If queers can fuck why can't bro and sis?

if queers can fuck why can't bro and sis?

are the argument same?

Attached: 1521584604735.jpg (1382x1166, 489K)

i dont think the arguments are the same besides if both of them consent, then it should be allowed

You're obviously a Trump-country slack-jawed yokel wishing he could hump his sister.

If both can and do consent, and also plan to not have a child, then there is nothing biologically wrong with incest. Even deformities in babies comes after multiple generations of inbreeding. Honestly it should be legal, but just don't have kids. Refute this (you can't).

only reason its wrong is cause the end result equals actual mental and physical disorders

You're the one posing this subject. They're nowhere near the same. Convince me otherwise.

i agree with this, tried to fk a cousin, she stopped a bit into texting saying she felt like it was wrong and against god or some bs

That then more and more things will be allowed. Example: man who cant stop being attracted to children. = man who cant stop being attracted to men. Dangerous logic.

Nice slippery slope fag

Pedophilia will always be different because kids just aren't educated enough on sex so they can be easily exploited and abused. Incest should be normalized because it's between 2 consenting adults, and if they use protection, there are literally 0 biological things wrong with it.

>because kids just aren't educated enough on sex so they can be easily exploited and abused

I dare you to prove that kids don't enjoy sex.

The argument was of the obvious power dynamic between children and adults. Financial, transportation, physical, etc.

You think an 8 year old can enjoy sex the way an adult can? Sure kids can get pleasure out of it, but there are serious problems that kids might not know about (sex ed clearly doesn't work for some people). They need to be old enough to understand the risk.

Ok. So how old is old enough to understand the risk?

>The argument was of the obvious power dynamic between children and adults.
Power differentials exist in every relationship. Should that not prohibit anyone from ever having sex?

I guess there's nothing actually wrong with brother sister protected sex. But by making it legal, there will be a sharp increase of actual incest babies (because people will absolutely use pull out method).

Besides the fact that I personally find it actually fucking disgusting, as do most people, I hope that they never change the incest laws

DON'T FALL FOR THE PEDO CHAT, THIS IS AN INCEST THREAD!!!

Was just trying to make the point that who decides what is sexually acceptable and who doesn't?

Sex between two consenting people is the point. At what point did we decide that the government gets to decide who has sex with who?

what is consent.... a man asks a woman if he would do demeaning shit to her and she goes along with it....

Attached: b8a.jpg (640x480, 56K)

Also, wasn't trying to steer the thread into something else, but the truth is that all sexual freedoms are interrelated. You can't really talk about making one allowable without getting into the others.

Can I get more maid pics bro? Or thathe pic by itself?

Attached: Taskmaster.jpg (600x338, 23K)

This is such a good point. When 9 clowns in black dresses announced that they found that the federal constitution guarantees fags can marry (even though it doesn’t mention it at all, read it if you don’t believe me), my first question was, ok what’s next? I’m at least 4,000 years of marriage not once in history has it been understood that the same sex can marry. However, going all the way back to ancient Egypt, incestual marriage does have a precedent. Also, polygamy has been widely accepted through many societies as long as the husband can afford to support his many wives. So, how did fags get this benefit, but not people that actually have a historical precedent? Kinda fucked up.

*in at least 4,000 years

Also, btw those 9 clowns disregarded DOMA that was passed in the Congress (with bipartisan support) and signed into law by the president. Such disrespect for the democratic process by these clowns. This was obviously a political decision by the court and not a lawful one.

Getting jerked off by a family member is VERY DANGEROUS and thus it should be illegal.

Getting AIDS injected in your gaping fisted butthole is NORMAL, probably more normal than heterosexuality.

I think OP's post is a compelling argument for the forced sterilization of Yea Forumstards