Frame rates are a spook.
You don't actually "need" 60 FPS to better your execution in games. The only reason people see improvements is because of latency that is usually reduced as frame rate improves, though it's a mistake to treat these factors as synonymous.
30 FPS under ideal conditions is objectively better than 60 FPS in naïve setups. You can easily end up with 100ms of latency at 60 FPS if you do not know what you are doing.
Latency is the only thing that matters.
Other urls found in this thread:
testufo.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
twitter.com
Well, when it comes to hitting buttons at extremely specific timings, then better framerate is the solution
i don't think any of it matters. the game is either fun or not
I am fine with just 1 frame per second
Obviously a ton of input delay is going to feel bad no matter the frame rate. It's almost like they're different aspects or something.
tee bee aych this desu
if your shitty 30fps game isn't even a stable 30fps it's a lot more jarring than your 60fps game dipping into the 50s
Your eyes are fucking slow, dude. Monitor screens and framerates never syncronize 100%. Your brain is more than able to see the gaps which are translated as stuttering. If "true 60 fps" was a standard, some people would experience dizziness. For that exact reason, the more fps the better. To "fill" those gaps. 120fps on a 60hz monitor is still better than 60 fps, even though most frames are wasted.
I like 60 FPS because it looks better. Can't really see.much difference between that and 120 but its still there a little
Frame rates are a spook.
You don't actually "need" 30 FPS to better your execution in games. The only reason people see improvements is because of latency that is usually reduced as frame rate improves, though it's a mistake to treat these factors as synonymous.
12 FPS under ideal conditions is objectively better than 30 FPS in naïve setups. You can easily end up with 100ms of latency at 30 FPS if you do not know what you are doing.
Latency is the only thing that matters.