Who still /1080p/ here?

Upgraded to an entry level 24 inch 1080p 144hz about a year and a half ago.

About a week ago i got a great deal on a 27", 165hz, 1440p IPS G-sync monitor and i love it. I agree that 60 vs 144 is the most important difference for gaming but 1440p vs 1080 is very nice as well.

I agree that 4k gaming is a meme but there is a very noticable difference between 1080 and 1440. Obviously 144hz at 1080p is better than 30fps at 1440p, but all thing being equal 1440p is way superior.

Whats the best 1080p 144hz monitor right now?
All the top sellers i see are like 3 year old models.

Do I need a 2080 to play at 1440p 144hz?

Yeah probably if you want a stable 144fps and play newish games on high settings.

Yeah, there aren't that many new monitors in that segment. Moast of them have garbage VA or TN panels as well with horrible contrast and brightness.

>>About a week ago i got a great deal on a 27", 165hz, 1440p IPS G-sync monitor
Link?

Sorry, got it used. Traded my shitty Acer 24" 144hz (which i got at an employee discount) and payed him $150 in between. So totalt cost for me under $300.

Hopefully it's a good monitor. I love my chinese cartoons but also love vidya so I'm stuck in the IPS life.

Who 1440p 144hz adaptive sync IPS monitor here? Poortards/consolekiddies need not apply

jokes on you, my monitor ran at 3440x1440 120hz

xd ikr looool memes memes meeeemes

i kinda got memed into a freesync monitor. reviews said it worked great with g sync even if it wasnt validated. Turned it on and there's just minor flickering whenever it kicks in range.. not too much of an issue but after a while i get eyestrained. Thinking of shipping it back.

Attached: 1345757575225.png (593x635, 210K)

>768p on both my laptop and college dorm TV
>works well on casual pc games and switch
Nah, i will wait another 4 years

I'm just thankful there will finally be IPS 1080p 144hz monitors coming at the end of the year.

Me. It's the best you can get right now for both price and maximizing the panel with reasonable hardware. You physically cannot even get the most out of the 4k 144hz ones because there isn't enough bandwidth over DP1.4 to properly utilize it let alone the hardware powerful enough to drive it, and 1080p is a fucking joke in 2019. Shit's over 15 years old .My Dell laptop from 2005 was 1920x1200 and I gamed on it for years after that. People need to get with the times.

That's a shame. The whole new freesync thing is really a shitshow. Adaptive sync is really nice to have, especially for 1440p since it essentially future proofs your GPU to some extent.

just get a CRT for 2019 games -digital foundry

I regret buying my 144hz 1080p TN panel bros. I played fortnite seriously for 2 months before stopping so i cant even return this shit. Im thinking of upgrading to a ryzen 5 2600x/RX 5700.

Would this be good enough for the 1440p 144hz ips monitor?

I think a new 1080p 144hz IPS is in production right now that will hit market soon. I am waiting for that.

Not gonna upgrade my whole sustem ghat runs great on 1080 just so I can get a decent screen.

Check if your monitor is in this spreadsheet and if there are any tricks to fixing it (e.g. using CRU to tweak some values)
old.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/agc348/freesyncvrr_compatibility_with_nvidia_megathread/
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ej9mOe5NamLldpfyFfXrqvLMZP-aG2Zi1su7QzPRNJY/edit#gid=0

>165hz monitor as advertised
>actually needs to be overclocked and doing this causes some artifacting

cancer

Nah, I've seen 1080p and 1440p IPS monitors side-by-side. It's not all that different, and definitely not worth the price increase. You're much better off staying on 1080p and getting a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor if you want an upgrade from 60Hz.

>Works: yes

Attached: 1544448408288.jpg (800x450, 153K)

1440p 144 or 1080p 250hz?

playing old games like half life 1 on 144hz is already orgasmic what will almost double be like?

don't fell for the over 1080p meme, i got a customer look exact like what you think a rich kid never work for a day in his life looks like he probably looking at some youtube video browse internet internet say its awesome so he go for a 27 inch asus gaming monitor, few days later his father came to returns the 300 dollars monitor for a 24 inch monitor

For video and games, the improvement is absolutely noticable but a higher refresh rate is better, as you say (assuming you play games that support it)
However for everything else (web browsing, programming, using a filebrowser, etc.) 1440p provides much more utility.

Attached: file.png (1200x675, 50K)

1080p 60hz, reporting in.

higher refresh is better for non gaming stuff aswell

How the fuck is 1440p a meme, when it is worth it just for desktop usage alone? But really, the best thing about it is enabling larger screens: 1080p is fine for 24 inches and less, but going to 27 inches and more, it starts get all lego bricky. But 1440p is just perfect for 27 inches, sharp yet still easy enough to run game with native resolution.

Explain how higher refresh is more advantageous then resolution for programming or spreadsheet editing.

not advantageous but feels nicer/smoother

Anyone who hasn’t tried resolutions over 1080p should do it just for the sake of non-gaming stuff, it feels damn good to have 2 pages side by side without it feeling cramped as fuck.

>dood 1440
doesn't scale well either up or down. It is a dead end resolution.

What do you mean?

Here, even bought a 144hz IPS monitor.

What do you even mean? If you have a monitor that does 1440p native, why would you need to scale it any way?

Look up the game you want to play. Generally no though.

1080p content looks blurry on a 1440p monitor.

I've got that monitor and don't hate it. Only issue is that the colors are a bit fucky.

1080p75 is all I want
I'll swap to 1440p once it's widely become standard and a 200 bucks card can reasonably handle it

How long until 144hz 1440p IPS monitors are a thing with reasonable input lag? Looked at a computer store last week and all they had closest to that was one with 5ms of input lag. 3's my upper limit.

dont play 1080 content then?

there is a 1080p75 but its only costs a bit less than 144hz

what's more important, high framerates or going for a ultra widescreen monitor?

Attached: 1564828623760.jpg (1080x1350, 506K)

I mean 75 can be achieved on a fair amount of 60hz monitors just by tweaking in the settings, I've got my vp228 at 74hz and it's nice

Yes

Frame rate, I don't get how people can stomach below 60.

>bezels
>in 2019
when will this meme die?

me
i have 2 of this monitor

>games
high refresh
>everything else
ultrawide

Which is more important? You be the judge.

Yep. Most video is still at 1080p so why bother having a higher res monitor? Besides, I haven't found any games I like released in the past five years anyway.

Wait nevermind. Get a 3600 not a 2600. 5700 is good but consider the xt

you don't need yo play every game at 144 fps
most games are fine at around 90-120 fps

1080p is hideous and is only good if you play rooty tooty point and shooty garbage all day.

1080p asus here that's like 7 years old. I need to buy a new one, but I won't go 4k. I have a 4k tv and most stuff isn't formatted specifically for 4k.

i wish there was an ultrawide oled with high framerates, g-sync, dolby vision and 1440p

>After you play at 1440 or 4k there's no going back to 1080p
I never understood the race to acclimate yourself to new tech as quickly as possible.
>I can't go back to standardized formats
Congratulations, you've just handicapped yourself out of ever getting good value for money.

Now, if this was 15-20 years ago, and a higher resolution meant the difference between the UI taking up half the screen and actually being able to see what you're doing, then yeah, higher would be better.
But we live in the age of scalable UI elements now. 1080p is more than fine, and the cost of maintaining a steady framerate just isn't tenable. 1080p is perfect bang for buck. 1440p is excessive but acceptable, but anything beyond that is just e-peen measuring.

