Currently the world is facing three very important problems with our population

Eat the poor.

Estimated to be 14 billion

I've got an idea..

Attached: thanny.jpg (1920x1080, 266K)

Oh I can tell you HOW to fix it. But you won't want to do it.

Forced reversible sterilization of poor countries with unsustainable birth rates along with completely restricting all immigration from shit countries to non-shit ones. Yes, this will restrict all brown people from entering non-brown countries.

We'll be lucky to get to 9 billion because of the famine caused by the collapse of international trade. Although there will be major pressures put on the West due to those nations' demographic inversions and the massive uptick in migration from the 3rd world, the global population projections for more than 9 billion are unlikely.

The prediction by the UN is that population will level off at ten billion because food will run out due to all arable land being used. Just leaving it alone would also result in a similar problem that Europe, Japan and the United States are facing where an aging population will need the support of a much smaller population of working aged individuals.

This is a fantastic solution that so few people will get behind for the worst politically correct reasons. I think even Bill Gates said something over the last couple of years about the solution to Africa's population boom might require "illiberal solutions." He didn't elaborate. But he did make note that Africa's population will begin to overrun Europe.

if we keep the current life style everyone lives its 10 billion but most people expect it to change to be higher or lower in the future

I love this old posting.

Attached: africapeacecorps.jpg (900x1998, 770K)

Attached: africathought.png (697x8275, 1.87M)

>expect it to change to be higher or lower in the future
you sound like trump. jesus fucking christ!

My idea is similar, if we distribute birth control for free or at a low cost birth rates will decline in poor countries.

>all arable land being used

>implying this would prevent humans from developing more efficient agricultural solutions

The only effective limit to human population growth is education. This is why it's so instinctual to hate immigration. Why allow shithole countries to shed excess population when, if nobody accepted them, they'd become developed in less than a lifetime, anyway?

I fucking hate that 30% of my country's population was born overseas.

This same claim has been made my morons for decades. The earth is nowhere near peak capacity. Leftists like to use scare tactics.

>higher: agricultural developments cause arable land to be used more efficiently as well as the wider use of clean energy allowing more people to be alive
>lower: less developed countries develop and start using more resources without innovation causing less people to be able to be alive
its not that complicated

No. Africans won't use birth control.

>Leftists like to use scare tactics.
Sure, boy, sure. It’s “leftists” who like to scare white people that they are dying out while we’ll soon have WAY too many brown and black people.

Make sure old people don't stop working, eliminating their need to be dependent on young ones. Find/make fields where their advantages are still worth something.

Who even invented the concept of retirement anyway? When was it first invented? I can't imagine that being a thing during the times of Da Vinci, Newton, Tesla.

>fuck brownies up so we have our violence free paradise
sorry dude reality doesn't work that way
you have a honeypot and your bees haven't fought for three generations now, so brownies will go there for the honey

the last time it was made in was in the 60s when we were close and it would have happened if the world didn't have massive improvements to agriculture in the second half of the 20th century. Its being made again now because it is predicted to happen in the next 20 years without some solution.

fkin lold

thats true that education and agricultural innovation would help but your initial claim was that we should do nothing

Whenever I hear someone, usually a liberal, talk about how it's wrong to have kids because of overpopulation, all I can think of it how naive and/or hypocritical they are. The truth is that the Western nations of North America, Europe, and a handful of others arrested their population growth starting in the 70's. Our demographics are in fact aging like never before thought possible. All of the global population growth throughotu the 21st century is predicted to come from the 3rd world, particularly Africa.

It's strange that the left doesn't want to have kids considering their precious gibs and public sector is about to be privatized because of the lack of workers per beneficiaries. Over the last half century, the welfare states of the West have become unsustainable due to our demographic inversions.

that would also cause problems because old people would be filling jobs that could be held by young people resulting in higher unemployment for young people

What are you talking about no leftist would ever ever suggest any of these things all of the people responding here are right or farright

problem with 1 child policy is everyone wants males to continue bloodline, then you end up with a sex ratio imbalance, and total collapse of population over a generation or two, unless you import women,

What exactly is your point?

poison their food/water to make everyone infertile in shithole countries so they will die off peacefully in one generation, we can then turn their shithole countries into massive farmlands to help feed the rest of the world and keep the population controlled

Bluepilled: import the poor people
Redpilled: hire the young people to ethnically cleanse the poor people

My point is liberal hypocrisy. Liberals will say, "Don't have kids." They don't know it, but that course of action will have the effect of making unviersal healthcare and the robust public sector they claim to want IMPOSSIBLE. Now the west has woken up to economic reality and that's why we're so keen on importing millions of 3rd world immigrants because they will have 6 kids. For two generations. So if we import 6 million immigrants who have 6 kids per family for two generations, do the math.

Wrong

makes sense

Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

It can't be forcibly applied. Chemical castration introduced to the food chain, instigation of tribal based genocide, stir up a nuke exchange between the Paks and Indians. Stop fighting mass extinction diseases like ebola and aids in third world countries. Really, mostly the only overt action would be the chemical castration, the rest just requires the developed world to just step back and let them roll.

>initial claim

Buddy, that was my first comment in this thread. But to support the point, anyway, we shouldn't do anything because, let's be realistic, if we're on Yea Forums, we're not world leaders. We're NPCs.

