Why are games devoid of mystery?

Why are games devoid of mystery?

Attached: 825-voynich-manuscript-2.jpg (700x915, 153K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=QcWERThHN_w
youtube.com/watch?v=p6keMgLmFEk
youtube.com/watch?v=tTTRsrzndTY
youtu.be/tTTRsrzndTY?t=198
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Voynich Manuscript was solved. It's a medieval Turkish phonetic spelling.

Data mining. The internet.

Old games still have mystery. People discovered a FFIX sidequest for the first time this year.

Because the internet ruined everything

Because developers have gotten in trouble in the past for adding easter eggs. Also fans are obsessive and will overanalyze anything then get upset when the reveal doesn’t match their headcannon. Also modern games are rushed and tailored to the mass demograph which doesn’t care about little details, references to past games, witty quest text, cleverly named characters, etc.

They would if you stop looking at guides and walkthroughs like a fucking casual.

Wasn't it just a gardening book

>devoid of mystery
>when the greatest mystery on CSGO got a follow-up
Check it out. youtube.com/watch?v=QcWERThHN_w

Attached: 02099218.347.png (608x496, 18K)

Wait, for real? That's it?

that was proven to be bullshit, just like all the other times it's been "solved"

No, the guy is retarded. It's nothing more than hypotheses until this day.

Pretty much. It has a botany log, a section that describes medicinal and other uses for herbs, and a calendar.
Yep, apparently.
Sauce? Because they demonstrated a translation.

>Sauce? Because they demonstrated a translation.
That's not how the burden of proof works, idiot.

Screamers are so 2009. You can see it from the thumbnail on the progress bar
You also must live a kinda sad life considering how many times you've posted it already

The Voynich Manuscript is "solved" once a year.

Because nerds insist on knowing everything about everything

So you don't actually have any proof of what you're claiming?
youtube.com/watch?v=p6keMgLmFEk

No need to be rude

I wonder how many times books got copied just because a new owner could not make out a single word due to the odd hand writing.

What claim you absolute clown? You were the one claiming it was "solved". So instead you post a video from a team that wasn't even able to fully decipher it? Good show.

Typically there were standardized calligraphy scripts the monks were well versed into. I imagine things got a bit chaotic when more people became literate beyond the clergy.

If you read the comments, you'll find a post by the creators claming they can translate Etruscan as well, and that they can prove that Etruscans were Turks. Why are you believing their garbage? They haven't their information for rigorous study

>What claim you absolute clown?
You're claiming that my claim was proven to be bullshit. Right here So I asked you to provide a source, and you can't. Meanwhile, I did.
>a team that wasn't even able to fully decipher it?
But they did, it's just a very long process to translate it. They've translated several pages so far.

Because casuals need e erything spoonfeedinv to them.

>they can prove that Etruscans were Turks.
Can you prove they weren't?

>Why are you believing their garbage?
They showed their process and demonstrated it works. Keep seething, nigger.

You mean the Nero Family side quest on disc 4? That was discovered 6 six years ago. Not exactly recent.

They "proved" it just about as much John Smith proved that the Papyrus he bought "proved" that the lost tribes of isreal were in the US because of magic glasses god gave him. It's obvious bullhsit.

>You're claiming that my claim
Yeah no shit Sherlock, that's why the burden of proof falls on you. And that's not even my post.
>They've translated several pages so far
>"several pages" vs "fully"
Lol ok. So not only is that vague, it means they haven't been able to decipher it fully.

Did you even watch the video? They didn't hide anything in a fucking hat and refuse to let anyone see it. They showed exactly the process and how they deciphered it.
>Yeah no shit Sherlock, that's why the burden of proof falls on you
And I posted my proof. You also made a claim, and did not provide proof.

The Voynich Manuscript is just a joke someone made hundreds of years ago. It's not the key to Atlantis, or a book of demons, or some other paranormal nonsense like that.

>The Voynich Manuscript is just a joke someone made hundreds of years ago.
Keep up with the thread, fag. It's not a joke, it's just a gardening book written phonetically in medieval Turkish. It's been solved.

