Isn't it unreasonable to expect humans to stay with one sexual partner for their entire lives (i.e.marriage)?

Got news for you, pal. Black people are Homo sapiens, just like you and I. We are all the same species. The genetic material you have in common with them is somewhere well north of 99%.

Sorry if that bursts your little racist bubble. Hope you can handle the truth.

Given that the DNA sequence similarity between humans and chimps/bonobos ranges between 95% and 99%, I'd say that similarity between White and Black people is WELL north of 99%.

I'm no psychologist but I'm thinking is because emotional investment is what's required to reach the point of marriage and the rest. Indoctrination is what I'd say it is. I've had many one night stands in my day and didn't miss any of them one bit.

You know how my parenting skills would degrade if I was constantly trolling for strange? My kids might as well be raised by wolves.

Selfish needs, like raising well-rounded children or having a much greater chance of living a successful life? Children need both parents. Family is important.

Kek this is so true. The thought of children being raised by parents like that - always out on the hunt to have sex - makes me cringe. I couldn't imagine what it would be like if I was raised in a polygamist home with Mormons or some SisterWives shit

You can find a good woman and form a family but it’s rare it means anything. My wife is a crazy ho. My kids a pussy. I’m a loser. If I knew now what I know when I was younger, I’d stay single and fuck unhappy married chicks.

Were not talking about societal expectations are we? I've raised 6 children with a loving wife and a marriage of 32 years. I know where your coming from user. I'm just saying that nature's opinion is that it's not necessary.

This is why the institution of marriage exists... to suppress our carnal desires. Because its for the good of society and is a bedrock pillar that has allowed our civilization to grow to such a large degree. Is it unreasonable to expect someone to control their carnal instincts? I don't think so. When people say relationships take sacrifice, this is part of what they mean. You sacrifice sleeping around and having lots of hot sex for a stable relationship where you can build and grow a healthy family/home.

Theres plenty of species out there that are monogamous. So I'd say no.

I'm sorry to hear that. I don't know what it's like, but I hear it can improve. Your Yea Forumsrothers are here for you!

Economically marriage makes a ton of sense, supposing that your significant other actually works. And I generally agree that having two parents together generally yields better-off children - though I've seen many kids whose parents are divorced that come out great.
But I feel like we're just animals ultimately. Many of our carnal instincts benefit us, so I can't get behind suppressing them all

Humans are separated from the average animal by intellect. Our intellect is why we must be raised for a longer amount of time than any other animal.

Lol thanks. I’m late to discover most women are incredibly selfish. I will probably never do better than 42-45 k a year and I’m telling you single anons stay single. Don’t put your money into women that will just want more. When you lose a job, even if you have some security, say bye to pussy and respect. Unless you find a great woman.

I often hear married men tell younger singled guys to stay single. But part of me still seeks that romantic idea of finding the perfect woman, 'The One'.

Intellect only happens because we're taught. A human without any other human interaction would be an animal.

This is true. Fiancées say that your income is not important. Then they marry and, if you don't produce enough income, they move on to someone else who does.
Similarly, guys tell the girls they'll love them forever but then trade them in on newer models as soon as they can afford to.
As Catullus wrote, the words of lovers may as well be written upon the winds.

In response, I agree. We can't and shouldn't suppress all our instincts. My thinking was that by suppressing our sexuality, and having a partner who can satisfy our sexual needs for the most part, we can focus our energies on more important things like inventing technologies/medicine/building etc.

That's the idea. Build a partnership with another and focus your energy elsewhere.

I can definitely see some truth to that. Though I also point to some eligible bachelor out there conquering life as an actor, musician, entrepreneur.
Hell, I bet Elon Musk slammed endless strange during the PayPal days. Then he married a gorgeous woman, divorced her, and I'd bet he's still slamming some pretty nice strange today. And his new company just sent some people to space and back! I guess it just depends on the person and what that person needs in their life to succeed.

Exactly proving my point. Humans need both parents and a long period of nuturing. That’s part of why kids should have two parents living with them and marriage is a good thing. I’ve fucked like 30 chicks. After fucking 27 of them, I wished I had just jacked off.

I love it when girls pee and poop. It makes them seem more human.

Attached: tumblr_nsdja56h2Y1uskoxgo1_1280.jpg (768x1024, 78K)

without stable marriages, there would be no healthy family

broken families makes losers that browse Yea Forums all day that never leave their rooms

By that reasoning isn’t it unreasonable for us to expect humans to not rape? After all it’s part of human nature for the sake of reproduction.
Isn’t it also unreasonable for us to expect humans to not be xenophobic? It’s part of human nature to be a xenophobe.
We could sit around and argue about human/animal nature all day. But in the end, we’ve progressed past human nature. We live in civilized societies for a reason.

>he think we should act like monkeys
lol
shit thread

I'm sure one parent could provide all the needs including intellect. But as I said, I'm a father of 6. I know where you're coming from.

