Biggest pro wrestling draws list

Wolfie is a successful investment banker

Attached: 1550834012624.png (2518x1032, 295K)

DING-DONG DIDDLY

since when can't investment bankers not have hobbies and side projects?

undisputed GOAT

Attached: tumblr_nh3blnefla1rkf4k0o1_1280.png (1280x720, 1.24M)

There's no mental gymnastics at all my friend.
I absolutely destroyed them, TWICE btw, in two different threads and I never got any justification behind it, he just ran. And that was after throwing insults because I made honest critique of his life's work.
Really should have acknowledged the mistakes and take the criticism but instead he got angry. Which is why I enjoyed it tbqh.

At least this is much more applicable though by the looks of it. So really well done and the effort is definitely there.

Attached: a26fe18118b8aa097401fe6669b09eb999bbbdcbf018e83956832fe30deafced.webm (350x250, 852K)

Get yaself laid, Wolfie

You did none of the things you claim. You pointed out stuff that was easily debunked.

>e-e-e-e-e-e-everyones WolfCHAD!
rent free

Attached: RentFree.jpg (1177x1057, 154K)

Lol debunked how?
Btw, am I speaking to nwoWolfpacTV or a larper? Don't know, but either way if you are, you seem to have a very fond memory of it.

Do you remember specifically what I was taking about?

Attached: 9hgGMA9.jpg (509x820, 142K)

I think you were blabbering on about how the world champion isn't solely responsible for drawing or something. Fact remains since the beginning of time, in every promotion, the world title has been put on guys who had the greatest ability to draw fans i.e. sell tickets. World Champions are mostly always the featured part of any companies advertising.

In terms of WWE, the brand being the biggest draw now but doesn't change the fact WWE still puts the title on people they think have the best ability to put asses in seats. Determining average attendance of the shows a World Champion was advertised for is a great gauge of business at that time and if that performer struck a chord with the fanbase.

Shut up with your retarded backstories, Carter.
>Investment banker
>tweeting Dave Meltzer on Christmas Day

> Taker and H at the top
List instantly invalidated, no one has ever paid to see either of them.

>pretending HHH & Taker didn't draw

Meltzer: HHH was never the draw Austin or Rock were. But here in San Jose, HHH drew the biggest crowd for a house show in the history of Northern California when neither Austin nor Rock were on the show (HHH & Rikishi vs. Angle & Kane, and it was clear HHH was the star of that show). When Hart was on top, there was never a period he could draw more than half of what HHH was drawing on his own at his peak, for a regular house show.

The San Jose match was when the company was on fire, but neither Austin nor Rock were ever advertised. You can find countless examples of shows without Austin nor Rock that drew great with HHH as the top star.

In many cities, HHH drew well when Austin was hurt and Rock was not working every show. I'm willing to bet when they split crews, more often than not, the HHH crew outdrew the other crew. Whether it's the name Raw or whatever, but everyone in WWE knew the year Raw sucked and Smackdown was great, that more often than not in the same cities, Raw still outdrew Smackdown, and HHH was the star on Raw at the time.

I don't like the guy and Hart is my friend, but facts are facts. But it is hilarious watching people twist themselves into pretzels for an excuse when the guy has had done well."

Attached: 1546106882214.jpg (236x350, 16K)

Raw's the A show. People are retarded an will watch Raw over SD regardless of quality. Put Triple H on SD and Raw would still draw better.

There you are!

>Fact remains since the beginning of time, in every promotion, the world title has been put on guys who had the greatest ability to draw fans i.e. sell tickets. World Champions are mostly always the featured part of any companies advertising
Not all the time though, as quite rightly stated as an example on Twitter of Austin in the AE, Flair returning to WCW etc. Austin, Hogan, Andre even Roman Reigns and John Cena today are perfect examples of draws who are attractions regardless of whether or not they've been given a belt.

>In terms of WWE, the brand being the biggest draw now but doesn't change the fact WWE still puts the title on people they think have the best ability to put asses in seats.
That's not the whole story and you know this.
If that were the case, then why was Kevin Owens Universal champ?
You know that was a storyline and not any kind of acknowledgement from the company saying "Yup, you're a guy. Thanks for drawing the house Kev!" That's not how things work. Reigns, Brock and Goldberg were the draws.

>Determining average attendance of the shows a World Champion was advertised for is a great gauge of business at that time and if that performer struck a chord with the fanbase.
It is a gauge, as you say, but it's still not as accurate as looking at the reason houses were drawn. An example I used previously was Miz in 2010 as WWE Champion on RAW. He was main eventing (not always) with John Cena and Randy Orton consistently on house shows. You can't realistically come to the conclusion Miz is primarily responsible for their success.

So there you go.

Attached: 1547747454489.gif (320x240, 567K)

Decent list, at least keeps it realistic with the modern guys.

Roman at 16 (tied)? Amazing.

bumpy wumpy manlets grumpy