Why are all African countries vastly underdeveloped compared to the western world?

Why are all African countries vastly underdeveloped compared to the western world?

Attached: 1543519094722.jpg (2476x1920, 1.3M)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/V79W5G4dgCk
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Guns.
Germs.
Steel.
Whitey.

OP never went to school confirmed

BECAUSE YOUR MOM GAY LOL

Real answer?
Because they've consistently been dominated and suppressed by Western powers that exploit them for their natural resources while doing little to educate and uplift, as doing so would threaten their hold on the region. See: Belgium, Portugal, France, England, etc. and their brutal regimes in colonial Africa.

Yea Forums answer?
becuz they's full of nignogs hurrrr

who is this

Fuck you, OP. You've obviously never been to Wakanda.

Are you going to take any actual answer? These things are immensely complicated user...

This

Attached: 1542812141607.jpg (300x420, 33K)

Okay but if assuming what you're saying is true and Africa needs to be "uplifted" then who uplifted the Western World?.

Basically, the salt King of Western Africa was the richest man in the world at a time. Then hardy dar, the europeans are good at fighting and that's about it, invade africa, take all of Egyptian and other African knowledge, and saying Euclid invented Geometry.
TL:DR
Europes good at fighting
Egypt ppl smart and rich but not gud fighting

because they are full of niggers

>Western powers
All the powers.. they've been a trade center for millenniums.
Secondly Africa is fucking massive and diverse. It's had a lot of empires rise and fall that have as much to do with each other as England and China. Thats the other part people miss. It's not a unified continent. Which is yet the third problem: unification. Which is caused by the stuff you're now mentioning.

Then how do you explain everything south of Egypt being so underdeveloped even in ancient times? There were no pyramids, no civilization. They didn’t even have the wheel lol.

But no, it’s whiteys fault..

Don't post tiny pics

Attached: 0688b2efbfbd0c9d88423bcd07815896.jpg (663x1000, 84K)

You mean the Mali empire? We don't quite know why they fell, and it wasn't Europe. It was like the Roman empire where no one can really pinpoint the moment it was "all over". They got ravaged in the aftermath. There have been other powerful civilisations out of there. Just in the cycle of civilisations and empires this isn't their time.

The non-cucked by college professors answer:-

[spoiler] white colonisation of Africa ended over a century ago still nothing has progressed [/spoiler]

The Scramble for Africa led to artificial borders, which split up people who wanted to be together, and grouped together people who wanted to be separate. That, and the fact that African culture was cut off from the rest of the world by the ocean and desert, meaning it developed less. African IQ is lower, so if you group bad IQ, terrible ethnic conflict, and separation from other world powers, that creates Africa

Egypt and Greece, Rome were trading buddies. Alexander the Great then came through and became a God to them. They even named a city after him, Alexandria. Then again, Egyptians weren’t black. So they were cool. Get it right.

for the same reason black communities in the usa are so poverty stricken - its because black people are stupid and not equipped to thrive in a capitalist society.

11 replies in there it is. Actually kind of impressed it took this long.
The point is less that Western powers didn't help Africa and more that they actively hindered their progress. It did British taskmasters no good to teach natives to read because they would then have a much easier time organizing and potentially ousting the colonizers. You have to understand, the population difference we're talking about is immense; the natives outnumbered colonizers by many orders of magnitudes. The only chance of keeping them contained was making sure they were too busy fighting amongst themselves to ever unite. This strategy was wildly successful in places like South Africa, as well as the Congo among others.

Europeans did NOT have the stagnating presence of a foreign power who's best interest was to keep them in the dark ages; they mostly developed freely and thus had a massive advantage.

jesus

>Germany not mentioned

God it feels good to have ancestors who were so based they didn’t waste their time colonisating Muslim shit holes

Attached: 9F4C592B-4C2B-4071-9C6A-FEDAA5947A13.jpg (1125x1062, 809K)

Never heard of Mali empire, Songhai, or even Ethiopia?

