>E-drones are AEW Fa

>>Only 25% of people who purchase WWE PPVs via traditional means bought Double or Nothing, rest are new customers.
This makes more sense, barely anyone buys WWE PPVs because of the Network's existence.
It also means the rest of DoN's buyer-base are probably still WWE fans, which also makes sense.
OPetty BTFO

Cable carriers have that data, ya simp. It's comparative PPV purchases.

Not how the OP worded it. Either OP is just a retard (strong possibility) or English is not his first language (a possibility) or he thinks this is bait and he is
>working
us (which makes him even worse reatrd than the first possibility).

how could they possibly have this info

>DoN's buyer-base are probably still WWE fans
Most Western wrestling fans are WWE fans, lapsed, casual, or hardcore. This isn't exactly a startling revelation.

it's explained in the thread retard. read before you post

No. Dave said 25% of WWE Network users based on a new investigation.

OP's mixed up, what Dave was actually comparing was how many DON purchasers are network subscribers, not the opposite. There's nothing you can do but speculate in that regard. The reason he's been going full autism with this shit the past few weeks is cable/PPV providers are bumrushing him with their data and stats trying to get answers. The idea that there might bepeople willing to pay full price PPV for wrestling again caught their attention.

>The idea that there might bepeople willing to pay full price PPV for wrestling again caught their attention.
That's what someone like mookie was saying all along.

Or rather, if I want to be specific.
mookie was saying that WWE Network should not have included WM, because people would pay for those and WWE would be able to get money from PPV buys.
He even went on saying that same was true for Royal Rumble and SummerSlam (Survivor Series is no longer seen as big to warrant that).
So people would pay their 10 bucks each month, but they would have to pay for the big ones separately.
And as we are seeing now, it looks like AEW will have model of 4 PPVs and then smaller shows that will be on weekends on B/R Live for free or only for the subscription fee.
Which makes sense, with mookie being the money guy in AEW...

Is this the thinly veiled Yuka Sakazaki thread?

Attached: 826345283.png (608x1023, 881K)

>The wwe network has almost 2 million users.
>25 percent of 2 million is 500000
>Which is five times as many people that bought double or nothing.
At least try with your lies

Listen to the latest WOR then. Autist.

Makes sense

WWEs audience is down to their hardcore loyalist fans that don't watch anything besides WWE.

There are so many lapsed fans AEW can take advantage off that branched off to boxing, mma, american ninja warrior or whatever.

Doesn't WWE Network have like 1 million subs? So you're saying at least 250,000 WWE subscribers alone bought Double or Nothing? Not even counting non-WWE subscribers in the buys?

But Big Dick Big Scoops Dave said the PPV numbers were only ~100k give or take.

That doesn't make sense, I think you're lying.

>see's title of the thread
>doesn't understand
>Get's mad
>Makes comment that has nothing to do with the topic
BASED RETARD

She has such a weird face, i can't tell if she's attractive or not. My penis is very confused.

>But Big Dick Big Scoops Dave said the PPV numbers were only ~100k give or take.
You mean he said 200k, then 98k, then 150k, then at least 100k? The plans keep changing with those PPV buys.

No. I will not listen to a kike spreading lies and misinformation. Imagine being so lonely and pathetic you listen to a stumbling stuttering autistic jew talking over probably one of those most annoying voices I have ever heard in my entire life.

Attached: oreally.jpg (1920x1080, 97K)

200k was google trends. 100k was always the number. Technically 98 officially, but I'm sure they did at least 2k in replays