Normal raiding guild in TBC WoW

pretty sure the elephant just thought it was funny starting shit with humans seeing as elephant are literally "racist" or speciest or whatever towards humans

Beta orbiters kill guilds not girls.

That's like saying infections kill someone with AIDS, rather than HIV. Technically true, but it wouldnt happen without the virus.

Wait a minute... That's not a room!

I kind of sort of get what you are trying to say, but that is a REALLY bad analogy

shut up, fag

Attached: Btfo.webm (1280x720, 2.04M)

Women ruin literally everything. Old news. Every man learns this at some point, and newer generations are always surprised that the lies their mothers have fed them about how women are turns out to be just that; lies. Only difference is that now we can't slap the shit out of them to put them in their place, and marriage is garbage due to feminist laws.

tl;dr video games

Attached: 1443829355815.png (1032x1023, 118K)

PRÖÖÖÖÖÖÖH thread?

Did somebody not get enough attention from mommy as a child?

Same, I never really experienced any drama in years. Helps that we were all shit so there wasn't much elitism or arguing. What kills guilds the most is the domino effect of people leaving the game.

based PRÖÖÖÖÖH

the elephant though she was reaching for her gun

Did somebody get too much attention from daddy as a child?

Yes how did you know? Is there any way to recover from it? It even keeps me awake at night sometimes. She was a drunk whore who beat me up as the only attention i got.

>Close to clearing Sunwell Plateu

Yea no you nigger, your shitty guild could just not clear M'uru. Stop projecting your failure on something that never happened and focus rather on why you and your guild were such shitters.

>mfw a girl sent nudes on the guild forums
>mfw she was a landwhale and her tits hanged to her knees

Attached: 1565833013760.jpg (399x388, 24K)

Attached: elephant slap.webm (960x540, 2.75M)

Same

Attached: xm7ju2qax1j31.png (439x439, 226K)

Post-nerf M'uru was very doable, pre-nerf was a shitshow yeah

Attached: Elephant hat.webm (1280x720, 2.32M)

it's actually a perfect analogy. if people with AIDS lived in a pathogen free world, their lack of an immune system would be inconsequential.
also being redpilled is like having the HIV resistance gene.

Attached: Elephant motorcycle.webm (1280x720, 2.54M)

something something tf2

>Asshole throws shit at Dumbo
>Doesn't understand why Dumbo gets angry
???

>that circus elephant that went on a rampage

cause and effect, retard

I was just shitposting. I had a great mom.

>there will never be an elephant uprising as payback for centuries of pajeet bullshit
I'd go and fight for them

It was probably food. Elephant wanted more.

Have this user.

Attached: elephant wrecks car.webm (1280x720, 2.89M)

Slapping the shit out of woman never worked. The only way to deal with them is to just not interact with them.

How are elephants not the king of the jungle? Doesn't it take a whole pack of lions just to bring one down?

Nah, it definitely worked. Back then, they couldn't run to papa state and get the man put in jail for it, they had to either become manageable or go live in the poor house.

>feminist_car_wash.webm

t. beta male

>joining a guild of incels

Neither elephants nor lions live in the jungle.

It didn´t work because the smart, actually dangerous woman, would simply try and ruin everything from their privileged protected position. All great empires were brought down by women from the inside, pretending to be good obedient housewives while secretly spreading the seeds of discord.

Being "Manageable" in pre feminisn days was a lie designed to fool the small minded into a state of complacency. Which was exactly what the woman needed to enact their brutal revenge on the society that spawned them.

She was hot in anons furry wank bank

They are.

There is nothing more chan than being able to get a lot of pussy, and not taking the offer because you realize all women are inherently duplicitous and evil creatures.

Attached: Elephants in the water.webm (1280x720, 2.3M)

precisely, cause and effect. retard.

Jungle elephants are a thing. The population that lives in the jungles is not the population that lives in the grasslands.

Elephants are fucking based, retarded urbanites who think dangerous wild animals should be treated like pets should be culled.

>privileged protected position
And then they'd get the shit slapped out of them by smart, dangerous men who see through their bullshit.

Stop believing the lies your mother has fed you. Women are, and always have been, inferior to men.

Attached: 1541736743813.webm (480x480, 2.89M)

prooh

Attached: dont touch me - elephant.gif (250x301, 1001K)

Attached: Elephant slide.webm (644x640, 2.81M)

Except you can't get a lot of pussy.

Attached: elephant slides down to the river.webm (720x720, 1.06M)

Attached: circle crusher.png (1280x1442, 1.54M)

Proof?

best thread

Attached: assert dominance.webm (614x1076, 2.92M)

Whitoids have killed far more elephants, Indians worship elephants.

You made the claim, the burden of proof is on you.

