Has graphics in games peaked Yea Forums?

Mercenaries did it right

Have you played the game user?

hell no. I will never spend money on shit like this. I own a PS4 and I have never played a single snoy exclusive. The last exclusive I played a Halo on xbox. Exclusive games are shit. Everything what's to tell a story, cater to dumb political shit, white american protag, 3rd person, cinematic, you know this shit why are you even asking?

NEVER. I will NEVER buy those depth-less games that are made for retarded people.

>Reel to reel projector doesnt need an external power source and works upside down
Yeah wow, very impressive.

Attached: 05-27-49-1567221213964.jpg (350x383, 27K)

Nah, raytracing (the meme that it is), hasn't proliferated enough into the gaming space. Which means that not only is it not implemented widely yet, it's still just a toe-dip into what's possible.
Just think of the difference between 360 games when the console just came out, compared to the shit they were doing with it at the end of its lifespan.
Unfortunately, raytracing will probably live or die based on console implementation, so unless it's adopted by the new consoles, it'll probably fall flat.

Don't get me wrong, raytracing is a hell of a meme and for now is pretty shit, but it's the best "next leap" in graphics we got.
Most likely it'll be pretty shit and gimmicky in this first iteration, but I think things should start to be pretty good looking after studios have some practice with it. Especially since it's "easy mode".
Just set up your materials, throw in your lights, and to quote a wise man, "it just works".

This is speaking from experience as a /3/ fag who's been doing this shit professionally for years.
Of course it can all backfire with devs being lazy. Even though it's actually less work.

Difficult to tell. I really can't fathom how much more it can be pushed. The ideal upper limit is when I cannot visually distinguish my screen from a window, and we're still far from that.

like clockwork

Didn't think so. Just wanted to make sure before properly discarding your opinion.

It's technically less work but right now, with it not being the norm, it's actually more work because you still need proper lighting, SSR and whatever else you're using for when raytracing is disabled.

Graphics through semi-realistic art direction peaked back around 2005, give or take a year, and still looks good. The needless realism boom has been a downward slope that leaves every game looking awfully dated a couple years later.

>BRO BUZZWORDS CONSOLE WAR FAGGOTRY SNOY SNOY SNOY
>did you play the game at all
>no

why the fuck do you think you get an opinion then faggot? seriously

Attached: 1509156366446.png (428x510, 180K)

Keep playing games made for retards. Gameplay is never fucking challenging in any of those games. That's why you fucks are so insecure these days. You play these games that give you a power trip but then when it's time to play something like a Fighting Game your peanut brain can't process shit because you've been playing games made for retards.

If I wanted deep story I'd read a book or watch a fucking movie. Not play a game that plays itself. I can't believe you fucks actually spend 59.99+tax for a fucking walking simulator.

How do you know what the game is like if youve never even played it?
Have you seen any videos of it?
Do you even know what they game is called?

Yeah pretty much. Which is the deciding factor right now. You've got to have 2 implementations for everything you've got. It's less work in the long run, but unless it's widely adopted, it's just going to be 3dtv tech all over again.
Honestly it'll probably be another 10 years before it's the standard. Consoles will play a big role in that, because it'll expose a lot more people to it, but it's also the devs who's gotta do the work for it.
There's a lot of shit it's riding on. Hopefully we end up in the right timeline and it does well.

How would you know? You're not even playing it.
Besides, one person can play different kinds of games.
This is so stereotypical of Yea Forums. No wonder you're so angry if all you play are fighting games.

>raytracing
>meme
No user. Ambient Occlusion is a meme.

It's just like a flash light in any fps

I could see the next console gen use some wek implementation of raytracing at 30fps, they sale consoles based on gimmick like that even if it tanks the framerate, it's only image quality that matters for them.
But AMD has to get their shit together because right now it's only Nvidia that provides an easy to use library of tools to implement raytracing.

AO is okay if it's tuned right, but honestly it's just a band-aid for good lighting.
I've used it from time to time on stuff and it's pretty useful for boosing the detail of normal maps and stuff (especially if you're using lower res lamps/shadows), but it's pretty easy to go overboard with.

I think the future is gonna be about making the technology easier for talent to work with on a smaller budget.
Instead of having one game with 10,000 workers, they could have 100 games with 100 workers. Kinda like the old days.

Attached: mike-redman-castle-colour-key-2.jpg (1920x823, 467K)

oh shit you're going too deep

Attached: Fallout4 2015-12-09 22-45-25-19.webm (960x540, 1.85M)

>I could see the next console gen use some wek implementation of raytracing at 30fps
That'll probably be what happens, then later on when the tech gets cheaper and better do another "Pro" version. Who knows though, maybe they've got some secret sauce now to upscale and use low samples or some shit. Intel has some good de-noising tools right now.

In any case, having it and having people exposed to it (even at shitty framerates) is better than not having it.
I think AMD coming out with a card is going to be one of those things that finally get things going. They always have a habit of making things cheaper, and early adopters will probably grab it.
I'm kind of locked to Nvidia for my work, but competition is always good if the consumer benefits.

AO is never and has never been OK or looked good because its post-processing.
There's no excuse since Doom3 to not have universal lighting and shadows. Shit even Silent Hill games had rudimentary implementation. Wind Waker had it also but used it very limited.

It won't get easier because software patents are cancer.