Why do we care about bezels?

1080P 60 here but I use 1440P VSR and it works fine.

They draw the eye for anyone with decent periphery awareness that's not half ape.
Also ruins multi-monitor setups for nonplebs.

>I'm so easily distracted by the nonmoving, monochrome EDGES of my screen that I need them removed
Who's the ape again?
>multi-monitor setups
Who games on more than one monitor at a time? Just get a bigger monitor

I have a 144hz 1080p monitor and a 60hz 1600x1200 monitor and I'm happy. I really like my 4:3 monitor, just wish it ran at a higher hertz

>1440p
>excessive
1440p/144hz is honestly the perfect middle ground for an upgrade. The increase in resolution is nice but not too much, and 144hz is more than worthwhile. I feel like 4k in a computer monitor is probably excessive considering how close most people are to them.

>I feel like 4k in a computer monitor is probably excessive considering how close most people are to them.
As someone who upgraded from 1440p to 4K: while the increase is noticeable I agree that it's really overkill.

1440p really isn’t new tech anymore, I remember getting a 1440p IPS screen back in 2012, and while it was more expensive than they were now, it’s not like it was *that* expensive even back then. Of course, it was more of a professional monitor than a gaming monitor, so 60hz only and no any adaptive sync tech in it, screens with that resolution and gaming focus only came later.

>dude just don't play the games you enjoy playing

Are there even any games that support 1080p but not 1440p? Any older games you have to scale any way no matter what modern screen you use and it looks nasty either way, and any even remotely modern releases support 1440p painlessly.

Now that I think about it, there have been only 2 games I’ve played that haven’t supported 1440p despite supporting 1080p:
>the Vista-era Halo 2 PC port
>Sang-Froid: Tales of Werewolves
And considering how much shit I’ve gone through the years, that tells quite a lot about how minor issue it is.

plenty mid-2000s games supported 1080p but not 1440p

1080p @ 60hz is more than enough.
Anyone who shills 1440p, 4K, 144hz, or 220hz fell for the meme.

Attached: 1567716541255.gif (160x160, 811K)

Who /4k/ here?

I only play japanese games and emulators so refresh rates above 60 are irrelevant for the most part. Also use the same monitor for work and its a godsend for productivity.

>he fell for the '120+Hz is a meme' meme
LMAOing at you're life, nerd

Do you have windowed g-sync on? Turning that off fixed flickering for me

>1080p @ 60hz is more than enough.
If you're playing exclusively on console, sure. 60 feels awful now.

1080p 144Hz is the minimum I would settle for but 1440p 144Hz is the best you can have right now.

I have a 4k monitor and a 144hz next to it and use my 4k monitor every time, 1080p just looks terrible in comparison.

1080p 60fps is more than fine and adequate no matter what anyone tells you.

That being said, a 1440p 144hz IPS model is the way to go if you're not a poorfag and actually have a job.

>1080p @ 60hz is more than enough.

Attached: 1568055259265.gif (248x287, 693K)

I play strictly PC. My frames would kill you.

Attached: 1568107967468.jpg (950x534, 27K)

Managed to get my monitors half off and the change to 144hz is amazing

i see literally zero reason to upgrade
i will never go back to double digit framerate

>>cost of a GPU to run a 1440p 144 hz is stupid
Nah, I just one during Black Friday like any other non-retard.

>get high res monitor
>utilizing the a high resolution means desktop, taskbars, game ui's, and other assorted things become improperly scaled
>use 1080p on high res monitor anyway
what the fuck is the point

Attached: 1541710778510.png (352x264, 151K)

running modern games at maximum settings 1440p 144hz requires a 2080ti

I too use 1080p monitor, but at 24" everything looks too small to me so I scaled it to 125%.

High end GPU's don't tend to go on sale during Black Friday.

Is ultrawide a meme?

Seems like it would make a great gaming expeirence with a solid rig but I've heard developers rarely give a fuck about supporting those resolutions, which is fucking retarded in 2019

>utilizing the a high resolution means desktop, taskbars, game ui's, and other assorted things become improperly scaled
This only applies to anyone dumb enough to use 1440p since it scales everything lower unevenly. 4k scales 1080p/720p perfectly.

>a 1440p 144hz IPS model is the way to go if you're not a poorfag
They're not even that expensive, $400 (or $300 if you wait for a sale).

Fair enough, most of the games from that era have supported 1440p through fucking with .ini files, but I’m not gonna pretend that I’ve tried everything possible from that era with it.

requires a 2080ti to have a chance a 144hz
fucking unoptimized shit games can still run like ass in the literal best GPU on the market

Except they do, like they did last year.

They are if you want one with tolerable input lag.

It's a meme for computer monitors since you sit so close to it anyways. After a certain point there is no advantage.

Attached: 1568264200136.jpg (1920x1200, 718K)

>maximum settings
lol.

1440p still some anti-aliasing while 4k usually doesn't.

>playing on a tiny ass monitor
>playing on a work desk
>playing on a personal computer using work peripherals
>2020 - 1

based and 1080@60-pilled

This is actually not correct, because GPUs generally don’t use such a neat and clean scaling model for some fucked up reason, the result ends up being blurry even if it should theoretically scale directly in proportion.

It was only just a few weeks ago when Nvidia implemented integer scaling on their GPUs (which is basically just what you described), but it is currently supported only by their newest GPU gen.

What's better to get first, the computer to play 1440p or the monitor?

>not playing jrpg at 144fps

fact: the majority of people would switch to 4k if they had the PC to do it. I bet the majority of people here haven't even seen what games look like at 4k in person.

The former because the latter is useless by itself.

Pic related is $400, which I got for $300 on black friday.

Attached: lag.png (679x573, 43K)

Lol, no they don't. All that goes on sale during Black Friday is mid range shit like RX580. There will be no sale on 2080Ti's on black Friday just like there was no sale on 1080Ti's last year.

They also need to have g/freesync and be 27". Anything bigger or smaller is retarded. Also no curved meme

I had a 1440p 144hz but i didn't like it
Sold it and got a second 1080p 144hz, 1440 is like 4k it's a meme
The worse are the people that buy 1440p in 60hz

People pay $400 for computer monitors?

Attached: 1505456193376.jpg (400x400, 24K)

whilst most anons ITT hate to admit it, most content is made for 1080p displays - even most games are optimized for 1080p. 1440p can introduce scaling issues,and even compatibility with older games. 4k is plain overkill, with few AAA games running well even with top-end hardware as they aren't optimized to run at that resolution; 4k media is also still very lacking aside from a few netflix shows and some UHD movie releases.

Higher refreshrates are worth it, but higher resolutions really aren't.

What do you define the word "meme" as?

>They also need to have g/freesync and be 27".
Freesync and 27", yep this monitor checks those boxes too. There's a few of these monitors in the $400 range.

It helps not being poor

>lol dude just avoid all 1080p content
No thanks. I'd rather just wait for 4k than deal with a resolution that doesn't scale well with 1080p.

eventually there will be linear pixel scaling for everything right?

Cost of perfection. PC gayming isn't for everyone and I'm glad it keeps console kids away

I can’t believe all these retarded buypigs, I wish that anyone stupid enough to pay over 200 dollars for a monitor would just be killed off.

