Forces auto hiding of HUD elements, even when you want to see them

>forces auto hiding of HUD elements, even when you want to see them
>anything not hidden needs to have noise added to it so there's no burn in
>still looks worse than CRT
>blue color disappears after 4 years
>noise added detracts from image quality
>stupid expensive and still not widely adopted
remember how people thought OLED was the future and it's already being abandoned? Will display technology ever surpass CRT in every way?

Attached: img_ST1_2_1_01.png (1440x810, 976K)

Will you ever stop being mentally retarded?

yeah it's called MLED senpai

Laser technology based TVs. Still a long way off.

Have had my LG C8 for a year and a half, use it for modern games and emulation and have never even had any sort of image retention non the less burn in. Fucking love this thing

Burn in is a meme that only happens to shitty cheapo OLED.

LGs highest end set has none of those issues besides price.

μLED is a bare minimum of 4 years off for the consumer market

Enjoy having the AGDQ frames perma etched into your screen this winter.

You said the same thing about OLED. It won't happen.

The what?

You could buy one right now... if you were a millionaire.

Okay?

I didn't say anything about the OLED.

>Will display technology ever surpass CRT in every way?
Yes, microled is coming soon and it will be better than every previous technology in every way.

Next year's iphone will have it.

Sure you didn't. mLED has no future in consumer displays.

We need dual-layer LCD to save us. Very good contrast and the only real disadvantage is the power consumption. Most important part is that it's actually achievable using current tech. It doesn't look like OLED will be getting rid of burn-in any time soon, nor does it look like microLED is getting small enough for monitors, phones, tablets, laptops or even "normal" sized 4K TVs. Maybe regular LCD with mini-/micro-LED FALD can be decent, but I'd really prefer dual-layer.

advertising like this is hilarious
Like I know how difficult it is to advertise display tech when 99% of people are going to view it through old display tech (and if you can see it on older tech then there's no reason to upgrade), but what actually are they trying to tell people with this imagery

reminds me of all the advertisements for low latency/high refresh rate displays, where they just take two screenshots of call of duty and run the photoshop smudge/blur tool over one

CRT is the future. We got scammed, time to accept it.

Attached: Panasonic FT2700.jpg (1536x2048, 748K)

You can keep your xray machine, desu.

I will, get your own if you want to upgrade from an LCD.

They have their own problems and drawbacks. I wouldn't really want to go back to the not-quite-perfectly-sharp look of CRTs, nor would I want the potential geometric distortion, nor would I want to give up the higher resolution I have now, or the refresh rate at high resolution that is possible with LCDs. CRTs also tended to be very big for their screen size, there's no fucking way I could fit 3 27" CRTs on my desk the way I do with LCDs right now.

I want an actual upgrade from current LCDs, not just 1 step forward and 2 steps back like what going back to CRTs would be.

>They have their own problems and drawbacks
sure they do
> I wouldn't really want to go back to the not-quite-perfectly-sharp look of CRT
You think you don't, but you do
>nor would I want the potential geometric distortion
Wouldn't be a problem on new CRTs
>nor would I want to give up the higher resolution I have now
You could get higher resolution ones and not give up low resolution support on new CRTs
>or the refresh rate at high resolution that is possible with LCDs
This is also possible on new CRTs
>I want an actual upgrade from current LCD
Sounds like you're looking for a CRT

Shut the fuck up you fucking autist. You crt kiddies are so fucking annoying. He wants an actual upgrade in tech not a step back to fucking tubes. Jesus Christ.

Isn't burn-in what killed plasma?
The tech for it in later iterations wasn't an issue, but because it seemed like the stigma for burn-in caused plasma to never really take off.

The step back is a step forward, no need to get so mad. All these things and more would be possible on CRT if the technology was continually developed. Too bad we just had to settle for what display manufacturers had an easier time shipping and manufacturing rather than what was better. Now we're stuck with it.

Plasma consumed A LOT more electricity.

I remember when tvs were an appliance. Something you'd buy every 10-25 years because it just worked.
Now all tvs are literally giant smartphones that you replace every 2 years because "the new model came out" or because a part actually failed causing you to buy a new tv anyway, thank you planned obsolescence!

