Untitled

Roman is a draw.

Attached: sp13-wwe.jpg (1200x674, 119K)

this
reminder i report all transmisogynists to the fbi for hate speech

Probably because the answers would kill the company before they even make their televised debut

>A literal who calling others literally whos

she has a dick?

>just because one of us is problematic
..................
.....
.

because AEW doesnt want those details getting out obviously

based as fuck, love its a girl asking too so beta orbiters can't pull the feminism card

squadW

But the problem is that WWE probably doesn't want a lot of other issues out there. What is the tweet poiting out is pro-AEW bias.
Because those journos want to be on the good side of AEW, to get access to people. They know WWE won't be giving them any access anyway.

To add to this the major problem also was majority of weirdos on twitter (and probably on reddit, cause that's where these people congregate) went with
>Please do not bother Kylie, don't ask her about it.
>Let Kylie be, it is personal for sure, otherwise she would have said something.
And it felt like they were trying to protect her from people learning she had like a miscarriage or cancer or some other shit like that.
All the while it was probably some wrestling politics bullshit, substance abuse, bullying or some shit like that. That is what journos would have uncovered if people weren't running scared about protecting her privacy.
While Meltzer (as an example) to bizzare lenghts to prove that Roman cancer is not real cancer because he doesn't need to nuke his body with poison.

ok you retards,if something really negative happened to kylie why she doenst go out and tells the history?

what she gains by keeping AEW safe from controversy??

>Kylie just asked privately to be released and was granted said release. It's that simple

and why are journalists refusing to ask very basic follow-up questions to Tony Khan like "will she back?"

They probably made her sign a NDA

>ok you retards,if something really negative happened to kylie why she doenst go out and tells the history?
>what she gains by keeping AEW safe from controversy??

AEW probably made her sign a non-disclosure agreement in order to get out of her multi-year contract

That's like asking Vince McMahon if Big Cass will be back after he was released.

>ok you retards
...
>why she doenst go out and tells the history?

Attached: tenor (8).gif (206x126, 597K)

>and why are journalists refusing to ask very basic follow-up questions to Tony Khan like "will she back?"
Or much better.
>has she stated why she wanted out of the contract?
Answer or say No comment, Tony.

we know why Big Cass was released from WWE, do you know why Kylie departed AEW?

Based. Though I have little faith in the FBI given it is a conservative organisation with a history of oppressing minorities.

REPORT THIS COCKSUCKER

Attached: e769bce0f0b5d8e8f7d3bfbbb6d3e96811b122ea_00.gif (300x170, 1.99M)

BECAUSE LE MELTZ LE STARS LE TRANSRIGHTS LE NOT WWE

I mean, it's a good point. Can't make AEW look bad.

Lol nobody posted any evidence of Romans fake cancer so he can shoot a movie

We only know because Cass himself said why he was let go.

Literally nobody is even talking about that Kylie chick, where are these people coming from

Meltzer really doesn't like Nyla though.

Kylie Rae was raped by Nyla Rose and her female penis in the sweltering Summer of 19.

Because they had sources willing to go on record about those details of roman reigns's cancer and don't have any sources willing to go on record about what happened with Kylie Rae
>While Meltzer (as an example) to bizzare lenghts to prove that Roman cancer is not real cancer because he doesn't need to nuke his body with poison
?????
He said that Roman did not have to take chemo (he didn't), how is that him saying it's not real cancer?

I hope there's video

Because she asked.