>Catullus
A nice reference there. Looked it up, and it slams women even harder:

"She says this: but what a woman says to an eager lover should be written on the wind and running water."

>he think we don't already act like monkeys
lol
you're a retard

Monogamy works for one simple reason.......genetic variation.

Say you had one alpha human male breeding with all the available females then say he had a deadly allergy to pepper.

All you have to do then is sprinkle that resulting population with pepper and everyone would die.

However if one person bred with one other person only and they have different genetic weaknesses then it would be much harder for one instance of something to wipe out an entire population.

I agree that it’s pretty unreasonable, but it’s possible to get the best of both worlds. I’m bi and my fiance and I are monogomous unless we find the occasional fuck piece that we are both into (guy or girl). Either of us can veto a candidate but it’s good to scratch the itch together every now and then if we feel like it.

No. One parent can only provide half of what is needed. In all relationships, one parent is the main nurturer and one is the disciplinarian. That doesn’t mean roles are reversed at times. Single mother households produce a lot of these sissy boys zoomed and lots of kids running wild.

So you're saying the church (and really countless civilizations before the Christian church) got together and established the institution of marriage to prevent a disease outbreak or a bio-genetic terrorist attack?

If you can't overcome an instinct, the world doesn't need you alive.

Real life rarely works that way.

I'm the product of a single parent household. My mother raised us on welfare, but taught us great things about life's do and don't. She also gave us an extra education by reading to us about all kinds of random things from an illustrated set of encyclopedia which gave us knowledge about the world around us. So don't tell me that a single parent can't do all the things necessary to create well rounded children. You're now going beyond your intellect.

Imagine how many people are actually alive today directly because of those instincts? I wonder what percent of the world's population comes from parents with previous marriages, or from parents that weren't married, didn't know their parents, etc.
I'd bet it's significant.

I never said it’s not possible. The odds are not in your favor in a single parent household. Two parents is better. It’s not an argument. It’s fact. So, your mom was most likely a skank. How many daddies did you have? One every few months?

I'll tell you about my father as well. He followed his carnal instincts as we're talking about in this thread. He died a lonely alcoholic with no friends. They only found his body because of the smell. They estimated that he'd been dead for a week before he was found. My opinion of life is that you only get out what you put in. Take part in nothing and that's exactly what you'll receive.

Attached: Hodor-says-hodor.png (767x508, 444K)

Small difference s matter. Why else would the mean IQ score of blacks be less than whites even within the same economic class?

Plus, anyone who thinks married parents isn't a benefit for children is a fool. Too much data to logically deny it.

>mean IQ score of blacks be less than whites even within the same economic class
If you're so fond of data, cite this one bud

so that is not accurate. there is a matriarch is most animal groups.

>married parents

Ever watch the TV show "Cops"?

Two things:

1: Monogamy exists as an invention of the church to prevent single motherhood (ie guys pumping & dumping). It shamed males into staying with the females for the sake of any children they may have whelped.

That's why the "wedding band" is what it is: an outward, easily visible symbol of the shackles of monogamy to anyone else they may interact with.

2: It's great that you posted a pic of a girl on the toilet, but tits alone are so 2017. Be metropolitan, be progressive. Show a closeup of the chick's pussy while she's on the toilet, peeing. THAT'S something you never see (unless you go looking for it).

Woulda been a great pic if not for the spooge all over her...

Government wants it as well so you're raising future taxpayers.

Faulty logic. It presupposes an intent to reproduce.

But what if someone has no intention of ever having any kids? I knew at 13 that I never wanted any children, and caught a lot of hell for it. Got snipped at 26 without ever having hit "print" on the human Xerox machine & honestly it was one of the best decisions of my life.* In my 40's now, and while I'm anything but happy, the fact that I have no dependents that I am 100% responsible for gives me incredible peace of mind.

*cue the right-wing incel retards about how I can't "truly" be happy because I have no idea what my DNA mixed w/ someone elses looks like. Sorry, I'm not that selfish. I honestly believe you shouldn't have kids unless you can afford to raise them and are willing to make them the priority of your life. None of that applies to me, so I took steps to ensure I never brought an unwanted child into the world; and make no mistake, if ever I had knocked up some poor bitch, that's precisely what the kid would have been. I'm happy, no amount of incel shaming me is going to change that, go fuck yourself.

Besides, call that non-children-shaming bullshit for what it is: misery loves company. You had kids, you're miserable because of it, but you can't admit that in civilized society. So you try to guilt other, unsuspecting sods into making the same mistake you did, knowing how bad it's likely to turn out for them. All that, and the cretins who do this have the audacity to call those of us who have no kids selfish?

Yup. The government tells us, BY TAXATION ALONE, which hobbies they find acceptable and which ones they don't. According to the government, evidenced by the taxes incurred, churches & children are good, and booze & tobacco is bad, and to be perfectly honest, I could not disagree more.