EVERYTHING SHOULD BE FREE

The only policy she has that anyone needs to know is that people who are unwilling to work should be given a free ride

If you still support her after that you're fucking scum

WHY? BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR YOUR FREELOADING ASS?

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-12 New York City will cover illegal immigrants as part of $100 million-a-year hea (873x295, 33K)

>EVERYTHING SHOULD BE FREE
Except every form of productivity. We should tax all that into nonexistence.

Attached: 1550789065164.png (620x581, 16K)

Reply or mom big die

When did she say that everything should be free?

oh boy this thread again

Attached: bait5.jpg (125x125, 3K)

Man and people say the horse shoe theory isn’t applicable

Socialism. Enough said.

Attached: 1544914353975.png (625x626, 181K)

close enough

>oooowwww the Edge

Nice 12 years old argument kid

which one is that? My google-fu doesn't come up with anything

>Pic related is (You)
>”Im forced to works an Shiiiiiiiiiet, Dis som bullshiiiet. Where muh broke bucks at?”

Attached: B64060D5-EB0D-48B3-9DF1-548FF116C07C.jpg (661x685, 234K)

Social security, education, food stamps, Medicaid, Medicare, police force, fire department, etc. etc.

All socialism. Stop demonizing a word because the scary Nazis used the word to sound more appealing. It works in every country that enacts socialist policies.

>Muh 'Merican selfishness tho

Attached: dumb.png (624x628, 81K)

As a European I can say a lot of that stuff is pretty great.

>Voluntary

Ok, ill stop working and die of hunger, since life is also voluntary, I mean, dont like it? Well kys, thats easy, no one stops you.

socialism is the act of actually procuring things and then rbinging them back though

Ya, back when I was 16 and didn't have bills I thought the same way. You'll grow up, there's hope for you too.

Your argument is old and lame...just like your cock.

It's only applicable if you're a retard.
Hope the mass grave is nice and cozy.

It's in the green new deal. It actually says that, she's actually that stupid. She's not a social liberal, she's just another retard that thought a 4 year degree was enough to make her smart.

Including your mother

>guaranteed federal employment, well above private sector pay levels
>guaranteed income, even if you refuse to work
>free college tuition
>retroactive cancellation of all student debt
>open borders
>stopping of 100% of emissions
>abolition of cows?!?!?
>abolition of airplanes, wtf
>70% marginal tax rate, to start
>wealth taxes
>excessive family leave
>ultimately wants to abolish private ownership of production

She's a fucking lunatic. She's the left's populist answer to Trump. And she will ruin the US economy if we let her. She's already driven out Amazon from NY, which hurt everyone there-- a loss of 25k high-paid jobs, billions in tax revenues, all the spending power and resulting jobs/sales from those employed people, and all the taxes collected on every level for every transaction that would have resulted. That's literally tens of billions in losses for NY.

She's a socialist piece of shit. She wants to see capitalism fail, and she wants to replace it with the subsistence living (at best) that socialism has to offer.

Name a system where you don't work

sounds an awful lot like stuff no one should care about

Attached: 567577689.png (2572x2068, 309K)

>doesn't know the difference between a public good and a commodity
Maybe you should read a fucking book before getting involved in a discussion about economics.

anarcho-primitivism

>ill stop working and die of hunger
Please do!

republicans tanking jobs and giving tax cuts to the richest of rich, that sure helps me pay my bills

In what way did that refute that all of those things listed are in fact socialist policies or systems?

every single day this same damn thread. OP is a cancerous faggot

Attached: 1550325062205.gif (250x210, 482K)

>die of hunger
No one in a Western country dies of hunger. it's so unlikely that there aren't even reliable statistics for it. Basic welfare covers this-- it's a public good that is absolutely necessary to make a capitalist society work.