CRT's are coming back going to go thifting for a widescreen CRT

Attached: maxresdefault[1].jpg (1280x720, 98K)

Nvidia already has it, but only for RTX GPUs.

Attached: E7181929-330B-4D2D-B98E-BF8A151385C2.png (550x585, 30K)

So don't play it in fullscreen? Why are you stretching shit out to fill your monitor?

Do you have experience with that? I've been running 4k for a few years now, and I have had no issues. 4k without AA runs only slightly heavier than 1080p 4X MSAA for games, and I've had no scaling issues with applications or my desktop. Maybe it's a Windows issue or something, because I'm running Linux and everything just works.
I'll need examples of some of these issues you're talking about.

Go buy your $50 Walmart TV then, retard

>*proceeds to pay $60 + tip per game*
>*proceeds to pay a monthly subscription to use his own internet*

I'm still using my trusty ol 1024x768 monitor after all these years. One of these decades the thing will crap out and I'll upgrade but in the meantime i gotta say im still content with it.

just read the thread user

any 1080p@75hz patricians?

A lot of scaling issues is probably Windows. In Linux I can set my taskbar and shit to whatever size I want by the pixel, the icons and text in it, etc. You can't really do that in Windows.

I did. I'm not seeing anybody posting images of issues they've had with 4k. I'm seeing a lot of people who obviously have never used 4k complaining about how shit it is, though.

Anyone who actually cares about high refresh rates is a moron that plays mostly shooters, aka someone whos shit taste need not apply to anything.

Congrats at being able to play fortnite at a high fps. Maybe you'll make plans to move out of your parents place after dragging a window around for the 4th time today.

yes. 1060 6gb for me

1080 is 10 year tech at this point

I also use Linux, but my wife uses Windows on a 27" 4k and I don't think she's had any issues either.

>"dude 1080/60 though!" he said for the 10th year in a row while even consolefags leave him behind

how bad is modern gaming for a 1060?

DF have proven the diminishing performance 4k has for most games

I just went from 720p to 1080p. I mainly play fighting games so I don't care about anything above 60 fps, so I'm fine for a couple of years with me setup.

No current console can even push full 4K, lol.

Attached: 1505322136020.jpg (1084x1238, 323K)

I'd take 1080p over dogshit checkerboard resolutions any day

for me, it's 1080p, 144hz, gsync.

Waiting for those new 1080/144 IPS monitors to come out. Maybe one day I'll fall for the 1440p meme when I'm not poor.
It's fine for 1080p anything more than that, no.

Most games on Pro/XboneX are at least 1440p30 though, so yeah even consoles are above 1080p now.

Not like poor people have a choice

>resolution is tech
the state of Yea Forums

Most pro/xbone games do 1440p/60 retards. How anyone settles for 1080p is beyond me but then again im not a poor neet.

true, consolefags are stuck with what they get

1440p is not worth it. Almost all media is either 1080p or 4K, and at those resolutions you can integer scale between the two. 1440p forces a 3:2 scale, which mucks everything up

Prefer pushing higher frames than higher resolution, the former actually makes a difference to gameplay.

Not playing on a blurry CRT from 2001 with bad geometry, I don't even.

>the former actually makes a difference to gameplay
Resolution can have an impact on gameplay.

For a simple example, say you have a 2D game. If the sprites are a constant pixel size, higher resolutions give you more screen space to work with, which opens up more level design options

1660 ti or RX 590?

I have a 6gb 1060

144fps@1080 with every game
120fps on a standard vive

Fuck gaming monitors. You should be playing your games on a big sexy TV.

3440x1440p 120hz Gsync is currently the ceiling of monitores. Maybe the CRG9 tops that but I haven't tried it yet.

Attached: 1568913702279.jpg (1470x1842, 401K)

daft example, no game on this earth uses 1440p nor 4k as a required resolution due to its level design. The last time level design was changed by resolution was when widescreen became the standard.

Why the fuck you lying? 1066 144fps? Maybe on lowest settings.

why would you post this pic you motherfucker... why

why are you making me want to coom now?

Attached: QAXzghz.png (597x625, 654K)

1060 6gb should manage 144fps on all games at high settings or greater

oh yeah i love playing on 60hz and 100ms input lag and shitty pixel response time
wtf i love gaming on TVs

Shouldn't be an issue unless you're a homosexual who plays competitive FPS games

1070 and 1660 ti can't handle 144 fps in Shadow of the Tomb Raider for example, why 1066 could?

they should make a monitor for coomers
my eyes can't see normally anymore

Attached: 1568713882806.png (427x117, 77K)

lol no

i bet you couldn't even run Witcher 3 stable 144fps on highest settings, and that game is like 5 years old

I still use a 1366x768 monitor and a gtx 750, and play at 30 fps. I only play hentai games now, so I honestly don't care about the lastest meme tech or hardware.

As someone with a 144hz 1ms monitor, I can never, ever go back.

going from 30fps to 60fps == going from 60fps to 144fps

1440p IPS 240hz 1ms

thats my dream monitor right now, but im a poorfag and it would probably cost 500+ $$$

I'm not that guy, but I've got a 1060 and Witcher 3 was not challenging to run at any settings @ 1080

Me. With that exact monitor +1 other 1080p monitor.

>highest settings
I don't know anyone that runs games maxed out, diminishing returns are all too real

yes but at 144fps?

LOL try $1000

I have been using this for about 10 years now, It used to work at 120hz but now its stuck at 60hz because my pc sees it as a generic monitor or some shit, Came with some 3D meme gimmick too

Attached: reference.jpg (640x480, 27K)

1080 @ 144 hz is a welcomed improvement.

I spent a bit extra for the 1440 144 hz set up since I built my pc about a year ago. No regrets desu but I would be happy as well with a 144hz 1080p desu.

1080p 144hz IPS panels do exist but they're all 27" garbage or something stupid so they look like shit. A new 23.5" panel has already begun production, don't know when they'll be available.

i meant to say to you

Diminishing returns.

this is why I haven't upgraded my monitor past 1080/60
1440/60 just doesn't seem like a big enough improvement
1440/144 is a complete meme that even a 2080ti struggles with
good 1080/144 IPS doesn't exist yet

IPS is a meme. I have both IPS and TN monitors, The TN is better, Most ips screens i have used had light bleed, And its practically a mirror too.

That usually means you need a newer cable. If the cable on carries 60hz then that's all the PC will push out. You'd have to do a quick search to figure out which one handles 120hz, but monitors don't just stop putting out a certain hertz range like that lol.

Do you think 1440p/144hz doesn't exist because thats where the sweet spot is these days. 1080p looks like shit after using a 1440p monitor. Don't drag your monetary resources into this conversation, either. No one cares if you are too poor, I mean, think it's a waste of money. Browsing the internet and watching videos on 1080p sucks compared to 1440p. 4k isn't widely attainable yet so it's a bit of a meme if you don't have shit loads of dosh to throw at it.

This story seems to have nothing to do with the actual technology and more to do with this kid's father not wanting so much of his money spent.

And TN has terrible colors. There is no perfect monitor. Mine is only at around 20% brightness at all times anyway so the IPS bleed is very negligible.

use some fucking punctuation you dumbass animal

Man, I wanna get a 1440p 144hz monitor but my 1060 ain't gonna handle that.
Thought about just going 1080p 144hz but I don't know if that really is a worthwhile upgrade.

nah IPS is god tier for watching movies and animus, TN can't even comapre

get a real decen IPS monitor from Eizo or Dell and you will see the diffrence, you probably have a shitty chep IPS monitor

>tn panels don't have horrid light-bleed and washed out colors
What shitty old IPS panels have you been viewing? Just got mine about 8 months ago and it has a tiny little corner that has a bit of light bleed in the bottom right. Never notice it unless the screen is completely black.

