….I’m sorry but how the fuck is this legal?

its generally known as illegal, but most people would not give a crap about it. Most porting dev for example actually used emulation if the real thing is hard to find.

Emulating the already-emulated Switch version of an N64 game sounds like jumping through more hoops than necessary.
Still, technological advancements like these are cool

>Just another way so stick it to Shitendo.
wouldn't sticking it to shitendo mean not giving their works any exposure to the world at all?

>emulating an emulator
Fascinating. Why though? Can't you load upscaled HUD textures and 16:9 on an emulator that doesn't COMPILING SHADERS every two seconds?

This is illegal. Emulators only exist in a grey area because 0.01% of people who use them ‘dump their own game and console keys’ and that provides plausible deniability to the 99.9% who just download switch isos from nxbrew

The game in OP has been removed by Nintendo, and there is no way to dump it. Therefore the only way to play it as advertised in the tweet (I.e you CAN play this) is by using an illegal copy.

any link for the nsp ?

What kind of toaster do you play on where shader compilation effects your gameplay lmao?

Attached: F1E97A50-58AD-46EF-897F-F2532326E5F8.jpg (3840x2160, 1.21M)

if it's just emulation, it's completely legal, as long as all the code developed for emulation is all your own

>its generally known as illegal
Again, show me the relevant law.
Probably, but I am a Tendie cuck at heard and Bing Bing just scratches that itch just right for me.
>This is illegal
Show me the law.
>and there is no way to dump it
Game card dumping tool: gbatemp.net/threads/508343
SD to .nsp dumper: gbatemp.net/threads/514816

also i'm talking specifically about the emulator program here, not any rom dumps

>and there is no way to dump it
Retard

Attached: icon.jpg (256x256, 27.62K)

wow they can finally emulate (with errors) a that released in like 2020

The joke was that "they don't want you to" because the miserly faggots made the game a timed physical exclusive, not because of the emulation itself, while still remaining ambiguous with their intent.
But you knew that. Stop shitposting.

...I'm sorry but why do you make the same thread over and over?

>show me the law
That's the Nintendo legal team's job. Won't stop me from reporting it.

Concession accepted.

>The game in OP has been removed by Nintendo, and there is no way to dump it. Therefore the only way to play it as advertised in the tweet (I.e you CAN play this) is by using an illegal copy.
You're wrong but still, let me ask You. Where do you think the illegal copy came from?

Technically the DMCA has provisions forbidding the circumvention of DRM. You are legally entitled to backups but the software used to make the backups is illegal because it bypasses copy protection.

Contains no copyrighted code by Nintendo and you are legally allowed to make backups of games you "own" so there's nothing illegal about it.

This tool is unofficial, not supported by Nintendo, requires use of a jail break which voids the warranty of your console.

>You are legally entitled to backups but the software used to make the backups is illegal because it bypasses copy protection.
Good thing Yuzu isn't responsible for any dumping software. Looks like we're in the clear, fruitbros.

I'm (not) sorry, but how is it NOT legal?
The code of the emulator is written from scratch so it's all naturally, completely legal.

You can pretty much guarantee when copyright laws change in the next 10 yearsvall that's going right out the window especially with devs now using games as a service to btfo pirates

Emulation is legally in the clear and is technically used by such companies. The acquisition of games and BIOS files (where necessary) for their usage on the other hand is questionable.

This fucking bait thread AGAIN? The last one got over 500 replies. Fuck you idiots taking the bait.

Piracy does not lead to loss of sales. There have been studies on this.

>devs now using games as a service to btfo pirates
you mean like gt7?
oh wait

it makes tendies mad, no other reasons required. eat shit

There's a thing on Github that lets you download precompiled shaders that other people uploaded, dunno how many people use it though.

github.com/CapitaineJSparrow/emusak-ui

Romhacks on the go.

Retard, Yuzu is a Switch emulator. As in you play it on PC.

Let me ask you something Nintendo cuck, how is buying pre-owned games legal?

i don't get it. it's just another switch game that can be emulated

>heh, I'm using my modern gaming computer that cost 1000$+ to emulate ports of a 26 y/o game, a 20 y/o game, and a 15 y/o game....and it runs better than they did on those old consoles
>I bet you are seething and SHOCKED such things are possible

Why are emulationfags like this?

