Untitled

.

Attached: joseph clarence.jpg (391x470, 51K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=C3HXYNOzW6A
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

CAROL ANNE

Thread theme
youtube.com/watch?v=C3HXYNOzW6A

WHITE BREAD

Attached: 1509334232150.gif (158x223, 3.88M)

Whatchu looking at cracka?

Mission Stories were a mistake.

He literally did nothing wrong

Please, look at the photograph, Mr. Clarence.

Attached: 1569365331658.jpg (528x557, 58K)

That's the point. Nu-Hitman, while great, always has you killing pure scumbags while blood money had you start by killing a man who made a mistake

What if they made an open-world Hitman game? Where the you're given a story mission, but also periodically receive non-story missions through a communication device thing (custom laptop, phone, or whatever)

No. The best levels are tightly designed.

Fuck off, retard. Hitman games are about you being presented with a carefully made, hand-crafted mission full of details, different ways to tackle the problem, and its up to you to work your way around it.

>not turning them off

Attached: 1537796018255.jpg (600x891, 28K)

That's Hitman 2.
And holy FUCK do I hate targets of opportunity as a concept and as a mechanic.

Even with them off they still get stuck in very limited routines because of them.

You mean elusive targets?

I kinda liked them, they're basically a casual filter.
Plus it helps mix things up a little.

I do hate that people with higher mastery unlocks get more benefits, but i understand its just to encourage more playthroughs

think of the open-world as one giant, tightly-designed mega level
they can make a carefully made, hand-crafted world full of missions, different ways to tackle them, and its up to you to work your way around or through them
Notoriety can actually be meaningful

It won't work like that because it never does

>It won't work like that because it never does
so many great games wouldn't have been made if game developers operated with this attitude by default

I'm not a game developer.