Mentally ill. Probably an incel.

its the fault of all the people who praised RE4 as the best game ever, when in reality its shit and started this shit

why come weak woman cant just pick up projector with her flabby arms

>There's no excuse since Doom3 to not have universal lighting and shadows...
I have no clue what you're trying to argue here.

>AO is bad because it's post effects
Once again, I said it's a band-aid solution to bad lighting. If you know how to light a scene, then chances are you won't need it. If you bake your lighting, you won't need it. There are times however, where having AO is better than not having it. Notably, games with global illumination. You can only get places so dark and have so much contrast with GI, AO helps get those areas darker and provides contrast.
There's a lot more to making a good image than throwing shit at it and seeing what sticks.

>post-2016 Yea Forums: the post

Attached: 1564718021844.gif (467x490, 1.31M)

>white american protag
More like low-IQ third-world "only whites are racist" type of person.

Your prejudice on games are making you miss out on great games, like control.
Within 5 minutes the game is a all out,fast paced shooter. It's nowhere near a snoy movie game. It's a legit video game(for a lack of better words)

Is anyone else bored of the generic "hold arm back" pose when doing telekinesis or similar in games?
I mean I get why it's done, since it's a visual feedback of "yo, you're holding this object with your mind and you can throw it", but surely there's more interesting choices. Like every game has that same pose when you can do that shit.
Give me some Magneto poses or something.

Its not a bandaid. Its a forced meme by lazy affluent people.
Fixed camera angles and boundaries to hide baked lighting = bandaid
Post-processing = lazy

projectors exist even in gmod, silly zoomer

Christ, you really are a retarded ESL aren't you?

Hey, that's pretty cool.

Not him, but all over-the-shoulder third-person games deserve to burn in hell for being a forced meme.

>projector works without power cord
Immersion broken desu

Your brain just peaked making this dumb thread user.

You don't call someone retarded because they care enough to call out deception when they see it. You only do that if you're being a complacent bitch-boy.

DX12 hasn't been used enough for devs to get the hang of it, let alone get QOL patches like DX11 did. As an API, it's absolutely dead as long as it's attached to 10, the lack of interest meant a lack of games, so this means brand-new AAA games being forced to add card-selling features at gunpoint are going to run like dogshit

He didn't even read anything and just made shit up out of nowhere.
Not anywhere did I mention using fixed camera angles to hide baked lighting.
I gave him examples where AO is used, and where it's not used, and why.

All he got from it was
>muh post effects is bad because it's made by rich people
If that's not retarded I don't know what is.

DX12/Vulcan/Mantle is vaporware. They gave it away for free hoping it would make devs use it and indirectly increase the sales of their hardware.

Mercenaries, Destroy All Humans, and Battlefront 1 & 2 (classic) did it right. Hmmm, maybe Pandemic was onto something.

you're a real tough Yea Forumsirgin user good job

it did a long time ago

Attached: 1549876197402.gif (500x317, 1.17M)

You're the one making up bullshit about what constitutes a "bandaid".
Post processing is lazy nu-male affluenza bullshit.

That's why EA killed them.

why the fuck is spiderman a psychic

Band-aid is a quick solution to cover up something without much work.
It's a bad thing.
Not once did I say AO was a good thing, I just provided examples as to why it is used.

No, stop, RTX is just a meme haha

Fag

But I dont get the metaphor, so its bullshit.

What does AO "cover up"? Its a LITERAL extension.
You can't even use AO to "cover up" anything because that's not how it works. Are you genuinely retarded and don't understand how light works in real life, much less video games?
You clearly have no fucking idea how to speak outside parroting echo-chamber talk.

all FPS games need to burn in hell for being a forced meme

Faggot-talk

I do this shit every day for my job faggot.
AO covers up bad lighting by making places contrast more and adding fake ass shadows. It's not "covering up" in the sense that it's over the top of it, it's "covering up" in the sense that you're polishing a turd so the normies can go "wow look at that great lighting" because the fucking corners are dark.

Faggot-talk

So long as people continue to use 7 a decade after release, DX11 is going to be the lead API for years to come

Then do it right you worthless faggot.
AO does not cover up bad lighting. It accentuates it. It makes it look worse.

God damn I'm arguing with someone that doesn't even have a basic grasp of physics.

Thats bullshit and you know it. You're just a kid who has no idea what the fuck he's talking about.

>owns sony console
>spergs about sony exclusives

kek

I don't know why people keep saying you're wrong.
I think you're just arguing with someone that can't read.

It never lead anything. OpenGL has always been more successful.

AO isn't even fucking real you mongoloid. There's no fucking physics involved.
There's no light interaction involved with AO. It's just math. It takes angles and shit at specified distances and multiplies black over the top of them. That's it. It's completely independent of light strength and direction.
You can have AO without any lights in a scene.

You have no reason to say they're right except to perpetrate bad standards.

I don't own any consoles. They're a waste of money.
I don't know how explaining how some games are lit is indicative of owning a console.

Seems like it.

What game is this?

I think part of the deal is gonna be purchasing assets. Like the obvious Quixel assets in death stranding.
youtube.com/watch?v=9fC20NWhx4s
youtube.com/watch?v=ORhyofGno70

>AO isn't even fucking real
Because shadows aren't real. They're the absence of light. The occlusion is because light and shadows "occlude".
>no fucking physics involved
Straight retarded denial.
>you can have AO without any lights
Because its an extension. You're not fixing a problem. You're adding one. You're working backwards instead of forwards.
Literal ass-backwards game design.