If you're referring to the EU supposed scandal about suppressing loss of sales data, that only applied to mega giants like Disney, Sony, Microsoft, etc etc. Just say you didn't read it and stop talking about it. Regardless of that though when laws change again it won't be for your interest or the interest of patreon dollar farming emulator devs that are le heckin based

A desktop emulator on its own literally cannot have any effect on any Switches warranty status. Unless you install Linux on a Switch to run Yuzu on it, which sounds like fascinatingly stupid endeavor.

>The game in OP has been removed by Nintendo
Cool so there is literally nothing wrong with pirating it

Emusak is wonderful, but completely useless for Yuzu. It's Ryujinx only.

because its true. where do you think the
>@FBI
meme came from?

>Unless you install Linux on a Switch to run Yuzu on it, which sounds like fascinatingly stupid endeavor.
I want to do this so bad. Think of that buttery smooth 1fps slideshow emulating a machine on itself.

That will only happen when GAAS becomes a thing. As long as their code runs locally on your machine and isn't a video stream with a client for accepting inputs to use remotely, it is established case law and the Game Genie has already gotten BTFO'd by development costs and save game protection and encryption because of privacy and "cheevos" integrity.

Attached: STOP RIGHT THERE.png (761x1040, 118.67K)

sounds based to me

>falling for the same stale bait
arch.b4k.co/v/search/text/"I'm sorry but how" "is this legal"/type/op/

>that only applied to mega giants like Disney, Sony, Microsoft, etc etc. Just say you didn't read it and stop talking about it
lmao completely fucking wrong. why dont you wipe off your butthurt tears and read it yourself?

Attached: 652.jpg (250x250, 13.64K)

I guess they want people to talk about Byte[] in particular? I can't think of any other reason.

Attached: 97436039c19974488717bcf5f2432a00.png (400x400, 92.84K)

And en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony_lawsuit

>retarded newfag is scared of url encoding in an archive search link
please be bait

I did read it. I even wrote a paper about it in college you fucking moron. Anecdotal evidence used in studies does not factually represent the supposed word of mouth sales that it supposedly drums up nor does the system of "I trust you to buy this thing if you like it" system some developers and musicians have led themselves to believe because pirate fags will use mental gymnastics to manipulate, eventually lead to a sales. Because in reality as far as the word of mouth goes if you get something free and you spread it via word it's going to be for free you and maybe 1 in every 10 people you share it with will but it if they're turbo retards and if it's not a mega giant there's a good chance you won't see a sequel because John piratefag and his gang of butt buddies decided some to believe one of the most tripe studies in the history of entertainment with some of the most brain dead human beings available as case studies because some piracy websites were forwarding hit piece articles about it ignoring any and all factual evidence brought on by the shareware boom of the 90s. Please feel free to fucking kill yourself uneducated mutt

i doubt the bleem devs knew what their win meant at the time. Their victory against the soulless corporate is now the reason why we can sidestep corporate bullshit and arent forced to buy the same rereleased game over and over at full price like consolecucks do. They're heroes ad martyrs

>please be bait
Was fishing for "I clicked that shit, nigga" image.

Playing it right now on my Deck, thanks Yuzu!

Mario 64 version of all stars is utter shit

It's just Shindou rom on >poorly coded emulator.

So what you are saying is that convenience destroys piracy? Gaben was right after all.

Nothing about that abortion of a post indicates you have a tenable grasp on the English language, let alone went to college.

b-but you can play switch games on the steam deck!
Better than on the shitch!

They cut out the BLJs and I like fucking around with those sometimes.

>I even wrote a paper about it in college you fucking moron
oooh, a paper. Do Gender Studies and Liberal arts curricula demand those now?
>the rest of that pointless rambling
let me ask you this. Do you have any factual, unarguable evidence that Piracy affects sales?
No. You do not.

I'm not excusing them, just pointing out why it's shit.
>I like fucking around with [BLJs] sometimes
Every time the A button is pressed, a Pannen loses his wings.

If you own the rom, you're legally allowed to upload the data of it for any personal use. That includes running the contents on an emulator of another device.
Said emulator is also allowed since it's not using any stolen code from the device it's emulating.
What isn't allowed is downloading and distributing roms. Also, Nintendo can suck my dick and rim my ass.