Varför har du ingen flickvän user?

jag tyckar benin :-DDD flyckar är inte bra :(

I don't usually have deeper romantic feelings for others, only find them attractive.

It's because you're autistic

*Casts a pleasure spell on you*
Avada kadavra!

Attached: 1458799866588.jpg (531x531, 55K)

you need to take this (heartpill v2) desu

Attached: medical-background-design-with-heart-pill_gg64635640.jpg (450x357, 16K)

heja sverige

jag är finska gubbe

No. I have girls asking me out or at least checking me out frequently enough. Problem is I don't want cheap sex and flings. I want something real. Hope you find it too, dude.
dubs, and thank you
yeah, forgot that. thanks

have you heard of telegony?

finlandssvensker?

>I have girls asking me out or at least checking me out frequently enough.

hard to believe when you don't have a job

But I've already pegged you as some weird fuck who just lies whenever it suits his ego so idc lole

Attached: shrug.jpg (554x439, 106K)

*pulls out gun and shoots you*

Everybody keeps bringing up these old ladies I killed in Ashina castle and im like I THOUGHT they had poison knives

kind of weird fuck fantasy is this nigga indulging

pyramid fag is the guy who says "yeah I have a huge cock but my girlfriends didn't like it.."

lmao

We're pretending to be shinobi. We're not actually shinobi of course hehe

*replies to the schizo who lives in his 70 year old parents attic*

so how'd your day go Kevin? have any meaningful conversation or social interaction with anyone that wasn't your mirror or some effigy you've fixated on
?

having a job, being subservient to another does not make you more attractive to others

if girls like you for your money, that's a red flag. those are called whores

holy FUCK he SHOT catfish!!!!!!!!

Attached: 270230A3-F28D-4D17-9B0A-BE836C8FB1F5.jpg (512x512, 100K)

I can tell you're a virgin because you can't have a relationship without having money lole

shove your pretentious explaining aways up your ass lmao

Attached: Sakuya cute nice wink.png (350x330, 143K)

Yes my doesn't want me to call her Sally anymore

well I'm a neet who has nothing going for me but I have morals so.. oh nobody cares cuz I don't interact with people IRL that's why I gloat about my 20 pretend discord friends

-you

my wife**

Attached: 1465896588777.png (465x750, 268K)

that's literally every namefig since 2015

then you have never had a real relationship if you think money is love

Do you and CTS exchange money in order to have feelings for eachother?

I've fucked more girls than you

which really means: I've had sex with one girl

Attached: bane.png (584x329, 179K)

*I've fucked more boys than you
ftfy

I'll let you know what Avril Lavinge's asshole smells like

closest thing I've come to irl gay is I was messed on adderall and showed this gay guy my dick because why not I'm on pills and he leaned down to suck it but then I put it back in my pants

I would've let him but he was masculine.

whatever you say. dubs

traps aren't girls you dumb nigger

I am asking you a question

Attached: 1508660855802.gif (389x413, 1.83M)

r u sarah connor?

yes koishi is too powerful

*giving you an answer*
___

lole gay

by being a chad
he didn't date them, he just fucked them

maybe gods/God do get lonely, how would we know

Loneliness is a sense of not being whole.
Godhood is completeness.

Completeness does not mean not lonely. If desire is a destination then 1 being whole/complete/perfect would still require an additional unit to reach it.

1 needs an additional 1 to make two. the ancient greeks and romans speculated on the gods emotional states as well. it's all projections of personal or belief oriented values onto an abstract concept anyhow

你说什么?

Attached: yosho.png (271x274, 15K)

There is a difference between gods in polytheistic pantheons and God in the monotheistic sense.
The Greek and Roman "gods" are more archetypes rather than gods because they represent concrete ideas or natural patterns/processes/cycles, both macrocosmic and microcosmic (psychic). Or rather, not even that, but it's the relationships between the gods that do. There is not one individual god that represents the totality of existence, but rather the entire pantheon, the entire system of the relationships between the gods, fulfils this function. A possible analogy maybe would be the entire Tree of Life vs the individual nodes.
No god in the Greek pantheon is all-powerful; they are all subject to the whims of the Moirai, the fate-spinners.