Get b8d goober.

Stop talking like a faggot.

only if you play on a high res CRT apparently

They peaked like 10 years ago.
Console shitters are just catching up.

They peaked in the late 90s early 2000s.

Attached: Soul Calibur.webm (1280x720, 2.77M)

Again. You're missing the point where I agree that it's fucking shit.
All I was doing was giving a place where it can be used and why. Scenes with GI look washed out in games without something to darken places. Consoles can't handle having high shadow-map sizes, so AO is the quick and dirty solution right now to darken those places cheaply. It's bad form, but sometimes you can't just bake lighting into everything.

There's no point. You're being a deceptive cunt.

Then just turn it off faggot.

>remove graphics
>then lock them behind an expensive GPU check
>pretend you innovated

What a great fucking scam these dudes are running.

control you illiterate nig

Imagine taking the time to get graphics this good.
And then putting a woman who's face has been hit by a shovel as your MC.

Why do you think they spent so much time on the graphics user?
So you're looking at the pretty concrete instead of Little Nicky.

RTX isn't too bad for specific tasks, just don't let it do everything. Seriously, quake RTX on max everything runs fine at 1080p but go to 4k and it goes under 60fps, so imagine how bad it is for newer games. Then again, maybe it's just poorly implemented.

I know this is more of a technical thread, but was it ever explained what happened to Darling in the game?

Don't include it since its always been an injected post-processing filter since its inception. It was created to function the way it does and be "easily" applied to all games. It wasn't created to fix anything. Like some retard in Photoshop with his "cool" filter.

There's no reason for a game to use Brown & Bloom.
There's no reason for a game to use Ambient Occlusion.
There's no reason for a game to use fixed third-person over-the-shoulder camera.

These are all retarded forced memes by lazy affluent developers.

Please kill yourself Yea Forumseddit shitposter

>Use new GPU tech that works with the new GPU tech since it's new and nothing else can really run it properly.
>actually innnovate
>B-But it costs too much!
Yes, that doesn't mean they aren't innovating. VR isn't cheap either.

Attached: 58.jpg (1024x710, 180K)

Am I looking at a buggy mess or the fourth dimension?

They're already doing it with browsers.
>your browser isn't approved, please use approved browser
I'd rather not use a browser that secretly whitelists ads and botnets. Sure you can trick with static custom useragents but its only a matter of time before they make it so you have to dynamically change it.

Probably because they're destructible

Well, then clearly graphics haven't peaked.

>then
Go back to school faggot

welcome to Yea Forums

Retard

user. Do you know what "then" means?
Because "than" definitely doesn't go there.

Real-time raytracing and super hi-res textures and models without LOD Bullshit are about the only things left. One needs moar GFLOPS, the othe other meeds MOAR RAM. Matter of time really. Even then, enjoy waiting 10 years between AAA studio releases.

>Than
Used as a comparison
>The word then usually relates to time. It is most commonly used as an adverb. It has the following meanings:
>As a consequence or in that case.
??? My native language might not be english and I might end up spelling certain words wrong at times, but I don't see it chief, got any context?

Attached: 1557111481594.jpg (1000x1000, 92K)

I hope you mean "then", friend. Because "than" is used for comparisons.

>"projection" is just an overlayed texture on surfaces, just overlays the video-on-texture with "screen" additive blending
>doesn't actually light up dark areas

yeah, sure, nice "peak" graphics.

>Literally says THAN followed by "used as a comparison"
What do you think user?

Graphics haven't peaked until you don't even know you're playing a game

Attached: bathro1squash.png (1265x673, 445K)

>reflected video-on-texture is clearer than actual "projection" because it has no postprocess filters, it's just a reprojected viewport of the textureout

try again, memer.

Fucking hell I've stayed up too long.

This poster is black

Attached: Halteres_from_ancient_Greece.jpg (1920x1277, 294K)

It could be SSR, though there's none of that blending when the camera turns away from it.
Unless that's what you're implying.

Either dead or in a different dimension

>SSR
Except it doesn't stop reflecting when original is out of frame, and you can see some details from the room that aren't even shown in the webm.
It's Raytraced reflections, period, I don't see why this retard seems to think otherwise when the rest of the game behaves in the exact same way.

Attached: Control Screenshot 2019.08.30 - 19.24.54.09.jpg (1920x1080, 247K)

Yeah it's raytraced.
Most likely the post effects aren't on it because of the order shit is done in, or there's some fuckery going on with the raytracing, like not being able to isolate it or something.

I really hate that Capcom unleashed this on us, but it's more on devs for being shitters who do nothing but copy paste what's selling without working on good gameplay. Control isn't that bad, but the majority of them really are.

That's probably the case since the projection is kind of like a spotlight attached to a prop

Have they made a mod for a mask yet?

I don't know how vidyas are implementing raytracing, but if it's something like sending out rays into the room and having the information stored in a cache or something for a few frames or something (using some temporal filters over the top for denoising), then I could see why they'd opt not to do post effects on it. It'd probably look pretty fucky with the projector's video moving on top with the added effects since they'd be lagged behind.