Those derpy little tusks just make it that much cuter

[eurobeat intensifies]

Attached: elephant friend.webm (648x720, 2.93M)

Because whites live in areas where elephants are abundant, clearly

Please tell me that's not normal

Attached: 1566779892322.jpg (515x515, 50K)

Attached: You fool.png (1344x174, 47K)

my heart

Does that teach the elephant bad habits?
Once it grows up it'll end up breaking someone in half

Attached: elephant trunk.webm (480x480, 206K)

How are the parents not smashing that man's skull under their foot?

>"Fuck birds"

This needs a glow stick edit

it's probably better than teaching it that it can just butt heads with whatever it wants with no repercussions

That's a good thing. How is being peaceful around strange humans a good habit? That's a great way to end up dead at the hands of poachers. Lower your estrogen levels.

Its probably like that other user wrote that the elevant just wanted to fuck with them for keks, it only imitates offensive gestures and walks away

How strong is the nose on a full grown elephant? Would you crack ribs if he swinged it at full force? Is it strong enough so choke you?

Do it yourself or piss off, m8.

It contains 3000 muscles and is used to uproot trees. Yeah it can kill you

obviously because she kept posting pictures of herself all dolled up to the guildmembers, begging for attention and gold

Attached: elephant vs car.webm (656x448, 451K)

I can't say for certainty but I would bet money on "yes" and "yes"
Elephants are irl monsters, dude

Attached: elephant and rhino.webm (640x360, 2.98M)

It's over a meter long tube of pure muscle clad in thick skin that is controllable by the elephant to a minute degree thanks to the tons of nerves in it. It could easily kill you in one swing

Attached: elephant on the roof.webm (640x352, 978K)

>Indian joins the guild back in vanilla
>says nothing except gibberish that's close to broken english
>rolls need on everything he's eligible for (including Vendorstrike, which he actually used)
>still somehow 2nd in DPS
Dunno how they do it

Attached: Horton smears a poo.webm (640x468, 2.56M)

Imagine being able to bench 600 lbs with your nose

PR RAJESH, CAMERAMAN

>People always blame the girl and not the virgins who are so starved of female attention that they fight over her like a bunch of obese apes

Attached: when cashier skips an item.png (382x379, 23K)

All these webms are giving a false image of them. I guess they were just shooing away a pesty fly in their minds when they send some dude flying.

>That fucking filename

Attached: 1566188809663.gif (100x100, 23K)

*Nothing more chad.

It's a combination of both. The virgins usually are to blame for giving her attention, but the girl is to blame for letting it get to her head. If either party would stop, no bad things would ever happen.

Rhinos are retards compared to elephants no wonder they fuck with them

are there any animals that could 1v1 an elephant?

>Thinks women are dangerous.
>Also thinks women are inferior to men.
This is the reason why the anti feminism worldview is inherently stupid. They always reveal the true nature of themselves through their own hypocrisy. They don't actually think women having rights are bad, they just want to be able to rape and abuse women without repercussions. Because they are sociopaths incapable of getting laid.

aren't elephants one of the few species with abstract thinking?
that footage is amazing

Young elephants eats their mommy's poop (that they scoop from inside) because they need gut bacteria that they don't have yet. In short, they need to eat poop before they can eat anything else without dying.

I made no such claim.

>built like a semi truck
>bully all the other dumb small animals
Imagine being a chad nerd

They're dangerous because weak men have allowed them to consolidate power, but in their inherent form they're very much inferior. I'm sorry that the soi has clouded your brain.

Attached: elephant chased by baby cape buffalo.webm (640x640, 1.12M)

Humans. As long as they have automatic weapons.

>intimidate on a small pokemon

>no I didn't father that there's no way I have a mulatto kid

You can go back to resetera anytime

Attached: 71059053_2636039776417265_2233051379495075840_n.jpg (960x880, 44K)

Think dolphins and certain birds are the only non-humans definitively proved to be capable of abstract thinking.

shit i was so scared it was going to step onto the glass and fall through hurting itself

that and this
They are very close, if you gave them a million years or two you could conceivably start seeing them build simple shit because the trunk gives them manual dexterity only comparable to primate hands in the animal world. Whales are theorized to be fairly smart as well but they can't manipulate the environment

Not even various apes? To be fair, that's kinda cheating.

Oh fuck off, this is like blaming the victim of a scam instead of a scam artist.
Yes, it's good to be more savvy, but the scammer is still the responsible party.
Preying on the guiliable and the desperate makes it worse, not better.

>They're dangerous because weak men have allowed them to consolidate power
Then they were always dangerous. People were simply too inhumanely cruel back then to give them the chance to ask for equal rights.

>but in their inherent form they're very much inferior.
Nah. When it comes to intelligence, the only thing that actually matters, women are are our equal.

Attached: Elephant family.webm (720x422, 2.74M)

Don't forget blacks and women.

cute! CUTE!!!

feminism is toxic
femininity is fine

know the difference

>When it comes to intelligence, the only thing that actually matters, women are are our equal.
Maybe for you, retard.

Attached: look at this dude.jpg (728x1024, 183K)

Why would I when I can have a far better time watching you people trip over yourself trying to explain how the supposedly inferior women are part of a massive conspiracy meant to destroy all men.

