What’s the best response to say to this person now

There is not a single way to justify it.
It may be true nobody is harmed but still those are pictures. Of children. In sexual acts.

Which is pretty much everywhere unaccepatble except in the depths of the internet.

thats rich coming from the guy collection pictures of prepubescent girls and acting like it is somehow normal or healthy to have such a strange fascination with them

Are you going to jerk off to it, you freak?

It's still child porn. It doesn't magically not become child porn, cause you don't want it to.

Lol yes

cute girls aren't sexual objects, user
if this image looks pornographic to you, you're the pervert

Attached: 1530713687428.jpg (600x716, 58K)

Child porn requires a child. Child porn is bad because it hurts children. Who is the victim of a drawing? Ink? Paint? Pixels? Tell him to get a fucking grip.

Well ask yourself:

What could be the driving force in a young male to paint a picture of a topless child with roses in her hands on her crotch.

What is the impression we should get here?

I'm just here to argue buddy, I neither condone nor condemn loli porn.

keep lying to yourself. hopefully you get put in jail and treated like the sick fuck you are.

Attached: 1494060719364.jpg (540x960, 36K)

if you did it with an adult woman, people would just look at the titties

"Child porn is illegal to protect children who would potentially be used in it, thats the legal reasoning behind child porn laws. "Pedophilia' isn't actually a crime, possession of CP is. Cartoons are victimless."

Im not quite sure about that. Ever heard the term "nude painting"?

You might try to put the right light on the inner innocent beauty of a child. But on the other hand: who trys to? Who looks at children and thinks "what a wonderful beautiful little girl, I really would love to draw her half naked"
It is just odd. not normal

Also trolls trolling trolls

A mature, mentally healthy adult would not be interested in exploiting the sexuality of a child. A child does not know what they want or what they're doing sexually. An adult could only exploit that & abuse it, causing rape.

Loli is fucking wrong because it's fantasizing child rape. Raping a child should not be something seen as appropriate under any circumstances on anyone's mind. Faggots.

you're injecting your own sexual undertones into it by saying "half naked", the rest of that sentence sounds perfectly reasonable.

True, but drawn loli rape is fine

So it is just by accident and not a choice of the artist to draw her half naked?
I've been just observing.
She is half naked not bringing any sexual undertones into this conversations except maybe those which you feel deep inside you

in my opinion people are nude by default and nude paintings aren't porn

Should kids wear clothes? Simple yes or no.

yes, everyone should wear clothes

How is it child porn if no children were involved in making it?

Attached: 1527033416882.gif (330x300, 47K)

You just block them and forget about it. It's how twiter works. They don't matter, you don't matter, etc.

nude by default? What are you even talking about?

I slowly grasp the degenerated state of mind you really are in. bye retard

because it is porn of children, don't be dumb on purpose faggot

Assuming you're who I replied to. You don't even believe your own statement that child nudity is tasteful by admitting that the concept of covering one self is appropriate.

you probably came out of your mother wearing a tie, strange boy

It's socially acceptable to wear clothes, so everyone should do it, why pretend to be retarded?

So a drawing morally the same as a pic of an actual kid getting fucked. Got it.

>because it is porn of children

Except it isn't, you double faggot.
Those images are created entirely in the mind of the artist, no actual children are involved at any point.
There is no child abuse victim to be found.
Are you in favor of punishing victim-less crimes?

Attached: 1552037056473.jpg (826x1000, 189K)

Yeah, you're literally too stupid to understand what I'm even saying.

very well sir, have fun in your tiny castle for very smart good boys

Attached: 1539232499992.jpg (246x250, 8K)

im sure that nobody ever looks at them not fantasizing about it being an actual kid, thats the whole point. grow up and stop pretending to be retarded.

Can you unbreak your fingers next time you write a reply.

Says the fag who just misused the word "literally"

Attached: 38395e7a78c2a8e601ad1ba9780c9430c754def92dd3479a53d6a296605b6bf8.jpg (725x731, 108K)

No.. I just watched him miss my point in real time. Pretty sure "literally" is accurate here.

you tupe bad so i win

ITT pedos try to make excuses for their cartoon child porn collections

People fantasize about all kinds of things.
I can fantasize about murdering you, should that be a punishable offense?
Should people be thrown into jail for "thought crimes"?
I get the feeling that you are the one who has some growing up to do.

Attached: 2018-12-25-hit-or-miss-7x.jpg (1011x1200, 348K)

Is Shadman a pedo?

>Implying that growing up means thinking about murder is ok, as well as sex with kids.
Just, break your own neck.

Don’t pretend a huge majority of loli isn’t lewd. You’re attracted to cute things. They are young/portrayed young. Which you’re attracted to. Therefore you are a pedo.

Yes.

keep making excuses for your child porn fetish, pedo

>stutter txting grow up child trying to have a conversation
>I draw pictures, if you see them a CP then it’s you that is the pedo.

I dont need my cartoon child porn collection to be excused from anything, im just trying to make sure retards don't devalue the term "child pornography".

yes

thinking about anything is ok, you smelly butthole

pedos can be attracted to children in non sexual ways too

Non offending pedos are much less harmful to children's psychology than you screeching faggots, but captcha is cancer so i concede all arguments and all loli is banned forever.

So you actually are in favor of a thought police, huh?

Keep ignoring valid points that contradict your preconceived notions.

Attached: tr0005.jpg (1000x950, 644K)

Just live in Japan, you'll be fine. End of argument. uwu

Attached: 1432643680.jpg (908x1586, 136K)

if it was illegal to think about murder, how would we stop murderers?

That is hot.

There's nothing pornographic about it. The Morton's Salt girl is naughtier than this Arby's thing.

>shadman

Attached: 1488196910022.jpg (723x683, 41K)

>If I draw you dead, won't you be dead?

>nu Yea Forums hates lolis
O-oh...I guess I'll move to krautchan or something...see you Yea Forumsro.