>Be me a few hours ago >On a hentai discord (Hentai!) >Mod starts talking about "Lolicon is pedophilia, people who like lolis should be locked up" >I said that's thought policing, whether or not you find it gross they haven't hurt anyone, should you get arrested for thinking about murder? >"Yes, you should" >I said so you've never thought about killing someone before" >"Yes, but it should be illegal" >Wut.jpg >Calls me a pedo and bans me >Message him >"You're a pedophile and I'm not unbanning you" >Say I didn't break any rules, I didn't post any loli stuff, all I did was say that loli hentai should be legal, not even on that discord, just in general, besides I'm nore into big tits than lolis, the subject just came up and i voiced my opinion >"I don't care about your logic, you're a pedo" >Blocks me
The fuck is this guy doing? Also, anyone have a good alternative big hentai discord server, preferrably one where chat IS allowed in the nsfw channel?
Pic not related, just some hentai to eyecatch, artist is yd
I think that people are overreacting as fuck on a topic on pedophilia or loli. I always laugh my ass off when some dude says that he's seen some shit but loli is over his limits. Pathethic and hypocritic
Logan Russell
IIRC some 70% of people have admitted to having had homicidal fantasies, so his point on thinking about murder is retarded
Adam Cooper
Tbh, most of what i did there was post lol. I don't usually find that many actual good images. I like vanilla tbh, again I'm not even rlly into lolis lol Got a less lame one?
hey, we don't determine the definition of pedophile, psychologists do and its published in research papers and the DSM-5. Some people who like loli would qualify, others would not. Educate yourself
Lolis = drawings Kids = real why is this discussion only limited to lolis btw, people generally agree that media violence Dosent lead to irl but for some reason it does in this one case?
I asked for terms to be defined, user refused. Can't create an argument without both sides being clear about what they are saying and the meaning of pertinent words
>OP like's to fap to drawings of little children proforming sexual acts >somehow thinks this should be legal >doeisn't want to be called a pedophile for fapping to depictions of children.
Sorry to break this to you op, but your a in the closet pedophile who's in denial about the fetish and porn they fap to, to the point where you have now fooled yourself into thinking since "its not hurting no body" is a legitiment & casual response to fapping to depictions of children.
& you somehow are now surprised that others find that morally & ethically disgusting to the point where they ban you from place's for saying such things should be "legal"? I mean really op, when was the last time you left your fucking basement lol? Talked to anyone on the street and just mildy describe what you said in that room and see how fast you get the fbi breathing down your neck lol.
>1)primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children : Nope >2)must be at least five years older than the prepubescent child : Sometimes, but not always >3)involving intense and recurrent sexual urges that have been acted upon : Nope >4)cause the person with the attraction distress or interpersonal difficulty : Nope >5)sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal : Nope
So please tell me how im a pedo by the definition of pedophilia
>So please tell me how im a pedo by the definition of pedophilia I'm not the one calling you the pedo. So, it's not my job. But, I just think it's hilarious how you're trying to engage with everyone in an argument.
Evan James
>Be on a hentai server That was your first mistake buddy
Ayden Baker
>1)primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children : >Nope so we're just going to lie then?
Jaxson Walker
Do I need to show you my pornography collection and how much time I look at different genres? Lolis are just one segment of lewd stuff I enjoy
>i can't be racist, because i have a friend that's a nigger
Henry Powell
Lol this & this >5)sustained, focused, and intense pattern of sexual arousal : >Nope Like who the fuck you think your lying to guy? Your posting the shit as you type yet your going to try and say its not a concurrent & repeating thing? I mean holy shit denial vill called man, they want you back lol. Its so sadding to see such a neglected human being try to defend there sick fetish's to the point where they are telling ppl there not attracted to the thing there straight up posting and showing they have a pattern of attraction to.
Lying to no one, sometimes I'll post/fap to loli, sometimes not. This whole thread, just posting so no sexual arousal. Its just another type of porn I like, just how most men search for teens on porn sites. But you do you boo
Lmfao, baby. If you're going to fap to cartoon images of children, you're going to need thicker skin. People like you are fucking babies. "Yes, my fetish is condemned by mainstream society, but for some reason I'm going to deadass EXPECT people to justify it the same way I do". News flash mongoloid, only people who fap to Lolicon try to justify fapping to lolicon. Find a porn community that accepts you and don't be a baby when a fucking discord group BTFO's you. Fuckin' baby. Yeesh
Henry Baker
B-but you c-can't prove it's a p-primary sexual a-attraction! So neener neener!
This. Like, the only people that know about my fetish are other guys I j/o/goon with that get it on some perverted level, where everything is fair game and this stuff is thrown in to switch it up on occasion. You'd be completely daft to let normies in on the 'con.
Luke Anderson
>prepubescent child Redundant words are redundant.
>Lolita is literature, legal >Humans cannot imagine from nothing, must use real life references >People who read about little girls imagine real life children they know, or mixes of several children they know
Meanwhile >Lolis are most often drawn from short young women 22-32yo >Combined with proportions of shrunken elderly women >And further stylized to fit into whatever work they're drawn for
Besides not even being real, most lolis aren't even human. Hell, Madoka is literally an entire universe of positive energy tumbling in on itself. Rori Mercury is an 800+ year old demigod. Kanna is a dragon. Shimakaze is a battleship. How many IRL children are any of these things, or even remotely capable of becoming them? 0.
AND, why are health and beauty businesses allowed to show pictures and videos of real life naked babies and toddlers in advertisements and media campaigns, while a fictional character who's only ever 2D is child porn. It's not like there aren't fucked up people who fap to toddlers or babies, like wtf logic is that. Why are girls' swim teams and school sports teams recorded in newspapers, spread online by schools and news, and never questioned? Do these people think clothing makes a difference somehow? Even department store catalogue books have stuff in them that can be used by real pedos.