I have a fact for you: Feminism has been nothing but a boon to humanity. If you have any, and I do mean any, shred of evidence to the contrary. Then please, go ahead and post it.

>they're dangerous because
>then they were always

what is reading comprehension

I'm disengaging here, you're literally retarded and not worth arguing with.

Attached: (you).jpg (800x450, 45K)

Attached: Elephant charge.webm (480x360, 689K)

>Scientists often debate the extent to which elephants feel emotion.[35] Elephants have been one of few species of mammals other than Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] known to have or have had any recognizable ritual around death. Elephants show a keen interest in the bones of their own kind (even unrelated elephants that have died long ago). They are often seen gently investigating the bones with their trunks and feet while remaining very quiet. Sometimes elephants that are completely unrelated to the deceased still visit their graves.[15]

It's like a toddler pitching a fit in a grocery store

Attached: elephants watering hole.webm (404x718, 2.79M)

Attached: 1505676066595.png (364x322, 56K)

>Elephants show a keen interest in the bones of their own kind (even unrelated elephants that have died long ago).
So theyre necromancers huh

>be a hunter
>quest
>dungeon
>raid
>and pvp all solo
>never joined a guild
>never seen any WoW drama
>only had one friend in the game that did a smoke break in TBC and never came back
I feel like i played an entirety different game from everyone else.
I stuck with it too through all the expansions and even enjoy bfa.

Fuck off with your shitty bait, this is an elephant thread.

Attached: Apply Yourself.jpg (625x626, 31K)

I would say that most women are more intelligent than people like you. That's why the social economic circumstances allowed feminism to develop. Because they were worth more as a part of our workforce than as a housewife.

But please, go back to masturbating over conspiracy theories involving feminism. The actual world is too big and complex for a person like you.

Attached: Elephant bullies Rhinos.webm (854x480, 2.9M)

>Scientists often debate the extent to which elephants feel emotion.[35] Elephants have been one of few species of mammals other than Homo sapiens sapiens and Neanderthals[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] known to have or have had any recognizable ritual around death.
What's this then

Attached: Turkey circle.webm (422x608, 2.35M)

Attached: elephant can.webm (640x640, 1.56M)

>what is reading comprehension
Something you are not a capable of either. It's also not a actual argument. Because you know you have none.

Why are you still playing WoW, and when did you feel like it began to really suck? I quit in Cata

Demon summoning ritual

>I would say that most women are more intelligent than people like you
Of course you would, serving your female overlords is literally the only mating strategy omega males such as yourself have.

Don't slap women around, that shit is for fussy betas. True patricians just stay single their whole lives and patronize escorts along the way.

Attached: 1564830318806.jpg (578x605, 28K)

Attached: Elephant goose.webm (400x400, 1.79M)

>tfw fucking the guildmaster's gf

no regrets but would not do again

Then stop trying to push your inane conspiracy theories about women.

Apes are stupid as fuck when compared to other "smart" animals tbf. Considering we evolved from them it makes you wonder just how intelligent dolphins, whales etc. really are

I have no interest in woman whatsoever. Wanting to have a girlfriend is a clear sign of weakness, and unlike you I am not a weak person. I'm just pointing out that you and the worldview you espouse are retarded.

For me i always treated as an action rpg and the hunter class fantasy always appealed to me.
The game disappointed me at many times throughout its life span but theres nothing quiet like it in the market and since i dont do any serious end game stuff i have time for other games on different platforms.

Turkeys are one of the stupidest animals on earth. They will try to mate with decoys like they are a real turkey. Those are just circling the dead cat watch out for predators, but are so stupid they ended up in a loop.

>Join random guild while leveling since I lack friends on the server
>MAGA
>Ok
>Tranny joins and immediately starts talking about being one
>MAGA
>Tranny guild quits on the spot
Was pretty based

Attached: nu-v.jpg (349x642, 29K)

You fool no one.

How fast can an elephant go? Could a man run away from them?

When I was ever "pretending" to be retarded? Please, show me the post.

I think it's very subtile but the elephant retreats its head and ears just like an angry cat would do.

Attached: the ritual.gif (425x315, 499K)

Not a argument. The fact that I am not a weak person, blaming everything but myself for my inability to get what i want, is already evidence enough anyway.

Now please, actually try and argue some actual points. I know you people are a embarrassment to your race, country, and family. But you could really be a bit less blatant about it.

Oh you weren't pretending?
I'm sorry for your condition then.

>Could a man run away from them?
Fuuuck no. Maybe you could juke them, but good luck not shitting yourself or stumbling. It's like being chased by a goddamn semi-truck.

Im not sure if it was Bluejay or some other bird species that have some mass freak out ritual when they discover another, even an unrelated, dead bluejay. They also couldn't be fooled by a dead decoy planted by scientists..

I don't care about arguing with a pigeon, at this point I'm just enhancing your self ridicule by leading you to post more.

I repeat, please show me the actual post. Unless you want to admit defeat.

