Do you agree with the age of concent in your country state?

It should be 20

You aren't really in a right state of mind when it comes to other people until your 20

And even then you're not, but if the government sees 20 year olds fit to go to war and drink then they're fit for the consequences of sex too

That’s not true some girls under 18 are much smarter than girls that are 18 , brain development doesn’t happen all at once especially with women

I think we can agree all sexual acts with hirls under age 18 is sexual abuse and all sex with girls under 18 is rape unless you can argue that girls should be able to make decisions especially mate choosing decisions for themselves earlier than 18.

Look it up it’s a known fact

I think the age of consent in men should be 25. Because until then, they still make really bad choices. At least after that, they calm down a touch and mostly make really selfish choices.

20 for sure. Braindead freaks like you are only interested in yourselves. But "development" means way more than physiology.
Young people need time to adjust to the fucked up world of adults and their exploitative tendencies. And they need time to just be kids, and live without adult worries, because without such carefree times, they won't survive later on.

So how do you test a girl for these decision making skills.

Seems about right where I live.
Age of consent is 16.
Most girls were sexually mature in HS by then.

Well since everyone is a result of sex, people of all ages already experienced it and its ok to fuck em

Tons of estrogen in the food supply means women develop faster. That is true but it doesn't excuse rape.

So you want everyone to be a virgin till they’re 20-25
Idk about you guys but I was ready to plow when I was 15
Must be a white boy thing

Sterilize both sexes at birth.
Let them fuck all they want at any age.
Apply for license to breed at 18.

Libtard detected
Always jumping to massive conclusion to justify your singular frame of thinking

Even if a guy gets a vasectome its still rape because the girl can't give concent.

I think Men 17 Women 19

If a girl cannot give concent then sny sex with them is rape the same way that a roofied girl cannot give concent

15-16 is a good age to start most guys and girls started already by then. 14.... Dont know man its only a year but where are we going to draw the line

If a 16 year old girl goes to a party and grabs guys by the dick I’m pretty sure that means she wanted the dick

You aren't accounting for hormonal imbalance of teenagers faggot being fluent in a social studies book doesn't make you smart

The government agrees in my state.

In japan its 13 (they are changing laws so its 16 in the cities). In nigeria its 11, in angola its 12

15 years for females. 21 for males.

Like any 25 year old women are hormonaly balanced try talking sense in to a Latina bitch that hasn’t had a taco or dick in the past 5 hours

I find that vaginas ripen at around 13.

So I reckon 9

Attached: 1552362546300.gif (336x189, 1.04M)

More like a soyboy thing. If you've got low T of course you wouldnt want to have sex.

She might have wanted the dick but if she is stupid the state shouldn't allow her to make any decisions until she is old enough to know smart from stupid decisions.

This threat just 404d not to long ago fuck off. Bunch of neck beards and 30 year olds that haven't done shit in life and want to prey on some hormonal teenager because "they're smart" having a impaired way of thinking and no real world knowledge outside of basic social skills and text book knowledge doesnt justify your romanticized degenerate fantasy

Where I live, it is 14 y.o. but it is still somewhat considered the age gap in case of...problems

Or the parents could put some effort in the upbringing instead of the government meddling in everyones business.

Us laws that force you continue to follow us laws even out of country are rediculous.

in my country the age of consent is 14

Its 15 here, so not too far off. I think it's ok. If 15 year olds want to get it on, I'm fine with that.

I wouldn't go for anyone younger than 17 myself. I'm 20, so it isn't that big a difference.

First off most parents are shit to begin with. Second, if kids don't want to listen to the parents and constantly disobey sociatal/cultural norms (which is normal in teens because of hormones) it's not the parents fault. There is only so much you can do as a parent to discipline correctly.

Implying that 18 year olds don’t make stupid decisions
Why don’t we just have the government control when we shit while we’re at it libtard

age of consent should be thirty one

What country are you in?

Germany. it is legalized through §182 StGB by the law

Hey all people make stupid decisions at all ages but 18 is the best midfle ground when women finally understand their bodies and have their emotions under control.

The age of consent is basically just a measure to discourage middle aged men from trying to take advantage of literal kids. Tons of people fuck before 18 in the US, hell... more than like half the people who were in my class got laid before sophomore year of highschool. The rule isnt very effective in the majority of cases that it would apply to.

Personally, i think the rule is fine how it is in the US. If people want to have sex before 18 they will and not have to really worry about it so long as its consensual.

they should raise it to 25
clearly some are not prepared even then

Thats not true at all. A girl could be drunk or she could change her mind the next day after the sex. Her parents are definitely not keen on letting random guys into their daughters panties and might vome after you if they found out you were 18+

I would say 16. Regardless of what the age is decided to be.... there needs to be some kind of allowance for situations where the girl is 17... and the guy may be 18... poor guy really shouldn't be forever ruined over that.

In Sweden you can have sex with others if you are under 15 with other under 15. And then the same above 15. But a 14 year old cannot have sex with 16 year old. But in some case it’s ok they say.

Drunk consent and retroactive removal of consent are different topics entirely.

My state let's you marry 12 y/o with parent consent then fucking is legal. They tried to change it to 16 and it failed. Disgusting. Usually it's 30+ y/o men marrying these girls.

That’s too young. It should be 21 andanyone fucking underage should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. No exceptions.