Firstly, there were a lot of empires around there. The Mali, the Ethiopians had a good one for a time, the Hittites. There were a lot of rise and fall.
Second
>How come not south!? Same reason no empires including the Romans went South. Pull out a big ol map of Africa. See that big barren bit? That's the Sahara. Even today it's extremely difficult to cross and even today it makes trade and travel by land extremely difficult. Theres nothing going on in the Sahara and wasn't a whole lot going on in inner Africa for perfectly normal reasons. It's why all the empires that we're sprung up on the coasts.

Gents this is a momentus day. 12 years on Yea Forums and I've never fucked up a green text this bad. Actually kind of moving...

I sense a German Imperialism thread

Attached: 14DF23CC-D821-4B62-BD97-435F73FB3EF3.jpg (1303x1083, 959K)

They did colonize parts of what is now Namibia, as well as Tanzania I believe, but they were quite late to the party and learned a lot from the other Powers' mistakes. Those places aren't quite as shitty as the rest nowadays.

>europe is totally blown to bits and japan is nuked
>takes them decades to recover

>africa untouched by the white man for thousands of years
>mud huts

lmao

There's stick huts and teepees in occupied by the Sami people in Sweden, user... That's normal shit for countries with indigenous groups(basically all of them.).. if Sarah McLaughlin turned the camera around you'd see city skylines...
Even this photo is from Sierra Leone, the worst country in the world.

Attached: 65c3f3846f20d8175d0403d34ddac3736afe7c2c.jpg (768x467, 68K)

We didn’t really need to come to the party. Germany was always an economic and military power house of Europe. We didn’t need to colonise because we didn’t need spices or other bull shit the English obsessed with and fought the Dutch over.

Germany had a poor position for colonization and they were so butthurt they had a plan to invade the USA in the late 1800s they really wanted to carry out.

because germany didnt even exist back then only german tribals who were killing each other over territory. meanwhile rest of the western world already had colonies in africa

ssshh stop bringing up facts

You colonized a lot
You lost it all as a condition of WWI

Go fuck yourself

>Germany was always an economic and military power house of Europe.
Well thats just poor nationalist bullshit

So German’s had their priorities right rather than buying niggers from other niggers as slaves

Didn’t colonise Muslim and nigger infested shit holes though did we?

So did England lmao. How’s all them British colonies going now?

Kek.

>Germany was always an economic and military power house of Europe.
uhhhhhh...

Uhh .... Ok you seem to be thinking about Roman expansion before the common era, and we're talking like 1600s on when the land that is now Germany was very much was not tribals...

>England declared war on Germany in 1914 because Germany was small and weak

Nice historical revisionism

"Burundi, Cameroon, Namibia, Rwanda, Tanzania and Togo. Parts of contemporary Chad, Gabon, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Nigeria, the Central African Republic and the Republic of the Congo were also under the control of German Africa at various points during its existence."

Germany didnt even exist for most of European history. Youre literally just talking about 20th century.

See Everything Germany touched got better. Deal with it

Attached: 765C3071-998A-40D1-9638-05173F5B4D96.jpg (957x1024, 145K)

No Germany invaded France which triggered the triple ententes alliance and threw them all into war...

And Germany at the time I promise you was extremely powerful. England mostly wanted nothing to do with them even up to world war II. Both wars were primarily Germany vs. France but alliances and accords were what spread them across the globe.

Damn do you even read before posting?

Run on sentence

Because they are low IQ people. /thread

why dont you talk about anything pre 1870?
oh right because germany didnt even exist yet

>what was the Kingdom of Prussia

Attached: 46046B07-E7F2-43A6-9A6D-D9EE6D25B558.jpg (1125x1121, 373K)

That doesn't explain their lack of development prior to white people ever going there.

Implying any of these Anglocucks get any of this history in their “education”.

