Why are there kids at pride events?

Brainwashing

I have a right to say whatever I want to who I want, especially when you're pushing weird sex shit on kids you tranny shitbag

You're correct because I'm not stupid.

You know that gay people can get married and adopt children right? They've got the same rights as anyone else. If it's okay to take your children to Roman era propaganda school to learn about how they must worship a Jewish sandnigger and pay him once a week to do nothing, all while getting molested by priests, it's okay to teach them that they're free and can do what they want.

Attached: 2un7fp.jpg (664x376, 68K)

the future of humanity, sigh

bad parents involve their kids, thinking that it'll add some kind of sympathy to their outrage because "MUH PRECIOUS CHILDRENS"

Almost the same fucking thing but the first one is worst

This always bothered me. Id never go to one of these. I think it does more harm than good honestly

Attached: 1551062956747.jpg (547x500, 29K)

>implying if you're against degeneracy you're christian
>implying gay people and lgbt in whole don't molest kids way more than priests

Attached: 1546409508395.jpg (640x815, 134K)

>Raising a degenerate faggot VS raising a kid who knows how to effectively use a firearm.
Yep, I know which one I'd prefer too.

It's almost like that whole "slippery slope fallacy" turned out to be exactly what they planned to do each time they were given an inch...
>huehue

Attached: 1551078304698.jpg (960x640, 140K)

Attached: 1549350023567.jpg (512x1024, 95K)

Attached: 1549433420845.jpg (750x611, 45K)

Attached: 1550306527144.jpg (460x703, 65K)

its ok to be who you are maybe

but it is just 3 dudes that get off dressing / acting like dogs this doesnt really represent the population you are nit picking

They are being raised and forced to be homosexuals

Attached: 1549429862506.png (500x522, 70K)

in some sense i beleive some parents use children being gay as a fashion statement posting them being gay on social media wont end well years down the line being told all your life you are gay but are not sort of the opposite from the past in many respects

Hmmmm...who think was him...?!

Attached: vg5jen723tw5maymv227640657100.jpg (1592x1141, 128K)

We are talking about the kids not the furrys you fucking crack babby

There is no slippery slope. We've become much more aware of child abuse in the last 50 years or so. Look at the catholic church. And compare metoo liberalism with the laissez-faire liberalism of the seventies. When it comes to abuse liberals have become much more puritan.

If seen a lot of kids, even Muslim, going to pride events in Amsterdam. You are the real pedophile but let me get it straight. A kid cannot see anything sexual in something like a gay pride other than funny guys doing happy stuff. Especially a pride (with boats and gay people) appears rather funny and happy to them than anything near sexual. It's not that gays are fucking each other on boats they just dance. You're the pedophile here, I hope that makes you happy and confident.

Thanks for the sauce, I'd put it on a hitlist.

Your idea of the 'correct' sexuality means more to you than actual human life.

This is such a terrible ideology, I can't even begin to wonder how you justify this.

I'd rather be gay than pedo tbqfh

This site is filled with closet pedos because most live a shitty socially isolated life. Hating fags is just a way of putting hatred towards people with more succes in life.

whatweknow.inequality.cornell.edu/topics/lgbt-equality/what-does-the-scholarly-research-say-about-the-wellbeing-of-children-with-gay-or-lesbian-parents/
Hmmm

youtu.be/gXGlawiibK8

Ignoring the made up '92%; statistic, the citation relating to the 51% statistic is discussed below:

>Sullins claims that having same-sex parents increases the likelihood of suffering from depression, abuse, parental distance, and obesity and concludes that households with gay or lesbian parents “may be problematic or dangerous” for the “dignity and security” of their offspring. Yet to support these conclusions, Sullins would have needed to compare same-sex- and different-sex-headed households in which it is known that no family disruptions occurred (or that the same level of such disruptions occurred in each group).

>Instead, he draws sweeping, outlier conclusions (74 studies collected by my research team at Columbia Law School's What We Know Project [2], which aggregates scholarship with public policy implications, have found that parent sexual orientation does not affect the wellbeing of children) that can only be reached by fudging the way gay- or lesbian-headed households are discussed and compared to households headed by heterosexuals.

>Sullins achieves this through a crucial elision between households in which a child spent some time in a home headed by a same-sex couple and families in which a child was actually raised, from birth, by a stable same-sex couple, a situation more auspicious for healthy child development. This conflation of household stability with parent gender fatally mars his conclusions, which are much more damning of gay and lesbian parenting than are warranted by his data.

>[cut for post length]

>What Sullins has done makes no more sense than surveying a hospital to derive mortality rates. It is hard to imagine that Sullins does not know this and equally hard to watch his misleading findings get past peer review.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5204108/

The 10 comandaments
You shall have no other Gods before me
You shall not make for yourselves an idol
You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God
Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy
Honor your father and your mother
You shall not murder
You shall not commit adultery
You shall not steal
You shall not give false testimony
You shall not covet

I guess a better question is why does terrorists attacks never happen at events like these? wouldn't it be the ultimate goal for muslims

so progressive