One of you is a 190 IQ genius that can solve the problem of climate change in 5 seconds

Problem solved, I win teh interwebs

Attached: Czk11u0W8AI1RIi.jpg (1200x745, 107K)

Jizz on pictures of the sun. Post pictures of jizzed on sun to Yea Forums.

Nothing to be done. The companies that are putting out the most pollution are the ones in control of most things anyways and can't be stopped by mandates to cut back emissions.

This will keep going until it's too late and we destroy the planet and eventually ourselves. And then over time millions of years from now, enough time will have passed for the planet to rejuvenate itself and be back to where it was. And maybe a new evolutionary strain of human will emerge and we won't be as stupid this time as we were last time.

nuke

IQ changes with age.

The top 10 corporations created 95% of the pollution on our Earth. The answer is obvious.

Kill everyone in China, India, Pakistan, and Africa.
>problem solved.

Y would you want to stop something that is supposed to happen? The climate changes get over it.

Attached: 1547925656589.jpg (640x640, 62K)

We can. The tools exist. We just...won't. Ever, probably.

>no brasil or russia
>t. jose ivanovich

China is hitting its benchmarks. All of Africa produces less CO2 than California. India and Pakistan are not the biggest offenders.

Racism won't reverse what's been done.

I didnt say feed i said raise the wealth. You dont raise the wealth by giving people free shit.

Based user

Kill all humans.

>solve climate change
You are retarded. Climate change is relates to the earths geological cycles, and can't really be stopped without tech that doesn't exist. Human factor merely accelerated the proccess

This quite possibly is the dumbest thing I've ever read.

Giant reverse electro-magnets

Attached: 1416592516938.jpg (608x489, 73K)

move all industry and power generation to the moon. keep the pollutants and heat in space, find some means to send power back to earth- we already have wireless power, just needs to be about 1mil times more powerful

underrated post

This.

The best thing we can do is hunker down, increase our agricultural coverage of the equatorial band and move towards magnetosphere power generation.

Soo...he was behind that?

Attached: hhmotcae7sqqoas8x228639982800.jpg (1684x1159, 170K)

This is just straight up American denial right here. How delusional can one person be?

Get rid of China

found the genius

Just look at the middle class in first world countries all they do is bitch and moan about the environment. Hard to get poor people to care about the environment when they are fucking poor. You want to change something on a global scale you need the majority of the globe to be in the same frame of mind.

Yeah, we need more people buying junk they don't need so factories can spew out more waste .

Exactly now your catching on.

Eliminate all international shipping of crude, cars food etc...all supertankers/large container ships use bunker fuel that has to be warmed and then combined with an emusifier like a keytone to burn...
So, eliminate all international shipping, and you will reduce 90%+ of all greenhouse carbons...
>but you won't do this now will you?

Realize it's a hoax

No because thats an idiotic idea and not even close too 90% of greenhouse carbons.

We need to figure out how to take the unlimited cold of space and force it into our atmosphere.

The real 190 IQ

ONE answer.

Massive human die off.

Massive iron seeding and upwelling of water from the deep ocean floor. Like a trillion dollars worth of them in the next decade.

This is the inevitable truth.
There are times, doers, and feelers.
You need 1 entity with all 3 to address this problem. Google is the closest on earth to this, and America is about to pass legislation to limit their influence.

Too long; didn't watch.
This is good advice, originally irrelevant though.

This would work if it were not experimental. We would ruin our planet for human life if we embarked on this today.

Sup

This is the best solution. Like OP points out with the law of large numbers, the best option is to enlarge the potential list of problem- solvers to maximum. Poverty decreases the number of people who may solve this and every other problem so temporarily forcing socio- capitalism on the first and second world is optional.

Having thought about this, I think the world needs to invade every potential violent dictatorship and move their populations to a civilized region (nonviolently if at all possible).

Then, we make a rock-solid treaty as a unified planet to redistribute our collective defense budgets to human rights and environmental for a few decades.

The "problem" is humans are so arrogant they think they actually affect climate.

That's not how entropy works

It's not real. There, solved it.

How could removing 80% of the world's forests since agriculture was invented possibly effect the world?

Just get the population down around two billion and the problems should start solving themselves.
Cue fun arguments about target selection...

Once we piss away all our working antibiotics for short term financial gain we may not need to pick any targets

Green hitler will solve it all.
Starting with COjew emissions

Don't pull out of international cooperation accords.

Found the pothead literally no one can find any reason to dislike.

Oh! I know this one!

Idiot

Fuck...
Thinkers, doers, and feelers*
(Inventive, ambitious, ethical)

Probably irrelevant*

Forcing socio-capitialism is optimal**

You're in a 'climate change' thread and you're asking that?

Put people who are damaging the enviroment in gas chambers with a mix of sulphur derivates and various other factory gases... let them live. Strip them of all property.

They would suffer until the end of their lives.

Prohibit industrial fishing. Feed everyone who resists with rotten fish until they get serious medical conditions. Striip them of property.

Let Oilkikes drink so much oil that their digestive tract wll be destroyed... strip them of property etc..

