ITS HAPPENING
Other urls found in this thread:
So do you just get your wand broken and sent to Azkhaban? Because that's what happens when you use forbidden magic.
Do you live under a rock? This was literally shown in the trailer. Nanny clean this thread up bitch.
You mean you can use the most basic offensive spell in the Harry Potter universe as an offensive attack in the game. Brilliant.
Wasn't that only against humans? I mean they didn't put a taboo on it.
harry potter is maybe the gayest IP there is. grow the fuck up
>game has Avada Kedavra
>it's not an instakill spell like in the books
the game's going to blow
the best spell we're gonna get as damage dealing is probably gonna be Sectumsempra
To be fair to them, at least it's not a nintendo first-party.
Does that mean we can shoot up the school?
What did he mean by this
what did jk rowling mean by this?
NYEAH
>Every student at Hogwarts has the wizard equivalent of an ar16 in their pocket.
>There isn't daily mass shootings
Checkmate shitlibs
Does that mean you can mercy kill an animal and that wouldn't be illegal?
I am pretty sure even casting them is a big no no
I'm only going to say this once and I'm going to say it loud for the people in the back.
Stop
Signalboosting
Transphobia
>ITS HAPPENING
go back to /pol/
Well for one, Taboo curses are also Dark magic, and highly illegal. The ministry could have done it, but people wouldn't like the ministry constantly monitoring them. The Trace is only around young wizards. In addition, it would also catch people just mentioning the spell by name without even trying to cast it.
And on top of all that, a skilled wizard (much less skilled than what would be required to cast the killing curse) could just nonverbally cast it.
solve coagula?
Doesn't the one eyed defense against the dark arts teacher kill a spider with it?
Or was that only in the movie?
If i cast Avada Kedavra on a mirror, would that be suicide or would I kill the mirror?
Go back to getting raped by centaurs, Umbridge.
>I'm going to say it loud for the people in the back
>No all-caps
>No exclamation marks
I'm afraid I couldn't hear you back here.
:)
Is he on his knees here or is his body very small compared to head?
That's good, they can use it on me to prevent me from having to play a game set in the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody? just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
Does the hogwarts universe have powerlevels?
Can any shmuck with a wand who says Avada Kedavra cast it as well as Voldemort?
I think your wand matters right? But is there like wizard power levels that make dulmbaldore with the same wand more power than a first year with that wand? Or do you just need to know the correct words?
That was an Azkhaban escapee who disguised himself in order to get into Hogwarts and put Harry's name in the Goblet of Fire.
Any professor using the curses in the classroom for any reason would definitely have gotten them fired in a best case scenario.
>Can any shmuck with a wand who says Avada Kedavra cast it as well as Voldemort?
idk about that specific spell, but i remember harry casts the torture spell at one point but because he's a nice guy hero he didn't "mean" it enough so it wasn't as effective.
I think the patronous thing they do on 3 and 5/6 is the equivalent of a power level at least that's what it seems. Harry has a bigger animal than most of the other students and when they have a small animal it probably means they are pathetic.
Isn't that just his dad making it ultra powerful for... reasons?
I don't remember I read these books so long ago.
There's a skill level, and there's one student that's so bad that his spells blow up in his face. So I guess if you're not skilled enough you can probably kill yourself.
According to the wiki it was legal in the US against magical beasts?
Was the taboo just something Voldemort created? He was pretty good at weird curses like with the DADA professor curse. Because I don't think it was ever used for anything else.
That said I don't think you can cast the high level curses silently. At least, I can't think of a single instance.
I recently watched it all, after telling myself I'd fall asleep anyway, and yes he is on his knees.
>Atlas Shrugged
>God tier
after seeing this I'll give the books a chance, I never read them, but if a retard with that list saying it is bad, it cannot be too bad.
It's a classic Yea Forums bait/rage image
I wish they would use it irl to kill he game before it comes out
HuffleCHADS UNITE
We will purge Hogwarts from anyone unfriendly.
user, that post is incredibly old bait.
There's a few things that go into it, but it is partially skill and will based
At some point (I think in book 6?) Snape says something like "If all of the students in this room pointed their wands at me and cast Avada Kedavra, I'm not even sure you'd give me a nosebleed". Beside the fact that it's a hard spell to use, just knowing the words and the correct movements with your want isn't enough, there's plenty of cases of apprentice wizards fucking up basic spells throughout the series despite training constantly.
I'm fairly confident that you do need specific training for each specific spell in order to master them. That is what they did for the Order of the Phoenix, to the point that even guys like Neville went from F-tier wizard to pretty good
>We live in a world where crucio wasn’t used on all the Elden shills from Reddit
avidicadivi
It's been a long time since I bother with Potter stuff, but I'm pretty sure spells require intent. You actually have to really want the other person to die if you use Avada Kedavra. Though both hot hatred and cold malice should work.
Right, i remember there's a guy like that on the first movie, i wonder if he ended up killing himself when trying an advanced spell.
there arent enough melaninated wizards for that
There are definitely varying levels of power, though not really quantified. Natural affinity, training and what the wand is comprised of all contribute.
Avada Kedavra specifically requires the caster to be fairly skilled in magic, so it's not as though a random first year could cast it during an argument, but the most important part is intention.
Voldemort, Bellatrix and the like are able to cast it virtually indscriminately because they are completely comfortable with and prepared to kill their targets.