>monitors don't just stop putting out a certain hertz range like that lol.
I know it shouldn't, It's strange it worked fine for a good 5 years or so, But when i upgraded my PC it became a generic pnp monitor. It came with this old ugly pre build

Attached: it_photo_168355.jpg (945x709, 59K)

>2080ti struggles with
Well, no shit. You need a high end graphics card to run modern games on ultra 1440p and have high frame rates. 2080ti doesn't struggle either. 2080 doesn't struggle and that's what I have. I may not be playing everything maxed at 144fps but it's maxed at over 100fps in every game and most games are 144 fps.

sounds like a driver issue

Ye, But they stopped support years ago, So its kinda fucked.

So you're saying it's not maxed and not even 144fps cool.

>1080p monitor 144hz
>scale up to 1440p

ayoooooooo

1080p 240hz but really i play in 1024x768 @ 240hz in cs

Attached: 240hz master race.webm (138x124, 37K)

>slap gsync sticker on monitor
>its +300$ more expensive

god i hate jews

I dream of 4K at 60 FPS

this

the real masterrace is 1080p 240hz

us.aoc.com/en/gaming/products/24g2
WHEN???

I'm saying it is maxed at over 100fps in games like doodsex Mankind Divided which is notoriously bad with it's optimization. Everything else is maxed 144fps. FF15, maxed, RTX, 144 fps. Only the shittiest of shit optimized games don't run maxed 144+fps and your assumption is wrong.

>27" 1080p
I don't want to see individual pixels thank you very much

>not playing your pc games on TV with Steam Link
shiggy...

Number 1 it's $100. Number 2 gsync works vastly better than freesync and anyone saying it's a meme has never used it.

Attached: 1549916277106.jpg (500x454, 140K)

>t.v
>steam link lag

Attached: 1544285344247.jpg (464x618, 32K)

i'll be 1080 the whole next gen coming up

I got an LG 4k IPS monitor a few months back, It had bad light bleed at first, But it must of settled cause i can barely notice it now. I know nintendo is known for it, But the IPS screens on the DS are absolute shite. I got a refund because it, Bleed coming from all sides of the screen.

>16:9
Move over, peasants. 16:10 master race represent. 1920x1200 is what you need.

Attached: Dell Ultrasharp U2410.jpg (800x614, 38K)

yeah good luck finding a current year with 16:10

16sed and 10pilled

>lg
Some panels have it worse than others. I only buy panels brick and mortar so I can view them in store and return immediately. Microcenter has a god-tier return policy.

The good thing about 4k monitors is, You don't have to use any AA ingame

>RX 570
>Ryzen 2600
It's it even worth considering anything above 1080p/60fps?

Still using 1200x1600 lcd. Shame games are now not supporting 4:3

Attached: 1568554392280.jpg (460x416, 45K)

no.

can someone comment on this monitor? it seems too good for the price... am i getting baited?

amazon.co.uk/dp/B07G9J35CQ/

The performance is almost equal to that of 1080 with full AA

> I only buy panels brick and mortar so I can view them in store and return immediately.
i would like to do the same, But the stores here have little variety and overprice there stuff, PC world for example.

1600p 120Hz Freesync IPS here. Always preferred 16:10, too bad it's commonly unsupported nowadays so you end up with black bars.

I was happy with 1080p until I got this thing for free. Took $225 to get it to work with my PC but it looks fantastic. It still has some issues though and I'm thinking about selling it. I'd probably still get a 4K monitor and just keep the extra cash. I don't really play new AAA games so I'm getting 60fps at 4K on most of the stuff I play

Attached: file.png (1525x675, 736K)

Seems good enough. My suggestion would be to go to a brick and mortar store to see it for yourself. Maybe even buy it there if their return policy is such that allows for open-boxed returns, a la microcenter here in the states because some of these panels suffer from unbearable lightbleed. If you get one without lightbleed you will be happy as a clam.

Ridiculously expensive but man it's an amazing monitor

>not working for a company that sells used electronics

My company sells monitors for stupid cheap because displays have a poor rate of sale, plus I get employee discount. I got a 1440 165hz IPS with G-Sync Predator brand monitor for £280.

I have the same one. It's great. I can't OC to 165 hz anymore though for some reason. It's just a black screen. I need to trouble shoot it some more but i don't really care about the extra 20fps.

27" 1440p monitor downscaled to 1080p looks like absolute crap and isn't worth it, right?

That is a shame. Microcenter had to step their game up since amazon threatened to take them out of business. I was told by an employee they end up sending the "defective" products back to the manufacturer and they resell them on the Asian market so it doesn't really effect them at all.

Correct. It gets a bit blurry in my experience. Unless you can reliably output the native resolution it's not worth it. Or go CRT which has zero issues with that.

>plenty mid-2000s games supported 1080p but not 1440p
Depends on your definition of "mid-2000s". Before 16:9 became the standard games were often locked to only 4:3 resolutions and most need a widescreen patch to play nice with anything else.
It really wasn't until around 2008 that 16:9 became the leading standard. Most PC games don't even restrict your resolution though, it's so much easier to just fetch the list of supported resolutions from the OS and let you select from that.
So the game supports any resolution that your system claims to support, 1440p being no exception.

1080p 144hz is master race. Anything else is retatded.

I am happy with just stable 30 fps

Attached: 1568301306651.png (719x713, 587K)

Yeah it's very nice but it'll randomly stop working and I'll have to
>uninstall TB drivers
>shut down computer
>remove TB PCI-E card
>boot computer
>install drivers
>shut down computer
>install TB PCI-E card
>boot computer
to get it to work and it's a pain in my ass. I'm on the brink of selling it and just buying a decent ~$500 4K displayport monitor

Maybe if you said 1080p 240hz but when 1440p 165hz exists and is attainable with a $500gpu you are pleb race.

>1440p
I, too, enjoy scaling issues

Who the fuck needs to play games at 240hz besides competitive FPS players?

Why would you choose a lower resolution over a higher one and think the lower was better?
>scaling issues
WTF are you on about? Is this poorfag shit? I don't understand.

>WTF are you on about?
read the thread

What scaling issues are you talking about? I don't play shit at a lower resolution than 1440p unless it's old as shit.

I honestly never saw the benefit in anything beyond 1080p, ridiculous costs for little return.

cope

>no good 1080p 144hz IPS monitors
>VA monitors are all curved and still have shit viewing angles somehow
>TN will forever be shit
I'm forced to buy a 1440p monitor

Attached: 1558492151147.jpg (1024x504, 94K)

The biggest hurdle for me to get into 1440p 144hz is how horribly unoptimized most games turn out to be. Not gonna buy something I'll be able to properly experience for a select few games.

I'll never go back to 1080 after getting 1440

I think a lot of anons say they look the same because the monitors are the same size. With a 1440p monitor you can push to 28 inches without it starting to look blurry.

most mid-2000s games don't support 1440p, also most media outside of videogames don't support 1440p either. If you're doing anything remotely productive, 1080p or 4k are a much safer bet.

