I miss when Halo was good

So never?

I too was 12 in 2007

It's still good, it just will never touch Halo 3, Halo Infinite go me excited though more than any Halo after Halo 3 has gotten me.

Because you should ask Nintendo the same thing and then come back to me, if you have something that's very successful and you enjoy making it, you don't kill it.

wtf i was 12 in 2007

Yeah I think it's an age thing. For me halo 1 was the best halo, and I was 12 then. So maybe 12 is the age where every video game is pure kino

That's not true at all, Halo was never generic. It innovated in a number of ways to make FPS comfortable on console. I happen to think those innovations were a load of hot garbage that made the genre a tedious bore but it's hard to deny that it was influential.

>It innovated in a number of ways to make FPS comfortable on console.
Yes, for consoles. Playing it on PC KB/M was nothing special though, it played just like your run of the mill FPS, nothing noteworthy, except for maybe the extremely repetitive level designs at the middle. If it wasn't for being babbys first console FPS, this game would have been forgotten.

dude what fps do you like, I wanna judge your tastes

>3
>halo 2 but slower paced with shittier maps and a random inconsistent BR

Not him but I'm glad it's an Xbox game then. You don't like the game series, don't play it, why even post in a Halo thread if you're not a Halo fan?

>not liking concurrent games

The usual boomer shit, I played most of the stuff back in the day, Doom games, Unreal, Unreal Tournament, Half-Life 1-2, Quake 1-2-3, Starsiege: Tribes, Battlefield 1942, Duke 3D, No One Lives Forever 1-2, Blood, Jedi Knight (2 and Academy as well but I wouldn't really call that FPS), I could never really get into Heretic and Hexen series, but I'm thinking of giving them a try again sometimes.
This is not a hugbox, so I'm afraid you're going to have to deal with it. Try reddit if you are looking for a hugbox. Besides, I never said anything outrageous about Halo either. I only said it was nothing special, it appears more than what it is only for console players.

Halo is my fav

>why can't things just end on a trilogy and leave it be
Because Microshaft needed to keep the series alive because it and Gears were the only things selling their consoles. Now both Halo and Gears are nearly dead with a notable decline in quality since the originals, and the Xbox is in the shitter.

>It's still good
>Halo Infinite go me excited
>having such shit taste AND being gullible

Attached: 12 IQ.png (800x729, 48K)

I don't miss it bad enough to blindly trust 343 to bring it back.

>3
>halo 2 but without the numerous bugs and extreme bullet magnetism
FTFY

>it appears more than what it is only for console players
That's what's good about it and that's what it should always be.

Halo 3 is fun but its campaign is worse than 1 and 2s, not that its bad but those are just the facts

Agreed, even though 3 had better graphics and more polish and whatnot, overall I enjoyed 2's campaign a lot more and it was more memorable too.

MCC when

As autistic as this sounds, Halo 3 is one of those things you had to see when it came out to understand why it was such a big deal

There are games far worse than Halo 4 and 5, try playing more games.

one of the rare games people skip work for

If ODST, Reach, Halo 4, and Halo 5 didn't exist, Halo 2's campaign would be shit, please don't put it on the same pedestal as Halo CE, never saw what you animal fuckers saw in that campaign. Halo CE and 3 are the only truly good Halo campaigns in the series.

CE was pretty uninteresting, and it was suffering from extremely repetitive level designs at some parts, as mentioned in an earlier comment. 2 had the storyline of the Arbiter introduced which made the story more interesting by offering a chance to look at it from more perspective, and the visuals of the covenant city were amazing.

You kinda answered your own question there bud. it was clear that everyone at Bungie actually gave a shit about making the best game they could. People making a game they would actually want to play. AAA titles are far too corporate and high budget now to risk letting the developers take the wheel on too many design decisions.

>Worse games exist so they aren't bad
Wow. Guess Nigeria existing means that the Soviet Union was actually a really cool place.

>storyline
Stopped reading there, Halo campaigns are great because the levels and gameplay are great, Arbiter was boring, had terrible levels, played exactly like Chief, had bland environments, terrible enemy encounters, terrible boss fights, his levels were scripted out the ass, he had a character, and was the sole reason Halo 2's campaign is the worst of trilogy, Chief had better levels but even his levels suffered because of the horrible split campaign format.

Garbage taste all around. Opinion discraded and flushed down the toilet.

t. given back their bomb

We're talking about video games, not /pol/shit, get your cuck ass out of here.

Your opinion never mattered in the first place.
>choosing story over gameplay

>not /pol/shit
>coping this hard

>only gameplay matters, everything else doesn't, ingame models could all be cubes since it doesn't impact the gameplay
Safe to say that yours mattered the least from the beginning.

Yes, in a video game, gameplay always matters the most over everything, if it's no fun, then the game is not good. The only fun part about Halo 2 was its multiplayer and wow look at that, that's the only reason Halo 2 is even remembered today.