>roles are randomly assigned: you're liberal, fascist or literally Hitler. liberals have majority >fascists can see everyone's roles, liberals and Hitler don't know shit >everyone pretends to be liberal >each turn a player gets to be president and pick a chancellor, players vote on whether the pair is a go >having an order that will give info on as many players as possible in as few rounds as possible is a good idea, i.e. 1-5 -> 2-6 -> 3-7 in a 7 player game >president draws 3 policy cards which are either liberal or fascist, discards one and passes 2 to the chancellor >chancellor makes the final choice on which policy to pass >first team to max policies wins (5 for liberals, 6 for fascists) >presidental powers are unlocked as more fascist policies are passed, for example after 3 are down the next player to be elected president, if a fascist policy is passed, will have a gun and shoot a player off the map >if Hitler is shot liberals insta-win >if Hitler is elected chancellor with 3 fascist policies down, fascists auto-win >liberals win by taking notes, paying attention and trying to figure out who lied based on inconsistencies in the deck, attitude etc and pausing to discuss the game logically, trying to solve it as a puzzle >fascists win by lying, conflicting with others, sewing chaos, framing others and rushing votes full rules here: secrethitler.io/rules/ The account is free and doesn't require an email as far as I know. Mods get anal about "naughty" words in your username but once you get into the game they can't touch you. >A primer on understanding the "loop skip" meta: pastebin.com/L9u8VUNV
>starting the game with two fascist pulls liberals are retarded if they lose this one lmao
Gabriel Hughes
man this looks complicated I just figured id finally click on one of these threads to see what it is all about but man
Jaxon Flores
It's not that complicated. Come join the next game and you'll see.
Henry Rogers
OP's rule explanations are shit, dont know why he sprinkled it with meta explanations when Yea Forums's a bunch of retards who wont know how to play anyway. Just go read the pdf of the rulebook for 2 minutes and you'll get everything
>10 players >1 lib policy, 4 fasc policies >first person shot is hitler. glorious lib victory
Angel Walker
>playing r on gp when hitty invs you lib
Brayden Taylor
im gonna need some vocabulary lessons if i want to play this game, what the fuck is inv
Juan Harris
SE means Investigation
Joseph Robinson
any other weird slang that i need to know about this game
Charles Myers
cnh is confirmed not hitler conf is conflict
Adrian Adams
>SE Special Election, where a president picks the next president instead of the normal rotation. After the SE, the president who wouldve been next if not for the SE, is the new president candidate. >inv investigate, where a president sees another player's party membership. he reports it to the group, but can lie >B liberal policy >R fascist policy >L liberal >F fascist >frozen has done something to invoke suspicion, or has had a suspicious person ally with them, to the point where they are unviable for election >cnh confirmed not hitler. all players who become chancellor after 3 fascist policies are CNH, but can still be fascists >conf conflicting. fascists dont typically conflict with other fascists, so if players conflict, generally one is fascist and the other is liberal. exceptions may include 2 liberals turning on each other, or hitler accidentally outing one of his fascists
Kayden White
Why cant I find this game on the main list ? Do I really need the URL to find it ?
Carter Thompson
Its private, so you can only join by clicking the game link.
Julian Collins
Nevermind its called newgame, found it.
Thomas Taylor
Holy fuck do something you retards. Theres only one card left for each color either choose or give it up to chance dont take 50 minutes for one decision on a shitty web browser game.
Game was over the minute 4 investigated 7 at the start of the game for no reason and then told him who to make chancellor for no reason. If youre a fascist dont investigate without getting every ones input first and asking who you should use it on or else you'll just be outing not only yourself but another fasc
Levi Green
2 More Needed!
Robert Rodriguez
As I explained before, this is wrong for multiple reasons: - There was discussion, and nobody said anything or pushed for anyone. - Investigating your order-assigned chanc (someone you didn't arbitrarily pick) is the normal, regular play, and deviations from that are suspect. If this is something you don't already know you're not qualified to make comments on peoples' play. - It was a 6B deck and I was assured to get RRR.
If this is 8: screenpeeking off of 5 (absolutely cheating and is bannable) and seeing that 5 investigated someone as fascist does not make you smart or good at the game. Retroactively trying to piece together logic as to why your screenpeeked inver saw a fas is not believable to others.
The fas misplay there was 7 not SEing 2, a credible SE, instead of 6. 6 should also not have shot the people in the conflict who jaed them, as if 58 were fas fas, they would not have neined the passing 6x.
Levi Roberts
Also, if top deck was red - which was very likely, certainly more than a coinflip - then 2x was going to play, which would have won fascists the game.
Aiden Evans
Just one more needed! Get in here!
Elijah Ross
do i need an account to play
Luke Butler
yes but accounts are free and easy to make
Adam Nguyen
Yes.
John Miller
Don't you want to shoot Hitler so we can be liberal together user? I'm electing, right now.
>Liberals can only win by pausing and thinking before they act >Detecting inconsistencies >And thinking logically So it's not possible for them to win, got it