Yup. I just feel like it's not worth it yet. Diminishing returns, poor value etc.

higher pixel delay means more blurry mess on your screen from movements. 60hz on anything besides video content which never go beyond 60fps anyways, looks fucking terrible once you know what 100+hz looks like.

Fair point. I personally see no need for anything beyond 24”.

1440p seems like a really awkward middle-ground to use that isn't widely adopted. I'd rather wait until 4k is a widely adopted standard (it's gradually getting there already); but, until that point is reached, I'd prefer to stick to 1080p. I still use too many older applications that literally do not work at 1440p, whilst 4k is overkill for my needs.

So what is the standard resolution these days, as in what do most people use?

sprites don't scale to higher resolutions, unlike 3D gameswhere you can play an old game looking much better

1080p will take decades to die

most people use 1080/60

It is no ones fault but your own that you don't know how to use your monitor in tandem with your gpu and modern software. I have never experience scaling issues unless a game graphics options defaulted to 1080p. Do you honestly think that a 1440p monitor looks worse when watching a movie than a 1080p monitor? Fact: It doesn't.
>if you're doing anything remotely productive 1080p or 4k are much safer
No.

did you even read the post?
I ain't talking about modern software

2080ti can't even do that in a lot of games. It's gonna be another generation or two before 1440p/144hz is doable in every game.

>Do you honestly think that a 1440p monitor looks worse when watching a movie than a 1080p monitor? Fact: It doesn't.
it does as you end up with stretched pixels, tell me what movie is formatted for 1440p? Fucking none of them.

Most are formatted for 720p and LOWER so I guess we should just go back to the lords resolution of 640x480.

AHEM
>FUCK CRYPTO FAGS
>FUCK JEWVIDIA
>FUCK AMD DRIVERS AND THERMALS
>FUCK THIS GPU MARKET
>FUCK TN
>FUCK CHINKS
AND
>FUCK JEWS
Thank you. You may go back to your thread now.

Most old games don't support 1080p and widescreen, however if you fix their lack of widescreen support with community made stuff, you'll be able to play them at 1440p editing whatever files are used for resolution.

Wrong. Show me 1 game that a 2080ti doesn't max out a game at 1440p/144hz.

mid-2000s games supported widescreen, and usually supported 1080p native as well as it was a standard resolution even back then (just uncommon)

amazon.com/AOC-CQ27G1-DisplayPort-Adjustable-Zero-Bright/dp/B07V39QHMY

Attached: 1530218314674.png (899x547, 33K)

blatantly false, there are very few digital movies mastered at the resolutions you posted. Most older movies were filmed on tape and can be mastered in excellent quality for modern digital resolution, and most HD masterings are 1080p. I cannot think of a single movie mastered at 1440p off the top of my head meanwhile.

Which games support 1080p but you cannot find a way to make them play at native 1440p?

If games that do not support widescreen originally can be made to support those resolutions with community fixes, you surely can make certain games play a 1440p when they already support 16:9 aspect ratio for a smaller res.

Very few older games don't have widescreen hacks. The ones that don't even display in 1080p anyway so what is your point?
>very few games from the mid 2000's support 1440p
Objectively wrong and if they don't there is 100% the ability to change an INI file to force it. If it can do 1080p it can 4k.

>frameless
>visible frames
I don't get this

>formatted for 1440p
It's all gonna be 16:9 anyway so it doesn't matter. If it bothers you that much then don't use fullscreen.

Can't really do frameless, until we get oled I guess.

The age of scalable hi elements means they're larger at resolutions above 1080, not smaller on 1080.

1440p is the way to go. Nothing excessive about it at all.

Who the fuck watches movies on a PC monitor anyway? We are talking video games and the resolutions we play at. If i'm watching a movie it's on my 4k tv.
>muh scaling issues
Quite the non-issue.

>Which games support 1080p but you cannot find a way to make them play at native 1440p?
Sims 2

Also this amazon.com/Acer-XF270HU-Cbmiiprzx-FREESYNC-Technology/dp/B07CY137XM/ref=sr_1_1?crid=KQ00NUEROZ5C&keywords=acer xf270hua&qid=1568919410&s=electronics&sprefix=acer xf,electronics,231&sr=1-1

I see no reason to upgrade in a long time.

Attached: HWiNFO64_ChtkrPR670.png (640x577, 62K)

my monitor is 1680x1050 60hz

>If it can do 1080p it can 4k.
no shit, that's not what I'm arguing though. 4k is no problem since it scales well with any game that supports 1080p; 1440p does not.

>it's good enough
the COPE of poor people

For 1080p even a 1050 ti is plenty on any game even on high settings still.

The powerful cards are made for 144hz or 1440p. If you're content with 1080p you're in a golden age.

>Who the fuck watches movies on a PC monitor anyway?
I do?

How does 1440p not scale well? You have yet to explain yourself other than saying "yes" to yourself.

According to Steam, two-thirds of people use 1920x1080. Almost 12% of people still use 1366x768. 4% of users use 2560x1440 and not even 2% use 4k.

So 1440p and 4k are very much niche in terms of PC gaming. I guarantee you most of the people in this thread bitchiest about 1440p or 4k have not used it.

They're coming out soon, just wait.

And what 2d games other than ancient 90s RTSes do that?

>have not used it
Which is abundantly clear since you have retards talking about how 1440p doesn't scale well but 1080p is the bees knees.

I had this before I upgraded. Feels like I got a new pc.

wsgf.org/dr/sims-2
just edit the ini file with the res values

because 1080p -> 1440p does not divide. Certain games/programs/movies have to resort to stretching pixels to fit.

He said high settings not maximum ultra with 16x MSAA and shit on like all the benchmarks do.

>can't into a 10second google search

Attached: expectations.gif (422x207, 1.92M)

UI elements don't scale well at 1440p last I checked; text became unreadable.

People think just because they see 15 people on Yea Forums agree with them that they're the majority when it comes to 1440 or 4k

ultra isn't 16x msaa you mongrel

>unreadable
Awfully dramatic
How is it anymore blurry than 1080P? It's not. It just looks more blurry because it's not 1440p.

>How is it anymore blurry than 1080P? It's not
do you have any idea how bad stretched pixels look?

1080p 144Hz >>>>>>>>>> 1440p 60Hz

Is a 5700 overkill for 1080p/60fps for the next 2 years? Looking to play everything at ultra

>F-14 being pursued by a fucking avro lancaster
>Lancaster has tracer rounds firing off from one of its engines
>nuclear bombs exploding in the background

what the fuck is going on here?

>Not 30 inch 2560x1600

You're the peasant.

>curved

this aint it

>120hz 1600p

What monitor??

>Dual monitor setup allows you to have best of both worlds without having to sell a kidney
kino

A little bit.

I can't find any G-Sync (or at least officially compatible) 1080p 144hz IPS monitors so I guess I'll have to take the 1440pill.

Attached: 1523267072750.jpg (359x359, 23K)

Literally every reply to you is full of shit I have a 1080ti and run most games at 144+ 1440 EZPZ

Why do people hate curved? It's especially helpful for ultrawides.

I'm sorry, where are my stretched pixels? Certainly not in movies or games. Have you ever used a display greater than 1920x1080 for any significant amount of time?

Name exactly 1 game that runs at 1080 but not 1440

In what situation would 1080 be better than 1440 for productive purposes??

Honestly everything outside of gaming is why I don't want to go from 1440p back to 1080.