Not to mention it's probably pretty hard to do post effects on raytraced results anyway. Since you're not using the same information that you would from regular vidya lighting. Reflections and stuff would be hard to use in a post result unless you specifically specify another layer just for reflections, but that'd mean more sampling/rendering. And things are already pushing it with how little samples these cards are putting out for barely serviceable framerates.

>Has graphics in games peaked Yea Forums?

probably not but consumer satisfaction has peaked.

Cyberpunk 2077 is first person and once it dominates you can bet your ass many other games will suddenly be first person.

Is the result of raytracing actually geometry or just pixel?

>Projector works upside down with no power cable

wow realism. So immersive

With raytracing, samples (rays) are sent out from the camera. They hit a spot in the scene, and depending on the parameters of the shader and other texture info (normal maps, roughness maps, etc.) send that information to the renderer as an output. Those rays also bounce off of the object, and hit other objects (indirect lighting). Which means you'll get colored objects transmitting their color onto nearby objects, and also lighting up areas around them based on the light that's interacting with the scene.
So it's geometry, but there's a bit more to it than that.

Honestly I think my description was a bit off in some places, but Disney of all things has a pretty simple and decent explanation of how raytracing works on Youtube.
youtube.com/watch?v=frLwRLS_ZR0

Not yet, but almost.

Attached: CNTRL21.jpg (3840x2160, 1.43M)

Developers should stop trying to improve graphics and focus more on ai and world design desu

>them normal maps
muh dick

YOU HAVE NO FUCKING IDEA WHAT REFLECTIONS LOOK LIKE

Control is pretty much the Crysis of this gen, except Crysis was actually a fun game too.

I was asking about those raytraced reflections specifically, because a scene that's outside the frame doesn't have any post effects, but if the reflection itself is geometry and not just a 2D image, then post effects can maybe be applied to it, does that make sense?

this

Attached: Ghost of a Tale cutie.webm (900x506, 2.88M)

wait Flight Simulator 2020

>There's no reason for a game to use Ambient Occlusion
you're a dumb fuck

Attached: AO.gif (1280x720, 1.45M)

You're different!

Oh shit, my bad.
Yeah I don't know about games, but the way you'd do it in regular 3d renders is to isolate different channels so you can do post work on them. I'll be honest I haven't really messed around with projections, but I'll do my best to explain probably how it's done, though it may be wrong.
So you've got stuff like diffuse/albedo, reflections/specular/glossy, emissions, transmissions, and other stuff. Then you'd also have a pass that isolates your different objects with different colors for masking (kind of like a green screen, but everything is a different color that you could pick from).
So for the projector projecting on the wall, you'd probably just use the emission pass (and maybe the color pass). Then it should be pretty easy to isolate it and apply post effects onto it.
Reflections are weird though, and would be kind of hard to isolate, because you're not just reflecting the projector, you're reflecting everything in the room. It's pretty hard to isolate reflected objects, because shit like the Object/Material ID passes (the color green screen thing) don't get reflected. So you'd have to do a lot of weird workarounds to get just what you want out of it. So it's easier just to not do it and process the rest of the image instead.

Again, I haven't really fucked around with projected images/light textures so that could be wrong, and I don't know how video games do it or even if they use the different passes.

I tried explaining that to him, but it's just a post effect made by entitled white boys apparently.

Also Crysis actually looked impressive, Control is the same blurry shit as Quantum Break with some reflections stapled on.

But it's made by nu-males(apparently). checkmate

>5 dynamic lights per scene
>1 shadow per object
This is the modern standard.
Graphics in games have declined thanks to consoles.

Nonono this one is different because its on PC, DELETE THIS

...

Prey did this like two years ago

It's probably less noticeable because they are more brightly colored, especially when you factor video compression.

And newton was an autist with no wife and more or less no friends, what's your point?

Attached: Does this look like the face of mercy to you.jpg (600x643, 39K)

Still looks worse than Mirror's Edge

Where did Remedy go wrong?

Out of curiosity what platform did you play the game on? Ever since the zero punctuation review I'm toying with the idea that everyone who says control's gameplay is shit played it on console.
>use spin and pierce
>unbind aim down sights or whatever the TPS version is called
>max energy setup
>aerial dogfights with hiss elevated
>finishing them off with the charging slam midair
>sprinting/dodging around the battlefield, using spin as a more effective closerange shatter
>yanking a forklift from behind a group of enemies which bowls them over, release it at them and its like a 120 mile pile up on the freeway
>kill hiss charged, launch their exploding corpse at their mates
>seizing hiss clusters to make yourself immortal with the healing
>killing half the room by throwing demolition experts rockets at their mates
>chain reactions of getting one enemy low, killing them by picking them up with launch, throwing their body at their mates which drops them to low hp, repeat
I'll admit I don't normally touch TPS so maybe this kind of shit is all standard, but if so tell me some good games like control to play

Attached: 45286723_190930758527650_1280720876439664127_n.jpg (1080x1350, 95K)

probably selling Max Payne

>implying snoy isn't the king of over the shoulder cinematic adventures
>implying the over the shoulder cinematic adventure genre is anything like traditional third person shooters

Lol yeah right. Notice how quickly the person snaps the camera when the projection starts going through the books.
That's what happens when you lazily inject features into an engine instead of balancing the whole thing around it.

Why isn't she the one playing Triss on the witcher series?

