If the government can’t decide what I can and can’t say (freedom of speech...

If the government can’t decide what I can and can’t say (freedom of speech, 1st Amendment) and what religion I choose to believe in (freedom of religion, 1st Amendment), why do they keep trying to regulate my right to keep and bear arms (2nd Amendment)?

Attached: B753B1D6-F532-47F2-BE43-7E30C7B2D7B2.jpg (1480x832, 298K)

because of the idiotic fuck tards who shoot shit up.

That doesn’t answer my question

because they need to take the second before the first and they need it to look like it was voluntary.

because morons keep abusing the right by killing innocent people

Cars kill more people every year than guns

Attached: 1507067249657.jpg (435x395, 33K)

your logic is because there is child molesters and abusers in the world we must ban most people from having children or make them go through a special process to make sure they won't abuse or let anyone abuse their child.

because people no longer value freedom as much as safety so they vote for people who plan to ignore the second amendment

the whole purpose of that amendment was in case someone tried to invade us while we were still young(France, Spain, ect.) we could defend ourselves, we have one of the largest armies and don't need it no more

So, just trust the government to protect us? Disarm and hope that they dont abuse their power?

Because if you're a nutjob who will go shoot up a school or a shopping mall or a church then you shouldn't be allowed to have a gun.
If you're a violent criminal asshole then you shouldn't be allowed to have a gun.
If you just plain can't be responsible enough to be trusted with a gun then you shouldn't have a gun.
It's just common sense and you should accept it.

I'm NOT EVEN FOR BANNING GUNS. No way, if for no other reason than criminals will find a way to illegally get guns anyway. But we don't need fucktards and dangerously crazy people having guns.

What if the socialists take over?

Attached: FFA21251-74F7-4C04-BEFC-0F9C041E866D.jpg (770x415, 24K)

Because the second amendment is no longer relevant and guntards are disgusting people

Your logic is car tires last way longer than they used to so we don't need spare tires anymore. Their is always a shop or road side assistance ban all spare tires. FYI Spare tires kill more people every year than guns do.

We already have laws against people like that owning guns. Why do they keep trying to make new ones?

then we are technically communist

Not really, at that point we’ll be in a state of civil war

ok

God i wana blow my load right in that mouth.

so does alcohol.... and your point?
I'm saying what the government is thinking

You shouldn’t be allowed to say that and you should be arrested. I decide what you can and can’t say from now on so I’m revoking your right to free speech

See how that works?

cool pic bro

>innocent

Nobody is 100% innocent.Only Jesus was with no sin,everyone else did some sin this way or another.

The government only thinks about what grows their power and dominion not whats best for the little guy what keeps them in power and the cash flow rolling in is all they care about.

>he believes in Jesus and sin
Get a load of this dipshit

Shut up faggot

>(not that user)

Yes, that was his point. He's on your side.

Because they fear a civil war that soon will happen between the cities and the countryside.

Obvious bait, OP. The 1st does limit speech, the 'you can't shout fire in a crowded theatre' clause. But you knew that, you're just trying to start stupid arguments which no-one ever wins, and no-one ever changes anyone else's point of view, but just set's people against each other. But you knew that didn't you? Is Putin paying you well to divide the West?

fuck I wrote set's.

Was referring to

Attached: 1531498741939.jpg (460x460, 64K)

Because your religion and your speech don't kill people, but your guns do. Gee, that was a tough one. Maybe only smart people should own guns, huh OP?

you don't have any fucking rights, and the constitution isn't sacred. its just the struggle my friend, jast as it has always been.

"Now, if you think you do have rights, I have one last assignment for ya. Next time you're at the computer get on the Internet, go to Wikipedia. When you get to Wikipedia, in the search field for Wikipedia, i want to type in, "Japanese-Americans 1942" and you'll find out all about your precious fucking rights. n 1942 there were 110,000 Japanese-American citizens, in good standing, law abiding people, who were thrown into internment camps simply because their parents were born in the wrong country. That's all they did wrong. They had no right to a lawyer, no right to a fair trial, no right to a jury of their peers, no right to due process of any kind. The only right they had was...right this way! Into the internment camps.

Just when these American citizens needed their rights the most...their government took them away. and rights aren't rights if someone can take em away. They're priveledges. That's all we've ever had in this country is a bill of TEMPORARY priviledges; and if you read the news, even badly, you know the list get's shorter, and shorter, and shorter." - george carlin

KEK what epic bate.

>Implying religion and speeches don't kill people.

Attached: 1549507656963.jpg (600x630, 75K)

muthufucka... tryin to say some shit and i misspell "just". what an ass i am.

Refuses to give rights gets brains blown out the back of head. Rinse Repeat.

Attached: 1550732437741.jpg (596x600, 58K)

>1st amendment
Except they can and have. Look up obscenity laws.

care to clarify your point? i dont follow.

Without the 2nd Amendment. The rest of the bill of rights becomes toilet paper.
Think the government fucks with you? Think that treatment will improve when everyone knows you are disarmed?

Attached: large.png (500x211, 145K)