Microsoft (23 studios) buys activision

if jews like this do not open your eyes to the behavior of these people when they get a crumb of influence, nothing will and you'll be in the dark forever

Druckmann is also a useful case

This kike lost all his credit when he tried to fuck over Bethesda MS and failed miserably.

he's a vile bottom-feeder

What does Yea Forums think about his book?

What would you do?

Attached: yo new guy.jpg (1617x810, 902.02K)

Pearl clutching jew, probably.

Attached: 1648043703014.jpg (1080x1665, 494.07K)

so was he implying this was a good thing or a bad thing?

The worst part is that they in fact do have a woman at the studio, she just wasn't there the day they took this picture. He defamed this company for no reason.

Central banking is a neat little trick. You can find one in nearly every single country on earth.

Attached: instant contradiction.jpg (600x334, 75.79K)

>hidden replies

ummm it's current year and i thought we were past merit-based employment

>Different perspectives improve your product
Well shucks, glad to hear you're going to be hiring some conservatives from the Midwest to provide creative input on your game, you're so welcoming!

Activision is way, way, way bigger than the western half of Square Enix, plus Embracer group is third party, so there's nothing being restricted from other platforms

Without looking it up name the western games square enix does.

if you take this as a mere statement of fact I actually agree with it

Attached: 1556071046582.jpg (708x1000, 205.08K)

Deus Ex
Thief
Tomb Raider
Just Cause (staying with Japanese Square Enix because they want to fill it with NFTs)
Most Marvel games

if there were any that weren't retarded then sure

you looked it up

What does Embracer even do other than leeching profits? Their groups just seem to be there doing their own things.

California has an average IQ of 95

So, a literally normal average?

Not exactly

Attached: 1625760424567.jpg (1500x1030, 244.95K)

Embracer does not own a platform.
the Anti-trust concerns are anticompetitive practices Microsoft could do to make Xbox dominate the market.

the studios embracer acquired are all dead as fuck

Well, MS took Bethesda under their wing and Jewson hates them. He will probably go hard at MS from here on out.

Embracer is the Tencent of Europe.
It's funny how the EU only gives a shit about antitrust if it's for punishing american companies.

What's Embracer group? I genuinely never heard of it. Is it another TV/streaming company buying vidya studios so they could enter the videogame streaming meme?

He's JEW

The only thing I care about is Embracer letting Eidos-Montreal make a new deus ex game

Imagine if western Kansas wasn't filled with Mexicans.

Alexa, please read me “Jason Schreier Wikipedia early life section"

Why are Steppe Americans so smart?

>red states GOOD
>blue states BAD
hmmm I wonder who made this lmao

Demographics

Literally just a giant holding company, you don't notice them because all their companies tend to publish on their own as THQ, Deep Silver, Gearbox, Saber, etc, and their devs don't really cross-polinate.

Give the jew money and he will shill for you somple as.

>embrqcer is the tencent of Europe
Yes, they are a holding company
>It's funny how the EU only gives a shit about antitrust if it's for punishing american companies.
reread my post. I already explained it .
Game IP/studios going from one billion dollar company to another is not a concern.
a game studio/piblisher going from independence to being owned by the guys who make Xbox who can then starve out PlayStation, Nintendo etc is the concern.

>the western half of square enix
Which company?

One day you won't have to, and you won't even have to try to learn how.

Attached: 1629787258698.jpg (680x573, 52.7K)

You were shitting on midwestern conservatives for being dumb, i proved you wrong and now you cope

I see. Have Square said anything about Avengers? It is being developed by Crystal Dynamics. Not that I care about it, just curious. If they take it in-house, it'll be pretty fucking rad to have Tetsuya Nomura to redesign all of the characters.

>a game studio/piblisher going from independence to being owned by the guys who make Xbox who can then starve out PlayStation, Nintendo etc is the concern.
You mean the same shit Sony did for years with their buyouts and exclusives during the PS3 and PS4 generations? But it's only bad when Xbox does it

lower percentage of niggers and spics

Buying studio(s) and a massive publisher(s) with multiple studios are two different thing. Sony buying Naughty Dogs vs Microsoft buying Bethesda are two different things And exclusivity deals is a grey area because the developer will still be allowed to release their games elsewhere when the contract ran out.

microsoft has lost several anti-trust suits regarding internet explorer alone and they're still causing the same anti-trust issues with edge. Expect them to lose another suit soon.

"THA JOOZ" isn't creative input.

>anti-trust with edge
With their what, 10% market share using a reskinned chrome? Google are the ones running the browser monopoly

Nobody knows Embracer.

>You mean the same shit Sony did for years with their buyouts and exclusives during the PS3 and PS4 generations?
from a consumer perspective these are just as shit (more so when they don't bring it to PC)
but legally it is different. There is nothing stopping Microsoft from bidding for FFXVII exclusivity for example. Sony bought exclusive rights to individual gamea using deals Microsoft could have made. There is no mechanism where Sony can fairly bid for a Microsoft IP. Buying Tomb Raider because you think it will generate you revenue, is different than buying Call of Duty because then they can't put games on PlayStation (Microsoft says they will, which probably helps their case to purchase it)
>But it's only bad when Xbox does it
I want it to go through to, for what it's worth. And I think it probably will.
Think of it this way.
If a holding company bought Spotify so they could make money off it.
Not antitrust
If Apple paid them to get updates early, probably not antitrust.
If apple bought them to either fold it into apple music to monopolize their service, or to remove it from Android to sell iPhones =antitrust.

If the japs (the ones still making games for straight people) lose power, ips or influence, is a good thing for thme.

Embracer is getting concerning, but most of their acquisitions have been fairly small. A lot of their studios are also involved in other entertainment media outside of video games, like comics or tabletop RPGs. In terms of video games, they basically have THQ Nordic, Gearbox, Eidos, Crystal Dynamics, and fucking Saber Interactive. Certainly a serious player, but not overwhelmingly such. Activision owned some of the highest-grossing video game franchises period, and Bethesda wasn’t a slouch either. It’s all about scale, and Microsoft clearly went for the big boys.

>.jpg

I fucking love these kind of images

Attached: a true camper.jpg (1080x1168, 454.3K)

That's exactly what Nintendo, Epic, Sony and Microsoft have done with all their previous buyouts. Only Bungie and Mojang stayed multiplat and that's because neither were willing to sell unless they could remain multiplatform

But now when it's activision all of a sudden it's a problem. sure thing jason

Neither is "MUH SOUFERN CHOODZ"

No one's saying that, so your strawman falls flat.
Meanwhile

gaming journalism is gay.