Fuck, they are evolving their body into creating new destructive tools

BTFO

Attached: laughinggirls.gif (700x285, 3.38M)

Terrible wording, user
Fucking hell

Attached: 1564719474462.gif (400x225, 506K)

>I don't care about arguing
Well, i'm glad you admit defeat.

>playing_tank_apexlegends.webm

>2+2 is 5! Go on, give me your points for 4, I've already told you it's 5, so your arguments doesn't matter

imagine being this poster

I didn't lose, you're just literally retarded, and it's showing.

Very cute. But you still aren't actually showing me the post.

Could it be that, shock of all shocks, it doesn't actually exist?

>Be king of savannah
>Get bullied by obnoxious bird

>Imagine being such a weak person that you can't even come up with a decent counterargument.
People like you are almost too pathetic to be funny.

You have lost. The very moment you resorted to doing anything other than actually fighting my points, you failed. You know it, I know it, other people here know it. Stop pretending.

PRÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖÖHHHHH :DDDDD :D

Attached: 1567984163480.jpg (466x388, 18K)

>it pets back
i love elephants

>still
I'm not him, dummy

Then it seems we have two imbeciles on this thread. How neat.

Those elephants are usually orphaned

>Considering we evolved from them
pls

FATALITY

Attached: laugher.png (584x634, 431K)

If the parents are used to humans then there's no reason for them to be hostile when a human gets close to a baby

Attached: Trunkjob.webm (446x320, 2.76M)

I agree The fact that i won became evident the moment he refused to back up his claim.

Based privacy conscious elephant

>manletrage.webm

I would like to point out that nobody has yet to make a single valid claim against equality for woman expect "I do not benefit from it".

Typical incels.

>You ARE the father

Thats a nice webm

Let's go with that intelligence can be generalized under one term, which is represented by IQ. You argument is that women are equal to men on this scale, however, all tests indicate that while the general spread of intelligence is the same, women have a higher concentration towards the middle of the bell curve, whereas men are spread more towards both ends of the spectrum. Which means that there are more genius men that there are genius women.

At the same time, the way women interact with their environment is based on emotions, which fluctuate constantly, whereas men are much more rooted in reason. This leads to women being much more prone to outbursts of emotion, and acting on them, while men remain rational and "cold". Considering overall how society functions with hierarchies and leader roles, this makes men much more fit for leading that women. Combine that with the physical weakness of women, and you have an inferior specimen.

Also, if you take a look at some of the most egalitarian societies in the world, Scandinavia, women naturally flock towards positions such as nursing and childcare, because that is what their nature is inherently programmed to, whereas men sit on a vast majority of high positions within companies and government. Given a sandbox to illustrate themselves in, women naturally assume a submissive position, and are actually happy with being ruled over by men.

This is just a very, very basic gist of what the dynamic between men and women actually is, however. You should try reading some sociology, psychology, and anthropology papers, instead of just agreeing with whatever you think will get your dick wet.

tl;dr fuck you for making me respond to your retard ass seriously.

Attached: qbxNInO.gif (650x363, 14K)

Never reply to me again, intlet.

Attached: (you).jpg (545x476, 77K)

I wish i wasnt a virgin

The only one who "lost" here is you from the start of your retarded posts, brainlet.

Post-nerf M'uru was a joke

Women have the low cunning of the street huckster that knows how to identify and scam a mark.

incel

dilate

degenerate

You know, losing your virginity won't make you a better person

top PRÖÖÖH thread

Can we take a moment and laugh at women even failing at being women?

>trans men allowed to compete on women's sports teams
>utterly obliterates biological females

Attached: 1562668705924.jpg (611x548, 69K)

Whitey btfo

we have a girl in our guild. we bully her and she says nigger so it's all good

>Yea Forums - Elephants & Misogyny

are elephants misogynistic?

Just look at their trunks! Clearly a phallic symbol!

yea

Attached: Horton hits a Ho.webm (640x360, 2.79M)

he's right you know

Attached: death_of_hobby_fanbase.jpg (2404x1260, 512K)

post cute sneks you faggpts, I know you fags are loaded with those

Attached: style.webm (224x400, 389K)

>shoot a man
>police show up
>no, officer, it wasn't me
>it was the bullet

>Khaya Peake used to be in that top TBC guild

Except in these situations, the girl is the victim, not the perpetrator. A lot of girls get flooded with unwanted attention literally just for talking on voice.

I can see it happening somewhere in 'merica
>the warning label on the gun didn't say "don't pull the trigger while pointing at someone"
>what do you mean "gun training"? from my cold dead hands commie faggot

>You argument is that women are equal to men on this scale, however, all tests indicate that while the general spread of intelligence is the same, women have a higher concentration towards the middle of the bell curve, whereas men are spread more towards both ends of the spectrum. Which means that there are more genius men that there are genius women.
While I have yet to see any evidence for such a claim, I am actually going to give you the benefit of the doubt when it comes to this claim. Even if it is true, I think it makes a valid case for equality between the sexes when it comes to social roles. Genius women do exist, and should be used accordingly for the good of humanity.