A good example is Draco's infamous attack on Dumbledore. Both Dumbledore and Snape knew that Voldemort would kill Draco if he failed. Draco, had he actually gone through with it, would not have been able to kill Dumbledore because his heart wasn't in it. He was trying to impress Lucius, but he didn't desire to see Dumbledore die, least of all at his own hands. Which is where the preparation comes in with Snape, who was only able to do the job because he knew that Dumbledore was dying anyways, due to using Gaunt's ring, and that it was his final wish.
sectumsempra was invented by snape who wasn't born yet
So what's a downside of using that spell and the other two ( I don't mean ingame), like do they use much concentration or mana if there is some sort of the like on that universe, or like is a projectile hard to aim, the wizard world sounds interesting but is anything actually explained? how it works / cost , etc? I'm only a movie watcher ofc.
I want a more in-depth gameplay trailer about the customization for your wizard/witch, we've seen literally just a small portion of what it can do. Also I want to be able to wear different robes, sort of like what the Dementors are wearing.
>Hand in the air and hand within isn't an old symbol of knowledge and wisdom.
>it's not an instakill spell like in the books
That's not what the trailer showed.
>Sectumsempra
Was invented by Snape 100 years later.
you get 5 stars if you use it
>nanny
What about Crucio?
>Basically just a gun spell that is supposed to be part of basic kit for anyone who particulates in any combat
>Most forbidden, feared and reviled technique ever, you can get life sentence for using in regardless of circumstance
Yep that's a bong book
You're applying 20th century judiciary standards to a 19th century setting. It's like asking why don't they send helicopters after Arthur Morgan.
Destroys the mirror and carve a hole in the wall. It's magic that looks like light, not actual light.
That seems to make sense considering what we know about the soundtrack so far
streamable.com
>People tell me no women (actual females) browse Yea Forums
>There's been this many harry potter threads
myth debunked
Wait wait wait, didn't Voldermort invent the three curses? How could the killing curse exist hundred years before the creators birth
Never watched or read Harry Potter. Seen a clip of Voldermort shouting "Adava Kadavra!" and I thought it was fucking kino. People in the comments are making fun of it.
So is this like a "I win" spell and why is this such a big deal?
That should exist. Wonder if we'll be able to use it (as well as imperio).
>Nothing is ever said about the inventor of Avada Kedavra, but it was invented before 1717, because it was classified as an Unforgivable Curse by the British Ministry of Magic then.
t. google
>>Basically just a gun spell
People can survive being shot with a gun.
It's borderline impossible and very much a fluke for someone to survive getting hit with Avada Kedavra.
I wanted multiplayer, and we're not getting it. Fuck this game.
Unless I'm remembering wrong, casting the kill spell successfully splinters your soul each time you use it, but I don't know about the two others
probably a dot or a CC spell
What’s (you)r favorite game?
>didn't Voldermort invent the three curses
lol no
You won't be able to play as an evil mage and fuck up every NPC if that's what you're thinking about OP
When you have effective non-lethal spells the spell that can only kill, and will always kill, would be a bad spell.
It's an instant kill against anyone who's not a very special boy. Also one of three taboo curses (along with torture and mind control) that only bad guys use.
>In order to conjure the avada kedavra curse, you have to want to kill your victim. We all know that Voldemort could easily kill a child without an ounce of remorse... but not Snape. Snape didn't want to kill Dumbledore, and this was why the spell was blue instead of the usual green.
I did not know this.
>wear vest with rats in it
>if you get hit in the chest with avada kedavra a rat dies instead
It's like kevlar armor but for wizards
>it took user that longto realize there are women on Yea Forums
three years of daily 3 Houses threads didn't clue you in?
Dude if you're grazed by a bullet you can survive
If you're grazed by the curse you're dead.
It doesn't maim, it doesn't disable, it just kills.
Do you think the Avada Kedavra spell will have its own meter sort of like a special insta-kill move that kills everything on the screen? I have the feeling it will be something like that. If that's the case then no thanks on the spell.
It's a straight up insta-kill spell. How exactly it kills is vague but getting hit by it kills you within an instant. No pain, no blood, just dead. Requires some serious willpower and intent to actually cast so it's no some accidental thing people can go around waving willy nilly. Only person to ever survive getting hit by it was Harry himself because his mom had some desperate post-death magic go off that made the spell bounce off him.
The only thing that can stop q bad wizard with a wand is a good wizard with a wand, duh.
>Can't sneak into the Hufflepuff dorms to spam Sectumsempra on all the Hufflepuffs as a cheeky school prank
That's a bummer. I guess I can settle for Avada Kedrava for my cheeky prankster mischief.
If the movies are anything to go by then big deal, the dudes form the ministry were more useless than stormtroopers.
So why is that a big deal? Surely there's hundreds of those kinds of spells, what makes this one worse? Even more so when it's instant.
The pose of both hands on the right are very specific and nothing like that statue you posted
There are in this game.
>rats
go with ands, can fit more, less weight
Guess who you can't use it on.
at the very least, learning it will be linked with a specific path/story choice
You won't learn that shit in a normal playthrough during classes, that's for sure
the first 2 movies are kino comfy family movies
3 is darker but still interesting
4 has a cool concept with some edgy parts
5+ is "I am going to slit my wrist while listening to emo bands" tier
oh im sure
Not sure if insects count