There is no point in history where people could, generally, live their lives without some form of work. And for the majority of people, that meant either busting ass physically, or being very smart. If you're not smart, and not willing to do physical work, you're just a drain on society and you don't deserve to be above the poverty line.

nah some people, myself included, like her policies

That uh
that isn't actually true and you're just hiding behind the fact that lots of people exist

She's actually a good example of how simple stupidity can turn an otherwise somewhat functional adult into a dangerous, lying, seditious, socialist cum socket

Attached: 1550521675775.jpg (1022x1024, 127K)

That doesnt make it voluntary

Socialism is public ownership of the means of production (i.e. government control of all commodities). Everything you listed is a public good (i.e. things that are not commodities that are more efficiently provided by the government, and which provide for a functioning society). If it's not a commodity, it does not fall under the purview of socialism.
>Social security
Not a commodity. Basic welfare, which is a result of regulated capitalism
>education
Not a commodity. Public good, which enables a functioning society.
>food stamps
Not a commodity. More welfare.
>Medicaid
Not a commodity. More welfare.
>Medicare
Not a commodity. More welfare.
>police force
Not a commodity. Public good, which enables a functioning society. Has existed for thousands of years in all governments.
>fire department
Not a commodity. Public good, which enables a functioning society. Has existed for thousands of years in all governments.
>roads, which you didn't mention
Not a commodity. Public good, which enables a functioning society. Has existed for tens of thousands of years in all governments.

dear mom
can I pls pee in ur mouth
--jesus

god damn it

Imagine

Attached: C4EFA958-22E9-412F-A166-DB3AA0BC8ABA.jpg (480x360, 8K)

Itt: triggered ameriburgers from both sides of the political spectrum but same severity on the autism spectrum

there is no proof anywhere, of anything, that says anything happened ever because we live on a sentient being

I mean in

>No one dies of hunger

First world countries of the west you mean, why do you think ilegal mexican inmigrants go to your country.

>whycan'ttherightmeme
nobody under 60 is going to find that humorous

it's just retarded

Translation: WAAAAAAAAAAAH I AM SO AFRAID OF THIS WOMAN I HAVE TO MAKE FUN OF HER AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY! SHE THREATENS MY MASCULINITY! HOLD ME, PAPA, I'M A PUSSY!

OP, go away with this shit
saged

it's really hard to do that because people poop

Looking forward to the revolution eh comrade?

Attached: 1550502522769.jpg (480x360, 22K)

>abolition of cows?!?!?

I mean, looking at the Netherlands you can see they did something good.

They are utterly fucking themselves over right now, but they established a system were you could get good stuff for a good quality of life without fucking your economy.

Off course, some economist conclude it was because of they "High" moral conduct and they policy of not raping and thieving each other out, which is nearly impossible to establish wherever nigger are. But the point is, it might be possible.

don't disrespect my wife you faggot

Attached: e82b8b8648c13c3e884f5735cbd40f00.jpg (483x442, 19K)

Me too (in Scotland). A world without socialism sounds pretty shit, and I say that as an above median earner.

Oooo Eeee Oooo Ahh Ahh ting tang walla walla bing bang

This is always their response when the irony in this post is they don't even have money.

>Social security, education, food stamps, Medicaid, Medicare, police force, fire department, etc. etc.
What do those entitlements programs have to do with owning the means of production retard?

Does AOC ever talk about workers owning the means of production? No? Then how come so many people seem to think she's a socialist?

It's called equivocation, it is a hallmark of the leftard and the leftard argument...

Attached: Screenshot_2019-01-23 the definition of equivocation.png (767x256, 26K)

>EVERYTHING SHOULD BE FREE

Even mainstream democrats finally get it
TY OP

tfw the $100 monitor I bought is an AOC monitor

how the shit did you know that

>The term "Western world" is generally interchangeably used with the term First World or developed countries
>The Western world, also known as the West, refers to various nations depending on the context, most often including at least part of Europe, Australasia, and the Americas, with the status of Latin America in dispute.
That's why I capitalized Western. In a generalized way, it means 'countries of European descent', which is why Latin America is only sometimes (and very loosely) combined with the more accepted Western countries.

everything should be free. the resources exist on this planet that we could easily be in a post-scarcity economy. barges full of grain and rice sit in harbors, rotting away, because the excess supply would ruin the value of that already on the market. walmart rejects a good chunk of the vegetables it receives from farmers because the queue to get into their receiving centers can be days long. in the wrong weather, This Kills The Tomato.

supply-side economics is fucking retarded and inevitably leads to increasingly large gaps in wealth, which creates a society of haves and have-nots. we currently live in that society.

