was Bret correct about Triple H never having a classic match?
Was Bret correct about Triple H never having a classic match?
Yes
I'd say the triple threat at WM20 but Benoit and Micheals surpassed him in every sense, he was just there to get his pedigree countered into a crossface
Bret was/is right about everything
He’s never had a good singles match that didn’t have a stipulation.
No, Foley carried him to two.
Hi Bret still seething over the screwjob 20 years ago?
based
seething isn't the word for it. he literally had a stroke over it. the bicycle story was a cover. he cares more about montreal than his own brother dying
Double based.
Triple H has never even had a passable non-gimmick match.
Hi.
>Bret in an NWO shirt at the WCW World Champion
It's crazy this happened. Seems like a photoshopped pic
Yes. All HHH matches are all the same and rely on gimmicks
This is prime WCW Russo kino.
More good matches than Bret the shitman shart
No. Bret also said the Freebirds never drew. I think Goldberg kicked the common sense out of him.
He had two great matches that didn't have any gimmicks. The one against Ambrose and the one against Cena in 2008. Neither of them are classics though.
They didn’t. Tag teams rarely draw.
Ya simpin pretty hard here slugger.
>Tag teams rarely draw.
True. Only the Road Warriors and Freebirds ever drew.
HHH vs Catcus Jack (no way out 2000)
HHH vs Steve Austin (no way out 2001)
HHH vs Shawn Michaels (summer slam 2002)
HHH vs Shawn Michaels vs Chris Benoit (WM20)
HHH vs Undertaker (WM27)
>calling this a classic
Jesus man, get some standards. It was a good match.
OH NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
Bullshit the only match haitch ever had that people will remember was with Booker T.