Why isn't the standard age of consent 16 instead?
Why isn't the standard age of consent 16 instead?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because 16 year olds still do not have fully developed brains. Have you ever met a 16 year old? They're practically retarded.
Agreed. Because 18yo are totally matured.
The standard age of consent should be “upon penetration”
I live in Iowa. Age of consent is 16. There are some other stares too I think
Why make the age of consent lower when you could just make rape legal?
Thats a good point. Consent tends to be difficult
Exactly, for some reason my fedora is out of order
Because you wouldn't be able to put pp in retarded teenagers.
I would since rape would be legal, age of consent just means when they can say yes to consensual sex.
The age of consent is 16 in Canada.
Isn't it 16 in America too?
You mature up a lot at about 19 yo depending on every person and becomme fully capable of knowing what's good for you at this age, legal age of consent should be 18, 17 at the very least.
The federal law states that the minimal age of consent is 12, so it differs from state to state.
In reality girls start fucking at 15 and they just lie about their age which gets alot of guys in trouble when the age of consent 18
And yet they can accelerate several tons of metal to triple digit speeds while responsible for everyone around them living or dying.
So 16 yo can drive around in cars and put everyone's life in danger but they aren't responsible enough to suck a dick. Makes sense
britbong here
it is, faggot
>Implying girls don't wilfully spread their legs before 16
kek, come to bongland user, 16 is the age of consent here, it's a raging fuckfest of 16 year olds
Didn't checked accuracy, take it with grain of salt.
Because it should be 21.
>not living in a green country
just die
Its 16 where I live. Felt weird after i pounded my first 16 yo pussy but it's all the same really.