What's her name, user?

Sonic Mania > 3&k > Sonic 1 = CD > 2

Oh, fuck.

Attached: 1553908557957.png (286x239, 79K)

>1 and CD > 2
Gosh no unless you mean the Christian Whitehead versions.

Wrong Retard
dunno if 4 = 3, but ill take it
its not even out yet
no way in hell 4 = 3
fucking retard

Zelda oot > Zelda LA = Zelda ALttP > Zelda 1 > Zelda BS I suppose > Zelda 2

>no way in hell 4 = 3
It's objectively correct, though.

That image was made for gears

Yes but Big secret inbound
sonic 2 stops being fun after Casino night

DMC goes:
5 = 1 = 3SE > 3 = 4SE > 4 > DmC:DE >>> DmC = 4 Refrain >>> 2

5SE, whenever it drops, will be the best in the series, if it adds as much as previous SE releases.

Breath of Fire

Thank you. Absolute based.

The Last Of Us

Reverse all those signs and it might make sense.

Halo

>Zelda 2 lowest
No, not even close.

I can only think of devil may cry, nothing else fits.

Attached: ssrphf75rih11.jpg (1277x725, 390K)

remove 5 and 4, Mass Effect

FO4 > FONV = FO3 > FO1 = BOS > FO2

Persona, but swap 4 with 2

That's just bait.

Just the amount of numbers makes me go insane trying to think what it would be. I'd say metal gear that that makes me question OP's sanity.

>old good new bad

Disgaea

reverse it and you have MGS

halo

dragon quest

>MGS5 the best
>Zelda 2 the lowest

Attached: 1537153860027.png (763x718, 1.28M)

DMC5 is on top because it has everything. Gameplay, cinematics, story, level design, variety, enemies - everything a DMC game needs.

DMC3 and DMC4 are both great games. DMC3 has a better story and better characters. It also has more variety, to an extent. Meanwhile, DMC4 has better gameplay, level design, enemies, and weapon quality. Out of the two, DMC3 is a much better standalone experience but DMC4 is a better "game".
People would often say that DMC3 has a better story than DMC5 but I would disagree. DMC3 is the start of the story. DMC5 is a continuation. When both are equally good, the beginning of the story always has a bigger impact on the viewer.

DMC1 and DmC are on the same spot for different reasons. On one hand, DmC has better gameplay, level design, and variety. On the other, DMC1 has atmosphere, soundtrack, and enemies going for it.
Both games have a pretty bad story but only DmC tries to be "story-driven". DMC barely gives its characters any personality while DmC makes its retarded.
I would place them next to each other. I'd say I see DmC as maybe "a better game" but I fail to find any reason to respect it, given everything good in it was just taken from the mainline DMC games. Meanwhile, DMC1, even if wonky, can still be seen as a solid foundation for the series.
People tend to have very strong opinions on DMC1 but they don't put much thought into it. It's a good game but it is heavily dated. It's an achievement it's perfectly playable even today, but the issues of the game are easy to see.

DMC2 is just a sad and a bad game. It's a shame, as the game did have quite a few interesting ideas, but the final product is just a mess.

Could be OP just made up something random to laugh at us all.

HoMM

>4 = 3
fuck off

Attached: hmmm.gif (517x328, 1.69M)

That's a horrible taste.

pokemon

Shit taste detected. Literally every zone besides oil ocean is great.

Final Fantasy

Super Mario World 2:Yoshi's Island>Super Mario World=Super Mario Bros 3>Super Mario Bros=Super Mario Land>Super Mario Bros 2

What's her name, user?

Attached: what her name.png (3000x150, 19K)

FF5>FF4=FF3>FF1=FF: Mystic Quest>FF2

Try not to make it so obvious next time op

>buy full Guild Wars collection because Yea Forums says it's good
>most boring mmo i've ever played
you only like it because of nostalgia goggles

>gets tricked by a forum full of pepe and wojack posters into buying a video game let alone the full collection without any knowledge whatsoever
>"my personal experience is more relevant than everyone else's"
lmao faggot

No.

Pokemon
Gen 5 > 4 = 3 > 1 = all spinoffs except mystery dungeon > 2

fpwp

persona

are you one of the retards who judge vidya without playing them?
and don't pretend it's expensive or something

based

Possibly FE, but I never played 1-3, only the re-makes but I would say
Thracia>FE4=NM>SD>Echoes
Only spin-off I played is Warriors and Heroes.
I wouldn't reate Heroes above Echoes, and possibly not Warriors either

3>5=4>spinoff>1>2

This was some nice bait. Actually got me mad

Theres no way DMC5 is better than 3 or 4. You can argue it's a complete game compared to 4, but it's just much better to play and the plot doesnt suffer for the sake of nostalgia, nor is the pacing as terrible despite going through the game in reverse once you reach the Dante levels.