>great games like control
FUCKING KEK get the fuck out you shit taste normalfag

when they got woke

Attached: 1566926706738.jpg (1024x683, 164K)

Not enough of a minority probably.

literally how control isn't that visually impressive

this, aside from the rtx shit it doesn't even look better than quantum break

Unironically kill yourself.

Attached: 1547275726513.jpg (1068x1062, 216K)

I don't think these drooling retards understand why Nintendo is so successful at making thirdperson games and other companies aren't. Even for how blatantly cheap and houndoggish Nintendo execs are (Miyamoto doesn't even work on games anymore) they still understand what makes a good game and what doesn't.
Does Mario have forced over-the-shoulder camera? No
Does Zelda have forced over-the-shoulder camera? No
Does Splatoon have forced over-the-shoulder camera? No.

So why the fuck are all these Gears of War dudebro retards copying each other? Because there isn't a single decent AAA Western dev out there. Not one. They're all hedgefund kiddies with social connections. Forced to rely on indie companies to do real work now.

It was Gears of War that really made this genre popular. Almost every 3rd person shooter today takes influences from that game, starting from the shitty duck and shoot cover system.

>nu-Remedy game isn't movieshit
Who are you trying to fool?

that looks pretty neat but is the game good?

The gameplay is good and fun but it's a bit easy.
It runs into the same problem as Dishonored where you're given the most broken tools early on .

Attached: Control 2019.08.31 - 12.14.19.02.webm (620x348, 2.97M)

Yeah Gears of War / Xbox360 caused this because Xbox controller always been a bad design and not good for shooters. RE4 was really tame even though it was designed for the Gamecube controller and had low FoV. Gears of War and all these other retarded over-the-shoulder games have huge FoV and still can't be assed to center the character on the screen.

Claustrophobic FoV = Dynamic over-the-shoulder (swaps shoulder depending where you aim).
Little/No Restrictions = Center/Dynamic camera.

you're a fucking ai chat bot arent you
get outta here, law two stop browsing Yea Forums

a decade later

Attached: crysis 2007.webm (760x428, 2.1M)

Attached: crysis 1 3897434.webm (1280x720, 2.93M)

>nooooo stop bashing my garbage cinematic third person shoooters noooooo
nigger

Attached: crysis under water.webm (1280x646, 1.95M)

Quantum Break looks really good though

Attached: 20190731124720_1.jpg (3840x2160, 1.33M)

Attached: Crysis 1 mod2.webm (800x450, 2.85M)

As I've heard it's short. I'm waiting for a sale.

Lighting is better imo

Attached: CNTRL48.jpg (2154x2160, 2.81M)

Attached: crysis 1 tree.webm (960x540, 2.92M)

Attached: crysis explosion.webm (1280x720, 1.62M)

Here's you (You) attention whore.

Attached: crysis nuke.webm (1280x720, 2.4M)

Attached: crysis.webm (1280x720, 1.73M)

it's time to stop posting

I haven't played it still.. Is this vanilla graphics?
Will I have fun? Can I max it out these days?

Attached: 1568335130099.jpg (1280x720, 102K)

yes

Peak autism.

they all rook the same

Attached: output.webm (1920x1080, 2.91M)

Looks like dangerously like Dues Ex: HR pissfilter.

>go outside
>rook same!
I understand the argument but at some point the only thing that separates these games is actual gameplay. The problem is that all these shitty over-the-shoulder games don't innovate gameplay either.

>pissfilter.

Attached: CNTRL69.jpg (2159x2160, 2.34M)

>fast paced shooter

LMAO fucking consoletard kill yourself. The only "fast paced" shooter on console funnily enough is a squid baby game with 10/10 gyro controls. Fuck anyone playing a fps/tps with a gamepad and no gyro.

Attached: 1564676738742.jpg (316x500, 82K)

best projector tech/lighting tech in games period.

More nuts is that this shit also works on the volumetric smoke, projecting through it all. Crazy shit.

>noooooooooooooooooooo

Attached: faggot.jpg (185x218, 10K)

>periodblood filter

I guess graphics peaked at Crysis then

>literally how control isn't that visually impressive
You're a Grade A retard.

youtube.com/watch?v=ReDDgFfWlS4

OK FAGGOT JEZUS CHRIST HERE YOU GO: literally how, control isn't that visually impressive

>periodblood filter

Attached: CNTRL53.jpg (1851x2160, 1.77M)

Not just your grammar, but your blind fanboyism over a decade old game too.

If you going in thinking that you will get a fun game with interesting mechanic, then you would be sorely disappointed.
This game is made for Remedy fans to fellate themselves over its awful, cringy, muh deep and confusing story line and some obscure reference to other mediocre Remedy title as a lube.

There is a reson why Cuphead won so many graphics awards.

Attached: cuphead.webm (1280x720, 2.94M)

>toiletwater filter

>toiletwater filter

Attached: CNTRL59.jpg (1846x2160, 1.95M)

>is a retard
>vehemently defends control
yeah checks out you dumb faggot

Shut up nerd. You retards are stuck in the past.