Plasma was kinda shit for everything except image quality
>consumes power like motherfucker and heats up like a grill
>bulky
>plasma tech is hard to engineer for resolutions above 1080p with consumer size TVs, there’s limits on how small plasma cells you can make without it being expensive as fuck
>burn-in

>my LCD/LED tv just got hit with the burn-in thing
any way to fix it or am I fucked?

literally buy a new one. That's all you can do.

If it is your typical IPS/VA paneled TV, image retention should clear out with time, unless you forgot something on the screen for a VERY long time. It’s very hard to get permanent burn in with them.

>Sounds like you're looking for a CRT
No, I'm looking for LCD with at least 10x the contrast ratio. All the other CRT shit, you can keep, I don't want it.

Oh, so a CRT is perfect for you then. Wouldn't it be great if they continued to be manufactured? So many problems would be solved with that.

>Implying I like watching trannies

No, a CRT is not perfect. No CRT exists with the resolution, refresh rate, sharpness and space efficiency of my current monitors. You're imagining a magical CRT in your head which is somehow superior in all aspects, but this CRT does not exist, has not existed and will probably never exist in the future either. The CRTs that DO actually exist are inferior in pretty much every single aspect except contrast ratio in the dark and input lag.

why are there people who relentlessly shill crts
its not like anybody is paying you
if its just not suitable you cant convince someone it is

Like anyone who is mentally healthy actually watches those.

how fucking hard is it to not leave a static image on the screen for more than 4 hours. what the fuck are you doing for 4 hours where pixels never shift ONCE in a video game?

It’s literally tech hipsters. Yeah, CRT is really good for the one thing it’s good at, playing retro games that would look like shit on modern displays, but anyone who recommends CRTs for current-day content is a fucking retard.

>You're imagining a magical CRT in your head which is somehow superior in all aspects,
Ah, you're finally catching on. I thought all that talk about continued development would be enough of a hint. You still want CRT, but you have LCD manufacturing to blame for why you're not getting what you want. That tech has no future.

The problem with CRTfags is when they think any random CRT is better when the good ones are only a handful of specific models that are extremely hard to find these days.

>AGDQ

Attached: 1565008986187.jpg (506x477, 18K)

This. Otherwise CRTs are good only for 480i and below.
Me finding a FW900 for a good price is just as likely as getting laid.

Less HUD is a good thing

and PDP > LCD

Clearly it is CRT which had no future while LCD continues to develop, as reality has aptly demonstrated. You're imagining fairy tales and what could have been, all the while without any real evidence that CRT would even work well enough to actually support your fantasy. The point is, the CRTs which do exist most certainly don't match your imagination.

CRTs are good for any resolution

Most HD CRTs are shite.

>while LCD continues to develop
stagnate is the word you're looking for

No, the problem is cheap consumer HD CRTs which don't switch format.

So most of them?

Strange perspective when 200000:1 contrast ratio LCDs literally exist right now, with professional mastering LCD monitors reaching 1000000:1 contrast ratio too.

>Monitor and TV commercial
>If you don't have the monitor, you can't see how great the colors are on the commercial
>If you have the monitor, the commercial doesn't need to sell it to you
>The commercial is useless in both cases

Attached: am2.png (1349x1252, 1.15M)

Just TVs

sure, and they even use the marketing "finally, we surpassed CRT!" but you would trust marketing, wouldn't you?

Apple Watch*
Nothing has been said for the 2020 iPhone to use mLED

>Just TVs
And HD monitors are few and far between. Are you sure you read the post I was quoting in the first place?

just wait™ for MicroLED, which has the benefits of OLED without its drawbacks

>Will display technology ever surpass CRT in every way?
Sure, the eventual ideal is to skip displays and your eyes entirely and just connect your graphics card to your brain and render games directly to your mind.
Like, the thing VR needs to do to actually be reasonable for the average consumer.

I trust measured specs on real displays much more than I trust a delusional retard on Yea Forums going on about things which literally don't exist, that's for sure.

Except if you gotta carry a large CRT TV that will require multiple people and a hernia or two for each

I prefer my TV to not weigh 500 pounds

Wouldn’t really recommend waiting for it if you have a real urge or need to upgrade, it’s gonna take years before microled is actually available in customer TVs and it’s actually affordable for people without bottomless wallets. Gonna be something like 3-4 years minimum for that.

They're very common, what are you talking about?

If they don't weigh that much how will your mother relate to them?

