He's fucking good

Why waste 10/10 promos on Internet shit that barely anyone watches

How is this 11/10 babyface promo supposed to be a heel thing?

he is like has-been musical artist throwing up his new album on myspace for free

Because sadly more people watch the Youtube shit now than WWE's actual tv shows and PPV's.

god alexa bliss has the hottest eyes ive ever seen

that just isn't true though

>Thinks the division he's in is important and strives to make it the most important
>Puts the Usos over huge
>Namedrops Zack Ryder and Curt Hawkins who I'd legit forgotten were the Raw Tag Champions
>"It's only a failure when I give up"
Heel Daniel Bryan is by and large the best babyface in the WWE.

Why the fuck don't they cut these kind of promos on the tv shows? What a waste of good material.

Based and Ecopilled

Deranged savior, madman prophet howling in the desert m.youtube.com/watch?v=P71ZaU8hgio

Yeah, Bryan’s promos get around a quarter million views on YouTube, while SD gets a little under 2 million. Makes no sense for Vince not to put them on TV

Is this a heel or face promo?

No such thing as heel/face now

Not true and you know it.

BUT DANIEL BRYAN DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO CUT A PROMO AND IS AN INDY DARLING.
(when in reality he was cutting great promos while on the indies and he has been in WWE for last 8 years, more people know him now as WWE wrestler than they ever knew him as an indy wrestler)

Because he is too righteous.
Because that is not what Vince wants to see on his TV, this is too edgy and too heavy for his kids show.

Bryan's character on NXT Season 1 was "indy geek with no charisma who isn't ready for the WWE" and he's such a GOAT that he played that to perfection and worked marks into believing it for years to come.

See also: Retards who think Joe needed to waste a decade of his life/career in TNA so he could learn how to cut a promo, when he was exactly as good at it in ROH as he is today.

Weird coincidence how whenever we see WWE wrestlers in a setting outside of their TV, they come off as super charismatic.

>when he was exactly as good at it in ROH as he is today.
Minus the stair-shaped imprint in his spine.

Holy shit the /wooo/ invasion is real

I don't care what's in the video, being able to perform =/= being good, what is 1939-1942 Europe? Think for a second you midget fanatics.

I now regret not having any images with fish and hooks saved on my computer.

>being able to perform =/= being good, what is 1939-1942 Europe?
Did you just have a stroke?

Did you just flunk history? My God, the IQ standards of the people that come to this site is a bottomless pit.

You made no sense. I get what you are trying to do. Please can you not?
But anyway. What you typed out. Makes no sense. Read it again.
You said that being able to perform doesn't mean you are good. And then asked about pre-war Europe. That makes no sense, how did you even arrive to that conclussion. How did you connect those two things? Why? Why, user?

>A talentless mediocre nigger like Kofi is the WWE Champ while this guy is on the pre-show losing a tag team match to the Usos

Attached: 131.gif (174x127, 470K)

>WWE champ a month ago
>Jobbing on the preshow a few weeks later
And that's what you call 50/50 booking folks

He's legit become a better promo than Punk now.

that’s hard times usce

Retard

>Tell Vince you're not going to a sand nigger country
>Lose the belt
>Get de-pushed
>Roman put on your show
>Go from main event to pre-show in a tag match
>Get beaten on that pre-show

It's really impressive to be good on a WWE show considering they hate it when you perform well at all. This was on Youtube but still

His promos improved on the indies, but early in his career talking was very much a weakness whereas he was universally lauded for his in-ring work. He did get better, and it's certainly the area that has improved the most considerably while he's been with the WWE (conversely, his in-ring work is not as impressive as it was on the indies now).

youtube.com/watch?v=qcVL3DJ6GVs

Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince. Vince.

I think Hell No helped him a lot. If anyone should be teaching some talking at the PC it's certainly Kane.

>says the truth
>CRINGE
you sound triggered ;)

holy shit he really is becoming wrestling Varg

anyone still regurgitating this hosreshit take in 2019 is just proving that haven't watched Bryan in 10 years

wrestling is fake bro

hey thats my 2k19 caw name

95% of the segments on Smackdown wouldn’t break 250k if you put them exclusively on twitter

Because he isn't scripted by an old retard.

>pre-war Europe.
Pre-war? So you did flunk it.

>How did you connect those two things? Why? Why, user?

Ability is not the same as quality. Germany was able to take over Europe, that doesn't mean they were good rulers. Nuclear weapons are powerful, but are a tool that can be used for good or evil. There's no reason why in wrestling someone couldn't also be "able" but not good, and it's actually been seen constantly. That's why morons invented the word workrate. They wanted to deflect from the fact quality of a match or a wrestler has to do with something higher-level and more intellectual than mere athleticism. One can have immense talent, and harness it for forgettable cheap pops and burials because the strongest is not the same as the best, and when people/morons nowadays talk about a "good" wrestler, they foolishly mean one who can perform his job efficiently. That doesn't make a wrestler good. It could just as easily make someone the worst wrestler in the world. Imagine how much less screen time certain wrestlers would have to bore people to tears, if they weren't touted as "smooth" or "crisp". Imagine how short some reigns of terror would have lasted if the scripted winner didn't know how to play the game as a competitor for his own benefit. So think next time when saying something efficient is "good".

You're nowhere near as smart as you pretend you are.

Answering a question is not arrogance. But your post is.

If that's the game you want to play- your answer is arrogant non-sense.

>Ability is not the same as quality. Germany was able to take over Europe, that doesn't mean they were good rulers. Nuclear weapons are powerful, but are a tool that can be used for good or evil. There's no reason why in wrestling someone couldn't also be "able" but not good, and it's actually been seen constantly. That's why morons invented the word workrate. They wanted to deflect from the fact quality of a match or a wrestler has to do with something higher-level and more intellectual than mere athleticism. One can have immense talent, and harness it for forgettable cheap pops and burials because the strongest is not the same as the best, and when people/morons nowadays talk about a "good" wrestler, they foolishly mean one who can perform his job efficiently. That doesn't make a wrestler good. It could just as easily make someone the worst wrestler in the world. Imagine how much less screen time certain wrestlers would have to bore people to tears, if they weren't touted as "smooth" or "crisp". Imagine how short some reigns of terror would have lasted if the scripted winner didn't know how to play the game as a competitor for his own benefit. So think next time when saying something efficient is "good".
Thanks for the new copypasta

Attached: neckbear.png (345x337, 189K)

>Ability is not the same as quality. Germany was able to take over Europe, that doesn't mean they were good rulers. Nuclear weapons are powerful, but are a tool that can be used for good or evil. There's no reason why in wrestling someone couldn't also be "able" but not good, and it's actually been seen constantly. That's why morons invented the word workrate. They wanted to deflect from the fact quality of a match or a wrestler has to do with something higher-level and more intellectual than mere athleticism. One can have immense talent, and harness it for forgettable cheap pops and burials because the strongest is not the same as the best, and when people/morons nowadays talk about a "good" wrestler, they foolishly mean one who can perform his job efficiently. That doesn't make a wrestler good. It could just as easily make someone the worst wrestler in the world. Imagine how much less screen time certain wrestlers would have to bore people to tears, if they weren't touted as "smooth" or "crisp". Imagine how short some reigns of terror would have lasted if the scripted winner didn't know how to play the game as a competitor for his own benefit. So think next time when saying something efficient is "good".

Attached: 2D290161-ECCE-4450-ABD2-E6B73CB1550E.jpg (195x259, 6K)