The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the

>The Free Software Foundation may publish revised and/or new versions of the
General Public License from time to time. Such new versions will be similar in
spirit to the present version, but may differ in detail to address new problems
or concerns.

>updates licence to include require compelled conduct to be more inclusive

>I'm afraid releasing your open source freeware hate crime filled game, is in breach of our license agreement, see you in court Mr. indie developer.

This is now a real concern for game developers in current year.

Attached: download.jpg (310x163, 6K)

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/pjreddie/darknet/blob/master/LICENSE.fuck
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

pedo defenders are not welcome

actually I'm arguing against child abuse, can't you read?

i just gave a blanket statement

Who's gonna be their new president though, Linus?

It just won't be the same without RMS, it's not fair bros.

Attached: 1349592664017.png (385x299, 156K)

Someone with clown hair, rest assured, or/and some Microsoft double agent.

>they ruiningVidya
>They ruining anime
>They're ruining fit
>They're ruining tech
>They're ruining diy
>They're ruining k
>They're ruining boardgames

Where do we go bros?

Attached: 73626220_p0_master1200.jpg (1196x1116, 322K)

who's they

anyone that uses they as a pronoun

Attached: they.png (574x59, 6K)

meant for

(((They)))

Plenty of people still use v2 because they don't a agree with the shit added in v3. If they released a new version of the GPL with some bullshit people will do the same.

>stallman unpersoned
>terry dead
>satania added to the sticky
is this the end of /g/?

>tfw you just use BSD license with things you made

Attached: 1562290992088.gif (500x275, 1.86M)

>muh pedos

Attached: 1527534509292.jpg (500x500, 45K)

I have genuine concern about a GPLv4 being pushed out post RMS that totally guts it
Nothing to stop you from using v2 or v3 or LGPL, etc, but with blood in the water corporations will try to get a more BSD style GPL out there and try to convince projects to adopt it so that they can abuse it.
They've viewed GPL has a thorn in their side for a long time.

normalfags as the golem, jews as the mastermind

Fuck him nobody has to use that. You can literally make any license you want.

I genuenly don't know why more people don't do this.
I rolled a modified SNES9X style "not for commercial use" license for my software. Its just software for retro computers and their fans, but it just makes sure it stays that way, not that I think that there would ever really be an attempt at such but in such an occasion it's at least spelled out.
Roll a license that meets the goals and intent of the project.

standards make it easier for your things to get distributed and used though, but yes

depends on if you're just doing that weird hack on the sides, or if you actually want to get support and more people on your project

That's irrelevant if you can't use the license anyway because of a stupid arbitrary rule.

My favorite software licence.
github.com/pjreddie/darknet/blob/master/LICENSE.fuck

>actually caring that people will use your software commercially

Yes, continue working on OSX's compoments for free BSD cuck. You're an even cheaper date then the Indian outsourced workers.

t. developer of next android kernel

oh nice, hadn't checked the replies of the sticky