The great debate

The great debate

Attached: daniel-bryan-vs-shawn-michaels.jpg (600x300, 42K)

It’s only a debate if you’re an Edrone who doesn’t watch anything else.

Yeah because Yu Gi Oh drew so many dimes in Who Japan.

Michaels had a mind for the business, was pretty good at match pacing, was smooth as a dolphin..
He also reinvented himself twice as a main eventer.

Bryan is one of the smoothest of all time, has a bigger arsenal than most anyone ever, one of the best match callers of all time, and also has one of the best minds for the business ever.
And has reinvented himself as a main eventer 3 different times now - which Y2J levels of relevance.

Bryan is the best ever.

Shawn, not even close. Bryan has never had performances like WrestleMania 10 or Badd Blood.

Reminder that nobody in wrestling history is as proven an anti-draw as Michaels.

>signs for WWF in 89, kills off the golden period
>gets booked as a main eventer in 94, starts the darkest days in company history
>fucks off in 98, company has its most profitable spell ever
>which promptly dies as soon as he comes back in 2002.

Watch something other than da E

like new japan?
No thanks man.

You guys tend to forget that WWE is at another level pressure wise, and breaking through is even harder with the constant weight of vince and the idiots that are the creative team.
WWE separates men from boys.
Look at how much better Bryan and KO are than AJ styles.

Yu gi oh is still drawing dimes, yes. Your retarded man soap operas do not.

bryan eclipses michaels in basically everything that isnt giving vince mcmahon a hardon and is a legit candidate for GOAT, even considering other companies

Attached: 1523252323703.png (500x304, 238K)

Shawn is the GOAT, while Danielson is just a goat.

Am I missing something here? Daniel Bryan has yet to have a single GREAT performance in WWE.

t. doesn't know shit about based Bryan Danielson

Bryan, is not even close.

Shawn would never mid card as champion. Brys good but B+ all the way.

>Reminder that nobody in wrestling history is as proven an anti-draw as Michaels.

Even the most clueless of beaners is forced to accept that Eddie Guerrero was the lowest drawing "champ" of all time.

Worked and exposed

Reminder that Michaels trained Bryan way before he entered to WWE.

>Shawn would never mid card as champion.
No, he'd lose his smile and quit. Bryan was the guy who was never even supposed to make it to WWE, then got over as a great wrestler and sports entertainer on his own. Michales backstabbed and played politics to get over, despite his talent, because he was a manlet in the era of big guys and knew he'd be a midcarder at best because of his size if he'd didn't play dirty.

Bryan is the GOAT.

Michaels put his name on the school. Rudy Boy Gonzales trained him.

Bryan would never sniff the title in the mid 90s. He's in the East mode era. Plus Shawn politicked for him on several occasions. Bryan was far luckier than HBK.

shawn took two of the lessons

Easy mode*

>Bryan would have never made it at a time where people weren't judged by their talent At all.
shocker

More dimes than whatever Ching Chong company you watch muh choppa man dropping his friend on their rice bowl cranium is making ya simp

Attached: Qq2c3Vl.jpg (738x646, 157K)

This isn't even a question Bryan is one of the best ever. Even before entering the WWE he has a huge amount of amazing matches. His ROH title run in 06 has some of the best matches I've seen. Also his match with Sawa in evovle is next level stuff.

Micheals is good and has some fantastic matches but I don't think he's even in my top ten for best wrestlers. If he hadn't broken his back and had drug issues I bet things would've been different.

Delusional oddball post.

Eddie was in the B show in a split roster after the business took a huge downturn in relevancy in the early 2000s. Michaels was the lead boy at a time when wrestling was comparatively much bigger than in the early 2000s. If you want a true gauge, you'd have to compare to their peers at a similar point in time. If you're referring to shear numbers, technically Tripple H in the mid 2000s is a lesser draw than Bret and Michaels - two of the lower drawing wrestlers in a boom period.

He's 100% correct. Today guys are judged by their talent 1st, their look 2nd (mostly). In the early 90s it was look first, mic 2nd.

cringe

That's a bit reductive. It'd be more accurate to say talent IN THE RING. Cutting a promo and presenting "the look" to an audience and working a crowd are all feats that require both learned skill and inborn talent.... just not the same talents as "workrate" or whatever they're calling it.

Just goes to show that those statistics are not the most accurate way to gauge a wrestler's popularity.

This is like choosing between steak or cat shit.

Debate about what? Who got raped? Obviously that’s Kevin Nash Lmaooooo

BASED