Implying this isn't the actual best Ace Combat

>implying this isn't the actual best Ace Combat
>great aesthetic
>great music
>very accurate flight physics
>great plot

Attached: I mean the JP version but I like this cover more.jpg (1441x1429, 345K)

Literally just a worse version of AC2.

the only ace combat game I couldn't bring myself to beat, and I played both the worldwide release and the fan translation.

Describe to me the " very accurate flight physics"

Each Ace Combat is unique in his own way :
-4 have the atmosphere
-5 have the story
-0 have the Gameplay
-6 have the narration
-7 have good visual

3 has good music i think.

>filename

Attached: serveimage.png (450x443, 100K)

>5
>the story

5 > 1 > 4 > 0 > 7 > 6 > X > 2 > 3 > X2

What ?
5 have a good story, even if the tropes are classic as fuck.

Good sorting. Even if can't play AC5 anymore.

FLY LITTLE NUGGETS, of all the AC's 5 was the most over dramatic (slightly more than 6)

Who cares about how "accurate" the flight physics are? This is arcade, not a sim, and they feel like shit.

0 > 4 > X > 2 > 3 = 5
haven't played the rest

I only played AC4, I have 5 installed on pcsx2 though, should I play it or go back to 3 or maybe 2 first?

2 is the most similar to 4
3 and 5 are each their own thing

3 is completely different from any other game in the series since it's pure scifi and anime. Personally I didn't like 2 at all, it feels like a really awkward transitional period between the pure arcade stuff of 1 and the more fully featured experiences 4 and 5 offer. I'd recommend just playing the PS2 trilogy and then continuing to wherever you want from that.

GO DANCE WITH THE ANGELS

You konw you are wrong.
Why do you even shitpost ?

What the fuck? 2 is basically an improved version of 1. It's better in literally every aspect. If anything, 3 is the "transitional" game.

5 is extremely similar to 4 and in the arcade mode you even play as Mobius One because they didn't bother on changing anything else on a rushed release where the only concept they barely explored and over exploted was the Razgriz

AC3 is the real shit, different feel from any other in the saga and you can see it has the most work put on it. The missions, the atmosphere, the OST is Einhander tier

Isn't that version missing half the content and has almost all the story cut out?
>very accurate flight physics
you can't be serious

>5 is extremely similar to 4
In a pure mechanical sense sure, but the mission design results in a completely different gameplay experience. 5 is definitely the most scripted of the AC games I have played (haven't played 6 or 7)

The dynamic of missions changes because the implementation of wingmans in the game, and that makes it more unique than the lone YF22 obliterating yellow planes because they're bad until you kill them.

I like the change they made focusing on the people rather than on war itself on 5, but the sensation you get is rather the same

sad they didn't improve on anything on 6 and even less on 7, story-telling wise, guess I'll stick to Zero and 3 as my all time favourites, you should give them a go

One of the best presentation and overall aesthetic in games ever, sound and music included, like holly fuck. Late ps1 games are peak ludo art form

>very accurate flight physics
Yeah, most don't (or want to) get this. And if do, as a negative, ???

Recapturing Gracmaria is still the best AC mission