>At the same time, the way women interact with their environment is based on emotions, which fluctuate constantly, whereas men are much more rooted in reason
This however, is pure nonsense. There is no evidence that woman are more emotionally unstable than men. What is true however is that there are certain emotions that women experience more quickly than men. Some of these emotions are positive, some of those are negative. Equally important however is that there is no evidence that women are inherently worse leaders than men. Women that have historically been in a position of power have shown themselves to be just as rational, cold, and ruthless as men if the need arrives. Despite what feminism often claims, a woman with power can be just as bloodthirsty and cruel as any male ruler.

> Combine that with the physical weakness of women
Women tend to live longer, and are more sturdy, than men. Again, you seem to be mistaking "different" for "inferior" which is not the same thing. Women and men are good at different things, most people will not argue against that.

>Be girl
>Can't join guild because "men" can't hold their shit in

Really makes you think

Attached: 1448614284886.png (399x382, 89K)

Which one

What the fuck I've heard this story before. Is that common?

(you) tried

Attached: smugwash.jpg (1664x2360, 2.33M)

think it was ensidia, they were a priest iirc, youtube video out there somewhere of her talking

I gave you a serious response. You gave me pure hogwash. Thanks for nothing, asshole.

Attached: 1496958009714.jpg (807x659, 42K)

>durr durr having your tusk i the forehead

>Women naturally flock towards positions such as nursing and childcare, because that is what their nature is inherently programmed to whereas men sit on a vast majority of high positions within companies and government.
The former is very much the result of the genetic difference between men and woman. The latter however, while probably at least somewhat influenced by those aforementioned differences, is just as much the result of the systems of power still being primary aimed for the benefit of men. That is receding, obviously. But you can't simply erase thousands of years of male political dominance in a few decades.

>Given a sandbox to illustrate themselves in, women naturally assume a submissive position, and are actually happy with being ruled over by men.
That is simply not true. If it was the case, then women would have never fought for their rights in the first place. Most women are not happy to be submissive, if only because a state of submission is nearly always one of misery and abuse. Just like how being a slave without rights is nearly always a state of abuse and misery.

Women are happier in a post feminist world were they are not essentially slaves you have children with. More importantly than that, there is no valid reason for them to be in such a position anymore. Work at home has been automated to such a significant degree that keeping a women at home all day is a waste. You're literally cutting your potential workforce in half for essentially no real benefit. Even ignoring any arguments of women and happiness, that is simply a stupid thing to do.

>You should try reading some sociology, psychology, and anthropology papers
I've read enough sociology and psychology to understand the difference between women and men just fine. And like I said, while it's a fact that they are two different creatures. The assumption that one is inferior is ridiclous at best, only made by people that have a interest in seeing such fiction become reality.

>she's the same class as you
>have to reroll because the GM is just going to give her all of your loot

Something different can't be equal. You're contradicting yourself.

tl;dr Women are men are different, yes. But that does not make one superior to the other. Even outside of reproduction, both are necessary for a well run society.

>blaming the gun
I told you it was the bullet, incel.

>join guild on an EU ffxiv server
>chavy british girl loud mouth
>wants to "help everyone"
>keeps talking about her cheating on her bf
>posts shit about her thrush medicine
>everyone knows shes a slut
>she shit stirs and the guild leader melts the whole guild instead of kicking her

Attached: 1561421726809.png (428x456, 240K)

>Even outside of reproduction, both are necessary for a well run society
Not for long.

Not. For. Long.

Attached: 18l4mmbdf8f0ejpg.jpg (970x546, 139K)

Of course it can. Men are extremely different from other men, yet are equal.

your university induced illusion of intellect and smartness does you no good here, here people actually have other views and life experiences than the sniffing your won farts echo chamber singular brainwashing enviorment of modern "education", it's fucking off topic in an elephant thread about happy feelings but you just had to come in and ruin it with your shitty delusioned so called convictions, i know you got these views from long hard yeard in indoctrination school AKA university and social fake science, your complete inability to even understand the anons point about the bell curve distribution further reinforces my own point that getting the ever so covetet high society education/brainmoldingwash does not make one smart or intelligent, it makes you a smug condescending machine believeing themselves to be in the same class as the great thinkers and simple philosophers. your eyes are open but you cannot see.

>Girl joins guild
Thats not as bad as having a girl in the guild when suddenly another joins. After a week you log on and the guild is you, 2 officers and a handful of people feeling too much pity to leave. Logging in like both of your parents got arrested and you have to ask your traumatized younger siblings to explain how it happened.
I don't know if any of you have ever been in a guild when the last remaining people decide its best to disband, but its probably the worst feeling you can have in an online game.

Attached: 1568884589766.png (550x530, 129K)

I gave you a serious repose back. If you want to argue I responded with hogwash, then actually point towards the hogwash in question.

Something that is different can be equal. Two things not being the same does mean one thing automatically has to be better.

