When you play RPGs, is there a build you always go for in every single game?
For me, I always go for a rogue/stealth assassin build.
When you play RPGs, is there a build you always go for in every single game?
For me, I always go for a rogue/stealth assassin build.
Other urls found in this thread:
these ones
Usually a knight of some kind with a penchant for being a money grubbing mercenary or a penny pinching merchant on the side.
>I always go for a rogue/stealth assassin build
Shame they're shit in so many games
Paladin
Human
Heavy Armor
The biggest weapon (or Shield) I can get
And im done
When can I be a Bard (42 on the numbered image, dead center) where I get to play a mini rhythm game to buff allies
I feel like Brutal Legend was the last time I saw guitar solos as a mechanic
>Knight
>Human
>Heavy armor
>Halberd (or greatsword substitute)
>Lawful good to a tee
>Hyperfocus on beating the shit out of mages first in a fight
>Tomboy love interest (usually the first one the game throws at me)
I have the opposite experience actually. Usually they’re absolutely gamebreakingly OP in a lot of games because for some reason devs don’t realise that stacking stealth with damage and critical hit buffs allows you to easily one or two shot almost every enemy in the game. I haven’t played a game where stealth builds are genuinely shit. At worst, they force you to play the game slightly differently to survive, which isn’t a bad thing.
Buffs/Debuffs and being annoying.
battle mage
I like punching
yeah, i usually pick rogues or stealth types but end up running around like a warrior just killing everything anyway. i think it's a result of games being too easy in general.
Heavily armored summoner.
I usually go with Knights and Paladins, they're the most fun.
wtf is even a bladesinger?
shit like this is gay
Pic related
It's a class from the old AD&D Complete Book of Elves, a sourcebook famous for its wank. It's basically a better version of Fighter/Mage, but exclusive to elves and half-elves.
when you're young you just pick the coolest one
when you're mature you pick the most interesting one
get out of here man
Based
Recently I have taken a liking for pistols.
>first
The portals would destroy the planet as soon as they are created because the force from the new geometric pathway the establish would bend spacetime
>second
The plane can take off, but it doesn't mean it will.
>third
If 0.999... was 1 it would be written that way.
>but 2+2=4?
That's an algebraic expression, not a number.
I usually go for whatever will let me use a two handed sword. Even in Dragon's Dogma.
Depends on the setting
in some unoriginal fantasy DnD shit i go with Paladin or Cleric
if the game has guns, I use some long-range weapons and stealth if possible, so you could say Sniper
just because we have a symbol for 1 doesn't mean 0.999... is not legit as well
Battle mage unless the game forces you to pick one class, in that case I always play as a wizard or as a warrior if the game features unarmed weapons like cestus lr katars
>Clerk
If it's against AI, I mostly go for fast damage and regeneration not lo lose time.
If it's something multiplayer I like to go tanky healer or tanky debuffer to bother enemies.
Real mathematicians would write 1 divided by 3 = 1/3 or
1
-
3
0.999... just means infinite 9s and unless you're doing the gotcha " ≡ isn't = and = just means good enough so 0.999... = 1" then it isn't 1.
en.wikipedia.org
it is an established fact, you don't have a say in it and it's not even relevant who you consider to be a real mathematician
Either too dumb to speak brute or annoying fucking bard depending on how interested in the story I am.
>There are many ways of showing this equality, from intuitive arguments to mathematically rigorous proofs. The technique used depends on the target audience, background assumptions, historical context, and preferred development of the real numbers, the system within which 0.999... is commonly defined. In other systems, 0.999... can have the same meaning, a different definition, or be undefined.
Wow
>go to convenience store
>ask the clerk where to find thing
>he pulls the Jedi mind trick on me
>I go elsewhere to find thing
Sword and shield is the only way I like to play. I hate magic. I can't name a single game where I've found magic to be fun and avoid as much as possible.
yeah if you have 0.999... then nothing can fit between it and 1 meaning there's no way to differentiate the two, therefore they are the same
what if i have 0.999......999 and a half?
it never converges
First class in any game that gives me the option is summoner/conjurer/pet build. Anything that lets me press a button and summon some AI to do the fighting for me is my go-to and coincidentally it's usually very strong in every game it's in. In Skyrim conjuration was broken as hell since once you got to a high enough level that magicka stops being an issue in combat, even if something is strong enough to kill your daedra you can just instantly summon another one endlessly.
