All video games armors looks like shit. I want to see if Yea Forums can prove me wrong with examples of vidya armors that doesnt look like crap.
Inb4 >OP is a realismfag. No, i am not one of those cunts who goes: Not like real life = BAD. i just dont have any images of good looking vidya armors.
HARD MODE: Not using those armors from Dark Souls games that are heavily based on real life armors.
They are praying. These are found on top knights sarcophagus tops. The bottom part is the knights or the knight's lords heraldry.
Angel Cook
Those are sketches of Funeral effigies or brasses, sort of monument for deceased people(who could afford it). They are generaly representing someone laying down or sleeping, so not exactly stepping on dogs and lions. I heard the the dogs and lions have some form of meaning, like dying at home or dying on the battlefield but i never found a source for that. They are indeed praying, many are carved i this position but there are exceptions.
From what i was told, very few are actually used to cover some form of sarcophagous or tomb.
Thanks for the history lesson Anons, do you guys just like reading about knights?
Ayden Lewis
All other responses you got and will get are shit. Amano was the best designer by far to work in the videogame industry, it's too bad his designs were never fully exploited.
For Honor has the worst armor I've ever seen in a video game. It's like someone took high fantasy WoWshit and tried to make it realistic, except they've never seen real historical armor in their life and only have half-remembered dark souls designs to go off of.
The only thing that really bothers me about most of Warden's armors is that its a bunch of straps, over plates, over padded armor over chainmail. Its kind of busy. Lawbringer is better, incidentally one of the most fashionable heroes in For Honor too.
To my knowlodge, the closest thing that looks like that is as a form securing the arm harness of gladiators or as form of securing a breast plate with crossing backstraps in the late middle age. I would easily bet that any thing beyond the function of securing some part of armor is fantasy, but who knows, there is plenty of weird shit out there.
If you really want a reason for it, it is because the artist saw the chest as a space to be filled. The only versions of that class that has armor on their chest/stomach are the females.
>has to use his power armor to sprint, use a flashlight, or swim >can't sprint and use flashlight at the same time because they use the same power source >regenerating power does not actually power the power armor, only those three things >has to steal batteries from dead cops to power his power armor
>keep thinking to play DD again >have played it to death and know it inside out I hope DD2 doesnt go full retard like the MMO did and take the grounded aesthetic and turn it into generic MMO aesthetic, the armour in DDO was fucking stupid, all the normal looking stuff was complete garbage and everyone looked like a Korean MMO character past a point.
Really depends on what people describe as studded leather. Usually, when I see studded leather, I give them the benefit of the doubt and assume the studs are rivets holding metal plates in place, which would be a brigandine. But sometimes it’s clearly obvious that it’s just a leather jerkin with studs.
Grayson Cook
Make the shield 2 times bigger and cover the fucking face
fucking weebs
Sebastian Adams
They just never cared to put effort into it beyond a bare minimum since they weren't all about extolling the physical form like the greeks were.
He’s clearly fighting. Based on the rest of his armor, there’s no way he’d have a helm without full faced protection. And since he’s fighting, he’d have his visor down for sure. A full harness doesn’t work if your most vulnerable spot is opened up to the world.
Camden Flores
Christ do people really think the only effective armor was full body?
For all of For Honor’s aesthetic choice, I will say that the Warlord is the only character I’ve seen in vidya who uses a sword and board correctly. Mostly because he bothers to keep his shield raised whilst attacking and exposing as little of himself as possible
Those aren't dogs/lions. Those are representations of a demon/satan and they're crushing it beneath their heel like a good Christian should.
John Jenkins
>how thoust faire, fellow knights?
Alexander Foster
Those men are all laying down, so at worst they're resting their feet on the lion.
William Barnes
They're meant to mirror the old christian sculptures of angels stepping on satan and about to skewer the fuck with a spear. In this case, the knight does not yet have heaven's weapon but they step on a demon regardless because it's their duty. But yeah, it looks awkward since they're lying down. It's a necessity if nothing else.