need to go onto GoFundMe to pay for their insulin in the UK? None. That shit only happens in the US.

Standard issue opportunism, LibTards gotta LibTard...
The Agenda is everything, logic and common sense are right out the window, too busy literally sucking Stalins cock to notice or care about the cognitive dissonance.

LMFAO! Scandinavian countries turned away from socialism and have blossomed.

Plus, they are like 98% white. Nice job of saying countries are better without blacks and other minorities.

Do you literally need the threat of death before you'll follow the law?

The thing is that both the Left and Right have a lot of similarities. They have some similar goals in a lot of areas.

Ultimately they are both authoritarian. They seek power over the people, and a larger government.

Fuck authoritarianism.

Really hope the people fight back on this

>I mean, seriously America, what the actual fuck?
Some do, and some nations have more of these types than others... Unfortunately, here in America, there are some locations where our police are far more likely to be shot at. So yes, they definitely need to be armed. And if you want to address gun violence in the US, maybe start with the inner cities... And for fuck's sake we need to get off the goddamn zoloft already...

Attached: 1521873220967.jpg (500x375, 50K)

what's stopping the next one from joining law enforcement? in most countries you get access to guns early on and you get a bulletproof vest...

Attached: 1523213992692.png (1593x1418, 252K)

Me? No. But not everyone respects the law enough to not break it. That's why police have guns - to stop those who don't respect laws.

Given the lousy civil rights protections in the Commonwealth countries, UK is almost certain, Canada, and Australia strongly likely.
The usual shit-eaters are already yammering in the US, sadly for them the Constitution is still mostly in effect...

Don't commita crimebe stopped by the police for a routine check show them your papers without wiggin' out go home and live. Profit.

>LMFAO! Scandinavian countries turned away from socialism and have blossomed.
Uh huh

>Plus, they are like 98% white. Nice job of saying countries are better without blacks and other minorities.
Wow, you let yourself slip there! Gotta find a white supremacy angle somehow.

No, actually not. The right want smaller government so people have more control over their lives and the government has less control.

I'm with this nigga. I walk straight down the middle between those two groups of nutjobs

'Needs' has NOTHING to do with it, Fucktard.

Yup, fucking full-auto in the trunk, ready to go...

Fortunately, PD's and the military have a pretty good psycho filter... It's the reason that security company got fucked after Fucknuts bin Ahmedinejad shot up Orlando.

Attached: 1489859502109.jpg (1920x1080, 69K)

Roll over for tyranny and be fucked quietly?

>was hired to do it
big if true. dubs decide.

Ah mate fucking a lot of the Kiwi’s there are bears in their own right, glad my sister married a Maori that isn’t a domestic abusing fuck because they prioritise family over everything and can fight their way out of a steel cage the machines.

Domestic abuse is so prevelent there because usually a police officers only option when a kiwi is kicking in his partners head is either to be shot or the most common, charged and ordered to court while leaving him there in the meantime to beat this bitch more for not recording the simpsons after his long shift in the factory, chur.

Your mob is determined to start one over abrogating gun rights...

Although his post was spazzy there is an argument to be made for monocultures.

Then you want libertarianism; that's two doors down and across the hall...

Probably messier than that, but same outcome.

Better than getting shot by some random white supremacist with a gun.

This, completely...

reroll

So smrt

>logic
>food and guns are the same

Kys faggot, the only real way to lean politically is moderate.

Huge percentage of the armed forces will remain true to their oaths and shoot the officers issuing such orders as the traitors they are.

You will never get 60% of congress to support a gun-grabbing measure. The Republican party has lax gun laws as a core principle. Democrats would have to win big in Southern and Midwestern states to do that, which is pretty impossible.

Anything that scares a triggered LibTard...
Don't be so foolish as to expect a coherent list.

>3%

The funniest thing about that is the margin of error; gun guys don't like talking about their guns to strangers asking prodding questions...

Attached: 1487776586873.jpg (800x576, 24K)

this is what happens when u vote leftist women to congress.

