What do you want from Fallout 5?

Word is the game is *just* getting started on so I think we can expect it around 2025. What's on your wish list for Fallout 5? For me?
>Derivable vehicle(s)

Attached: 2d17e519096fa24c800d36bfea646ce6d9d76f4f-1280x720[1].png (686x386, 133.36K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bcldooi4oUY
jesawyer.tumblr.com/post/178166511166/hi-josh-i-love-new-vegas-and-played-it-for
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

idk, I want to be entertained, I don't want to feel like I'm clocking in for a job

I want to marry Laura.

Attached: 1651269946421.png (803x414, 438.84K)

>Around 2025
Lol. Starfield isn't even out. TES is the next big game for them and it's not even in the works beyond simple trailers. Fallout 5 is not coming until 2028 at the best.

Don't want it. Fallout's already dead.

What do you want from my shit in your mouth?
Your answer says a lot.

Southern setting Im fucking tired of 3 east coast games in a row
Oh and more cult like mysticism like in point lookout

a good game

I want roleplay, good quests, companions and lore-consistent worldbuilding. I expect to get retardation, dumbing-down, severely outdated graphics and a plot consisting mostly of holes. Thank goodness I'll be old and won't care about that shit anymore.

>Word is the game is *just* getting started on so I think we can expect it around 2025.
You haven't been paying attention, first Starfield has to come out, then they can focus on Elder Scrolls 6 which will probably take around 4 years, so 2026 for that, and then another 4 years for Fallout 5, so you're looking at around 2030.

I don't care about fallout anymore. It has become a normie theme park with shitty writing. The only good Fallout titles are 1+2, everything after that is just exploring utterly broken games made with broken engines and broken designers.
Fuck it, it's dead.

Attached: 1639500360903.gif (398x200, 2.21M)

Usable ladders

honestly since they're so focused on dumbing down RPG elements, I wish it would just play like a less janky STALKER. I never really think the fusion of FPS and RPG worked well from fallout 3 onward so I sort of wish they would just choose either isometric RPG or embrace the FPS. also I would wish for it to have good writing. big wish

Russia.
I want to see Fallout take place in Russia.

Actual RPG mechanics, that lacked in Fallout 4. As well as better mod support and a less faggy mod scene, than the one for Fallout 4.

Yall know a studio can work on more then 1 game at a time, right?

>drivable vehicles
Go fuck yourself

Tell that to Bethesda, it's been 11 years since the last Elder Scrolls game

If it's handled by another studio then it won't be Fallout 5, but something like new vegas.

I want you to kill yourself. You waste of fucking oxygen.

>Good game design naturally leads you to the next objective without needing a flashing arrow on your compass (Impossible for Bethesda but one can hope)
>lots of skill checks (somewhat possible, they seem to be headed in the right direction after Far Harbor and 76)
>good writing that makes for a compelling plot and complex characters with unique goals and motivations (100% impossible for a Bethesda game, especially since Emil Pagliurao or however you spell it is still working. You know, the guy behind Fallout 3's dogshit ending that was so bad they had to retcon it in the dlc AND the guy responsible for the institute's stupid absence of goal that Father just handwaves away with a "you wouldn't understand`
> New factions that are interesting and morally grey (Very unlikely considering Bethesda's track record but still somewhat possible. But most likely we will get 1 goody two-shoes faction like the BOS in F3 or the minutemen in F4 for players who don't like to think too much, 1 or 2 retarded gimmicky faction like the railroad who fall apart if you examine them to closely, and maybe 1 cool faction with tons of wasted potential like the Institute in Fallout 4)
Honestly I am very interested in seeing how Starfield turns out because this will tell you for certain which direction bethesda is going in with Fallout. Either it will be even more dumbed down than Fallout 4 and pandering to casuals and consolefags (like Fallout 4's four button dialogue cross) or they will kinda attempt to make an rpg that doesn't play itself and that requires more than 3 neurones to play

Attached: cathmm.jpg (715x727, 379.08K)

a big chunk of mysterious irradiated wasteland to explore

that was the best part of 3 and it went downhill from there, NV only had Lonesome Road and 4 was a fucking theme park even without the actual theme park dlc

At this point I don't care about any Fallout game that isn't written or directed by Josh Sawyer or Chris Avelone
I'm not putting up with any more Bethesda shit

Attached: 1634491560667.png (399x400, 119.98K)

This is bethesda we're talking about user, not exactly the most competent people on the planet

Unless Obsidian is doing it we aren't getting it in 2025

Northern Midwest/Canada or Russia, gimme me some snow.

chris avellone with the budget and development time of F3/F4 would just produce a massive wankfest

I have no expectations from Bethesda and I won't play anything of what they shit out regardless

Attached: Legate-Lanius-Wallpaper-New Vegas.jpg (3000x1688, 3.02M)

>The only good Fallout titles are 1+2
Tactics is fine.

next time just say 'im a fucking idiot'

`take place in New York City or Philiy

Fallout with faux-retro Soviet styling instead of faux-retro American styling would be interesting, but it wouldn't be Fallout.