Still on 1080p just for 16:10
Fuck 16:9, fuck movies, fuck Hollywood and fuck jews

watch a 1080p movie in fullscreen, you'll see stretching.

I got an older 1440p monitor for under 200.

Hes a full of shit coping poorfag. I have a 1080p monitor as a second and never use it because even browsing the internet looks like shit let alone doing anything else with text or images.

music production programs I've used (some I still use) typically only work at 1080p

>ultrawides
We hate those too.

Just buy an lg c9 55 inch and create a custom resolution, either 3840x1620 or 3440x1440, or 2560x1080 the c9 does 4k 120hz, so any resolution below that at ultra wide will work, and with the way oled works, the less screen space on will result in a high peak brightness throughput

Attached: 1563256324550.jpg (3072x4096, 3.78M)

Movies scale fine. Sometimes I have to watch 720p on my 1080p monitor and it's tolerable. Not as ugly and soapy as games in lower than native resolution.

Doesn't matter, you only think it can't handle the game at high settings because you're looking at benchmarks, all of which turn on the useless shit like that

Speak for yourself I love my ultrawide.
>Able to fit in 3 windows at once

Hmnmm, looks like you're wrong, again. I have a 1080p monitor as a second and it looks actually much better on the 1440p. Probably because it's higher quality though. Movies are the last thing you would notice pixel stretching if you were going to notice them at all.

He already said that's too expensive. He's just poor.

>Sometimes I have to watch 720p on my 1080p monitor and it's tolerable.
fucking disgusting

That's the most bullshit thing I've ever heard.

What fucking program?

Most music production programs are made for Mac which is basically 4k

...

Sometimes 1080p (or better) version just doesn't exist.

Attached: 1519714489747.jpg (804x743, 93K)

>Most music production programs are made for Mac which is basically 4k
t. only uses logic pro

>not watching 720p movies on your 720p display
you could at least watch 720p on a 1440p since that actually scales properly.

Name one, literally one program that doesn't go above 1080.

Hell even if that actually was a thing (it's not.) 1440 is still more productive because you have more screen spaces to keep things like vst windows on without covering the daw.

Or he could just watch 4k content. 4k content downscaled won't look any worse even if it is an uneven scale. (Cause that's how most 1080p content is made anyhow from 4k or 8k masters)

Do you live in a fucking hardware warehouse?

Attached: 1522699812538.jpg (344x380, 34K)

Reaper

based

windows is fine @4k, it's 1440p that can be a problem

It seems that a 5 second google search proves you wrong....again.

IPS has horrible input latency, unless prohibitively expensive.

last I checked it couldn't

PFFFFF. Are you serious?

Works fine.

It's getting harder and harder to find reasons to upgrade. I'm stuck in a 3770k 16gb ddr3 1060 6gb limbo.
Even going amd, it's still $700 just to build a case with the same gpu, 3600 and 16gb ddr4.
And this is excluding the new gpu I have to buy to withstand 1440 plus the monitor, and that's $350 for a semi-decent 1440p, 75hz (minimum) 27'' one.
And for what? Emulate the Switch? Play horrible western games or late PS4 ports?

Attached: 840117d9d8037da9.png (704x512, 89K)

>$60 per game
what game store are you buying from?
pic related is the store i buy my games from
i prefer it because most of the games are $0 and DRM-free

Attached: file.png (800x200, 68K)

Attached: fdywtxfm0lny.png (2560x1440, 247K)

What kind of benchmarks are you looking at or are you just pulling this shit out of your ass. Dishonest retard lmao.

Bringing up 16x msaa is clear indication that you don't even look at benchmarks or know what high or medium settings are.

I stand corrected then, last I tried I couldn't get it to work and it always ran 1080p windowed. Had the same issue with protools 10 as well

Any of them

Man, look at all that horrible pixel stretching. I'm so glad I still use 1080p.

Attached: 1523135856546.gif (326x268, 1.38M)

what benchmarks are YOU looking at?

Troll post? Nothing's being stretched. Screen estate is expanded compared to 1080p which is what you want for productive purposes.

...yea, it was a joke.

>uTorrent
Your argument is discarded

So, in summation anything that runs in 1080p will also run in 1440p and 1440p doesn't have the scaling issues poorfags use to defend why they still use 1080p.
>but my movies
literally no difference.

this
deluge rules

>1080p bros
>1440p absolute faggots
>4k total bros
why it be like this?

There are 1080p 144hz IPS Freesync monitors available in North America right now. I just bought the Acer VG240Y P for ~220CAD last weekend cause I broke my Dell S2417DG. The colors are noticably better than TN.

I run 1080/60, but I'll go ultrawide 144hz/1440 height res soon
I hope it's a good idea
>near 1K$ for such a monitor
>near 1K$ for the GPU required to drive it

Forgot to add, it's a 24 inch which is better than the pixelated 27 inch 1080p monitors on the market right now

>27" is garbage
>more screen space and higher resolution isn't as good as less screen space at a lower resolution

Attached: captain of retard airlines.jpg (480x360, 13K)

It's not like that but you're a 1080p fag and thus biased.

Attached: 1566134375701.jpg (320x320, 28K)

1440p being a faggot as usual, I see

1080p60fps on ultra, and most modern games implement AA solutions that's no where near performance intensive as 16x msaa. At best you'll get 100~110fps if you have them disabled and play at "high" and that's being generous l. Sorry, that's not 144fps.

1440p is only worth it if you're a 144hz tourneyfag

feelsgoodman

Attached: spec.jpg (839x598, 151K)

>1080p and below gayming
soul
>1440p and above gayming
soulless

based retard

yes, but AA scales in performance cost while decreasing in noticeable effect as the DPI increases, derp.

BASED AND REDPILLED

>salty about being a poorfag
Why it be like this?

seething 1440let who can't afford 4k and deludes themselves into believing 1440 is a "good middle-ground"

nah, Hz is only important when it comes to online twitch shooty

cope some more, poorfag

I'm still only 900p

>tfw got a 27inch 1440p 155hz monitor for 240 USD

Attached: 1565142025669.jpg (677x677, 36K)

ironic

sounds like garbage

cope and seethe

Attached: hiltonnn.jpg (506x453, 27K)

>double the resolution is only worth it if you aren't like me and have a job
FTFY

Attached: 1545943410402.png (400x382, 175K)

So why did we go from 60fps to 144? Where did 120 go?

It's not garbage. You just sound salty.

clearly said 1080p you dumb fuck

We're talking 1080p right? Not 720p? Not 1440p? Yes because turning down TAA from high to low will give you a 40fps boost. What a clown you are.

Whats the point of 120 when 144/240 exist?

>upgrade to a 65inch 4k HDR display
>didn't play a single game since
>shitpost in 4k

enjoy your chink shit I guess

>i liek thicc bordar
retard
>Who games on more than one monitor at a time?
people who aren't poor

The only reason to stick with FullHD is because 4k monitors aren't affordable yet.
WQHD is better than FullHD but not enough better to justify the expense.