You get safer better countries, not run by policies popular with Yea Forums incels?

Wrong question child...

Nope not everyday
Hate to hear it dont all asshats to take your guns and rights
Nope we hate to hear it but that's all

By deliberately attacking the rights of their own citizens?
The only thing they are doing is creating a free-fire zone for the next time...

I have a question for all those people who are bleeding hearts for gun control......

Since when do you give a flying fuck about humans dying? I ask this because of two reasons:
1. You think the world is over populated so Gun violence only contributes to solve a problem you claim is ever present
2. People who are for gun control also are for abortions. So you want to save the people you claim are stupid and contributing to climate change and overpopulation while killing the most innocent among ALL ethnic groups in the most barbaric fashion imaginable. I want to understand your thought process. I want to understand why you think this way. They just seem too contradicting to be taken serious. Please enlighten me.

Says who? Hillary wanted to arm the Kurds if she were elected. Destabilizing the entire Turkish region and what for? To destabilize the EU with another migrant crisis. Trump isn't doing shit like that. Bernie would've never even proposed shit like that. There are even studies that show tha femal souvereigns in medieval and renaissance times would wage more wars than their male contemporaries. So again. Says who? Stop collectivizing people. The humanist argument still stands. Individuals can be better than their peers regardless of gender you just have to find them and put them were they're needed the most.

H-hey um user, can I ask you for a favour? C-come join this /pol/ Discord server please, it's a really good server I promise! We can maybe even laugh at the Christchurch shooting livestream together if you did... so join using this link right now:
discord
.gg/668D4MY

c

Attached: join degeneracy akarin 3.png (320x359, 219K)

People have Rights.

>safer
>better

Attached: 1479592728766.png (1063x708, 1.7M)

>those 3% can't stop tanks with their pea-shooters.

Hurr Durr, this same retarded argument again and again.

Attached: gun control3.png (872x886, 220K)

>arguing that you can defend yourself with guns is juvenile

spotted the retard

Attached: gun control.gif (200x147, 1.99M)

Then it's a GOOD thing you've got a hard slog ahead of you to shit all over the Constitution then isn't it?

More guns = less chance of getting shot.

We're well aware, why do you think the Antis are getting more kickback?

THIS

read
the constitution has already been shat on.

Hunters, target shooters, people what want to defend themselves from those who would do them harm.

Attached: gun is civilization.png (1155x1020, 658K)

where is the one picture in which she is wearing the hijab ?

Attached: Islam.jpg (578x569, 54K)

So they are banning six shooters?

true in theory but not in practice, realistically the modern right is all about control and don't live up to the ideals of traditional conservatism

The only ones at less risk of being shot are the Elite in their gated enclaves, the rest of us will be fair game for criminals.

you think if men could give birth we would let people tell us we can't abort? fuck off with that bullshit

Vid wasn't even that good. I thought it would be more exciting. Very upset about that.

And Thug Lives Matter, and Fascist Action....

People of NZ fight back

Men cant give birth, fuck off with your hypotheticals

americans really do not realise how different gun culture is in their country to somewhere like new zealand

Sounds like it's back to muskets.

so you are only opposed to abortion because you don't have to deal with it, lol ok

Could you stop sucking Stalins cock long enough to back that up with some credible data?

BBC is the propaganda arm for the inter-sectional feminist takeover of Britain.

Woke af

Nz hate discord

/JrAtHxk

So you're opposed to Gun rights because you think police and government will protect us? lol ok

kind of makes him a bigger douchebag

Attached: chimpout.jpg (1008x1260, 315K)

user, the republicans lost the Spanish civil war, and their government proactively armed their citizens.

BBC is even more LibTard infested than MSNBC.

butt they do have islam so....

lately the police and government have shot very few innocent people in my country compared to maniacs with guns. i also am not opposed to gun rights i just don't like retards preaching about abortion

Tired of the gun hating fags crying about guns

That's fucking good

lol. Retarded foreigners watch a vice documentary and think they understand America.

