??
Untitled
Other urls found in this thread:
4
12
these dont work if you dont put dividing in them
8
Nutty Neil's Peanut Sauce would make this problem much easier to cope with! But are you going to purchase this scrumptious product? No, because you are a vile cunt who does not, even for his own betterment, consider that maybe Nutty Neil isn't so nutty. Maybe he really does have an amazing sauce that he just wants to share with the world.
what the fuck
420
It's 2. The zero in the parentheses ends up negating a lot of the math problem.
you see 2 2's you automatically assume 4
8
Have the same result
itt retards cant do primary school maths
This user gets it.
>2 + 2 x ( 2 + 2 x 0 ) + 2 + 0
>2 + 2 x (0) + 2 + 0
>2 + 0 + 2 + 0
>2 + 2
>4
Jesus christ, you literal retards.
It’s actually just 8. I thought you had to be over 18 to post here
8
2+2(2+2×0)+2+0
2+2(2+0)+2+0
2+2(2)+2+0
2+2×2+2+0
2+4+2+0
8
>Is Yea Forums really this dumb?
Order of operations.
2+
2x0 = 0
=2
2x2=4
2+4+2+0
=8
8 ffs
It's 10 you dumb fucks.
8
You forgot to BODMAS within the parenthesis
retard acting smart
2+2(2+2x0)+2+0
2+2(2+0)+2+0
2+2(2)+2+0
2+4+2+0
6+2+0
8+0
8
except it doesn't
It's definitely 8 for FUCK sake.
Litterally google it.
Pemdas still applies to inside the parentheses (2+2×0) > (2+0) = 2 literal retard
(2 + 2 x 0) = 2. The zero only cancels out that second 2. order of operations dumdum.
The answer to this equation is 8.
No, THESE Anons get it.
(2+2x0) = 0 he said
(2+2x0) = 2
2x0 = 0
2+0 = 2
0 is in equation, so answer is always 0
yes but many of wankers here pretend to be trolling only
> 2 + 2 ( 2 + 2 x 0 ) + 2 + 0
Pemdas: finish inside parenthesis first
> 2 + 2 x 0
peMdas: multiply first
> 2 + 0
pemdAs: add
> 2
replace parenthetical
> 2 + 2 x 2 + 2 + 0
peMdas: multiplication first
> 2 + 4 + 2 + 0
pemdAs: additions
> 6 + 2
> 8
also part of the master race
lol retards calling other retards retards
>not knowing you multiply before adding
2+2(2+2*0)+2+0
2+2(2+0)+2+0
2+2*(2)+2+0
2+4+2+0
8
Fucking retard holy shit
Apply BODMAS (Bracket Of Division Multiplication Addition Subtraction) rule.
First process the expression within bracket.
2+2x0, within this, first process multiplication.
2x0= 0, so the expression within bracket becomes 2+0, which is = 2
Now, the total expression is 2+2x2+2+0.
Multiplication first, 2+4+2+0.
Now additions, 2+4+2+0 = 8.
Thanks
Bhuvan.
I'm thinking it's 37
2+2(2+2*0)+2+0
2+2(2+0)+2+0
2+2(2)+2+0
2+4+2+0
6+2
8
0
6
what is really really happening!
> geeze i'm smart, answer is 0!
others point out stupidity
> lol i was just trolling
tell them they have small hands
> wtf i'll have my lawyers sue you
BODMAS? Has Common Core fucked up math that bad?
Parentesis Exponent Multiplication&Division Addition&Subtraction
Dunning, meet Kruger.
6
4
>applying dunning-kruger to arithmetics
Only one person in here with a fucking clue.
(and me)
I mean, you make a good point. Maybe I'm being close minded here. There are lots of good things out there, but sometimes you just have to close your eyes, open wide, and wait for a surprise. I remember when my uncle would give me surprise treats, it was always creamy and so sweet. I've never found those treats in the store anywhere, and sometimes I really miss them. Maybe Nutty Neil's Peanut Sauce is what I've been looking for since 1998 when the Understaker threw Mankind off Hell in a Call, and plummented 16 ft through an announcer's table.