>Burn in.
Turn the fucking brightness down, factory settings almost always have the brightness cranked to max.

what's wrong with just normal lcd tvs?

looks like I'm fucked, I fiddled with the settings to make it somewhat watchable

>It’s literally tech hipsters
nah, its mostly just retro game faggots that keep spouting this. but most of the time they dont know what they are talking about and it usually comes down to what this user said.

Black levels and response time.

No they don't, idiot. Nobody advertises by saying it's better than a CRT

>they even use the marketing "finally, we surpassed CRT!"
To the average person TVs surpassed that with LCD/LED.

fucking armlets

???

Please post more about things you don't know anything about I enjoy an easy feeling of smug superiority

Attached: prm4220.png (912x667, 135K)

How did you even get something to burn in with a TV like that? I remember forgetting PS3 menu on overnight my old (~2008) Sony VA television, and while it spooked me when it appeared to be burned in, leaving the TV playing some random video content for the day cleared it all off.

Use one of those YouTube videos for half hours.

>to the average person
>posts professional monitor advert
scraping

average people are kind of retarded, aren't they?

OLED is the best thing I ever bought for myself, completely changed my gaming and movie experience and makes me want to replay all my old favorites on it

>flat panel crts will never exist in our lifetime because 2 companies couldnt get along

That should be nearly impossible. Image retention can happen if you really abuse them with static images, but it should clear up. I think there are programs which flash random colors or noise which can help clearing image retention.

Attached: oled-1543877835432.png (398x530, 91K)

>he doesn't know what marketing is

>already being abandoned
Lol what. Samsung, Vizio and fucking AMAZON will start producing oleds next year. OLED won despite Samsung coping hard for years, they finally gave in.

>Flat tube
Explain this to me

>AMAZON will start producing
Amazon just puts their name on shit that is 1:1 identical to other brands since it all comes out of the same factory. It started with AmazonBasics but now they're launching a fuck ton of "brands" with random names. Look at the "our brands" page.

>Not having a high end Samsung QLED TV to get all the benefits of OLED without any of the bullshit

I am lmaoing at poorfags right now. Best purchase I’ve ever made.

Attached: FDFEE4FB-CE8D-45D4-8A6E-85AB73D0D9D6.jpg (1200x800, 179K)

Samsung is Korean trash and you're retarded for paying premium price for Korean trash.

Enjoy your blooming, lack of Dolby Vision and no DTS passthrough

Just another name for LCD, you'll fall for anything, won't you?

Keep coping, moneylet. Maybe one day you’ll get a TV that can go above 1080p if you keep saving up.

So, since CRT development has stopped and there are no real world examples of your fairy tale CRT, what are you basing the supposed specs of this amazing CRT on? Are you an engineer that used to develop CRTs? Do you have any sources on any of this being possible?

>1080pleb
>1440pleb

Attached: GDM-Fw900 resolution.jpg (4096x3072, 2.36M)

I'm sure you get amazing image clarity on that, especially with the VGA input.

The other user is right, companies don't market LCDs and OLEDs as "this display surpassed CRTs" because to the vast majority of the public, they already did. Why people suddenly stopped purchasing them which led to manufacturers stopping production of CRTs? Why are people selling old CRTs fot chump change? Because people don't see value in them at all.

>still posting this meme tube
Please tell me where I can obtain one for a reasonable price.

>QLED TV to get all the benefits of OLED

Attached: 42325325.jpg (1007x971, 148K)

yes
already proved they did
by not being underage

I already have a 21 inch 4:3 CRT so I just cope by telling myself 16:9 widescreen content is best experienced on a flatscreen LCD monitor.

You posted a productivity display that is hardly the kind of use for the average joe. If you say to a random person who has owned CRTs back then "hey my LCD monitor is better than CRTs" will be similar to saying "yo car is superior to a horse carriage"

>You posted a productivity display that is hardly the kind of use for the average joe
yeah that's cool

But that's almost exclusively not for quality reason (nobody cares about quality in office or game scenarios, it only matters for art and print), and rather for convenience: hard to lug a phat screen half your desk in width around or to find space for your notebooks and keyboard in that case.

>>blue color disappears after 4 years
My Vita's colours are still fucking bright to this day, unless Sony used wizardry for its OLED panels.

Yep, CRT's were great.

Attached: crt.jpg (4160x3120, 1.73M)

microLED TVs fucking when?