Attached: DCAEBFB9-B056-448A-BB73-9B8D7C386F82.jpg (720x405, 139K)

Marshall Islands for example krautbro.

a city skyline doesn't mean jack shit, post the streets

Attached: foreign city.png (1024x1024, 1.34M)

Partly also it's because france and England had a habit of making false promises with local leaders and then peacing out without any stable government.

The entire reason Arabia didn't rise to the greatness it should have is because they kind of did exactly that following the first world war. They were supposed to help one particular king who supported the west unify Arabia in exchange for strategic military occupation and trade.

Then after the war they were (long story watered down and shortened) like "lol NVM" and just left. Then the Sauds, basically the westboro Baptist Church of Islam found oil got.rich AF and spread across Arabia and established saudi Arabia and now, well, we have all that crap...

>op never met a nigger

Not germany, that is certain

I believe I said "worst country in the world" and I believe I was responding to someone who seemed to think it was all mudhuts....

Also a skyline doesn't "mean shit" user..

I'm Anglo. Canadian though.. I think we're a bit different.

thats London you idiot

Dumbasses used all their resources before reaching the feudal age

Top kek

Attached: ERChkVv.png (594x489, 233K)

And Wales isn’t apart of England, but still part of the UK . Congrats you’re an idiot.

Yeah it always makes me laugh when people blame the middle east solely on America and Britain and France are never mentioned lmao

We lose two months a year to bullshit. One month is dedicated to nigger history, and another is dedicated to cunts in history. The rest of the year is spread out with teaching how the niggers and cunts were done wrong by the white penis.

I think the world is loving its free pass because they can just blame America for shit.
You know how many natives we slaughtered enslaved and sterelised in my country? We just blame Americans and call Thanksgiving racist and fade into the crowd now..

>We lost two whole months
Tell me more about how your entire month was crippled and lost by people you don't know wanting to talk about historical topics you don't care for?

Such whiney snowflake faggotry

Hey that sounds like Canada!
I'll be interested to see if the America bashing becomes less prevalent if (when) we lose economic and geopolitical dominance. I feel like a fair bit of it is just "hate on the guy on top" but it'll be interesting to see how much sticks.

It was a crack at the snowflake Olympics that take place in public education, but you're a humorless ass.

Please tell me how some nut butter recipes that were already a thing in central America are a sign of the black man's greatness and how my education wouldn't be fully rounded out had I not known about it.

You have addressed zero of my concerns. I am.wkndering why you think you lost "two whole months" when, I don't know bout you, I didn't even realise it was black history month this year because if you aren't looking and listening for it, you don't see it. It doesn't dominate anything. If it bothers you, you want to be mad.

Yep we're Canada alright.
We also had polish slaves during WWI
I don't know how we got away with all this "nice" shit we have not been cool...

We even had slavery for a time but in our country it had zero economic benefits. It was just a high class fad to have a family slave. You weren't cool unless you had a non white doing your shit for you. That was in quebec.

It's a mystery.

Attached: Pakled.jpg (270x353, 67K)

Then you must not be stuck in the bullshit that is public ed. This garbage is drug out every year for about eight years (4-12) throughout the district. If you haven't ever wondered why the same material is retread every year, then you must enjoy wasting your time, or are totally up your own ass. I really give no fucks about your concerns, because I've already told you it was just a joke. If you want to sperg about it though, you're in the right spot.

You seem really really mad.

China got fucked way harder than Africa and look how the chinks advanced. We all know deep down what the answer is just liberal pussys are afraid to say it.

youtu.be/V79W5G4dgCk

Only the coastal cities got fucked in china, not really comparable with Africa.
South east Asia is more comparable.

yes but chinks have culture so fucking vast and deep that not even western countries can compete.

also a literal shit ton of rivers, arable land, a livable climate, fuckloads of chinks with actual education and discipline. alfrica has none of that.

that continent was fucked from the very begining, at least the sub-saharan part of it.

What do u mean Europeans didn't have the stagnating presence of a foreign power? The vikings constantly tried to take over Europe mostly England, They looted England as much as they could.

Blacks have very low IQs.