Attached: 1476062415992.jpg (522x495, 99K)

This was meant for

Well done, comrade. Putin will he proud.

>Netherlands
Not socialist, capitalist with a strong welfare state. Far smaller population, very homogeneous. There's a standard cultural history that lead to the development of their particular welfare state. Very few people abuse the system. There's basically no overlap in any of these qualities with the US.

we only call that that because everyone is from age of empires and they get mad if we call it europa

Attached: democratic_socialism.png (480x582, 289K)

how is that funny though

user still mad she won

Attached: 1538097258016.jpg (1200x1200, 154K)

and thats as far as you will ever be allowed to go.

FREE PUSSY FOR ALL

None of this is socialist. It's all either basic public goods or welfare.

>public goods
State funded military, police, fire protection, roads, etc. that are provided for security and the necessary functioning of society. These are not means of production in themselves, and they are not commodities. public goods are provided regardless of economic model, and predate even most of the basic formalized economic models.

>welfare
A social safety net, generally including such things as unemployment insurance, health, retirement, and education, at it's most basic levels. Welfare is generally meant to guarantee an existence just above the poverty line, which in turn should encourage those in the poorest sectors of a society to move up the economic ladder. As such, a welfare state is a common reaction to the potential inequalities of capitalist economies-- the promotion of economic mobility and a general enrichment of the lower classes guarantees stability for all to do better in society.

Socialist economies would never result in a welfare state, as state ownership of all productive means would negate this need. Socialism is concerned with equality of distribution, and ultimately, a reduction of total wealth. The goal of Socialism's goal is to guarantee a subsistence living by reducing wealth and guaranteeing equal distribution; the goal of capitalism is increased individual freedoms, which leads to more wealth, more inequality, and the need of a welfare state to even the playing field.

When the blue wave hits next year we are going to literally drown in conservative tears

Attached: 8621A8F4-833B-4558-9199-CA17819AF5C2.jpg (1242x687, 219K)

>the goal of Socialism’s goal

Shut the fuck up, pseudo-intellectual faggot you are just writing bullshit

>searches for typos
>instead of posting an argument

Attached: mittens.jpg (400x504, 53K)

why is nation colors same as poke'mon 1

the blue wave is hitting the southern boarder
all those votes waiting to cross

I'll just leave this here.

Attached: aocdjt.jpg (600x778, 78K)

If your standards are as low at an 80 year olds tits then yeah sure she's hot. Faggot.

Kek

Attached: 436345253636343454.jpg (923x515, 108K)

FU

Attached: 465373_345333695503377_2035378645_o.jpg (1270x680, 51K)

Real funny, Ivan. Wait til she crushes him in the rematch

That wasn’t a tyo, that was ranting from a faggot. A butthurt, unoriginal, mediocre, common faggot espousing the views of others and pretending they’re unique.

Attached: EBBB6FD8-00AE-4332-B48F-E3B8383CC7DB.jpg (640x800, 102K)

try it you fucking petrified little faggot.

Attached: 5B5425FB-F5AF-40F9-A334-139080D29A66.jpg (916x636, 170K)

>unoriginal, mediocre
When did anyone say any of these ideas are original? This is basic economics. Anyone that is even mediocre should be able to differentiate between common goods and commodities, or socialism and welfare.

>butthurt
Look, you're the one listing insults instead of presenting a counterpoint. user was addressing points made previously. Sounds like you're projecting your butthurt, and maybe you're the one that's a faggot. .

LOL. She meant if you don't want to work where you are, you should be able to work somewhere else. If Amazin treats you like shit, you should be able to quit and work somewhere else without worrying about getting fucked.

Show us where it says that.

EAT THE RICH!

She also wants to ban air planes. How tf are people supposed to get across an ocean without an airplane?