Well i don't think there should be a sex offender registry list. That is overkill. Just because you banged a girl who wanted it doesn't mean you are going to go around your neighborhood looking for underage girls to kidnap and rape

age of consent shouldn't exist in the first place.

anti-rape laws is all we need

Nope 48 anything bellow that is child pedophelia non concent me too movement rape

What you think is disgusting/offputting shoukd have no bearing on law. People should be able to do whstever they want as long as they arent hurting people or funding an industry which hurts people.

Man I don't even care I'm like thirty and girls under 20 are so goddamned annoying anyway

But I like hurting and oppressing people. Get vanned faggot.

See, I want to agree with you because I'm against the gov being in on people's personal shit, but the only problem with doing that is that then defining what constitutes "rape" can become more challenging in cases of children and teens, being that they dont fully understand the gravity of the topic and probably dont even have sexual tendencies in the first place. Even though its not that common, the age of consent prevent the case where an adult is able to convince or deceive a formerly non-consenting younger person into having sex they didnt originally want.

Agreed. Don’t know how pedos can stand those disgusting annoying kids who talk like they got a mouthful of shit.

Consent is a stupid idea. You should have to be entrusted with a woman by her father before you are able to marry and then consummate.

>science
LoL

I agree with this, but there should be a minimum age, I'd say 16 would be appropriate.

What state is that?
I mean is that any more disgusting then a girl growing up being used by men until she’s 30 with a loose pussy that no man wants

yea 14 is good

Attached: friends.jpg (527x279, 28K)

“It says right here in the Bible that the Bible is correct”

16 is good. It allows teens to develop their sexual tastes while developing cognitivley while still having them be old enough to consent

LOl whatever floats your boat you insecure weirdo.

AOC in the UK is 16. My first serious girlfriend was 16 when we started dating, and sex followed very quickly after. I'd pick her up from school at lunchtime and we'd spend 30 minutes fucking each other's brains out, then drop her back off for the afternoon. She said having a pussy full of spunk made her concentrate during double math

How old were u

I was 18, we dated for 2 & a half years

I was hoping you were gonna say 30 or some shit like that. That would have been hot.

Or you know your father could just never give concent.

Why hot? What gender are you?

Attached: 0935782104.jpg (2184x1394, 156K)

Nah, she was the daughter of one of my dad's friends. Thing is, she had a sister who was 3 years younger, fit as fuck and really had a thing for me. Saw (& felt) her tits on more than one occasion, we'd kiss when no-one was watching and she held my dick while I had a finger inside her, but we didn;t get each other off or anything, we just did it for about 30 seconds. I split up with her sister not long after and we lost contact. Good job too, found her on facebook a coupld of years ago and she REALLY didn;t age well

Male. And explaining a kink to someone who dosent have that particular kink is kinda pointless imo. But if you must have an answer, maybe its cause age gaps are sorta taboo? Idk

14 is legal here. But only 14 and 15 year olds with each other. Once 16 not allowed to corrupt 15 and 14 year olds. 18s cannot go less than 18.
16s and 17s swap however.
So you become a rapist if you turn 16 or 18 and have a younger GF or BF. Must stop sex until one catches up.

17 and lower can be charged with child pornography if they share nudes. Passing on nudes gets child porn distribution charges.

Clothe your pets in photos just to be safe. Animal sex acts and all that stuff.

No pretty, young girls want to fuck you. They probably would throw up at the sight of your dick and kill themselves out of shame if they happened to fuck you.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

Attached: 1526333770461.gif (800x450, 697K)

I love the feeling of tight young white and Latina pussy

I like it
it's 15 btw

Provide sources or shut your neck beard mouth, faggot.

Also, the "pussy full of spunk", was she on the pill? If so hats off to her parents for at least equipping her with that.

Google serch fagot what do I look like to you

>convince or deceive a formerly non-consenting younger person into having sex they didnt originally want

alcohol and bad mental health can do the same thing

shifting the burden of proof lol. Either admit you are a filthy pedophile or come with proof.

Protip: you are a filthy pedophile

Im not saying they dont, im just saying that there are cases where it does happen in the absence of those, and for those situations theres the age of consent.

Now, drunk consent is a different, hot button topic that id love to discuss but it dosent really relate to age of consent. There can be cases where both come into play, but they are separate issues.

Sounds like OP has a particular 14 year old in mind he wants to be completely rejected by.

It's completely meaningless to me because i won't score anywayq

It should be 10-12.

I don’t educate people unless I’m being paired for it. I’d love to tell you how much of a dumb ass you are though, but I think you’ve already proved that to everyone

Its not a matter of educating people, its a matter of calling out your bullshit. Unless you can provide any proof that what youre saying is true, its just bullshit. And everyone who has ever took part in a formal debate knows that the burden of proof is on the presenter.

Just think about how you look right now: "Heres something im presenting as fact that goes against popular belief. What, provide proof? The proof is out there, man, just look for it. Im too smart of a person to waste time to properly convince you, but i'll still call you dumb when youve never seen a statistic i swear to god i seriously have read somewhere."

Like at least say "according to the world health organization" or something like that, jesus christ. I dont even care that youre a pedo, i just cant stand idiots that dont know how to form an argument.

nice paragraph retard. didnt read

>saying bullshit without backing it up
>not listening to criticism
>too lazy to read
>trying to justify your own pedophile mindset to the least open-minded side of the internet

Youre the retarded one, you fucking mongoloid.

i backed it up you can fact check yoursef.
brb gona cream 16yr old pussy