Look out, you'll trigger the Bunnyhuggers...

easy
>G I A N T M E T E O R

This is what happens when you let LibTards destroy your educational system...

What a wierd mix of environmentalist and fascist white pride thinking

Last time I checked it was Texas racing science education to the bottom to appeal to the religitards. The rest of the religious red States then just adopt their books.

It may be an idiotic idea, however its the truth...those container ship and crude carriers with their 2 stroke engines burning bunker fuel create most of the planets carbon emissions...use your goolefu and look it up...
Unfortunately, I'm not wrong...

my sides are on their way to the sun, perhaps they will sold our climate problem

Attached: 1524693138704.png (600x753, 666K)

You know, they never talk about this because all they want to do is tax emissions. There is no solution in that just a money grab. We want to invent ways to scrub co2 from the air . Nature already did that and forests are very good at it. But they can't make tax money by planting trees.

Climate change is inevitable.
A much greater reliance on nuclear power would, however, decrease our impact on it.

Fuck as many women( preferably biblekike women as they are pro-life) as you can always cum in their pussies. Chances will be higher that your succesors will survive the apocalypse since there will be more of them.

Then your successors will become the new kikes of the post apocalyptic world, the new ruling class.

If you want your genetic lineage to survive... fuck all you can and cum in it. Perhaps edit the genes of your gametes so that your semen brings up only chads.

The corporations will destroy our civilisation ... so come in that pussy and maybe it will be your succesors who rebuild it.

All the countries near the poles should create large ice machines to put several pieces of ice on the poles on a daily basis.

It's a suicide race, and we're ALL losing.

Kill all of Africa, China, and India, the world would be better off

nuke china and india

Kill them all

Just accept that there are too many humans on earth and eventually it would have happened regardless of wanting change.

They tried this in futurama with Haileys commet, eventually itll run out

How about we tax emissions and use the money to invent environmental tech such as autonomous electric barges?

Topkek

Iron seeding and sequestration in the ocean works fine. But you can't seriously think they will spend hundreds of billions on that when we bitch about 70 billion to feed hungry Americans.

By realizing it doesn't exist?

Make more corporations to take the fall?

Too many asians and africans, more like

The problem isn't that we're causing climate change, the problem is that we're not causing the right climate change.

I tried
I guess I am as dumb as a book.

Laugh. At you.

Yeah it's fake took less than 5 seconds

falsify your birth certificate ... look like youre 17, create a boyband. Fuck 13-20 year old girls, cum in their pussies.

Youll have many successors, some of them will probably survive the apocalypse.

Wait for climate to change. Then wait for it to change back.

>70 billion?!?
Fuck i get disgruntled when a homeless person asks for change.

fpbp

Attached: jim.jpg (537x580, 46K)

I said humans, not races.
>racist

Im hoppin on the Trumptrain for this one.
>cant wait for longer summers

wait till the grand solar minimum is over

A personal energy budget.
Say you are limited to consuming 700W per day, including the power used to produce goods.
Could even use Wh as some kind of currency.
This would reduce energy consumption by up to 90%.

>solve the problem of climate change in 5 seconds
Can't.
Shouldn'tb if we could.
Although we really ought to stop generating energy through chemistry.
That means nuclear.
Fusion, ideally.

Yup

Start treating Earth like a Source of Life instead of a "resource"

Humanity is solving the percentage of climate change causes by humans. Politicians are being bought or shamed for and against the status quo. People are being educated with three views in mind: humans cause climate change entirely, climate change is just a phase caused naturally, and climate change is partially a human caused problem and partially something else we don't have the full picture on. Either way, its something we're aware of and the pareto distribution will take place. 80% of the change... for good or worse, will come from 20% of humanity that is plugged in and has power while 20% will come from the 80% too involved in their own lives to put in any real effort. The 20% will make the changes and the 80% will live by them.

Attached: 1552235000194.jpg (477x477, 89K)

exactly. First thing that came to my mind. I'd be sad for my loved one though and all the nice people as rare as they are, but it can't be helped. Total annihilation is the only answer.

Clearly but it's currently out of reach. And yet... we need to still create energy through chemical means if we are to maintain the current system which is attempting to reach viable energy through fusion. It's a catch 22.

It is a solution. People who are more neurotic jump to this conclusion first

>the problem of climate change
Based on the assumption, born out of complete ignorance, that the climate we have now is the best climate and doesn't need to be changed.
Tell everyone what the best average global temperature is and give a detailed, scientific explanation why it is the best.

Dumbass detected.

I legitimately hate you stupid fuckers.
You're like those annoying fucking kids that go around fucking shit up and then deny it ever happened vehemently.

Fucking neck yourself.

Become neo luddites and throw out all technology

Oh and get rid of Chinese, Indian, and black people

Hmmm, i wouldn't call myself neurotic. I think it got more to do with my education (biologist/plant scientist) and how i perceive humanity as a whole

I answered this question.

Thinkers, doers, and feelers*
(Inventive, ambitious, ethical)

Probably irrelevant*

Forcing socio-capitialism is optimal**

Nuclear.

/thread

Attached: 1547211555197.jpg (268x256, 49K)