On an individual scale, no one is equal. On a gender scale, no one is equal either. On a species scale, no one is equal, either.

Welcome to the universe; it's unfair.

Well, duh. All of humanity is heading towards a lab grown hive mind of clones eventually. We still got a while before then though. Might as well make the best for it.

>I gave you a serious repose back
You really didn't, though.

Which raises the question, why should we discriminate on gender when even in the same gender, no one is equal? It's better to be equally inequal than discriminatory.

same, raided with girls in guilds during vanilla-wotlk never had any drama. must be all the shit guilds that had drama.

By that logic, we shouldn't discriminate among species, either. We discriminate because we can, because it works, because it's in accordance with our nature, and because it brings structure. Survival of the fittest.

>is african
>tries to steal iphone

I'm just going to ignore the random insults and weird conjecture.

>your complete inability to even understand the anons point about the bell curve distribution
I understood it just fine. I even pointed out that i'm explicitly not arguing against his claim. What I did say is that I think the statistics do not necessarily imply that women are inherently inferior. Or that old fashioned social roles are justified.

>Yea Forums isn't full of reta-

That's a stretch, because species are inherently different on another level than genders of the same species. You discriminate against cows because literally all they do is eat grass and shit. They taste delicious, so we slay them.

>the result of the systems of power still being primary aimed for the benefit of men
It's aimed to benefit men because when women occupy the positions instead the societies collapse. Natural selection.

>Women are happier in a post feminist world were they are not essentially slaves you have children with.
Not when you ask them to tell you how happy they are they're not.

>The assumption that one is inferior is ridiclous at best
That's your assumption.

My assumption is they've evolved to perform different tasks, because of the advantages that specialization brings.

Human beings have ALWAYS gendered work, in all societies ever observed, and it's always along similar lines in every successful culture. It's not coincidence that women spent their time e.g. making clothes in rome, in medieval europe, in china, in the fucking incan empire so no danger of that terrifying cultural transmission that's always brought up to obfuscate the facts. These societies organized themselves in these similar ways all across the planet because that's how they're most efficiently aligned. That's not to say they were optimized, just that even literal pre-scientific cavemen who arrived at their ways of doing things through pure lowest common denominator trial-an-error figured this out. For you to arrive at the opposite conclusion makes you literally dumber than cavemen. Doing the equivalent of sitting there saying that, actually, the rock would roll uphill if not for the oppressive societal expectation that it should roll downhill, and that all rocks just happening to roll downhill literally everywhere one is observed is... what? Coincidence? Oh, wait, I forgot. It's the conspiracy. Because people really need to get in a room and conspire to make the world do exactly the same thing that it does even when they do nothing.

I did. A non serious response would have been something like this:

>But that does not make one superior to the other.
That's one of the most retarded shit denialist spew.
They admit that having a non-trash IQ implies having a very high chance of being male, that all the important social functions should be fulfilled by males, that almost all the achievements of human civilization is by males.
Then they add the retarded denial bit at the end:
>b-b-but this doesn't mean men are better, heh heh... *tips fedora* m'ladies, you have roles to fulfill, you're amazing at being housekeepers! no man can clean as well as you!

nobody cares
fuck off

>inherently different on another level
You're not the authority to make that distinction.

There's a difference between genders. There's a difference between species. Both allow for discrimination. Saying one is allowed but the other isn't is being a moral arbiter, and then we stray into the realm of subjectivity.

If you want to go that far though. Then nothing is equal or unequal, because all of those are just values we humans particularly decided upon.

>By that logic, we shouldn't discriminate among species, either.
The difference between a human and a one cell organism and the difference between a human male and a female male is significantly bigger.

Humans don't work on the principle of survival of the fittest. We never have, and probably never will.

pröööhhh!! :DDD

>Humans don't work on the principle of survival of the fittest. We never have, and probably never will.
Jesus fucking christ how much of a goddamn retard are you? Making even the religioustards look rational by comparison. Get the fuck out of here.

>Humans don't work on the principle of survival of the fittest. We never have, and probably never will.
Okay, now you're just blatantly trolling. No one could be this sheltered.

Attached: 1522891879287.jpg (1596x1582, 368K)

>Humans don't work on the principle of survival of the fittest. We never have, and probably never will.

Attached: 1505072632141.gif (234x159, 315K)

>It's aimed to benefit men because when women occupy the positions instead the societies collapse.
Which is not true because women have held positions of power plenty of times without society collapsing.

>Natural selection.
Doesn't apply to humans in the same way it does to animals.

>Not when you ask them to tell you how happy they are they're not.
What the fuck does that even mean?

>My assumption is they've evolved to perform different tasks, because of the advantages that specialization brings.
Which I do not deny. The part of your assumption that is wrong is that such a thing somehow makes women inferior to men. When in reality, it simply means they are different and are good in different things.