>water filled with algae filter

>water filled with algae filter

Attached: CNTRL10.jpg (3840x2160, 3.86M)

old literally good new literally bad, you have shit taste and you're a normalfagggot, get the fuck out

>period blood in toilet water filter

>Old Boys Club

physic is the future

Attached: vr_physics2.webm (1152x648, 2.38M)

So beautiful

Attached: download.jpg (464x500, 33K)

kek

seethe

>period blood in toilet water filter

Attached: CNTRTL36.jpg (2157x2160, 2.38M)

>"Didn't play the game? Well you can't have an opinion then!"
what is this retarded shit? If the game looks like crap I can say it looks like crap

user all of your screenshots only look good from a certain angle. Turn the camera and that composition will be gone. And then what do you have? Just a dark grey room, that's all. If you want to create compositions with light, make sure the player can't control the camera. Because I'm not going to be arranging your compositions on my screen, only shills will do that for their shill screenshots.

This, like all of this. The combat is so fucking satisfying and I haven't even gotten flight yet. Sprinting around and ripping parts of the walls out to batter my enemies with and then using their broken shattered bodies to finish their friends. Or bowling them over with a desk and while they're reeling from the attack I sprint up and shotgun them with a wall of rocks from the shield ability. This games combat gets my dick hard, and as someone who plays a lot of shooters, both third person and first, nothing has come really close to it lately.

Attached: 1568699945278.jpg (500x394, 29K)

No problem user, enjoy your grey cubes. Just make sure you don't turn the camera or you'll ruin the composition that only works in screenshots.

>duuude gravity gun
It's amazing how they fucked up something as basic as this by making your character hold objects on the RIGHT side of the screen somehow. You can have a clear shot at the enemy, but your gravity gun will hit a wall because for some reason your character is holding the object on the right side of the screen instead of in front of self. Bizarre.

In which case they'll never peak: You'll always be aware of some aspect making it a game, be it the HID in your hands or the VR headset's weight on your head.

Thanks user. I too wish they would have made another game in a forest.

Attached: CNTRL49.jpg (3840x2160, 3.16M)

Go through your folder and ask yourself "will this picture still look good if I turn the camera 90 degrees to the right/left". So far the answer is no for every one of your bullshots. It only looks good when you pick the right camera angle, during gameplay it looks like shit.

>You can have a clear shot at the enemy, but your gravity gun will hit a wall because for some reason your character is holding the object on the right side of the screen instead of in front of self.
Literally never had this problem, in fact in most cases it feels like the object you're hurling will ignore parts of the terrain to hit the intended target. It feels like it will through over small walls or through grates when it shouldn't just to hit what you're aiming at. Feels a little cheap I guess, but it's satisfying as fuck to use.

Indeed!

Attached: CNTRL28.jpg (3840x2160, 1.79M)

Majority of the time the object you're throwing should never get near you. You flick stuff in front of you/beside you directly at the target, the second it levitates off the ground you can launch it from where the ITEM is, not where you are.

He's right, Crysis 1 was leaps and bounds ahead of anything else that was out at the time. Control isn't.

Not the user you're replying but, I get that you're trying to pick this game apart for reasons that I really don't give enough of a fuck about to explore, but the game really does have some kino ass looking set pieces. Are they all kino? No. Do they look kino at all angles? Maybe not, but this crusade you're on against screenshots is just moving goalposts.

have sex

Hey, is the suit in the OP a mmod or something? I looked up the game's costumes but there's nothing like that. It's a cute butt.

Astral Dive suit, its a """ps4 exclusive"""
Use a hex editor on the PC exe to get it like in the pic

Attached: 1567265423748.png (1312x542, 33K)

Thanks user, have a good day

Cheers mate.

Attached: 1566029977827.jpg (720x720, 31K)

Hopefully, so we can start getting good games again.

It's a ps4 exclusive pre order bonus outfit or something but you can get it on pc using the link below.
cs.rin.ru/forum/download/file.php?id=60585
Replace the game exes w/ the exes in the link above. Or use hex editor like this guy And yes she has a cute butt

Attached: Control 0.0.269.9979 (FINAL_release) 13-09-2019 20_24_04.png (1920x1080, 3.22M)

Those are not bullshots though user. Game do looks like that and you can just disable motion bloor. I know your console brain can't really comprehend that the game graphics can be changed. Control do look like that, even better in movemenent because of the destruction and particle effects, flying papers and broken furnitures, etc.

Yes
Yes
Maybe

You are a fucking retard.

Do you even know how light works you retarded nigger?

game looks nice. too bad i have no interest in playing it

all wrong

Attached: 20180416184024_1.jpg (2560x1440, 888K)

You can't see it because I was forced to drop video quality to compensate for size. Original vid factored in at about 130 mega bytes and I suck at making webms.
Here's another one for clarity.

Attached: Control_projector1.webm (800x450, 2.76M)

Attached: SonicUnleashedWindmill.jpg (1920x1080, 201K)

Attached: 1522153703409.jpg (3840x2160, 3.41M)

it has the power source in it and it would work upside down, you zoomer.

The lighting in this game is absolutely superb. I wish it had a better color palette though. I will say that the gameplay is pretty standard and fails to live up to it's potential.

Attached: Control 0.0.269.9979 (FINAL_release) 17-09-2019 11_50_01.png (1600x900, 2.29M)

Attached: 1522152869062.jpg (3840x2160, 2.86M)

The only problem I have with this game is that you can't really look under the hiss possessed office worker's skirts.

>you will never clamber onto a levitating hiss office worker and fuck her while she chants
feels bad man

Attached: 1521317078183.jpg (4000x1904, 3.68M)

DROPPED

thanks for saving my screenshots user

Attached: cut.gif (600x338, 2.89M)

graphics wanking is such a futile exercise
What you want is a game most people can run on their system like W3, looks amazing and runs well.
Control is notable for the first actual implementation of rtx but its not a great game when most people cant run it with the rtx effects.

