Damn, the art in the Sonic origins trailer looks a million times better than the opening animation of Sonic Mania...

What are you talking about? They're both still images taken from an animated sequence.

>top looks like sonic cd. nostalgia good.
It looks like dogshit compared to Sonic CD, Being influenced is not inherently a good thing.

Attached: sonics 2.jpg (1366x1536, 340.67K)

I do like the bottom one better, but the top one has better colors and the background is more interesting.
>Artistically
Kek. Nothing funnier than a brainlet using words that he can't understand.

ok

Explain in detail then.

Looks like a cheap knock off and out of place when the rest of the characters are drawn accurately

>Nothing funnier than a brainlet using words that he can't understand.
coming from someone who vaguely describes shit he likes by saying things like "better colors" and "more interesting". Congrats on having the vocabulary of my 7 year old nephew.

user bottom is from the trailer

i don't see the problem, they both look nice.

Attached: images (2).jpg (225x225, 4.55K)

No one said there was a problem. People here just get bent out of shape when you criticize something they like.

this
sure the bottom looks "good", but its not going for sonic cd soul

so simply because it's not trying to poorly recreate something and instead tries to be it's own thing that somehow makes it not as good? I don't think the top is bad but you're insane if you think it's a good representation of what Sonic CD actually looked like. We can see them side by side. They're vastly different in style.

Best Sonic is OVA Sonic.

Attached: Screenshot (312).png (1366x768, 986.34K)

Top was animated by a studio that mostly does small cutscenes for indie games and shots for second-rate CN shows.
Bottom was done by the people that did fucking Castlevania and the He-Man reboot.

Attached: momr.png (960x539, 475.06K)

>It looks like dogshit compared to Sonic CD
>Posts a comparison in which the Mania one looks miles better in every single way
What did you mean by this?

The OVA was good, but the animation in the OVA was definitely cheaper than the Sonic CD FMVs

i don't think you know what cheap tumblr art or what tumblr art looks like in general

Attached: 1639174941991.png (548x593, 82.6K)

Has anyone ever noticed how goofy and out of place Sonic's nose looks? Just a random portruding black spot in the middle of his face.

Attached: sonk.png (1280x720, 667.2K)

Are you mocking Sonic fags for being persnickety?

Simple statements. Not every argument needs elaboration.

This looks so damn flat. It lacks depth.

user, that's generally how cartoony animal noses look.

Lol op is wrong as the top is hand drawn and the bottom is clearly that lazy 3d shit that's made to look hand drawn.

Top has real soul and the bottom has artifical soul

>bottom is clearly that lazy 3d shit that's made to look hand drawn.
You have no idea what you're talking about

>THING BAD BECAUSE.... IT JUST IS OK

>artifical
This is not a word

both were made by the same dude lol

OLD GOOD
NEW BAD

That being said Sonic CD intro is peak Sonic

Attached: AAE5DDA6-63A2-4F82-89B5-038FDABCF546.jpg (809x542, 238.75K)

>WHATS THAT METAL?!
>THIS WORLD ISNT BIG ENOUGH FOR THE BOTH OF US
>WELL, I AGREE
>DUN DUN DUN DA DUN

That's the hypest moment in the film

Lies !
don't spoil my ignorance and shit posting you gag
It means fake

Yeah, that's generally how cartoons look.

Attached: mickey.png (1280x720, 584.2K)

50 minutes of animation costs more than 1 minute of animation

I don't like those weirdly detailed fingers

Sonic CD levels are so comfy.

Most OVAs from the 80s and 90s look better than Sonic.

Attached: debil2.webm (480x360, 2.62M)

Don't care, not paying $60+ for roms

Yeah cheap ones look flat unless it's a stylistic choice. Quality ones know how to separate characters in the foreground from blending into the background. It's how you can tell good artists from bad artists.

dang, whats this? Its neat

>t.yson heese

I don't like lazy no detail balls that are suppose to be fists

>Most OVAs
jesus christ shut the fuck up you retard, you know nothing about OVAs outside a few cherrypicked MAL/reddit-core shows

He did both.

It's Devilman anime series.

This is a specific animation with a large budget. Most OVAs don't look like this at all. Most have poor animation with very little moments of good animation. You're using the Devilman OVA as an example but I've seen literal thousands of anime OVAs that are pretty low quality. Far worse than Sonic. Not all but the vast majority are. For every Devilman or Wicked City OVA that exists, you have 50 dogshit OVAs like Twinkle Nora Rock You and The Humanoid.

Attached: The Humanoid - Copy.jpg (3500x2660, 2.58M)

>implying everything looks like old disney cartoons
your point is stupid. learn to concede or rope

Not to mention the only reason why Devilman looked that good to begin with is because Go Nagai created some of the most popular franchise of that time period so most of the things with his name attached to it were given special attention.

You're missing the point. That user is retarded but not for the reasons you think. Old Disney actually looks great and has great depth and detail in it's characters. He thinks cartoons in general are suppose to look flat but that's only the cheap ones with mediocre artists attached to them.

Well I'm not the one throwing around budget as the deciding factor when it comes to animation quality.

Attached: mezzo.webm (640x480, 1.66M)

Silence cocksucker
Both have flaws that makes them look like shit in some ways
The shoes of top look like lumpy shit, looks more like football boots instead of shoes. plus any and all examples where the eye shape doesn't align with the muzzle is bad art design.

>throwing around budget as the deciding factor when it comes to animation quality.
but that's literally the reason why your examples look as good as they do.. It's the budget. These aren't good representations of most old anime OVAs. These are specific examples of when they do look good which isn't all that often. Projects such as Kite and Devilman have way bigger budgets than your traditional direct-to-video anime.

>C O I N S
>O
>I
>N
>S

Attached: 1625982932439.jpg (1280x720, 374.98K)

The fact you can't even tell the difference from a 2D drawing and 3D models is sad, retard.

>Coomers wouldn't prefer this
Gas them all. Bring back old anime.

>The shoes of top look like lumpy shit, looks more like football boots instead of shoes.
Sonic's shoes are literally supposed to be boots in the classic era.

mezzo forte is definitely not a good example of the average OVA

Animation quality is dependant on a lot of factors but budget isn't one of them, you're not gonna make shit animators or directors under tight time constraints do better work simply by giving them more money.

You said "Artifical". The word you're looking for is "Artificial"

>Animation quality is dependent on a lot of factors but budget isn't one of them
It is absolutely a factor.
>you're not gonna make shit animators or directors under tight time constraints do better work simply by giving them more money.
The money goes into hiring more animators. The more animators that are working on a single project, the less labor there is on an individual. Instead of having 3 people working on a single animated sequence, you now 8 people doing it. This leads to it not only getting the job done faster but also more creative freedom for the artists who can implement more frames since there's more people on the job to get it done.

Damn, dude, were you really so bored that you had to make this bait thread of all things? Of course we both knew it would work because Yea Forumsirgins have to argue about anything.