Play OMORI

why is all the fanart i see for this """""""""""""""game"""""""""" by the same artist?

I will never play your shitty game

this isn't in the game so no

Remember that the creator of this game is a shotacon and wants to kidnap little boys

Attached: 1650388614203.jpg (786x1080, 745.42K)

cum fuel

Attached: 1632245599597.jpg (1536x2048, 746.96K)

should feel at home here then.

Already did.

Attached: E0Cr9-jVUAArOSo.jpg (635x635, 44.45K)

>shotacon

>little boys

Oxymoron

What?
Sorry but Sunny belongs to Aubrey

Attached: 1650281784026.jpg (1501x2048, 243.2K)

Only Basil can make him happy and that's canon.

Attached: 1649978693740.jpg (1133x1600, 155.16K)

Fiction has absolutely nothing to do with reality

If you think heavily stylized and unrealistic cartoons are even remotely close to "children" you're, by definition, delusional

built for booping and tickling

Attached: 1647841747449.png (1196x624, 144.95K)

Is it actually worth it? I heared that the lore is the only good aspect about it.

Damn that's a nice ass. Does whatever this is have H scenes in it?

I'm very surprised there's not a porn fangame of this yet

Built to inflate until she explodes.

No,it's not a hgame

Sunny daydreams everyday of Aubrey
I don't get why do you get so angry, i was referencing when the creator posted on twitter that she wants to kidnap little boys, you got so defensive about it lmao

Attached: 1648811158673.jpg (853x881, 189.77K)

Ah, so a waste of my time then. Thanks for the heads-up.

The ones with the most to hide put up the biggest walls.

Fuck off groomer, pedos are a small minority in the shotacon community

Most of us want nothing to do with them

Shit game

Attached: 1641227684023.png (1732x1332, 64.84K)

user I'm pretty sure the whole concept of shotacon is predicated on pedophilia - otherwise you wouldn't have to involve young children.

How do I acquire big sister wife with delicious sisterpits

Drawing are not "young children"

Lines on paper have no "age"

Project harder

Attached: 5be.jpg (1592x1888, 366.2K)

it's not on sale

Then why do they have to look like children?

Unbr- hehe
Unbread twins

Attached: 1650626215150.gif (292x292, 1.44M)

Explain how this looks anything even remotely like a "child"

Looks closer to alien than anything even human

But if you cum to a drawing of an erect cock it's still gay

Hmmm, curious, Yea Forums has been getting very pearl-clutchy about "grooming" lately

Oh great now all retards will be posting this image even in threads that are clearly not it
The fate of all OC on this website: to be used by retarded children who don't know anything

Obvious bad faith argument, begging the question

Not even gonna engage

And apparently jerking off to drawings of women with animal features makes you an animal fucker, but I don't quite get why one is like that but not the other.

Attached: 40ab939897d29f9a91aaef146dc5a8bc.jpg (850x1187, 137.23K)

ironic lolicon twitter tourists, why do you think they spam literal twitter memes and think it counts as "fitting in"

>anthros: human body anatomy with dog ears and fur
>loli: complete 2d depiction of prepubescent child, maybe the occasional horns
nice false equivalence dork

>shit game
>shit story
>shit gameplay
>shit fanbase
It's an overpriced rpgmaker not worth pirating.

Attached: 1619418207746.jpg (471x471, 27.25K)

So why do you think some people are attracted to lines on paper in a certain configuration, and other people are attracted to lines on paper in another configuration?

So you're saying there's even more argument to call lolicons/shotacons pedophiles than there would be to call furries animal fuckers, then?

>Wrong
>Wrong
>Wrong
>Wrong
Seethe more, cuck

Even IF lolis were based on children (they're not), one is heavily stylized and unrealistic fictional cartoons and the other is a real life breathing human person

The appeal of fiction is often THAT it's fiction

Take LP and real live horses, the only thing they really share is name alone, surely something as stylized isn't comparable to zoophilia?

Ok but what does that have to do with anything? Who was saying that shotacons are pedos?

huh? yeah im not on the ironic faggots side

Attached: 1641220274543.jpg (1080x1006, 152.65K)

>>Wrong
>>Wrong
>>Wrong
>>Wrong
>Seethe more, cuck

Attached: soijak.png (722x720, 32.73K)

This is some third degree cope going on here.

He literally said shotacons kidnap little boys, that shit's not fucking funny, ESPECIALLY in the context of harmless fictional cartoons

Sentiments like this are literally used as ammo to pave the way to get our identity and community globally banned, it's not something to be taken lightly

>(they're not)
lol

Attached: what.jpg (288x467, 42.08K)

Don't people on here accuse homosexual and transexual people of grooming or abusing/molesting children all the time? Surely you take issue with that as well, right?

>Even IF lolis were based on children (they're not)
Then what are they based on, user? Do you know where the name comes from?
>one is heavily stylized and unrealistic fictional cartoons
Stylised cartoons of what?
>The appeal of fiction is often THAT it's fiction
Often? So not always?

>there's even more argument to call lolita complex pedophiles
user I..

user... If you think real children act like anime lolis, you need to go to touch grass.

>Do you know where the name comes from?

Classic pedo excuse, I guess Lolita fashion is also "pedo" now too

>Stylised cartoons of what?

Heavily unrealistic short fictional anime characters

>Often? So not always?

There's a million reasons why someone might be into lolisho, and very rarely is it because LE FICTIONAL CHILDREN XD

That hand makes my weewee the small weewee

I miss Charls bros :c
Does anybody watch his streams? I refuse to go on Twitch

Right, they act like idealized versions of children, which is actually even more pedo if you think about it.

ARE YOU RETARDED? I WAS SAYING THAT THE CREATOR SAID IN A TWEET THAT SHE WANTS KIDNAP KIDS? DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW TO READ?

Attached: 1650558744905.jpg (816x840, 189.73K)

Lines on paper don't act :^)
>Classic pedo excuse
Now that's some cope
>Heavily unrealistic short fictional anime characters
You protest too much.
>There's a million reasons why someone might be into lolisho, and very rarely is it because LE FICTIONAL CHILDREN XD
If you say so.

Would you let your daughter wear that outfit?

>Lines on paper don't act :^)
touche

Attached: 1637360107807.png (900x900, 392.99K)

"pedo" and "groomer" is just the tranny of 2022. Shit used to de-rail threads because no one wants to be accused of being one and no one has the self control to ignore it.

>doesn't actually address any of my arguments

I accept your concession, pedophile