Also play Atom RPG, it's jank but the good kind of jank

bullly (2006) ran on the gamebryo engine and had ladders.

just play stalker or metro

Theres one in 4.
youtube.com/watch?v=bcldooi4oUY

If you're saying these two names because of New Vegas, ill have you know that House, caesar and pretty much any interesting characters and factions in the game are the work of John Gonzalez.

Avellone wrote Ulysses and the BEAR BULL BEAR BULL wankfest. He also complained on Twitter in the last few years about making the legion playable in new vegas and how it was hecking problematic to let the players play in a rapist fascist group.

Sawyer is a retard and also has his fair share of dumb takes like how he was categorially opposed to including romances in New Vegas because relationships formed in the wasteland or during periods of combat are unhealthy and that is very yikes

>what do you want from fallout 5
Quality

For it to be developed by Obsidian and for the last two games to be erased from history

you cant come back from 76
fallout is dead

>he was categorially opposed to including romances in New Vegas
Good. This stupid shit never adds anything to a game besides being a beach head for faggots and redditors.

Bethesda has never had more than one major project in development at a time and they pretty much admitted they're not that interested in Fallout anymore. Starfield is in the final stages of production before going through robust and thorough bugtesting and QA so it can be released later this year. Elder Scrolls VI probably hasn't had any work done on it besides some brainstorming sessions and some concept art being commissioned. ES6 isn't coming out until 2027 at the earliest, and they won't be working on anything else for the forseeable future besides a smaller team maintaining and updatingg Starfield. If Bethesda is making another Fallout game, it's not coming out this decade.

A more realistic expectation is for Microsoft to hand the Fallout license to another developer and let them take a crack at it. Another Obsidian Fallout game is more realistic than another Bethesda one before 2030.

Play Metro

Those neither play like Fallout nor have a 1950s atompunk style.

Attached: original content on v.jpg (1500x952, 266.52K)

This I want a adventure in a post apocalyptic wasteland not a Saturday afternoon soap drama.
I want to explore old ruins full of danger I want to see how people deal with their fate and what kind of approach they choose to survive in a hostile world.

>so I think we can expect it around 2025
lol fuck no, are ya stupid? 2025 we MIGHT get TESVI. expect fallout 5 to released at least around 2028

>he was categorially opposed to including romances
Sounds based to me, romance was by far the weakest part of all Fallout games where it was present.

If Starfield is successful I could see it basically replacing Fallout, like Fallout 4 already felt pretty uninspired, like it was just a newer Fallout 3. In comparison it feels like they put more effort into Elder Scrolls and its world.

Where was it ever present? I didn't play 4 or 76, but the closest thing I can remember was the shotgun wedding, which was more of a joke than a romance.

>2025
The fuck you talking about. TES6 will be first, and that likely won't come out till 2026-7 at BEST.

Actual dialog options
Skills instead of just perks
Less level scaling
Removable pip boy
Weapons that look somewhat functional
No more creation club

>unequip pip-boy
>can no longer access map/quests/notes
>can no longer access inventory to re-equip pip-boy

Attached: y.png (875x960, 37.08K)

>no more creation club
that is a pipe dream, the creation club has been the primary income in 76 for bethesda, they arent going to scrap it

more trans characters
ONLY gay relationships
creating a white character uninstalls the game
bring the enclave back but make them racist (bad)
make the railroad the only playable faction
let me kill russians
souls like gameplay

What's the point of removing pip boy?

It's strange that Sawyer and Avellone have been hyped up as the men behind New Vegas, when Gonzalez was the project director and directly responsible for or at least had oversight on, everything.

I suppose that's the merit of good PR.
Sawyer has had many many reasons for being against romance over the years. It's a good position to hold. Bioware fucked up the industry by introducing romances as a major selling point. All it has done is reduced character interactions to dramas. Locked content behind a romance path forcing you to replay the game over again just to see everything for said character, and reduced the reward for a lot of companion characters to just being sex/a relationship .a relationship that is never fulfilled. Romance options often just end at sex. Nobody is roleplaying out the difficulties and interesting drama of actually BEING IN a relationship. It's just shipper fanwank about two characters admitting they want to fuck, and then fucking after the PC solves their daddy issues

Aesthetics and RPing as non-vault dweller

Maybe you could tear it off your arm, wear it on your neck.

