Will they let us side with her this time?

That's the SS1 remake though

>dat loog gool
Literally a nigger. She is literally a fucking round faced, wide nosed, round fore-headed, thick nigger lips nigger.

>implying that doesn't look perfect

Soul.

Attached: 031762971afe52bef25163be6ffe9107_original.png (700x467, 383K)

That's what I'm saying that image looks much better than this

Attached: System-Shock-3-Pre-Alpha-45.jpg (1162x637, 53K)

That ship interior looks cool and so does the SS2 version. Makes me want to play the original cause I know the remake won't be good.

That looks fucking great

>crusty, washed out youtube jpeg
bruh

>doesn't hold back the neon lighting style
>fog everywhere
>no CINEMATIC shit

I'm hyped for the remake

Attached: shockprealpha02.0.jpg (1200x800, 75K)

honestly if shodan wasn't there could you tell this apart from any other generic sci-fi setting?

Attached: system-shock-3-looks-appropriately-horrifying-in-this-pre-alpha-teaser.jpg (1920x1080, 140K)

>they rejected this concept for WEWUZDAN

Attached: SS3.png (1920x720, 629K)

>cause I know the remake won't be good.

Honestly if they just update the maps, and modestly improve the controls, it will be far superior to the original.

thats SS3 shodan concept bruh.
What you quoted is the SS 1 remake shodan.

I think its primarilly the lighting and angle. Shodans lips are fookin huge.

>not posting the superior edit

The space ship and weapon aesthetics of system shock was always generic.

Looks like late 90's cg, looks cool t bh

>system shock was always generic.

naw its very 80s scifi with light 60s robot designs.
its also colorful as fuck.

Attached: System-Shock-XCDSHOCK-Patch_1[1].jpg (800x600, 180K)

First one maybe but the second one is very generic and its the aesthetic they are going with for the third game.

>its the aesthetic they are going with for the third game

Well thats why I'm saying its generic looking.

That's bullshit, SS1 had an 80s vibe, SS3 looks like doom3

We'll see how crazy it gets later on in the game, thats when the second game had interesting areas to me.

who knows really?
but if I had to bet, the remake will be better.
I'm unfamilliar with the studio, but everything they're doing and have to do should simple. They'd have to try really hard to fuck it up.

So?
Same franchise, same character. They had the right to use this concept but they decided to go woke.

Nightdive has been pretty consistent in quality, their turok remasters were great

>They had the right to use this concept but they decided to go woke.
Email them. They've recieved criticism with some designs and changed them in response.

Nightdive Studios. They re-release old computer games including System Shock, they haven't made their own game. Although, like you say, since it's a remake they don't technically need to have any of their own ideas.

Just gonna post videos so people can see it without looking at the shideo youtube images.

SS3 "gameplay" trailer
youtu.be/yIWAMT2og3M

SS1 Remake gameplay trailer
youtu.be/JdiaIRkjpI0

SS3 enemies are pretty cool and spooky, but the enviroment looks better in remake. Hope they're both moddable.

Soul

Attached: 8RQR243.gif (640x448, 26K)

They changed her you worthless retard. They. Fucking. Changed. Her.

Fuck Yea Forums.

>What you quoted is the SS 1 remake shodan.
That's from the previous System Shock 3 trailer you moron.

Why did you post an image from SS3 to complain about how bad the the remake looks?

they made her face look fuckable

I don't like it...
she's supposed to be creepy

Attached: 03916738-10DD-4615-857D-70DB1D721E9A.gif (572x476, 398K)

>implying creepy shodan doesn't make her hotter
>implying hot shodan isn't creepy

but I agree, shes way too pristeen

this screen oozes atmosphere.

I think its the onscreen fingerless glove meter.

ever game lets you side with her though

oh because the original is good? Are you that stupid?

Yes the original is good, no I'm not stupid. You mad?

>look atchu cracka, a pathedic WHITE BOY WIF no Rhythm or SOUL
>SHODAN falls back, gets back up again, falls back, gets back up again while laughing

>AHHH THIS AI BITCH CAN'T BE SHUT DOWN BY NORMAL MEANS!

>IMMA GONNA HAVE TO COOOM ON HER CPU BRAIN MATRIX CORES AHHHHHHHHHHH

kickstarter.com/projects/1598858095/system-shock/posts/2615923

I hope you like the faux lowpoly pixelated retro aesthetic, because that's what you're getting.

SS1 > REST

Attached: Maintenance.png (1920x1080, 136K)

where the fuck do i get the code for deactivating the security shit so i can shoot up the lasers god DAMN. can't really do anything else on the R level right now. SS1 btw

>I hope you like the faux lowpoly pixelated retro aesthetic

bruh

Attached: hungry bat sees borger.gif (202x175, 3K)

that's not ss1, it was the first trailer for 3

>With System Shock we want to create a quasi retro look that combines modern physically based rendering tech with a low-res, pixelated texture aesthetic that evokes the low resolution of the original game.
Everything seems to be in order here.

>that original UV map

holy shit lmao, but the second version seems like its wasting a LOT of space.

looks like fucking reboot character

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 105K)

And thats a good thing...

>faux lowpoly
When they say low poly for the mutant they're not meaning they want it to look like a 3d model from the 90's
Usually you make a highpoly model of something with alot of it's details like wrinkles and scars being physically sculpted. Later you make a a lower poly version of that model and relegate those smaller details to normal maps, bump maps and other shaders.

Attached: lo-poly-VS-Hi-poly.jpg (720x427, 51K)

Well, I meant they are trying to make it look like angular 1990s 3D model aesthetic-wise, not in literal technical sense of it.

mmm mmmm I love the delicious raw pixels aesthetic

Attached: de7f541db4d2138009d1296b1ec085c7_h264_high.webm (640x652, 2.79M)

Soo much soul!

Thanks, doc

Why do people act this looks like a black woman?
It's just plain ugly, that's all

Attached: 590.jpg (640x640, 33K)

I have to say I can't agree with their execution on pixelating everything there.
Just that specific method, because it makes everything look fuzzy and compressed, and not in a good way.
They need to move that into an optional shader while authoring their content in high-res with sharp, clean lines.
Their work flow on the aesthetic already makes it look great in that style, but making it look muddy like that goes too far, imo. They could get similar results through a shader people could toggle.

I actually don't know if that video is just horribly mashed with compression; The earliest look of the Unity demo and then the first batch of new assets they'd made since going back to the classic style on Unreal, was pretty much perfect. It was sharp but still subtle pixilation like the textures weren't being filtered.

That's the way to do it.

But what they're showing there is a bit heavy handed. Less is usually more.

Almost looks cel shaded. Never got that vibe from the earlier material.

Err that doens't look cell shaded at all.
Cell shadings whole deal is having hard lines of shadow. if its "almost" cell shaded it wouldn't be cell shaded.

Hence I deleted that.
I'm ranting anyways

Attached: 1526587209822.png (557x443, 163K)

WE IZ GODZ N SHEEIT.

well okay then.

Its a webm, its the compression.