Focus on making your irrelevant shithole of a country not so bad, and stop worrying about America. We're doing great.

Attached: Trump7.jpg (400x267, 14K)

Attached: 1517252999707.jpg (640x812, 94K)

Attached: homicides vs gunz.png (762x960, 185K)

Attached: gun homicides vs gunz.png (762x960, 189K)

niggers: police keep shooting niggers
the same niggers: we should make guns illegal

people in the U.S. go to mexico to buy cheaper insulin.

Uk is a shit hole, and the government has no care for its citizens, ever since we got rid of the guns its been getting worse and worse.

>i just don't like retards preaching about abortions

So people with down syndrome should shut thier mouths if they were an abortion candidate? Ok newfag

>We're doing great.
You dont even know what is going on

Attached: jews aipac.png (1350x3570, 1.37M)

don't confuse capitalism for corporatism

newfag? back in my day trying to repress the speech of down syndrome abortion candidates is what this board was all we did on here

>Back in my day
>newfag tries to show how long he's been on Yea Forums
>mfw

mods!

yeah as an atheist who studied religion extensively to discredit them, %90 of this crap is new , what are you smoking please i want some

No, he wants to sow discord and he is accomplishing that, taking away people's rights doesn't solve anything for law abiding citizens. Fucking idiot.

the shooter legally bought his guns.

It's like when you don't see Chechen rebels doing something.

You understand, right Ivan?

Attached: hqdefault.jpg (480x360, 13K)

Who NEEDS semi automatic rifles?
>Hunters
No they don't
>Target shooters
No they don't
>People what want to defend themselves from those who would do them harm.
Only valid point but still doable without semi automatic rifles

the guns are gonna go, and there will be no civil war. There is no way the US splits up into tiny countries either like he predicted, he was just an autistic spaz. Hopefully some good comes from his act of terror and no more terrorists can do something like this in NZ ever again. Hopefully, this policy is coming to a country near you.

He was right about one thing, you whites better get those birthrates up or an hero, it's not gonna be pretty once we truly outnumber you and reparations etc come.

Not when the people that intend to do me harm have them and i dont

places with high birth rates tend to be 3rd world shitholes, why would anyone want to emulate what they do?
hell look at Africa all the countries who's economies are improving also are seeing lowering birthrates.

Attached: check em animooted.gif (320x306, 259K)

This is exactly why we are able to replace you so easily. The US will be majority Latino by 2050, we will be the face of the country. Look at all the muslim and brown people in europe. We will be the faces of your countries in the future, just as obama was for the US.

You all can't stand that truth, that's why you're so afraid. That's why trump is president(for now until replaced by a socialist democrat in a year and some change) and that's why these terror attacks happen.

You terrified little cucks.

>we

Attached: 1375664762984.jpg (538x426, 33K)

Kill yourself you fucking nigger shitskin.

Oh conspiracy crazies

Attached: download.jpg (273x185, 8K)

he's right tho

Attached: zs0r5.jpg (640x360, 19K)

Its because you fuck anything that moves with no self control animals

>"good guys with guns stop crime"
Pretty much this. When has this shit ever happened? If anything, if a lot of people with guns try to find the same culprit they would just end up shooting each other and making the whole thing even worse.

It's literally the only thing that's ever accomplished when the nutjobs cut loose.

The next thing the politicians will be working on is banning all immigration laws.

Okay...?

if he couldn't buy the guns this shooting would not have happened.

because everybody knows how much criminals obey laws, so it'll work for sure.

why does she look EXACTLY like merimutt face?

Attached: 200px-Le_56_Face.png (200x164, 44K)

What a fine way to ensure only the RIGHT people will have access to all of the weapons from now on. Yep, no more danger left in the world anymore... it's all been taken care of and sorted out. Thanks everyone, you're free to roam about the world now knowing you're safe and sound from all the evil in the world.

As a new zealander and a licensed gun owner I dont give a fuck if they ban semi autos. I dont use em to hunt. Our government isn't actively trying to kill us and our cops are decent...so yeah no biggie