Attached: Capture.png (876x654, 155K)

Very nice. Now watch all the salty 1080peasants provide you with a steady stream of (you)s

Attached: 1542430374968.jpg (640x714, 107K)

no, you just go to 4k 60Hz like a normal person

I guess the real question is "what is the significance between 120 and 144, besides the number"

>60hz
>120hz
>240hz
>for some reason 144hz is a thing
Why

>60Hz in 2019

Attached: 1565611933461.jpg (1024x1024, 103K)

i mean, you can't even get a decently priced 144Hz monitor that isn't TNshit

That's nice, the performance will improve fourfold at 4K with almost no perceptible difference in image quality, yet every 4K benchmark tests at ULTRA with max AA at EVERY resolution.

good non-TN 144hz panels don't even exist

>TN in ever

Attached: th.jpg (278x259, 7K)

>people denying that 1080p content does not scale well on 1440p
>Yea Forums has gotten to the point of refusing to believe in basic division

>he thinks all 100+hz monitors are TN shit

Attached: 1568573411564.jpg (782x788, 321K)

buyers remorse

>bringing up movies in a thread about playing video games
What video game outputs in 1080p and not 1440p?
What movie have you seen in1080p on a 1440p monitor? My guess is none.

>1080p benchmarks don't exist
what

am I talking to someone with a fully functional brain.

this

Talk me out of getting 32:9 - 5120x1440 120hz.
Been using 21:9 for a while now and I can't go back to being a squarefag. Want to make the jump.

Attached: 1568923821291.jpg (679x453, 29K)

buy it faggot

>curved

Do it and let the 1080p poorfags seethe

>49"
>not curved
cope, stay with your 23" 1080p tablet

unless you pay out the ass they are.

Only good for gaming, a total meme for working. You will never be able to manage that space properly while you work.

Cope a bit harder

That's not what I said

if there's anything that is a bigger meme than refresh rates above 60Hz it's aspect ratios wider than 16:9
You're much better off getting a good old 4K 16:9 60Hz screen

what? It's probably TNshit or refurbished

Sure, buddy.

Attached: 1567632031222.png (550x361, 312K)

What does 4K have to do with a 1060 being able to output 1080p144fps at settings at higher or greater.

Lets see you post one inexpensive high refresh monitor that's not TN then

>we're in Yea Forums therefore you must pretend that only video games exist

what benchmarks have you seen that are not running AA and prove your assertion?

Personally I find 21:9 perfect for games but never enough for working. Always feel that I never have enough space. Wouldn't 32:9 solve that?

Inexpensive is subjective.
Poorfags might think $500 is expensive, others do not.

What's the difference between ultrawide and having a multi monitor setup?

>he watches movies on his video games PC

bro, do you even have autism?

no, it's subjective to the average going rate for a monitor. No shit price stops being a factor when you don't care how expensive anything is

That monitor's curve is not enough imo. You either keep the monitor on a big desk that allows you to stand far from it, and hope the curve is enough, or just get three monitors, and tilt them enough that you're positive you can just glance to the left and the right and keep doing whatever it is that you were doing. Turning the head = dealbreaker.
If you can test that curved monitor and it works for you, do it, but if you can't test it, you may seriously regret it.

Attached: CnuQazO.jpg (4160x3120, 991K)

Why does 144fps exist? Like, we have 60, we have 120, and we have 240. So why this irregular number?

>average rate for a monitor
So average of all monitors for sale?
Dumbest shit I've heard all week. A Bentley costs more than a Dacia Sandero, so I guess you might as well get the Dacia even if you want and could afford the Bentley, since the average MSRP of all cars is $30k?
Also, here's a 144hz IPS monitor for $400.

amazon.com/Nixeus-FreeSync-Certified-Monitor-NX-EDG27S/dp/B07N4DL9F7

60 fps (standard framerate for games) + 60 fps + 24 fps (standard framerate of movies)

Do you have any benchmarks to prove that disabling AA solutions like TAA gives you a fps jump from 60 to 144? muh 16x msaa is not argument. Also 1080p with no AA at all is "high" settings? Clown.

We're talking in the general case here, brainlet. The world exists outside of you. And that's actually AHVA

I'm currently using a Samsung C27HG70 and I love it. You don't know what you're talking about OP.

Every time I see people talking about asus's monitors on their own they say they're over priced and obsolete but when they talk about them in comparison to other monitors they usually get recommended.
what gives

Attached: 1529290820654.jpg (540x404, 12K)

That's what I get for trying to have a discussion with a retard, I guess.
Have a nice day.

Attached: 1567267006794.jpg (640x426, 133K)

Oh wow, I would have never made that connection.

>i'm a poorfag so whatever I say is expensive is a fact!

I have no idea if that's actually the reason but it's the only thing I could think of

He literally said IPS.

1080ti
9900k here
i still play in 1080p asus vg 24 inches just like ops pick
wont pay $700 for a monitor 1440p just
to have games dipping in fps
144fps+ locked is more important

Attached: 4c2cba006f238fedb84935ea07b4e4c675d603eb48d06b733a5786d096af8b1c.jpg (1024x1024, 92K)

>mfw I got a 1080 Ti for $320 the day after RTX was announced and sold my 1080 two weeks later for the same price
Feels good to have got a free upgrade. 1440p 165hz with a 60hz 4k HDR TV also hooked up to it. Best of both worlds.

Attached: 1552411622875.jpg (750x725, 90K)

>Do you have any benchmarks to prove that disabling AA solutions like TAA gives you a fps jump from 60 to 144?
Never claimed that, I just said that the performance increase would scale with DPI, it is up to you to prove that you've seen benchmarks that show your described behavior, because as I've said all benchmarks I see do straight max AA across resolutions.

>Also 1080p with no AA at all is "high" settings?
Again, not what I said. Merely that AA is not anywhere near as necessary at higher DPI despite scaling in performance cost

I'm still 1080p, but I also had a 1280x1024 monitor well past the point where UI designers were supporting that resolution, so...

I asked a simple question dood

nope

>watching movies on a pc monitor
That's what a 65" 4k t.v. is for. Have sex.

At least you don't have 1920x1200 which was never supported by anybody at any point.

is that a fucking bag of lettuce?

What a retard you are.

Nice. 1080p looks like shit to anyone with a steady job and a brain not as smooth as a marble.

i do as i please and i don t insult people
about frivolous choices as a gaming screen.
the fact you engage in such dubious ventures shocks and disturbs me

Attached: 1551998244356.gif (245x184, 784K)

just call him a fag and be done with it
no need to tumblr post

>claims that 1080p144fps on all games @ high settings or greater is possible on a 1060
>I point out how it only hits 60fps at ultra
>even if you turn off AA and lower every settings, at most you'll get is 110fps if lucky
>brings up 4K for some reason
????
It's either that you're actually lying about your settings, or your brain is desperately coping and thinking that you're getting 144fps when you actually aren't. But again this board is full of people like you so I wouldn't be surprised.

>>even if you turn off AA and lower every settings, at most you'll get is 110fps if lucky
proofs?

>bought a 1440p/165hz ips and the build to run it
>after a month felt like I could not justify the expense
>sold it and built a PC with 1080p/144hz + va second monitor for half the cost
still glad I did that

You earned this you

nah usually a bit of AA does the trick

>buying a whole new set up just to consume a different type of media
I mean if you have money to give to jews, sure

1440p is a meme resolution
4k at acceptable frames is not feaseble yet

tryhard fags succumb to peer pressure/bragging rights, and be forever low fps otherwise.
besides, who can really play CSgo with less than 600fps?

disclaimer: i dont play CSgo

Attached: 32-1.jpg (342x500, 17K)

>besides, who can really play CSgo with less than 600fps
Everyone on the planet apparently, considering 600Hz doesn't exist yet

By not being a brainlet that thinks that 16x msaa is the same performance hit as TAA or other modern AA solutions. Also benchmarks never typically go 8x msaa or even 4x for that matter. If you think you can jump from 60 to 144fps by turning off AA in 1080p, you most likely don't even a computer to have experimented with the settings, or just a prebuilt at best.