Who do you think has more chance to survive in a fight, user? A really strong man with a spear. Or a really weak man that has convinced fifty average men to fight for him?

the convincing sure is easier if you are strong and with a spear

That is still survival of the fittest, retard.
Although I'm sure you're autistic and take everything so literal that you think "fittest" means physique only.

Attached: 1505397609813.gif (538x572, 338K)

The really strong guy with a spear who've convinced fifty other strong men to fight for him and armed them with spears as well.

Also, depending on level of combat aptitude, the spear guy could kill the fifty average men and assrape the weak guy afterwards.

>You're not the authority to make that distinction.
There is no authority on that distinction. The best you have are biologists, nearly all of which would agree with the assessment that the difference between a man and a woman is different from the distinction between a cow and a one cell bacteria.

>Saying one is allowed but the other isn't is being a moral arbiter, and then we stray into the realm of subjectivity.
We were straying into the realm of subjectivity the moment the concept of discrimination entered the picture. Discrimination being possible is a fact, it being valid is a subjective argument.

You're aware survival of the fittest doesn't mean raw strength, right? Having social skills to form massive groups is what makes us fit to excel in our climate. The weak socialite who forms relationships with those who can protect him is more fit for survival then the strong guy who pisses everyone off.

Discrimination is reality. It's not subjective.

nooooo clearly I'm too stupid to understand it doesn't concern physical fitness exclusively and somehow this is supposed to reflect poorly on you, I guess, or more likely waste half an hour getting nowhere so until you get exasperated enough to leave and I get the last word, which is the closest I ever got to knowing how it feels winning an argument

Why does this happen so often in wow but so rarely in other mmos

Could be. Or you might be a strong man with a spear that has the personality of a dead cow.

Obviously, I do not. What i'm trying to point out, which you unsurprisingly missed, is that humans "fitness" is more than just raw power. If anything, raw power is completely insignificant.

Don't try to change the argument.

>Also, depending on level of combat aptitude, the spear guy could kill the fifty average men and assrape the weak guy afterwards.
We are talking about normal humans here. Not legendary heroes of folklore.

Normal humans can do insane feats of violence. You really are sheltered, aren't you?

Imagine if one day all dolphins grew arms and hands.

There's other facets of evolutionary fitness than just brawniness, you fool. Being very charismatic makes one extremely fit in an evolutionary sense.

Fuck, how can cars even compete, in the future we should be riding elephants instead.

No shit. It's almost like that was the point of my entire argument. Human "fitness" is not a matter of raw power, or even of obviously biological differences.

If I convince 50 people to go kill you, I am the "fittest." Or at least relatively more "fit" than you.

yeah
peak fitness, this
fucking idiot

Attached: 1552109776768.jpg (800x1191, 159K)

That discrimination exists is reality. If it is valid to do, that is a different matter altogether.

Sorry, I forgot the [THIS IS CLEARLY SARCASTIC YOU FUCKING IMBECILE] tags. Won't happen again.

Arguing with a legit autist is a very interesting experience.

I'd rather have a guild full of weaponized autism ready to steamroll every raid rather than one subpar whore. Sorry bitch, you're bottom priority. Simple as.

>Normal humans can do insane feats of violence.
Sure. Would still put the odds on the guy with fifty people backing him up.

Also, I said "Strong guy" not "Insanely strong guy." Learn to read.

male elephants do that with each other. it's a dominance display. he's not really teaching it anything it doesn't instinctively know already, just obliging it.

It's very much valid, I've discriminated my entire life and become reasonably successful from doing so.

No, your argument was that Humans don't subscribe to survival of the fittest at all. Literally no one ever said human fitness was based on raw power.

>Humans don't work on the principle of survival of the fittest. We never have, and probably never will.

they're lovely beings, which other animals pet back?

I agree. Especially if they are also sexist and stupid.

In BC the guild I was in had a southern couple who had a kid and got divorced as the expansion played out. They both wanted to play and not care for the kid. Dad eventually lost the kid to her and she took his PC too so he couldn't play and she couldn't play due to caring for the kid full time. I'll always remember the endearing way that guy would say "mana biscuts" when asking for mage food during the preraid setup. Super funny.

I'm more thinking "delusional and sheltered".

I'm thinking more two passive aggressive little bitches fighting over the last word like anyone cares after a 50-post off-topic argument that lead nowhere because the reddit niggers got their egos into it. Just fucking kill yourselves, see a psychiatrist, or whatever makes you fuck off and stay fucked off already. Nobody wants you people here.

I mean, most people here are also incredibly delusional and sheltered.

Sexist? Probably.
Stupid? If knowing that your guild is a bunch of spergs that will chimp out the instant a meathole is introduced into their ranks and you take precautions to make sure that you retain their skills rather than letting it all fall apart makes you stupid, then sure.

This thread was doomed to be an argumentative shitfest from the get-go, nigger.

Arguments are fine. Being a whiny little bitch is not.

Then live by your own words and shut the fuck up.

Survival of the fittest has a very explicit definition, user. You can't pretend that it somehow applies to humans because it makes your boner for fascism big. Natural selection applies to humans, survival of the fittest does not.

