Literally nothing changed

Literally nothing changed

Attached: 79de5-15481790285764-800.jpg (800x450, 55K)

Literally no one is surprised.

it was a work

I could put up with most of it but the reliance on cheap heat is nauseating

everyone in that ring has had sex with steph

What have you expected?

They need to give authority angles a rest for a while

They won't. because that is the only thing they know how to do and only people who can be considered stars are those four at the OP picture.

Haven't they been doing them since literally forever? Like I started watching with the corporation vs ministry and I can't remember a time since then that there wasn't a fucking authority storyline.

It'll calm down once football season starts again.

Its all so tiresome

You bugs bunny looking mother fucker!

they just keep rehashing it because austin vs. mcmahon was the biggest thing in the best period of wrestling

What are you talking about, I've been booking Raw ever since. You can thank me for the product.

The product is bad, user. You should hang yourself.

this shit was so fucking gay not only these 5 faggots lied they looked SO FUCKING GAY STANDING IN THE FUCKING RING OUT THERE MAKING FALSE PROMISED FUCK THEM ALL FUCK THIS COMPANY I HOPE THEY GO FUCKING BANKRUPT THIS IT THE GAYEST THING THIS COMPANY OF FAGGOTS HAVE DONE IN A LONG WHILE FUCK THEM FUCK THEM ALL TO HELL

Are you going to hang yourself? Or jump off the bridge? Or blow your brains out?

Based and Corny-pilled

Yeah, I mean it's only been going on for over 20 years now.

I don't even know why they bothered. I'm sure they realise the only people left watching are the hardcore braindead retard drones who'll watch regardless of whatever garbage they put on every week.

When am I getting my Shane vs Triple H feud? (preferably in a hell in a cell match) Not only would the match be based, but it would mean that they don't take matches from people half their age and replace it with "giving them momentum" despite the match being extremely predictable.

God I wish that was me

Attached: 1553560043943.png (492x1054, 351K)

Is anyone surprised?
Vince did that basically to take heat off himself. He even buried HHH and his own children just to make it look like it wasn't his fault.

They're an integral part to wrasslin' at this point. It's like how they like to have a bunch of titles, because that gives them an excuse to put matches on a PPV card. Everyone wants a title, but no one really gives a fuck about two indie-shitters cutting politically correct promos on each other over basically nothing. You don't need any build-up with title matches either. You just announce the #1 contender to the next PPV on the RAW after a PPV ends, and the cycle repeats endlessly. Likewise, you don't really need much of a build-up for authority storylines. Authority figures are a necessary part to maintaining the flow of the show, so they're always going to be around. So why not have the GM randomly hate some face, and try to stop him from getting the title or whatever, only to have the face go over in the end?

The idea that authority angles are overused is something concocted by the smarks are /r/squared circle. It's because they're know-it-alls, and have this vague notion that it's possible to write a captivating story between two people with no outside stimulus whatsoever. But the truth is that no one gives a shit about matches that mean nothing, even with main-eventers. It only works with money matches, like Rock vs Cena. Meanwhile, smarks all loved the Daniel Bryan storyline, despite the fact that it was a pretty bland story, and relied entirely on both heel authority figures and an arbitrary "title hunt."

Are you talking about the recent Daniel Bryan vs Kofi storyline? Or the Daniel Bryan vs Authority angle leading up to WM30? Because everyone hated that angle. They could have built something great with Bryan vs Orton, but instead they made Randy look like Silent Simp every week and did so much garbage start/stop with Bryan that no one cared. People were happy for the title change but that was about it.

Such revisionism. Is that you Haitch?