Based Corny working outlaw shitters

Based Corny working outlaw shitters

Attached: 2D6ECB9C-8867-4007-97F8-147378E89307.jpg (1125x1093, 135K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theindyconnection.com/collections/indy-drip/products/fuck-jim-cornette-tee
nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fair-use-rule-copyright-material-30100.html
ipinbrief.com/when-is-a-parody-a-protected-fair-use-under-copyright-the-law/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>actually worked into making a cool shirt for Cornette
absolutely based boomer still got it

If this is real, some retard is getting sued. Jim Cornette owns his likeness and he literally shills his ultrajew lawyer friend on his podcasts.

it's legit. and apparently on pre-sale?

theindyconnection.com/collections/indy-drip/products/fuck-jim-cornette-tee

Stephen P. New always goes over in the end brother

it's fair use parody

I wouldn't fuck with Cornette

Attached: Jim Cornette.webm (1280x720, 2.26M)

>its always fair use until they get sued
you're not going to make it with the wolves kid

He's a public figure, he can't do shit

>for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/fair-use-rule-copyright-material-30100.html
Idk if parody for profit counts, but you could be right.

This is disturbing. Imagine getting worked so hard that you spend your time drawing something like this.

Attached: 1525798868817.jpg (263x309, 24K)

Doughy Jannetty ought to have ten heads, so Jim can live rent free in all of them.

Imagine making a shirt like this about Sonny Kiss or Nyla ManRose

Imagine being alive in 2000+4+15 and not understanding that context matters

Who would even wear this shit ever, ironically or otherwise?

Attached: image.jpg (875x640, 86K)

ipinbrief.com/when-is-a-parody-a-protected-fair-use-under-copyright-the-law/

This was an interesting read. So Jim might not be able to do anything.

jelly fans?
triggered aewtists?
fat retards?
oh wait they're all the same, my bad

Very true. It would depend on how transformative the design was determined to be. I think it could go either way, honestly. A lawyer could throw in some "call to violence" shit and maybe away someone to his side like that.

sway*

I agree with the call to violence claim, because the parody argument seems weak at best. I just think it's funny that there are probably going to be some losers (probably at an AEW show) wearing this dumb shit.

THESE GODDAMN OUTLAW MUDSHOW FLIPPIN’ SHITS CAN’T EVEN DO A TACTICAL ROLL HALF AS GOOD AS MY FAT OLD ASS AND YOURE TELLIN ME THEY’RE GONNA COMPETE WITH VINCE IN NEW YORK!?