>remove pipboy
ever heard of mods?

>RPing as non-vault dweller
itd be nice if there were a handful of meaningful, divergent "origins" for the player char.

After Fallout 4/76 I don't want 5. It's just going to be more shit.

based laniusposter

Attached: thumb-1920-1230106.jpg (1920x1008, 223.44K)

>he was categorially opposed to including romances in New Vegas because relationships formed in the wasteland or during periods of combat are unhealthy and that is very yikes
Where are you getting that from? Sawyer is opposed to romance, but not because of anything about unhealthy relationships in the wasteland or something. It's from his dislike of how often a character romance exists solely for the player to do a checklist and get their fade to black sex scene, sometimes at the cost of actual character writing. Think Dragon Age. It's an understandable viewpoint IMO and makes sense considering his generally autistic attention to gameplay detail.

>when Gonzalez was the project director
No, Sawyer was. Gonzalez was the lead writer, but Sawyer directly oversaw pretty much every aspect of the game. Read jesawyer.tumblr.com/post/178166511166/hi-josh-i-love-new-vegas-and-played-it-for

4 has almost every one of your companions as a romance option.

Vehicles aren't a deal breaker for me, but it's ridiculous that the series that steals half of its setting from the Road Warrior has gone this long since F2 without a driveable car.

My wishlist? Originality. Original locations, factions, and enemies. No more using the BoS, Supermutants, and Deathclaws as a crutch.

Attached: 1632807068754.jpg (1920x1440, 271.15K)

Unless you count sarah weintraub or red lucy (which you can bone after bringing random shit to them) it's not present at all.

doesn't matter, they'll never be able to top Fallout 76 ever again

seriously, who the fuck thought that bringing jumpsuits for a vault dweller would make them want to have sex with you? Which obsidegenerates wrote this?

>Another Obsidian Fallout game is more realistic than another Bethesda one before 2030.
Would be good from a marketing standpoint or Microsoft as well. Just gotta slap a "from the original creators of fallout 1&2" on the cover even if none of the original team is even at obsidian anymore.

>yall
Dumb cunt

>better UI, I fucking hate the pip boy menu. Its so slow to navigate.
>I really liked building an army with the Minutemen, so expand that with more factions like Raiders. Have factions fighting for control of the wasteland taking over settlements one by one.
>Make settlement building and management easier and more automated like mods already do.
>Add more perks to SPECIAL and more skill checks in quests like Fallout 76 has already done.
>Further improve companions letting them use more non-combat skills beyond hacking and lockpicking, so like a companion that can use first aid for example.
I didn't hate Fallout 4 like most of Yea Forums but I didn't love it either, I just saw potential with certain aspects and hopefully they work on that for 5.

The Highwayman in 2 works because the game world is so huge in-story and the screens you visit are abstractions, smaller areas meant to represent a whole area, with a lot of dead space between them. From 3 onwards, the world has to be fully explorable on foot and in person, and the setting ends up a lot smaller as a result- even New Vegas which takes several real world towns and greatly shortens the distance between them, Euro Truck Sim style. They can't make a world as big as the isometric games' multi-state sprawls and still have it explorable on foot and with enough empty space to make a vehicle worth using, and conversely a running car doesn't work in the 3D games' maps where streets are 200 yards long at most and covered in junk and shit forever.

>Sawyer is a retard and also has his fair share of dumb takes like how he was categorially opposed to including romances in New Vegas
Seems fucking good to me, what we got in NV was fine, a few random flings if you look for them and nothing concrete, just like what you get in fallout 1 and 2 outside of the literal shotgun wedding.

>Derivable
>wanting FO5 after 4 and online

With underwater combat and exploration.
Maybe a vault with half-mirelurk mutants.
Wild wasteland option that makes Canada a big crater from mothership zeta.
Raider mechas that are made out of cars after some lunatic took over detroits industrial districts.
Chicago has ghoul mafia that are actually pretty okay IF you pay for protection.
Wilds are plagued with bear cults the leader sounds like Ted nugent.
Maybe have Lanius ailed Legion and Maxton led BoS show up vying for the region.
Main Plot revolves around an onslaught of ghosts (holograms) coming from an island in the lake, the island is a project blue beam site and it has an ever churning radioactive hurricane protecting it. The facility is controlled by a schizophrenic brain in a jar.

Attached: Lake Michigan fallout.png (1242x1763, 708.93K)

Gore