Where does Cleric fall in this chart?
Spy, deviating into Technomancer or Warlord depending on how ineffective stealth is
Soldier
Knight
Paladin
Archer
Marksman
Strategist
Templar
Battle Mage
Ranger
Hunter
And I occasionally splash into some incredibly niche wizard, like an illusionist, when I want to meme or just slaughter everything like like a literal god.
How do you know if you've never seen it end?
0.999... never ends by deinition
It needs dots + an occasional hard hitting spell
Neither does 1.00....
Therefore, equating unending numbers with ending numbers is incorrect because it implies an imprecise conversion. So you can't say 0.999... = 1 because that is a false conversion, like str to int on a computer (which can only be compared if an implicit or explicit conversion function exists) and you can't say 0.999... = 1.000... because they are different infinities.
I usually go with Warrior and Knight classes because those most fun ones and I originally got hooked on them after playing Protection and Arms specs of Warrior in WoW.
Or when you're younger- you explore classes, but when you're older you just go for what's meta.
1.0... and 0.9... are both the same because you can't slot anything between, this is an established fact, you're arguing against something that's established.
theres no reason not to be a wizard
wizards are classically weak early and god tier late but in reality they're usually god tier early and elder omega S tier broken bullshit late
when you have the choice between not being a wizard and being a wizard the answer is clear
Sword and shield with medium armor or unarmed if avaliable. We need more games where unarmed is an option. Even more games where unarmed =/= kung fu. Fuck that fake martial arts shit, I just want to brutalize fools
>can't slot anything between
That's like saying integer 1 and 2 are the same because there is nothing between them as integers.
Mage is pretty much the only fun playstyle in dragon age 1
wtf that's classist
No it's not, you can't slot anything between
You can between 1 and 2, you limiting it to integers doesn't matter
>You can between 1 and 2
There's a reason they are called "real numbers". Sure, you can make up more rules about how 0.53a-*p678...1533;6 exists and is also equal to 1, but then you're just making up rules and saying "my made up rules are true because I made them up". Perhaps 0.999... and 1 are not equal, there are simply more rules to be made up, hmm?
Is this a Magicka ad?
That game was great, and I think they had a million different skins all with unique abilities.
*Disarms u at range with high initiative*
No spooky spell casting without focus.
>implying shield spell will get you past my +10 to hit at level 10
*Throws pocket sand and Fears u*
Good luck rolling to get rid of these next tricks.
*trip attack*
*Nets u*
You take 21 damage, you're feared, disarmed, and prone with a net on you. No way in hell your dex is high enough to move before a dex fighter; you're absolutely fucked.
Okay, I end my turn, you go.
sweet i love these
Perhaps you're just arguing against established mathematics, hmm?
It was an hologram
usually mage/rogue hybrid, in your pyramid probably anywhere from Alchemist to Necromancer, I usually don't like Fighter oriented classes
FUCK
Being established doesn't make it correct. 0 not existing was established for a while, does that make it correct? Spartans throwing their babies off cliffs was established as well, is that correct?
Ok well good luck proving modern maths wrong.
>proving modern maths wrong
You need to be proven right before you get proven wrong.
>*Throws pocket sand and Fears u*
Nice physical attack, I repel it and you fear yourself.
>*Nets u*
>he didn't bring a big enough net for my forcefield
A tiny net is a death sentence.
Only a sentence? My immortality stacks require a death essay to break through.
No, you can disprove false statements. Lmao what a dumb post by you, read it a few times if you have to.
Whichever of you nerds linked wikipedia as a source, you're the faggot.
You are retarded. Show this to be false, otherwise it's true.