/thread
genuinely concerned by the number of innumerates in here who think its anything other than 8
you should be worried about the number of imbeciles here who think it's 8
It's 2
You're all wrong
you can't argue with a muppet.
the answer is now 2.
26
I'm going to go with 4 here
(note: after you handle the parenthesis in which the result is 0, you multiply to the left to eliminate the first 2 to the left of it, then you add the remaining shit to get 4.)
the answer is 3. your all morons.
This can be more simply written so there seems to be a lot of confusion. Just think of it as:
4x4+2
Now it should be much easier to solve with the zero out of the way.
incorrect
On what basis exactly? When you say something is wrong, you at least need to explain why.
wrong.
oh mkay
sounds about right
you are wrong, it's just that simple
42
i mean probably, but its not the knowing the answer is 8 that is concerning about them
the result is NOT 0 you utter retard
>this
Fucn degenerates
Yup
You're smarter then all the other 12 year old nf
please don't reproduce
It's 10
The two positives make a negative, the answer is -2. Your' all faggot libtards
starting equation
2+2 (2+2*0) + 2+0 = 0
(multiplication inside parenthesis)
2+2 (2+0) + 2+0 = x
Rest of Parenthesis
2+2(2)+2+0 = x
Parenthesis again
2+4+2+0 = x
addition
8 = x
discord
=========
.gg/dPF5h5r
Guys, its really simple. Just move the zero into the denominator, transpose the equation to give us a net negative and then take the square root of the whole thing.
Ok, I admit it, I really was a brainlet with that answer, but it only took one fuck up to spin the answer completely out of control.
I'm shocked. This actually works out to be 8.
If you said anything other than 8 your reproductive rights have been removed.
I'm pretty sure math is subjective. There is no real right answer. There are many possible solutions which means everybody is right :-)
8
leftist :)
hi! we are a fantasy faction war discord server that needs beta testers! we need to test rpg elements, battle systems, war systems, and a LOT of other stuff before we are ready. if youre interested, heres the invite link!
/5SfbGmE
:)
>Math is subjective, you're all correct!
A is for Affort!
Everybody gets a prize!
??
it's a Yea Forums8
24... It's 24.
A true master/b/8.
H...how is this thread still alive? How is this still a debate? Got help us and common core.
8
Well tell us the answer then. Is it 2 or 8 or24?
8. It's undoubtedly 8.
8
2. the answer is 2. Fuck
4
WHICH FUCKING IS IT?
8.
its on the calculator so its right
9/11
It's 8 you damn mongoloid.
2
8
8
usually these problems (when posted to Yea Forums) are ambiguous to at least some degree so that at least some case can be made for a non-obvious solution.
but that isn't the case here. virtually everybody arguing for something other than 8 is trolling just like the people arguing for finger boxes or a flat/donut/whatever-shaped earth
4
7
40(40)20
45*(0,07776)=?
?-pii=0,358*(5000)
These threads are always stupid
The answer is -1/2 you fucktards. You even meth?
Took this long for these idiots to get it. You sir are a chad
What is it about these math questions that people finds difficult? We learned stuff like this in like the 3rd grade in my country!
-3 u retards
The common core standards is shit
This
correct
B8 for americunts rip education
Pls be a troll
Bimdas applys within the brackets
8. If you say otherwise you're actually retarded
everyone the answer is fucking 2!!!
first you do the parenthesis which equals 0 cus anything times zero is zero. Then you do 2 + 2 which equals 4, times that by 0 in the parenthesis and you get zero, leaving you only with plus 2, which equals 2.
8
2
you get the prize!
2.
2+2 (2+2×0)+2+0
2+2 (0)+2+0
2+0+2+0
4
Tards
Wrong. Inside the parenthesis you multiply 2×0, leaving a 2 inside. It is not 2+2=4×0=0.
So you have 2+2 (2)+2+0, which is 8.
2+2 * 0 = 0 moron
2
2.
Y'all dumb its -18,446,744,073,709,551,615
I can't believe there are so many stupid user's that don't know the answer is 2. They must all be eurofags. Lol, no wonder they all come to America for uni.
2