Completeness is the realisation that there is no lack. It means stillness, a lack of any desire that conflicts with the flow of the current moment and disturbs balance.
Loneliness is the (illusory) apprehension of a lack, and the generation of a (equally illusory) desire to compensate for that lack. The desire is an equal and opposite reaction to that perceived lack.
The lack is not grounded in the reality of the current moment, because the flow of the current moment in essence represents completeness and the absence of lack. Therefore the desire is also not grounded in the flow of the current moment, which leads to, discord, perturbation and suffering.

nej, finska-finska

A difference yes, but still the same speculation.
We cannot accurately describe how something in such a state of being would feel, if it feels. We can write fanfictions (religious texts) but never truly know.

dubs
If something is complete that does not preclude loneliness nor does it imply physical or emotional stillness.

Companionship would be the only thing God would lack, since they no equal. So it would be a logical assumption to infer God would be lonely even as a perfect singular being.

We could sit and argue all day over imaginary traits our creator/creators may possess, but it leads no where.

I agree that it's useless to speculate about things we have no knowledge of, but if we allow ourselves to employ logic here, as you do, then we can stick to being consistent with definitions and follow their logical course.
The phrasing "a perfect singular being" is somewhat contradictory when referring to God because it implies that there might be other " singular beings" besides. Godhood includes all of being. Once there is being outside of being there is separation and loss of Godhood. Godhood presupposes no lack and no perception of lack. Omnipotence means that any desire is instantly fulfilled. Omniscience implies non-engagement with nonsensical and contradictory concepts (such as the desire of God for an equal companion), because those are borne of ignorance: the idea of a companion outside of God is the idea of the separation of "the totality of being" from "the totality of being", which is both a contradiction, and also represents loss of Godhood. Loneliness is a priori impossible for that which includes all of being, because as soon as the lack of something is perceived, it simultaneously appears in being as a consequence of appearing in thought, and there is longer a lack of said thing. Alternatively, the concept of the object of lack is self-contradictory, which is a mark of ignorance and therefore an impossibility for that which includes all things and therefore all knowledge.

This doesn't mean that desire is incompatible with stillness though. There is always desire because there is always motion. However, desire that is compatible with stillness is a desire that corresponds to the reality and inertia of the current moment, and loneliness (like all suffering) is not of that category.

eternity is a long time to be perfect and alone

You are attempting to give definition to something greater than ourselves,
Our words and anything in our universe we can reference singularly or in totality would not add up to the force which created universe, and there could be countless entities, or something which is not numerically reconcilable in any conceivable way outside of the singular source which created us. For you to speak with such authority describing rules restrictions and limitations without proof is too far for me.

We cannot know, and logic fails to describe what we cannot measure.

Attached: hmifl.png (600x586, 262K)

I'm so alone

För att jag har en fru!

post et billede :)

Because I don't want one.

I'm not in denial, cute girls have unironically hit on me before or admitted they had a crush on me after we'd been friends for some time. I'm the one who friend zones them, not the other way around.

The reason is that I'm just your average guy afraid of commitment, but with slightly less of a sex drive and slightly more awareness of the impact of my actions on others. I don't have sex with girls who are into me because A) I don't have as strong a desire to have sex with them as the average guy might, and B) I understand and respect the fact that girls take that sort of thing more seriously than guys, so if I had sex with a girl who would be willing to have sex with me, then, from her perspective, I'd be sending the message that I want to be with her as her long-term partner, which, in my case, would be the wrong message to send.

It would be the wrong message to send because, libido aside, I'm not prepared to be with anyone as their long-term partner, not even platonically, much less romantically. That's where the fear of commitment comes in. I always abandon and betray people. Always. I know that better than anyone else. It's better for everyone if I just stop trying to form lasting human connections, and I want to make sure everyone I interact with understands that. A quick fuck would be counterproductive to that purpose.

Oui, merci

Attached: D5Jy9NyUcAA_lmo.jpg (1500x2048, 362K)

...

he wear party hat

...

fear of intimacy

nah just kidding

Attached: heart-pill-5971713.jpg (1065x1300, 56K)

how can i love somone if i dont even love myself...

dont give him attention. he wants confirmation so bad
>namenigger
>displaying pass
>telling people girls like him
he wants to be cool like the other boys so badly

Is being an s4s namefig with a pass enough to attract girls?