>W3, looks amazing

Attached: witcher3.jpg (1920x1080, 720K)

Game looks 2010. Just stop.

When will moot do something about these bots

Attached: sad.png (735x290, 102K)

What game is it? Looks like fc4 but less cartoony

it really feel like you tried your hardest to find the worst spot.

Attached: 1474361165746.jpg (500x551, 84K)

well, fc5

Attached: Tomb_raider_desert.jpg (1200x675, 305K)

seething poolack

Attached: 1522253434738.jpg (1920x1080, 678K)

Attached: 417290_screenshots_20180307214012_1.jpg (1920x1012, 2.31M)

3/35 (maybe 4/35) fuckable.
Not bad all things considered.

yep

Attached: glitcher34.jpg (2560x1440, 2.2M)

Attached: Nova Aetas.jpg (1920x1080, 563K)

The hot girls dont go for gaming industry in finland.

Attached: burgers-GRAPHICS.png (1000x1000, 439K)

Attached: 1520411385338.jpg (1920x868, 1M)

>The hot girls don't go for gaming industry.
ftfy

Attached: 1520345262541.jpg (2560x1440, 501K)

wtf stop saving my screens!!

Attached: laugh12.gif (376x376, 3.6M)

TO be fair contrary to popular belief Crisis acualy had amazing sandbox physics open objectives.
It was borderline a Immersive sim.
You can go full assault or do stealth and stuff in between.

In finland its more extreme because people have more freedom to do what they please so the girls choose stuff they personally like.
In usa they might choose to study math because feminism or something

always loved the part where Crysis is supposed to have bad gameplay, even when the webm are just right there.

Fair enough.
Just tired of graphics fags.

Attached: 23711493831_93588c9956_o.jpg (1920x1200, 2M)

>burgers
Crytek isn't even American, you obsessed europoor.

Also the hot girls in Finland are literally one in fifty thousand (if that), so omega rare to be in the gaming industry.

Attached: 1519069057332.jpg (1680x1050, 261K)

>obsessed
That's the original name of the comic.

Not even close. most games these days are still struggling with the following problems
>ray tracing is still fairly recent, so it works poorly or is too demanding for current hardware
>models still have jaggies
>hair looks like partially transparent sheets
>physics are messy and glitchy over 60% of the time
>good shading on bad models look like shit
>bad shading on on good models looks like shit
>good shading on good models still looks like shit
>smooth metal surfaces have some dumb ass glossy shine instead of proper reflection
>fire effects are still mostly made of a bunch of sprites
>draw distances are still too meager to properly convey photorealism - devs "solve" this problem by making games take place almost completely indoors, or if outdoors, there will be an obnoxious amount of blur or pop-ins
and much more

Attached: 1518343720233.jpg (2048x1152, 208K)

Most teens I see are perfectly palatable.
Most older women look fine too if they're the fit water drinking sort.

dont be poor

Attached: 20190620212545_1.jpg (3840x2160, 2.31M)

Attached: 1518333150457.jpg (2560x1440, 748K)

Attached: 33250_screenshots_2015-07-08_00002.jpg (1366x768, 493K)

Attached: 1499598017419.jpg (1920x1080, 1010K)

>I don't think graphics are important, I want good gameplay and story
>"y-your pour"
Cope.

Attached: 27196983252_d2d578cfc6_o.jpg (3440x1440, 3.75M)

The more realistic the graphic gets the more soulles so fuck graphics

Imagine posting something like this with sincerity

Attached: xplane 11.webm (1920x810, 1.76M)

Whats the point of that?

>soulless
There's that buzzword you inarticulate cunt flaps can't stop using.

Attached: 1567407037992.jpg (225x225, 7K)

>im a poorfag so i dont really care about graphics, i wish technology would get worse instead of better!
Cope.

Attached: 20190514193941_1.jpg (3840x2160, 1.46M)

Maybe it's for immersion, to know the world you're in is somewhat alive.
The old simulators were just flat ground with some buildings if I recall.

No I mean photomode that renders new stuff onto the screen when you zoom in.

Attached: 8d962ea3f982607decf496febc2a4e2e.jpg (1917x1015, 1.11M)

Graphics peaked like 10 years ago, now they just artificially raising system requirements with gazillions of polygons, cancerous effects (blur, dof, bloom, shitrays) and 8k tomato textures (which are still blurry crap somehow)

>I don't think graphics are important, I want good gameplay and story
>"y-your pour"
>"and you actively want worse graphics in everything"
Wow.

Over the shoulder was a fucking mistake. It's auto no-buy for me.

Every time I played a game with good graphics compared to the rest yea at first I was really amazed and it added a lot to the experience. But say like 10 hours in and they just do not feel any special or even good.

bring back UT detailled texture

Attached: detail texture unreal.jpg (2048x3072, 1019K)

Graphics peaked in 2014, when Unity came out.

The director has an ass like that?!

>playing games for their shitty stories

Attached: 1515747595422s.jpg (231x250, 7K)

I can't make out what's bait and what's not anymore

Attached: 1567689949652.png (907x415, 469K)

Graphics today are primarily limited by budget, and developers refusal to use the new Vulkan API instead of still limiting themselves with DirectX to what an Xbox can handle.