1 > 3 > 4 > 5 > DmC > 2

>arguing about a series you've obviously never played
He'd be right to reverse them

nice bait

Honeymoon phase is over, user. 5 didnt live up to the promise of exceeding expectations, in fact it fell under reasonable expectations of people like me who knew Vergil wouldnt be playable ever since the/v/ and ESRB leak was confirmed with the reveal trailer.

>1 is demon souls
>2 is dark souls
>3 is bloodbourne
>4 is DS3
what

Game that's not out > Serviceable at best = Best of the series > Pretty damn good = Good > Fantastic

What?

Yakuza

>5 didnt live up to the promise of exceeding expectations
I expected my expectations to be moderately exceeded but not really.
In reality, I was blown away.
>Honeymoon phase
Tell me that after you remove your nostalgia goggles and contrarian butt plug.

>Best of the series
Bloodborne is f2p on PC, give it up. Demon's Souls is the best game now.

This is correct, but casuals will hate you for speaking it.

Man I sure love spindashing past all danger for four zones in a row because the game wasn't tested properly.

sonic if 5 is mania and spinoff is cd

If you reverse the order, then Persona is the correct answer. Except for the spinoff part I guess, the Persona series has no good spinoffs. Barring 5, you could also MAYBE say the same for the SMT series, depending on the spinoff you choose.

Contrarian opinion would be that 5 is the best, which it isn't. Nero gets a sidegrade, but you can't swap through breakers and you're better off using overture, buster, ragtime majority of the time. V is completely underwhelming to play and what could've been a fresh addition to the cast is immediately killed off to bring back Vergil for two back to back fights that pale in comparison to any of his previous incarnations. Dante is the same with rehashed and boring weapons and no new styles yet again. Lucifer alone puts his DMC5 devil arms to shame, which his most exciting weapon being TWO Kalina Anns.

Layton games maybe. The overuse of moving objects puzzles in 2 was really bad, vs. phoenix Wright was bad, 3 is arguably better than 1. But I dont know about Last Spectre and Miracle Mask

Contrarian opinion is putting 1 over 3.
Nostalgia goggles is putting 3 over 4 and 5.
>you can't swap through breakers
But you can. You are allowed to use your resources, user.
>V is completely underwhelming to play
You mean "overwhelming" because V plays nothing like anything ever had in the series.
I can see why people would not like to play V on higher difficulties, but as a standalone experience he is a fantastic addition.
>that pale in comparison to any of his previous incarnations
DMC5 Vergil fight is objectively the best-designed fight in DMC series. It is better than every single Nelo Angelo fight (which are Vergil 1.5 at their peak) and it is better than Vergil 3 in many ways. Primarily because the fight actively goes through Vergil 1, 2, 3, and then goes beyond that.
Emotionally, it's much more intense than Vergil 3 too because of the story actively culminates at that point as opposed to DMC3's resolution. Story-wise, DMC3's culmination is Arkham fight and while the message is great, the fight itself wasn't good.
DMC5's resolution is Nero's fight and it's, again, at its best it ever was done in the series. We got the mood and story-telling integrated into the gameplay itself, with direct player control. We get the outburst of hype and we are there to finish the story. It works. It's amazing.
>Dante is the same
DMC4 Dante was already near-perfect. There was no reason to change Dante much outside of some polish which they did.
>rehashed and boring weapons
This is objectively false. All "rehashed" weapons outside of Rebellion/Sparda/DSD have more fundamentally new functionality than rehashed one.
>Lucifer alone
Lucifer was a subpar standalone weapon (by design) and it shined as a tool to link combos together. All of its capability and then some more was redistributed between DSD, taunts, and Faust.

1 does everything 3 does better besides combos and story, which is the small tradeoff 3 makes, though both are amazing. 4 pushes the combos to the limit but also got shafted during development so it falls below 1 and 3 in every other regard. 5 had a full development cycle and it may as well have been a full-price Bloody Palace, except that even it's BP was delayed a few weeks.
>you can swap
You can break, not swap, and then hope RNG is good to you for your replacement.
>V is overwhelming
You have to be an absolute brainlet to think this, considering is was literally designed for casual players who couldn't pull off most Nero and Dante combos, and it shows with how limited V's movelist is.
>DMC5 Vergil better than Nelo, DMC3 Vergil, and Credo
No, just no. His doppelganger turns to dust if you sneeze at it, his timing for attacks is far too lenient, and his health regenerates too slow in DT
>Dante was already near-perfect
Exactly, which is why 5 is worse because his selection of Devil Arms is not as fun to use and even with four years of development, he doesn't have a single new style. He technically had five styles in 4 with Dark Slayer.