PROOOOH

Attached: 1568973198997.webm (960x540, 2.92M)

You're so fucking retarded you can only be a woman.
Studies show that the more women a company has, the worse it does. There was that one company made by a woman and she only employed women, said company imploded in record time because of constant bickering and infighting of the women who inherently can't get along with each other and as they are incapable of putting anything above them (in this case the company) they completely fucked up everything with their egoistic behavior. Studies also show that women take a fucking ass long time to "evaluate" risk, which in itself brings risk. Funnily enough even though they have such a long risk management they still manage to make the worst fucking decisions.
I'm not denying there are intelligent women, but the majority of them is fucking retarded, can only memorize something instead of actually understanding it yet think they are intelligent hot pieces of the shit.

Survival of the fittest means survival of the one most fit for the environment needed to survive in. In the case of human society, that's all kinds of different factors, but it's still survival of the fittest.

I do. You don't see me getting in a 50-post off-topic argument slinging passive-aggressive insults. Get some self-respect, or get out. Then I'll stop telling you to.

I don't give a fuck about the last word. I just like arguing with people. The only thing I desire is people putting some genuine effort into their arguments. Which I do actually get, from to time to time.

My current guild is probably run by a woman. And my last one had a cute east European girl do most of the talking during raids. Stop blaming your own inability to keep it in your pants on girls.

Its better this way. You dont need to be in the group, and some of the guys are awesome at the game and cool to hang with, but become complete spergs with women. Better to keep it boys only. Especially since men like to give women things for free, and that often ends up causing problems with looting in wow.

GM's running no girls groups know what they're doing and I support it.

Attached: reddit1.jpg (557x305, 34K)

what if at the same time every human on earth had their arms replaced with dolphin flippers? do you think humans could cope or would dolphins rise up as the new apex?

Attached: 1532814881997.png (357x301, 223K)

Not him but he has a point. Humanitarian efforts can run counter to survival of the fittest, yet humans feel empathy regardless. You could chalk that down to being for the good of society, but often that kindness extends even to those who drag others down.

Attached: 1568970804460.webm (360x640, 1.48M)

>Natural selection applies to humans, survival of the fittest does not
they are literally the same thing.

Cool, those are exceptions to the rule. I've been in more guilds that fall apart due to women than ones that stick together. And judging on my response, you really think that I'm one of the spergs that fawns over a meathole? No, I'm the officer that kicks them the instant I see any sort of trouble brewing and my guilds are better for it. Will you suck my dick now or later, white knight?

wait really? i thought all girls destroy guilds, damn Yea Forums cant be wrong, you are lying

What's with the recent elephant threads?

All humans are self serving. You might think you are virtuous, but you aren't. Subconsciously you do things that you know will benefit you. The difference is humans have the ability to know it could happen later. If you help me do X, then in the future you will be more obligated to help me with Y.
But not, humans are not virtuous.

Right. Is this you or is that ?
What a fucking argument, either way. You're two are really going places with this "argument" of yours.
>yous dumb
>no u
>nyuh-uh!
>yuh-uh!
Gripping stuff. What a show, I'm at the edge of my seat. Where will you go next?

Attached: 1567324248877.jpg (398x376, 37K)

>You're so fucking retarded you can only be a woman.
I'm a man, sorry.

>Studies show that the more women a company has, the worse it does.
No, they do not. If you want to make a claim this insane and inane, actually post those studies.

>but the majority of them is fucking retarded
Again, no they are not. We even talked about studies involving woman intelligence. Read that if you want to have some idea of what the truth might be like.

What's wrong with that dolphin?

Autists upset at board culture attempting to upset it. Ignore them, they'll get banned for off topic soon.

Survival of the fittest means evolving in a way that makes one the most fit for your environment. It was a theory invented by Darwin.

Read a dictionary.

Wrong? Don't talk about one of the oldest religions on earth that way.

>I'm a man, sorry.
Truly the core of all your arguments condensed into one phrase.

Too much reddit browsing

Human empathy is necessary for a functional society though. And though you shouldn't give help to those that would exploit or use you, it's usually very hard to determine who those people are.

>Survival of the fittest means evolving in a way that makes one the most fit for your environment
Based on the specimen most fit for the environment thriving, yes. That's what I said.

I don't think anyone would cope with it. I know I wouldn't. Hands literally defined us as a species. Just to suddenly one day have them replaced with flippers would be terrifying.

I dunno if you just didn't understand the other user's post but it wasn't about how virtuous people are, their post was about how we don't rule our society off of survival of the fittest because societally we tend to implement social safety nets that guarantee a certain level of happiness/safety to people that might otherwise be very poorly off: disabled people, minorities, neets, sick, injured. this doesn't have much to do with being 'virtuous' as it does say, not wanting a society where if you personally get injured, then you just fall through the cracks and die -- so we try to extend this to everyone.

>played with multiple girls in the guild for years
>nobody gave a shit
Stop playing with permavirgins and sluts.