Why did it fail?

>Dude Raider
>a fat Princess Peach
>that brown thing
>Playstation "Stars"
At least it has Kratos before xis transition.

aside from the gameplay and roster issues, this game was missing a lot, Smash usually has 10+ songs per stage with multiple remixes, I think this game had 1 or 2, arcade mode was timed and slow as fuck, arcade mode boss was lazy and boring to fight, there were no other single player features such as an adventure mode, event mode, stage builder, or challenges, it did a shitty job at cataloging Sony's history and characters they most we got was a paragraph description of each fighter and that's it, I wasn't a fan of the combined stages thing they had going, etc

super only kills
some supers were extremely overpowered compared to others. kratos for example.

Sony doesn't have memorable characters compared to Nintendo.

didn't it also have lots of clone Cole characters?

It had Cole and Evil Cole.
This game was really scrapping the bottom of the barrel for picks

It was too easy, got bored of winning after a week

It's better than smash, only retarded nintendo fans think otherwise. If you don't think it's better you didn't try it full stop

it'd bad

Not all supers were costed the same, Kratos had the most expensive.
You could pull off 3 Jak and Daxter LV1s for every 2 Kratos.

>Samus
>Dark Samus

>Kirby
>Metaknight/Dark Kirby

>Link
>Young Link
>Toon Link

>Zelda
>Shiek

>Marth
>Lucina/Female Marth

The original roster was much better, why did they fuck it up?

Also Crash and Spyro was going to be in it, but Activision demanded a ton of money for it.

Attached: 98898987978.png (299x168, 113K)

there's still proper reps for those series
where the fuck are lammy, carmelita or any other ape escape character?
playstation all stars isn't bad because sony lacks something for a crossover
it's bad because, if you think through enough, you can make a good playstation crossover
sony just lacks effort and passion

it's still lacking both in terms of characters and art style

Kill yourself retard

it's true
it's just slighty worse than the retail release but that's not much of a high bar, is it?
why not look up what other properties sony owns or what other third party series could fit?
you're still settling for less

Isnt this game just a worse shrek superslam?
youtu.be/yijK_lzSpBQ

Attached: Shrek_SuperSlam_gamecube_cover.png (1024x680, 1.26M)

>zelda/sheik
Rest of the list is good but that's a dumb thing right there

Sequel will be revealed tomorrow.

And how will it look "better"?

Not enough obscure rival cutscenes

it'll have crash and spyro

This game had some retardedly hard levels/challenges in it from what i remember

You forgot the Playstation Classic. Now that was a monumental fuck-up.

>Shadow was cut
thank fuck

source

there was a video talking about some discovered cut content/beta for PSASBR but forgot the one i was referring to

Shadow doesn't deserve to participate in this shithole

Too little fat princess porn

>The sony move.
Move was a Eye Toy development which in fact was better than the wiimote with incredibly higher precision.