Or gameplay.
Also: so play the good ones.
Stop playing Crysis and fucking Zelda you goddamn weeb homo.

Graphics never mattered.

I don't give a fuck about graphics give me fucking gameplay. This shitty muh grafix fuckery means we still haven't had good physics based gameplay since HL

>muh soul
>muh soulless

Attached: 1568036895927.jpg (848x800, 80K)

>

Attached: splinter vs resident evil.jpg (1920x2523, 1.93M)

bro noone cares about throwing printers around show vids of throwing dudes into giant meat grinders

>Japs can't into grfX.
Wooooow what a surprise.

Attached: 314520_screenshots_2015-10-28_00006.jpg (1366x768, 218K)

That's what the drugs are for user, to make you forget, to make it all seem so real. Drop some acid, put on the headset and blast off to the moon.

thats a big fish, user

>A high profile Xbox/PC game known for it's graphical prowess
>A port of a 3DS game
You can't be real. Also isn't this Chaos Theory, released in 2005?

Name one Sony game with good physics. Just one.

For me_

See, while the rest of the scene is actually raytraced/pathtraced, the actual video being "reflected" is straight-up reprojected into the "reflection".

You can tell this because it is far more detailed than the rest of the objects in the room in the reflection, when in reality it should have the same sample count as the rest of the room.

It's a neat trick, but it's just a trick, and it's a trick that slows down the entire rendering pipeline because the RT cores on the RTX cards aren't actually asynchronous, they're concurrent (both run on the GPU at the same time, but concurrent running stalls the rendering pipeline every sync while asynchronous execution is truly parallel)

Not even close and obviously not in any console-focused game.
Cryengine still has the most impressive graphics for me, KCD has a dreamlike feel to it that I didn't get in a long time, Elite Dangerous also looks and sounds absolutely beautiful and immersive but we're still far from hitting some wall.

>an upscaled 3ds game
What did you expect?

Generic offices and sterile nondescript "facilities" aren't kino, this game easily has the most forgettable design I've ever seen.

wtf is this real

Trill af

They downgraded it for non rtx cards just so they could sell more of those its shameful, blacks aren't really blacks and when in penumbra it looks like a badly ripped movie

this, based user dropping some truths

get fucked cinematic snoy fags

no, you dumb fucking retard

This is the only legit good post here.
Dont worry user, i got your back.

>silvertail
That's not even a real fish.

explain the image then

>playing sony cinematic trash with a protag (female mind you) who wont shut the fuck up
lmao this looks like early 7th gen title at best.

based

>not because RTX is allowing the reflection to reflect less light than the actual projection does

Why do you keep shilling this shit on Yea Forums?

I enjoyed it a lot, but now i've no reason to touch it until the expansions are out.

Attached: Control.png (897x63, 12K)

real time rendering still looks awful.

Attached: hirokazu-yokohara-girl-face-b.jpg (1920x1080, 347K)

wow sick graphics what a cool looking ga- zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

>

Attached: EEni8N5WwAACHPr.jpg (2567x2131, 172K)

I guess the game is technically impressive but it's so boring to look at and everything is too clean and sterile

If a game made with it in mind, of course it needs it. Same effect can me achieved by using textures with baked shadows. Same result with zero cost.

Have these people played Crysis? It's amazing and there's nothing like it so far.

>. Same effect can me achieved by using textures with baked shadows.
>Same result with zero cost.
hahahahahahahaha

*SMOOOOCCH*

except for anything that moves

>projection that's been easily possible in game engines for years
>doesn't even have bounce lighting off the projection
>doesn't even shift focus like a real projector would
frankly boring to be honest

Attached: 1386634871692.gif (180x180, 216K)

>peaked
We've had this shit since gmod.

Attached: man reading a newspaper.jpg (1280x850, 253K)

it remind me people being amazed by snow in vidya.

I don't know why user keeps posting that webm like it's the best thing ever. Shit been around since more than a decade. Control has a lot more cooler tech like pretty decent destruction, look it up on youtube, it's pretty great.

>people acting like this is notable
Source could do this exact thing 10 years ago

Wish the story in this game wasnt complete fucking shit and a giant retarded sequel bait with not a single fucking thing resolved.
Also the STRONK WOMEN need no man meme has to end,

>As I've heard it's short. I'm waiting for a sale.
Its basically open world, so you can skip a lot of shit and rush it, but if you do side content its around 15-20hours.

>top - PC
>bottom - 3Ds
The fuck is the point of this image?

BING BANG WAHOO

You could do this in real time but without that fancy supersampling, 1 sample per pixel, dof made in post, pathtracing instead of raytracing and better and less divisions for hair curves. Marmoset can chug along 20mln+ non instanced polies in real time no problem with pbr shaders, slap in path tracing and you got this image.
Problem is that this head is all you could have, hair alone would eat up, the fuck you gonna play then?
A game consists of a game, not of a single model to look at,

she legit looks like a trany from the back in that shot, shoulders way too wide
>inb4 you see tranies everywhere
as a matter of fact i do see them everywhere in western games for some reason :^)

rent free

She looks normal
Most fat fucks today dont realize having an ass wider than shoulder son a woman is not normal and a sign of obesity or being out of shape, she still has that hourglass figure

Graphics won't peak, they're going to get so good that they're better than reality, then people will be creating reality within videogames.