So obviously he had to leave because of this, but was "I have cancer" really the best way to handle it?

So obviously he had to leave because of this, but was "I have cancer" really the best way to handle it?

Attached: myrealnameisjoe.png (458x541, 214K)

It was their way of getting him over. What better way to get a guy over than tell everyone he's dying?

he did have cancer, though it wasn't as bad as they made out and he basically just had time off to do a movie and used it as an angle to get him over.

pretty fucking obvious what lengths vince will sink to

i tuned in to see bald roman, then i realised it was work

>Fast and Furious Presents: Hobbs and Shaw
>presents
are you kidding me? why not just call it Fast and Furious: Hobbs and Shaw?

There will be Hobbs and Shaw spinoffs later

no stop exposing the business and chancing WWE's narrative.

Don't say that dude, Nia will try to sue you!

Do we actually know how big his role in the movie is?

Obviously the guy going away and taking pills for a month or so isn't anything remarkable, but it's possible he only filmed a few days and so it's kinda irrelevant.

How long do you think a movie takes to film?

The Rock and Statham are the only draws that franchise has left so they'll most likely become their own thing.

It worked you so I'd say yes

they already admitted on air that the cancer thing was fake

No, no they did not. Cunt flap

Most intelligent response on this thread..

He has like one scene where he and Dwayne do their coconut nigger dance together because this franchise is about family family family. He could've shot it in a day.

He wasn't in the trailer and he joined production a week before it ended, so his role is tiny. Probably just a couple scenes. Yea Forums is full of tards.

they did, triple h said in a promo that everything else on the show was fake except for his own angle

I don't wanna think that it's entirely fake but some things seem too convenient. They never reveal what type of leukemia he has, he leaves just long enough to film a movie and return for Wrestlemania season, he looks as healthy as he always had, and he's now definitively over and booing him is a taboo. My guess is his cancer returned but it wasn't as bad as it was built up to be so they kept the details vague and allowed him to return triumphantly right before Wrestlemania

I think the most suspicious thing is how gung-ho WWE employees are in jumping down the throat of anyone who calls it into question. Literally doth protest too much.

>he did have cancer, though it wasn't as bad as they made out
This explanation doesn't really address the suspicions people have about Reigns.
Yes, every cancer is different, and some of them are much more survivable than others, but no matter what kind you have it's still fucking cancer.
Even the "good kind" of leukemia is not something you shrug off like the flu, go shoot a movie that probably took beyond full-time hours, and look like a million bucks a few months later.
The only way this explanation would make any sense is if he just had a suspicious-looking blood test one day and they decided to assume it was cancer even though it turned out to be a false alarm.

If you have access to the best resources it's not improbable, and the UK Leukemia Twitter voiced support for Roman in that regard. He also left at a bad time, when he was holding the title and was headed for Crown Jewel. I don't see them doing that as a work, but like the other guy said I just think they're keeping details under wraps because it probably turned out to be not as severe as people made it out to be

watch the documentary wwe just put out on his return.

as I have said elsewhere
The negatives of this being discovered as a work outweigth the positives.

He is only in the movie for like 5 mins