"We should not be worried" is a more appropriate statement, because this problem will sort itself out. Technology development is faster than climate damage. We'll lose some biodiversity, but carbon sequestration technology will rapidly outpace our capacity to pump it into the atmosphere, and lab-grown meats will provide a ridiculously cost-efficient way of growing quality meat that will vastly reduce the actual cattle industry in the same way that sustainable electricity development is smashing the coal industry.

Brazil will cut down some trees, and then they'll regret it in 30 years when they realize the cattle they were raising is worth less than 1/10th the genetic information that they obliterated, destroying the forest.

That's not to say we have nothing to worry about, but it's not population growth. We need to be concerned about Big Data, but, like climate change, there's little we can do to affect it.

Can we at least all agree that a world full of Africans is the shittiest idea in the long history of shitty ideas?

Attached: iq_by_country.png (1357x800, 28K)

Glad to have an ocean to separate my homeland and a wall to slow down the tide.

Let the overpopulating faggots stay in their own countries and starve themselves out, auction off the land once they're all dead to solve finance issues.

Attached: 423.jpg (323x342, 36K)

this became a problem with indutrial revolution and cities
before that the family was the centre of society. the younger helped from the start and the elder worked/helped until they could. the family was making a living and sharing within itself, funcitioning as an intergenerational socioeconomic system.
Industrial revolution and consumerism created the individualistic mindset eroding the family place at the center of society's web. everything followed from there. (feminism, retirement, unemployment, etc). It's industrialization.

Attached: great-acceleration.jpg (1147x800, 398K)

>implying
Implying you CAN/SHOULD do anything.

The global population will rise to an expected 11 billion by 2100.
You also ignore the fact that as the population increases , birth rates decrease.

Your retarded fat first world incel ass has no bearing on global birth rates.
Gaia theory states that the earth will reach a self righting equilibrium of “that which the earth can sustain”, and you and every other edgelord memefag ITT will not be involved with it.

You should probably just kill yourself, if you are ‘determined’ to have an effect on global population.
We will be better off without you

Attached: 773567F1-4493-44A7-BEFA-816A1E7968C7.jpg (236x177, 12K)

>correlation does not equal causation
Your Meme is retarded

Fuck off. I worked my ass off for 50 years, feeding the liberal asshole "New Society" and funding the fucking swamp in Washington. I'm done, did my time. I am living now and not for all that long. Fuck yourself, get a job and leave the contributors alone.

>finance issues
Americas spiralling 16trillion in debt represents the largest debt ever accrued by a human civilisation.

I know it’s not what you meant , but it is America that must be eradicated in order to ‘save’ the planet

Thanks for volunteering

Attached: DE51EB30-AC98-4BAC-9D0E-85369D250F9C.jpg (590x775, 236K)

If their lands were arable in the first place, they could support themselves. All we need to do is stop sending food to them and let nature take it's course.

If you get rid of America, then that's 16trillion someone isn't getting paid. Dumbass.

discord
=======
.gg/EXdyf8g

I definitely get the vibe that if whites were in charge of some of those African countries, through irrigation and infrastructure development it would take 20 years to make them first-world paradises.

No, you funded the wealth centralisation. Into the hands of 5 super-rich people. The most unequal distribution of wealth in the history of mankind.

Don’t blame the only system that can break that monopoly. Blame the fucking monopoly, you retarded shit eater

>>The total global population is growing extremely rapidly and will reach Earths carrying capacity within our life time.
Most if not All developed nations have seen a negative trend in birth rates. Also, estimations see earth will never exceed 12Billion people. The carrying capacity of earth will not be breached by our predictions and current day statistics.
>>The vast majority of population growth is happening in poor countries causing regions that are already poor to struggle even more to feed those who live there.
The reason for this is simple, more people die in youth and faster. The more kids you have, the better the chance you will have someone to take care of you when you are to old to take care of yourself. So this is not actually as bad of a issue, feeding people is a struggle, yes, but the high birth rate does not add any excess stress.
>>In developed countries birth rates are dropping and life expectancy is very high resulting in a much larger demand on younger generations to support older ones that are out of the working age.
This is true, however, its not all that bad, we are not just improving life expectancy, we are also improving the amount of time people are healthy enough to work and support themselves, this has raised from 60 to 70 in recent years, and Im out of the loop on statistics this number may have increased further. Younger generations will be able to support older generations, with long term care facilities and government aid they should do just fine.

>implying America can/will ever “repay” it
No it’ll just grow bigger and bigger.
The sooner they are eradicated the better off the rest of the world will be.

Do the right thing.
Kill yourself

Attached: Nigger B8.jpg (468x307, 18K)

Collect gametes from the worlds top engineers, scientists, leaders, and other high performance humans that also do not exhibit many genetic flaws.
Sterilize the humans currently alive.
Set up reproduction vats and establish a child rearing counsel that is regulated by all of the world governments.
Legalize all drugs
Tell people to just fuck each other for fun, or whenever they feel stressed.
Enjoy your brave new world.

>an opinion I dislike
>call it bait
>sit back
>sip coffee
>work is done

Kill your self first.

Your system would exclude individuals like Stephen Hawkins, and in no way guarantees a productive society.

A retard with a retarded idea...what a surprise

Redpill me bro

>convince idiots that vaccines are government mind controlling drugs and cause autism
>the plague comes back and kills droves retards

Attached: doitfaggot.jpg (210x210, 22K)