Who was right?
Who was right?
The one who didn't post practically unreadable picture.
Ị̙͕̳͖̤̩̙̮̭̮̇̉̄͐ͪ̀͡ ̸̼͇͇̰̟͍̬̫̣̜̥͍̠̼̘̘̳͙ͩͪ̿͑̄̿͛͘ͅç͖͓̦͓̻̦̤̱̻̻̯̞̰̇̉͊ͯͦͤ̔̉̒̐̐̍a̶̸̱͍̞̞̙̺̖͙͎͔̱̻̙̺̳̟ͫ͛̄͌̿ͬ̇ͭ̊̄̒͛̌̽͋͊ͅn̴̥͖͕̤̽͗̂ͧͧ̃̋ͩ͊ͪͭ̓͢'̴̛͕̻̮̊ͪͭ͐̎ͫͯ̚t̴̮̦͈̠̱̦̰̤͇͚͉̩͓͎̰̰̟͈̃͋̈́̌ͫͯ͡ ̨̗̞̥̻̣͇̞̣̰̪̜̮̙̄̈͐ͩ̂̓̋̃̈̉̋ͬ̾̋͛͗͒̌͝r̨̛͔̞͈͚̳̠͈̣̝͉̣̯̪͖̺̤̮͉ͭ͋̾̐ͤ̂ͨ̄́ę̡̙̘̼͕̩̰͓͍̗̪̳̐̓̍ͩ͋̍̎ͭ̊ͬͤ̉̒ͭ̈ͫ̚͜͞͞a̵̛̖̼̻̟͕̣̺͈̙̣͙̩̞̋̑̉̍̔͌̀ͯͤ͌̕d̷̺͚̰̼̜̾̑ͣ̄̊̉̉̂͊̇ͭ̇͑̚͘ ̴̧̙͕̘̩̠̹͕̱̳͔̯̩̫̻̣͚̥̺̐̃̒̍̈ͦ̆͊̏ͩ̄̌͒͌ͬ̈̕s̵̗͙̳̝͎ͫ̔ͬͪ͌̋ͭ̃̏́̃ͧ͝ḩ̵̥̜͓̱̘̮̞͖͔͔͒ͧ̍̓ͣ̏ͨ̚͘͜͡i͔̭͎̦̫̣̝͖ͬͤ̓̈́̀̊́͐̔̊́̽ͣ͂̕t̥̳̠̙̻̺̥̯̺̞͈̝̬̤͆̎̂̄̑ͧͬ͐͆̍͂ͯ͋́͠
non-dark theme
>15 Reviews vs 418 Reviews
Control is easily an 8/10, all Yea Forums can bitch about is
>muh ugly female protagonist
So? Do you trust critics or user score averages?
There is a clear difference on how critics received Second Sight than users did. Those 15 reviews have zero chance of containing drive-by 0 'didn't play the game' scores. There are 29 critics for Control who played the game and gave it an equivalent score as users did for Second Sight. 29 critic scores isn't that much greater than 15 user scores. Critics are telling you one thing, the users another. So again, who is right here?
You answered your own question. Users tend to review games much more harshly and can give a game a 5/10 just because they dislike one element of it.
Well it seems that can be the case with new games that get tons of user reviews, yet that is not the case with Second Sight since that got more favorable reviews.
Isn't it curious how 15 user ratings for a game feel practically handpicked for quality compared to 418 ratings? I've been interested on a more serious note of seeing the difference of average review scores between not only critics vs user but forum vs forum.
Do you think for the people who actually played both games here they'd rank them around the same score?
I don't trust either, Critics are all paid off and users are all retards. If you have a half functioning brain you can determine a game's quality solely from live gameplay.
>Control is easily an 8/10
nah, it's a shallow, soulless tech demo
well shit, i am gonna make all these images into a gif.
To be fair, you have to have a high IQ to understand what Control is trying to do. Unsurprisingly, you, and most gamers, are too dumb for this.
Never played Second sight, how is it? Does Control plagiarize elements from this game?
>Second Sight and PsiOps back to back
It was truly psychic kino.
aghhhhh
Make it go faster
Critics are retards too.
Okay... how did you do this?
He just placed the noodles like that. Supreme craftmanship
ENHANCE
User scores are almost all garbage, and most critic scores are too. You need to find a few critics who tend to like the same games as you and use them as a reference point
Second Sight is such a good game.
>NO PC VERSION
its shit
There literally is. Good job being a complete and utter retard.
POST IT
POST IT NOW FAGGOT
Surely someone here has played both games.
Control is just your standard Third Person shooter that fails at being a RPG. Second Sight while abit clunky is still a more enjoyable product to play through.
>Yea Forums
>playing games
i cant play second sight cause no PC version
From what I've seen of Control both games deserve a 7/10 so I don't particularly trust either but neither is so far off that they aren't a useful reference point.