DING-DONG DIDDLY WORKED

DING-DONG DIDDLY WORKED

Attached: Worked.png (1235x345, 458K)

The old style of stuttered typewriter font actually suits dave's irl voice perfectly.

huh wats wrong with the Os?

rd put up wor

What was it like being a smart mark back in these days?

A very lonely existence.

t. Observer reader since 1986

11.99 was worth alotttttttttttttttttt more

and all these years later meltzer is on top of the world and more popular than ever and has legions of fans and huge influence on how wrestling is consumed and performed
meanwhile hogan is a racist pariah who can't pay his mortgage and andre is dead
lmao guess we know who won this feud huh

Didn't Hogan win $100,000,000 in a lawsuit?

That match was only one of the biggest draws ever
Arguably the biggest match ever

WORKED

Based Dave almost getting a clue and realizing that technical wrestling is not a draw at all but then missing this epiphany and overrating flippy shitters for the next 40 years

Why should Dave care that it drew a lot of money if it was a bad match, which it was? Andre couldn't move.

He gave a legdrop to Gawker brother and remarried. He's doing good

Attached: hhgawker.jpg (500x375, 37K)

That's factually incorrect because shows have drawn more than the actual number that were in the building that night.

Ah yes, back when you had to substitute other keys when one stopped working.

9/11 was one of the biggest draws ever too.
Are you saying 9/11 was the best ever?

Attached: hikaru-shida-4e2560b8-7d09-4ffb-aee1-5c8607ab83c-resize-750.jpg (640x960, 63K)

>there are zoomers here who have never used a typemachine let alone know what it is or how it looks like

Attached: efd.jpg (403x392, 40K)

9/11 never drew money
Imagine being this much of a mark that you complain about a ref not counting to ten in a FAKE FIGHT

9/11 led to tremendous oil and military profits so yes, it did

>9/11 never drew money

Attached: amd-freedom-tower-jpg.jpg (1200x2400, 467K)

I sense 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Attached: d57d36ac5cf35f859e9128beecee289d_xl.jpg (1200x1200, 123K)

Indirect consequences (or direct consequences that appear after a prolonged time) of an event aren't proof that something "drew", e.g. 9/11 led to oil and military profits but the war itself is what "drew" those profits, not 9/11

$31 million in the end, but how much of that went to Peter Thiel?