Fuck off, Rent Friendster.

>And I posted my proof. You also made a claim, and did not provide proof.
Proof of what? Something that's not deciphered? Where are you trying to go with this?

>They showed exactly the process and how they deciphered it.
Except... they didn't decipher it.

They literally deciphered it. Deciphering is not the same process as translating, faggot. Deciphering means to understand the 'code' something is written in. They've identified the language, and are now fully translating it. Is English not your first language?

>this SEETHING /x/nigger who can't fathom that there's one less mystery in the world
lmfao

Attached: 1546852857314.jpg (500x500, 27K)

>It's been solved
Except is hasn't. Where is the evidence? A few sentences that appear to map to medieval Turkish? And claims that they've done a few pages? Why hasn't this been published in academic journal to be critically reviewed?

>Why hasn't this been published in academic journal to be critically reviewed?
Their process is clearly available right there to anyone who wants to critique it. They demonstrated exactly how they found their conclusion and demonstrated how it works. Do you think something only becomes true if it's peer reviewed by subjective faggots with an agenda? Because funnily enough there are studies that show peer review is literally worthless.

youtube.com/watch?v=tTTRsrzndTY
>other Turkish linguists have examined the work
OH NONONONONO

Cool. Please explain why every year there's some else with a new cipher. Why is the team from the video that you've posted is correct?

Attached: 2019-09-21_23-27-57.png (216x447, 11K)

How fucking embarrassing. You're so full of shit.

>Why is the team from the video that you've posted is correct?
Because they've demonstrated that they're correct, and have been confirmed by other linguists. Please explain why you're so resistant to the proof in front of your face.
Mind talking about this? Mind providing any evidence at all that they're wrong?

>implying games have no mystery

Attached: 99d632c5814dbe91215d6dc7656a7e5ca8e34d10_hq.jpg (350x205, 8K)

>Because they've demonstrated that they're correct, and have been confirmed by other linguists

How about their submission being rejected by actual experts, by their own admission?
youtu.be/tTTRsrzndTY?t=198
Who are these other linguists who have confirmed that they were correct?

Because mysteries require good writing.

>How about their submission being rejected by actual experts
What makes those experts any more reliable than the ones that have verified their claims? Why do you think experts don't also have agendas and can't be wrong? The proof is L I T E R A L L Y right there. They demonstrate their fucking process, they show that it works.

The theory of the four elements "literally works" in explaining more of the natural physics of the world than the portions of the manuscript they claim to have revealed with their "translation".

Proof for your claim? What the manuscript's writer thought was true at the time has zero bearing on whether or not the translation is correct.

>Proof for your claim? What the manuscript's writer thought was true at the time has zero bearing on whether or not the translation is correct.
I don't even know why i'm wasting my time talking to your, you're either a troll or an idiot

You're talking to me because you're fucking furious that a mystery was actually solved. You can't stand it, so you're trying to find some way, any way, to justify to yourself that it doesn't count and you can keep being amazed by it. Can you provide evidence that their deciphering is wrong, or can you not?

>keeps posting this

>autistic manchildren arguing over some stupid little book
you people have no lives

MYSTERY NIGGERS

in retrospect thats kind of crazy to have a boss have litterally no explanation in dark souls

Where do you think you are, nigger? Go back.

wow you sound so epic user, do you have a blog or something?

I say they're wrong, and since by your own words they're right because they say they're right, despite evidence to the contrary, me saying they're wrong is just as valid.

t. trolled libtards

>they're right because they say they're right
They're right because they've demonstrated that their process works.
>despite evidence to the contrary
Such as?

>The Orkhon writings are not the oldest known Turkish texts. Both Sumerian and Etruscan are directly part of Turanian languages such as Turkish. We are not the only ones who are claiming this. Outside of hear-say we have more than substantial proof upon this subject which will all be shown in our publication.

We wuz Romans an shit

Thanks for the video, I had no idea

Because the first two Mortal Kombat games already happened.

This is hilarious

Attached: 5VMklUT.jpg (760x596, 206K)