Sounds good, you must get a solid or a very close 144fps in everything, not that 100-120 bullshit. I'm planning out my next build similar to yours.

post the benchmarks and there will be an end to the horror

there's more to high FPS than just the monitor refresh rate. Even at that level of frames you notice smoother control

Why don't you post your proof of 144fps 1080p at high or "greater" with a gtx1060? Stop being a bitch and end this horror. Witcher 3 is a good start.

I can't because all benchmarks blast the AA like originally asserted

yeah I use my PC on a 1080p TV now
GTX 1070 is a beast
super comfy in bed

Attached: tumblr_p4pe0pBhqR1rgdjn8o1_1280.jpg (960x1440, 111K)

Wrong, 4k is the meme resolution.
youtube.com/watch?v=ehvz3iN8pp4
Ignore the faggot, focus on the content.
4k was literally only created to wow the general audiences in thinking we totally need this awesome elusive standard that is multiple times better than 1080p, and we cannot live without it.
All to sell more tv, hardware and movies.
Imagine for five minutes if the world never got to 4k. Where would Nvidia and even AMD be?
Where would Intel and AMD be? 1440p has been maxed out at ultra high with mid-high range rigs at least two or three years ago, and this is by running bullshit unoptimized games.
4k is the "Crysis" of hardware gimmicks.

tried it on a cousin home with his 4k meme minecraft machine, and I'm still alive using 1080p

Why don't you post your own result lol?

They're both significant. 1080p is blurry and jaggy as fuck compared to 1440p, just as 60fps is choppy compared to 120+.

>4K20(+10)fps
>Minecraft
kek

Because I'm not at my computer. You made the assertion, you back it up.

Have a 1080p 144hz monitor and a1060 6gb mini
>90-100hz on GTA 5 on high
>144hz on a hat in time on max
>144hz on Yakuza 0 really high
>Games older than 2012 usually stay close to 144hz
>Newer games I do play rarely dip below 60hz

Most games I play hang around 80-90hz and 90-100+ when I overclock. The lowest frame rate I've seen is 40hz and that's when I started maxing out meme settings

The (you) you wanted, the lol I had

>1080p monitor
>RX 480 which I got for 100$
>Can play all games at 1080p ultra

Attached: 1250631840672.jpg (258x314, 11K)

>1080p is blurry and jaggy as fuck
You probably just used 1080p on a screen bigger than 24" because it's not.

There's nothing wrong with 1080p but if you deliberately stick with 1080p 60hz in 2019 you're even stupider than a consolefag and should be embarrassed.

Attached: 1566059128839.jpg (1280x720, 391K)

Funny that this thread shows up as I start considering upgrading. Upgrading to 1440p 144hz sounds nice, but what sort of CPU/GPU would you need to run modern non-competitive games consistently? 3700x with a 1080 TI?

>deliberately
What's the opposite? Your monitor exploding?

Yeah. Not all of us are richfags

>I'm not at x
yea sure, NEET. See you tomorrow.

4k60 IPS monitors are cheap these days bro

Based. I got 480 from Aliexpress or 80 bucks. 6 months and still working

refresh rate is not fps

its heaven.
imho biggest step is 60hz to 144hz
next step is keeping fps above 144 at all times.
i dont mind a TN monitor, i couldnt live with ips crap bleeding.
im good for now

If you can't afford a 1080p 144hz build (which is budget at this point) you may as well just buy a console.

>NEET
nice try. I also don't have the card we're talking about so I can't make my own :P

>See you tomorrow
ah, running away I see

A couple days ago a guy was crying because his 3600 couldn't run DS3 at 1440p maxed out at 60fps.
It couldn't be the gpu, it was a vega 56, it had to be the cpu because DS3 only basically uses a core, like ArmA.
So the answer is: if you plan on going back to older shit that hadn't multicore support fully fleshed out, you may want to think carefully before you go amd.

>4k monitor cheap
>4k gaming card "expensive"

see the problem?

High FPS
High Res
Funky Sizes

I had an ultra wide for a while and didn't like it because most games were a ball ache to get workin and its still awkward now. After having experienced a high refresh monitor it became awful using anything else. When it comes to res... the 1080p stagnation because of the lengthened console gen was annoying af. Unfortunately we are hitting 4K too early though. We should be aiming to get more people onto 1440p displays because it makes a big old difference, its nearly twice as many pixels as plain old 1080p where as 4k/2160 is eight times as much

I'm not sure if you're old enough to realize this, but people browse and post from work and on their phones. Me, I'm a work-poster too. I wouldn't waste my own time in this hellhole.

this guy knows

no I didn't
1080p just looks like absolute ass if you've been on a higher resolution for a time

>just buy a console

Yeah. I can't even afford 60$ game.

not really, you don't need to run everything at all ULTRA especially when you've bumped the resolution.

1440p 144hz is a meme. 1080p 240hz is kino

Attached: doom.jpg (300x300, 27K)

Then he can just go 1440. I remember one guy saying
>I love my 4k setup, I play most games at 1440p windowed, sometimes I can even play 4k
>even

Sorry, meant fps

>1440p has been maxed out at ultra high with mid-high range rigs at least two or three years ago, and this is by running bullshit unoptimized games

wrong. maxed out means being always above
in 1440p its not possible in most games even with top gear.
that why 1080p is so confy.

Attached: 1563991758025.jpg (700x667, 226K)

>mfw I'm still on 1280x1024

Attached: 1547483895333.png (500x509, 55K)

Maxed out means 60fps locked all the time, anything over 60 is a luxury item.

>buy 4k monitor
>don't play games
>COOM everyday errday

Attached: download.jpeg.jpg (246x205, 8K)

That sounds very... alarming. I'm slow to go through my backlog, so I'm always happy to wait for discounts and play games a few years down the line.

>Maxed out means 60fps locked all the time, anything over 60 is a luxury item

hello my console friend.

Attached: 1551996694843.jpg (614x712, 123K)

lmaoooo

>download.jpeg.jpg
>this post
I didn't think I could laugh this hard on Yea Forums

>very low at 1440p bumped with bullshit gimmicks to interlaced "4k" at 20-25fps is the equivalent of ultra high 1440p at locked 60fps
Sure.

>coomed so hard he didnt save the image properly

this

but rez is better than effects

Most of them?
tomsguide.com/us/nvidia-rtx-2080-ti-benchmarks,review-5779.html

It's still the standard

I usually give the benefit of doubt but I doubt a poorfag that copes into believing his own lies would likely have a job with this much free time.

>install game
>graphics options +unninstall all gimicky effects
>double check motion blur is off

i hope you guys do this

Attached: 0607.jpg (450x870, 67K)

By their logic, if someone goes insane and makes a 600hz 1440p monitor, "maxed out" means 600fps.

why would such a person be called insane?
can you imagine a world where you coud max out minecraft at 600fps? i can

Attached: 39-1.jpg (599x449, 51K)

having a lower Hz monitor places less emphasis on high frame rates, yes

Every time before I even start playing.

Standard=shit

I don't know about "uninstalling" gimmicky effects but I do make sure to turn all of it off. ESPECIALLY motion blurr. I don't need to spend processing power in order to see my game less.